Connect with us

World

‘The Way Home’ Bosses on What That Baby Twist in the Finale Means for Season 4, Sam’s Connection to the Pond and Jacob’s Disappearance

Published

on

‘The Way Home’ Bosses on What That Baby Twist in the Finale Means for Season 4, Sam’s Connection to the Pond and Jacob’s Disappearance

SPOILER ALERT: This post contains spoilers from “If You Could Read My Mind,” the Season 3 finale of Hallmark’s “The Way Home,” which streams on Hallmark+ and Peacock.

“The Way Home” kicked off its third season with the abandonment of a mysterious baby, and fans have waited all season to get more information about the enigmatic scene. By the end of the Season 3 finale, we know one key thing about the baby: who he was. It turned out that the cooing infant was Elliot (played by Evan Williams as an adult) as a baby. He was left by the pond by his time-traveling mother, who jumped into the frigid waters with someone who must be a male Landry, but whose face we never see. 

Why they left Elliot by the pond and what connected Elliot’s mother to the as-of-yet unidentified Landry are questions to be explored in “The Way Home” Season 4 — Hallmark announced the show’s renewal the day before the finale. As Kat (Chyler Leigh) and Elliot investigate his family’s relationship with the pond, Del (Andie MacDowell) will be busy looking for Jacob (Spencer Macpherson) who disappeared after Lewis Goodwin (Philip Riccio) threatened to press attempted arson charges against him. We can’t imagine that Del will be too pleased to learn that her boyfriend, Sam (Rob Stewart), knows a lot more about Jacob’s time travels than he’s let on, but it was gratifying for viewers to have it confirmed that Sam has his own relationship with the pond, which was confirmed in the finale as well. 

While many questions still linger about Elliot, Jacob’s disappearance, Sam, and KC Goodwin (Vaughan Murrae), the Season 3 finale did answer a number of them about Colton (Jefferson Brown) and his time-travel adventures. Alice (Sadie Laflamme-Snow) took an unexpected trip to the ’90s to have a heart-to-heart with her grandfather and get answers her family desperately needed about what the patriarch knew about the pond when Jacob disappeared. 

Variety caught up with showrunners Heather Conkie and Alex Clarke to talk about the baby twist, Easter eggs, closure, and what all the finale developments mean for Season 4 and “The Way Home” moving forward. 

Advertisement
What does this ending mean for Elliot and his relationship with time travel? 

Alexandra Clarke: It got a heck of a lot more personal, which is a fun new layer to all of this. It’s a really fun launching pad. As much as he enjoyed his five more minutes with Colton, and he’ll never forget that, Elliot has always been someone who kept time travel at arm’s length. To make this realization, or create this theory that involves his own family, takes that to the next level. 

Elliot and Kat also seem to take their relationship to the next level after an important conversation in this episode. Are they in a better place to actually make this relationship work than they were at the beginning of the season

Heather Conkie: It’s them coming to terms with the reality of who they are as people. They are not the same people that they knew in 1999; they have to shift gears. Alex wrote that wonderful scene. It’s one of those scenes that I think anyone who is having bizarre realignment problems in their relationship should watch, because it’s a master class. 

Clarke: We started this season with them in love. They realized through the course of the season that it’s not a love that’s fully formed yet. They both do a lot of growing in this season and make mistakes, and do impulsive things. All of the arguments that they have aren’t really arguments. They are recognizing they’re at an impasse, and they need to work on themselves before they can work on them as a unit. I think this heartfelt conversation is the crescendo of that. They are realizing that to really love each other, they have to love who they are now and not who they were. 

Going to the past is all well and good, but they can’t love each other with the past in mind. They can travel to the past, but they can’t live there. Elliot acknowledges that he’s always put her on a pedestal because her family was perfect, so any mistake she made he held against her because she was supposed to be perfect. Conversely, Kat realizes that she always took Elliot for granted because that’s how he was when they were kids. He was always there, and he never faltered. Her realizing she needs to appreciate that is really lovely too. 

Courtesy of Peter Stranks/Hallmark Channel

Advertisement
Elliot isn’t the only one we learn has a deeper connection to the pond in this finale. You validated everyone who has theorized that Sam at least knows what the pond can do by showing him standing there when he’s talking to Del. What can you tease about Sam’s relationship with the pond? 

Conkie: We put him in the exact position with almost the exact words as we had Elliot in at the end of the pilot. If you put the two shots together, they’re identical, literally. The lines are identical. 

