Connect with us

World

‘The Way Home’ Bosses on What That Baby Twist in the Finale Means for Season 4, Sam’s Connection to the Pond and Jacob’s Disappearance

Published

on

‘The Way Home’ Bosses on What That Baby Twist in the Finale Means for Season 4, Sam’s Connection to the Pond and Jacob’s Disappearance

SPOILER ALERT: This post contains spoilers from “If You Could Read My Mind,” the Season 3 finale of Hallmark’s “The Way Home,” which streams on Hallmark+ and Peacock.

“The Way Home” kicked off its third season with the abandonment of a mysterious baby, and fans have waited all season to get more information about the enigmatic scene. By the end of the Season 3 finale, we know one key thing about the baby: who he was. It turned out that the cooing infant was Elliot (played by Evan Williams as an adult) as a baby. He was left by the pond by his time-traveling mother, who jumped into the frigid waters with someone who must be a male Landry, but whose face we never see. 

Why they left Elliot by the pond and what connected Elliot’s mother to the as-of-yet unidentified Landry are questions to be explored in “The Way Home” Season 4 — Hallmark announced the show’s renewal the day before the finale. As Kat (Chyler Leigh) and Elliot investigate his family’s relationship with the pond, Del (Andie MacDowell) will be busy looking for Jacob (Spencer Macpherson) who disappeared after Lewis Goodwin (Philip Riccio) threatened to press attempted arson charges against him. We can’t imagine that Del will be too pleased to learn that her boyfriend, Sam (Rob Stewart), knows a lot more about Jacob’s time travels than he’s let on, but it was gratifying for viewers to have it confirmed that Sam has his own relationship with the pond, which was confirmed in the finale as well. 

While many questions still linger about Elliot, Jacob’s disappearance, Sam, and KC Goodwin (Vaughan Murrae), the Season 3 finale did answer a number of them about Colton (Jefferson Brown) and his time-travel adventures. Alice (Sadie Laflamme-Snow) took an unexpected trip to the ’90s to have a heart-to-heart with her grandfather and get answers her family desperately needed about what the patriarch knew about the pond when Jacob disappeared. 

Variety caught up with showrunners Heather Conkie and Alex Clarke to talk about the baby twist, Easter eggs, closure, and what all the finale developments mean for Season 4 and “The Way Home” moving forward. 

Advertisement
What does this ending mean for Elliot and his relationship with time travel? 

Alexandra Clarke: It got a heck of a lot more personal, which is a fun new layer to all of this. It’s a really fun launching pad. As much as he enjoyed his five more minutes with Colton, and he’ll never forget that, Elliot has always been someone who kept time travel at arm’s length. To make this realization, or create this theory that involves his own family, takes that to the next level. 

Elliot and Kat also seem to take their relationship to the next level after an important conversation in this episode. Are they in a better place to actually make this relationship work than they were at the beginning of the season

Heather Conkie: It’s them coming to terms with the reality of who they are as people. They are not the same people that they knew in 1999; they have to shift gears. Alex wrote that wonderful scene. It’s one of those scenes that I think anyone who is having bizarre realignment problems in their relationship should watch, because it’s a master class. 

Clarke: We started this season with them in love. They realized through the course of the season that it’s not a love that’s fully formed yet. They both do a lot of growing in this season and make mistakes, and do impulsive things. All of the arguments that they have aren’t really arguments. They are recognizing they’re at an impasse, and they need to work on themselves before they can work on them as a unit. I think this heartfelt conversation is the crescendo of that. They are realizing that to really love each other, they have to love who they are now and not who they were. 

Going to the past is all well and good, but they can’t love each other with the past in mind. They can travel to the past, but they can’t live there. Elliot acknowledges that he’s always put her on a pedestal because her family was perfect, so any mistake she made he held against her because she was supposed to be perfect. Conversely, Kat realizes that she always took Elliot for granted because that’s how he was when they were kids. He was always there, and he never faltered. Her realizing she needs to appreciate that is really lovely too. 

Courtesy of Peter Stranks/Hallmark Channel

Advertisement
Elliot isn’t the only one we learn has a deeper connection to the pond in this finale. You validated everyone who has theorized that Sam at least knows what the pond can do by showing him standing there when he’s talking to Del. What can you tease about Sam’s relationship with the pond? 

Conkie: We put him in the exact position with almost the exact words as we had Elliot in at the end of the pilot. If you put the two shots together, they’re identical, literally. The lines are identical. 

Clarke: That was a very purposeful choice to mirror. Our show is all about the echoes of the past and the present. The past is never gone. We love the call back to our first episode because the whole finale is about going back to the start, which is why we chose Coldplay’s “The Scientist” right off the top. We’re showing the audience that this has been in the works for a while. We’ve had these ideas since Season 1 and we’re finally showing it to you. 

So many loose threads with Colton were tied up in this finale. Does it fully close the loop on his time traveling, or is there more to discover there?

Clarke: I don’t think you can ever count Colton out. The lore of Colton is the foundation of our show. He is such a fascinating character, and we do definitely reveal a lot between Episodes 9 and 10 about his experience with time travel, and why he made the choices he did. There’s always more to the story with Colton. There are so many questions that I hope people ask about those final moments of the episode with younger Del, and Colton taking Elliot in. What are the implications of that? That’s part of Elliot’s story that certainly our audience hasn’t been aware of. There’s definitely more secrets to unveil. 

One of the things we did confirm in this episode is that Colton knew who Kat was at the crash site and he didn’t just forgive her, but always loved her. What does having that knowledge do for Kat going forward? 

Conkie: It certainly frees her of the intense guilt that she’s been feeling ever since she made that fateful decision to try and change things. I think it’ll change her in some ways, but Kat is also very “onto the next.” 

Clarke: One of the things that’s really intriguing about Season 4 is what Kat looks like after getting closure. Colton knew he was going to die, and he stopped Alice from telling him anything about how it was going to happen. He was willing to do whatever needed to be done in order to bring Alice into this world and have this moment with him in February 2000. He was resolved in his decisions. That is going to free Kat in a way that we haven’t seen her be free before. I’m intrigued to know what that means for her, whether it means looking for the next or whatever it means for her confidence. There’s a lot of roads to go down with her after this. 

Advertisement

Courtesy of Peter Stranks/Hallmark Channel

Del also got some closure in this season. She finally jumped in the pond! What does the trip back to the ’70s do for Del and her relationship to the pond? 

Conkie: The pond has been the enemy. This was the first time she realized it could be absolute magic. The wedding is one of my favorite scenes in the entire life of the show. I loved the music. I love the way it was filmed. It’s really quite something, and very emotional. 

Clarke: She needed that trip to be a gift in order to see the pond in a new way. She’s only ever known it as a vessel that takes people she loves away. Giving her the gift of seeing those people for five more minutes is going to allow her to see it in a different light moving forward. She’s a very practical woman. She’s not going to become obsessed the way that Kat or even Alice are, but she needed to have a positive experience with the pond to move on. 

We also learn that Susannah left Lingermore to the Landry family. What can you tease about what that means for Season 4 and the Goodwin/Landry feud?

Clarke: It’s such a delicious way to end that story right now. They have this paper in hand — what are they going to do with it? Do they actually want to go down that