Clarke: That was a very purposeful choice to mirror. Our show is all about the echoes of the past and the present. The past is never gone. We love the call back to our first episode because the whole finale is about going back to the start, which is why we chose Coldplay’s “The Scientist” right off the top. We’re showing the audience that this has been in the works for a while. We’ve had these ideas since Season 1 and we’re finally showing it to you. 

So many loose threads with Colton were tied up in this finale. Does it fully close the loop on his time traveling, or is there more to discover there?

Clarke: I don’t think you can ever count Colton out. The lore of Colton is the foundation of our show. He is such a fascinating character, and we do definitely reveal a lot between Episodes 9 and 10 about his experience with time travel, and why he made the choices he did. There’s always more to the story with Colton. There are so many questions that I hope people ask about those final moments of the episode with younger Del, and Colton taking Elliot in. What are the implications of that? That’s part of Elliot’s story that certainly our audience hasn’t been aware of. There’s definitely more secrets to unveil. 

One of the things we did confirm in this episode is that Colton knew who Kat was at the crash site and he didn’t just forgive her, but always loved her. What does having that knowledge do for Kat going forward? 

Conkie: It certainly frees her of the intense guilt that she’s been feeling ever since she made that fateful decision to try and change things. I think it’ll change her in some ways, but Kat is also very “onto the next.” 

Clarke: One of the things that’s really intriguing about Season 4 is what Kat looks like after getting closure. Colton knew he was going to die, and he stopped Alice from telling him anything about how it was going to happen. He was willing to do whatever needed to be done in order to bring Alice into this world and have this moment with him in February 2000. He was resolved in his decisions. That is going to free Kat in a way that we haven’t seen her be free before. I’m intrigued to know what that means for her, whether it means looking for the next or whatever it means for her confidence. There’s a lot of roads to go down with her after this. 

Advertisement

Courtesy of Peter Stranks/Hallmark Channel

Del also got some closure in this season. She finally jumped in the pond! What does the trip back to the ’70s do for Del and her relationship to the pond? 

Conkie: The pond has been the enemy. This was the first time she realized it could be absolute magic. The wedding is one of my favorite scenes in the entire life of the show. I loved the music. I love the way it was filmed. It’s really quite something, and very emotional. 

Clarke: She needed that trip to be a gift in order to see the pond in a new way. She’s only ever known it as a vessel that takes people she loves away. Giving her the gift of seeing those people for five more minutes is going to allow her to see it in a different light moving forward. She’s a very practical woman. She’s not going to become obsessed the way that Kat or even Alice are, but she needed to have a positive experience with the pond to move on. 

We also learn that Susannah left Lingermore to the Landry family. What can you tease about what that means for Season 4 and the Goodwin/Landry feud?

Clarke: It’s such a delicious way to end that story right now. They have this paper in hand — what are they going to do with it? Do they actually want to go down that road? It opens up a lot of questions about the relationship between the Goodwin and the Landry families. Don’t forget, Louis Goodwin already knows that the will exists —KC showed it to him in Season 2. What will it mean if it comes back to haunt him? Those are exciting questions to be faced with. 

KC returns in this episode and confirmed that they not Alice’s daughter. We still don’t know exactly who they are though, so why did you want to give that tidbit of information?

Conkie: This clears the slate for Alice. She’s been ruminating and dreading all season that she ends up with Max Goodwin. Is that really the future and is everything preordained, or does she have a choice left in this world? Then she finds herself actually being attracted to this guy and it’s a relief to her to know she still has a future she can choose, just like Elliot and Kat now have a future they can choose together. 

Advertisement

Clarke: In the writers’ room, we always try to associate these three incredible female characters with the past, present, and future. This was a season where Del was questioning her past. Kat was questioning her present and where she fit now that her mission to bring Jacob home was over. Alice was really questioning her future because of the existence of KC and what that meant. At the end, we wanted to see these characters get a sense of freedom from those questions. Del was free of her questions because she got to go back to her wedding and it was exactly like she remembered. Kat and Elliot having this incredible conversation, and arguably through her experiences with Thomas this season, she was able to free herself to be in the present. Alice — because of the KC of it all, and the closure they give her — is free of any doubt she may have had about the future. It was important to show in our finale that they are now all free. 

The idea comes up this season that the pond can punish people for breaking the rules. Obviously the pond makes choices about when and where to send people back in time, but is it a thing that can punish or reward travelers for their behavior in the past? 

Clarke: That was Colton’s explanation to Alice and his logic for why he kept it to himself, why he was ashamed, and why he thought it didn’t work for his family. These are all lessons in communication. Colton didn’t know the full story about the pond. I think the pond teaches lessons, but it is all about reflection. It takes you where you need to go. I think it’s a passive entity versus an aggressive one. Colton tells Alice he made a terrible mistake, and he did. We are all capable of making terrible mistakes, even an incredible character like Colton. That’s why this show resonates with people because even the characters with the best intentions that are nothing but pure good are also capable of falling down and getting it wrong. And that’s okay. I think that’s a very powerful message.  

This interview has been edited and condensed.

World

Hamas used sexual violence ‘deliberately and systematically’ on Oct 7, commission report finds

Published

on

Hamas used sexual violence ‘deliberately and systematically’ on Oct 7, commission report finds

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

WARNING: This article includes graphic and disturbing accounts from the October 7 massacre in Israel.

Hamas and its Palestinian collaborators used sexual and gender-based violence “deliberately and systematically” as an inherent part of a wider strategy of the 2023 massacres in southern Israel, according to a report released Tuesday by the Civil Commission on Oct. 7 Crimes Against Women and Children.

The Israeli nonprofit said its investigation documented evidence of abuse at multiple sites during the Oct. 7 terror invasion, including the Nova Music Festival, kibbutzim near the Gaza border, Israel Defense Forces bases, among hostages in captivity and in the condition of recovered bodies showing signs consistent with sexual violence.

According to the report, investigators identified at least 13 recurring forms of abuse, including rape, sexual torture, shootings directed at victims’ genital areas and abuse carried out after death.

Advertisement

ISRAEL’S QUEST FOR JUSTICE EXPOSES HAMAS’ SYSTEMATIC SEXUAL VIOLENCE CAMPAIGN DURING OCTOBER 7 MASSACRE

A Hamas terrorist is seen walking around a residential neighborhood in southern Israel in undated bodycam footage released by the Israel Defense Forces. The footage was shown to foreign correspondents on Oct. 16, 2023, as part of a 40-minute reel compiled from the Hamas attack on Oct. 7. (Israel Defense Forces/AP)

Dr. Cochav Elkayam-Levy, founder and chair of the Civil Commission and a principal co-author of the report, told Fox News Digital that the greatest challenge in compiling the findings was the team’s repeated exposure to graphic material and the trauma associated with reviewing it on a regular basis.

“We had to not only collect materials, but also review and analyze it alongside forensic experts while witnessing human suffering at its worst,” Elkayam-Levy said. “What motivated us was the denial, the hesitation and the questioning. We wanted to ensure that the world knows what happened to the victims.

“For us, it is a final act of justice for the victims,” she added.

Advertisement

The report also detailed cases in which sexual violence was inflicted in front of or involving family members, including one incident in which relatives were allegedly forced to carry out acts on each other.

FREED HOSTAGE ROM BRASLAVSKI DETAILS ABUSE, STARVATION DURING 738 DAYS IN GAZA CAPTIVITY

People visit the site of the Nova music festival in Re’im, southern Israel, where revelers were killed in a cross-border attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023. The visit took place on Jan. 14, 2024, marking 100 days since the start of the war between Israel and Hamas. (Leo Correa/AP)

It further accused Hamas and allied perpetrators of using videos, digital platforms and social media as tools to magnify psychological harm, spread fear and publicize the attacks, including by distributing sexualized material.

Elkayam-Levy said she hopes the findings will not remain confined to academics, human rights organizations or activists, but will also be studied by counterterrorism and national security experts to better understand and confront such atrocities.

Advertisement

“We cannot prevent what we do not fully understand,” Elkayam-Levy said. “No single prosecution could ever capture the full magnitude of these crimes in the way this report does. It is therefore critical that policymakers, decision-makers, members of Congress and senators find ways to formally recognize these findings and hold hearings so we can begin addressing this issue. We want the findings of this report to receive formal institutional recognition.”

The report, Elkayam-Levy noted, underscores that victims of the Oct. 7 atrocities came from 52 countries, highlighting the global scope and impact of the attack.

Witness testimony cited in the report included an account of a woman being sexually assaulted before being beheaded. Another witness described seeing a woman dragged from a vehicle, pinned against a wall, repeatedly raped and then stabbed, with the assault allegedly continuing after her death.

In another case, a witness described discovering the body of a man whose genitals had been severed, lying beside the body of a woman holding them, in what the report described as an apparent effort to degrade and humiliate the victims.

A Hamas terrorist is seen walking around a residential neighborhood in southern Israel in undated bodycam footage released by the Israel Defense Forces amid the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. (Israel Defense Forces/AP)

Advertisement

JEWISH DEM LAWMAKER PANS NY TIMES, SUGGESTS PAPER ON ‘HAMAS’ PAYROLL’ FOR PALESTINIAN PRISONER DOG RAPE REPORT

Investigators said some female victims were found naked or partially unclothed, with evidence of severe mutilation and objects including grenades, nails and household tools inserted into their bodies. The report also cited gunshot wounds, cuts and burn injuries concentrated on intimate areas.

The report said some female bodies brought to morgues showed broken pelvises or legs, bloodied underwear and additional trauma to the abdomen or groin.

Former hostages, both women and men, have also testified to rape, sexual torture and other forms of abuse during abduction or captivity, according to the report. It said some female captives reported sexual assaults while receiving treatment in Gaza hospitals for injuries sustained during the attacks.

A bloodied handprint stains a wall inside a house in the Nir Oz kibbutz near the Gaza border after a Hamas attack days earlier. (Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Male hostages likewise described sexual abuse while in captivity, including assaults in showers and incidents carried out under armed threat while victims were naked, the report said. One former hostage recounted being sexually assaulted when a captor forcibly rubbed his genitals against the victim’s anus.

Last month, former hostage Rom Braslavski recounted the abuse he said he endured during captivity in an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital.

SIGN UP FOR ANTISEMITISM EXPOSED NEWSLETTER

“They would hit me with whatever they had on hand. I underwent severe torture, bondage and sexual abuse. Everything they could do to me, they did. My body is still covered in scars. After four months of torture, I was clinically dead, rolling my eyes and passing out. They decided to stop the violence and brought doctors to treat me with injections and gave me food again,” he said.

The report said sexual and gender-based violence was “widespread and systematic” and constituted an “integral component” of both the Oct. 7 attacks and the subsequent treatment of captives, while calling the prosecution of such crimes an “urgent” priority to be pursued through international accountability mechanisms.

Advertisement

A soldier of the Military Rabbinate unit opens a container holding bodies killed during the Hamas attack on Israel’s southern border as identification continues at the Shura army base in Ramle, Israel, on Oct. 24, 2023. (Amir Levy/Getty Images)

Among its recommendations, the commission called for targeted sanctions against individuals and entities accused of carrying out or materially supporting the Oct. 7 attack and its aftermath. It also urged action against what it described as denial, minimization or politicization of the sexual crimes committed during the massacre and in captivity.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“The Commission further recommends that Israel adopt a comprehensive gender strategy within its prosecutorial framework and establish a specialized chamber or panel of judges dedicated to the prosecution of sexual and gender-based crimes committed on October 7th and during captivity,” the report said.

Elkayam-Levy said the report has received widespread international attention, including front-page coverage in U.S. and global media outlets. “We feel the discussion has shifted from questioning whether these crimes occurred to examining their consequences,” she said. “There is now a substantial legal evidentiary foundation preserved in a secure archive that cannot be denied.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

Spanish row fuels north–south tensions ahead of tough EU budget talks

Published

on

Spanish row fuels north–south tensions ahead of tough EU budget talks

The Spanish government is seeking to contain a scandal linked to EU pandemic funds, categorically denying that it used European money to pay pensions, as member states prepare for tough budget talks amid deep divisions over how funding should be allocated.

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT

An official in Madrid with direct knowledge of how EU funds are structured told Euronews that a technical matter is being instrumentalised in a way that is “simply false”, accusing the opposition of playing politics over what it describes as an accounting issue.

A Spanish budget watchdog reported earlier this month that the government of Pedro Sánchez used budget credits linked to the EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), an economic plan partly funded through common debt designed to revitalise the bloc’s economy after Covid, to partly finance Spanish pensions in November 2024.

Madrid insists it did not breach the rules.

Advertisement

The European Commission asked Madrid for clarification after initial newspaper reports, according to a person familiar with the matter. It did not issue a follow-up request once Madrid provided an explanation, and Spanish authorities consider the issue closed.

However, the political scandal lingers, even as Madrid insists that “not a single euro” of EU money has been misused, amid backlash in so-called frugal countries. Spain and Italy were the biggest beneficiaries of the €750 billion recovery fund approved in summer 2020 after difficult talks.

In Madrid, the opposition People’s Party has demanded that Sánchez appear before Congress to explain the matter. The issue is also making waves in the European Parliament, with strong reactions from conservative lawmakers.

“If these allegations are confirmed, we are facing a serious abuse of European taxpayers’ money,” wrote Tomáš Zdechovský (Czechia/EPP), an influential centre-right member of the European Parliament’s budgetary committee, on X. “Europe cannot tolerate any misuse of recovery funds.”

“Is €10 billion in EU funds, intended for recovery after the pandemic, quietly being used to help pay Spanish pensions? It would confirm our worst fears about these funds,” said Dirk Gotink (The Netherlands/EPP).

Advertisement

Madrid sources insist the issue is being overblown for political purposes.

A government official pointed to the country’s economic performance and pushed back against the frugal-versus-south narrative, which often presents the wealthier north subsidising the weaker south. “Spain is the fastest growing economy in Europe, Germany is not paying our pensions,” said a second Madrid official.

The incident does, however, underscore the additional complications the country is facing due to its inability to approve a budget in a fragmented parliament. After failing to deliver a fresh budget for 2025, Madrid was forced to roll over a plan approved in 2023.

A fight over the EU’s financial future

The timing of the controversy is particularly sensitive.

Brussels is preparing to launch negotiations on the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), the EU’s seven-year budget for 2028–2034, and a central question will be what to do with the roughly €750 billion in joint debt accumulated through the recovery plan.

Advertisement

That programme was the largest and most politically consequential collective borrowing exercise in EU history. Whether it is ultimately seen as a success or a cautionary tale will inevitably shape how member states approach future proposals for shared financing.

Spain, the second-largest recipient of the initiative’s funding with a total of around €60 billion already received, has been among the most vocal advocates for an ambitious European budget and a permanent mechanism to pool financing needs.

Spanish Finance Minister Carlos Cuerpo has argued that pooling national debt at the EU level could generate annual savings of up to €25 billion.

Cuerpo, who is now Sánchez’s number two in government, echoed remarks made by France, Mario Draghi and a number of European intellectuals calling for a more efficient borrowing mechanism that would allow the EU to tap into the European Commission’s triple-A rating and lower financing costs for all 27 member states.

While the European Commission’s current budget proposal does not include new borrowing, contentious debate lies ahead over how to finance the repayment of existing recovery debt. Frugal northern countries like the Netherlands and Germany favour strict repayment schedules, even if that means cuts to other spending programmes.

Advertisement

On Thursday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz reiterated his country’s opposition, even if the German central bank has been more nuanced about the benefits and risks of pooling debt.

Southern member states, including France and Greece, are pushing to roll over the debt accumulated during the pandemic, with President Emmanuel Macron describing calls for early repayments as “idiotic”. Paris is an advocate of a European safe-asset mechanism.

A European official supportive of the plan said the Spanish controversy is being weaponised not so much against Madrid, but against proposals put forward by southern countries ahead of the budget talks.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if this is used to kill rollover proposal,” the diplomat said.

The issue of the next European budget will feature in an EU summit scheduled in June.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

U.S. and China Will Start Discussing A.I. Safety, Bessent Says

Published

on

U.S. and China Will Start Discussing A.I. Safety, Bessent Says

The United States and China will discuss guardrails on artificial intelligence, including establishing a protocol for keeping powerful A.I. models out of the hands of nonstate actors, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday.

Mr. Bessent, who was speaking from Beijing in an interview with CNBC, did not give more details, including when these discussions would take place. But Xi Jinping, China’s leader, and President Trump had been expected to discuss A.I. during their summit in the Chinese capital.

If these talks happen, it would be the first time the two countries formally take up the issue during Mr. Trump’s second term. The capabilities and usage of A.I. have grown rapidly, and so have concerns that this technology could be weaponized by hackers and terrorists, or spiral out of human control.

“The two A.I. superpowers are going to start talking,” Mr. Bessent said. “We’re going to set up a protocol in terms of, how do we go forward with best practices for A.I. to make sure nonstate actors don’t get ahold of these models.”

Still, Mr. Bessent made clear that the fierce competition between the United States and China for supremacy in A.I. — which has been a major hurdle to cooperation on safety — remained front of mind for U.S. policymakers. Officials and experts in both countries have argued that they cannot slow technological development and risk losing out to their rivals.

Advertisement

Mr. Bessent said that the United States was willing to cooperate with China on A.I. safety because “the Chinese are substantially behind us” in terms of the technology’s development.

“I do not think we would be having the same discussions if they were this far ahead of us. So we’re going to put in U.S. best practices, U.S. values, on this, and then roll those out to the world,” Mr. Bessent said.

Experts have suggested that China’s A.I. models may be a few months behind the leading U.S. models.

Another hurdle to the United States and China working together on A.I. safety is that they have generally focused on different potential threats.

American experts have generally highlighted existential risks, such as the possibility of artificial general intelligence, or super-intelligence that exceeds that of humans. Chinese researchers and officials have more often highlighted risks related to social stability and information control, such as the possibility of chatbots producing content that challenges China’s leadership and policies.

Advertisement

Still, researchers in both countries have highlighted some shared risks, such as the possibility of A.I. being used to develop new biological weapons.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending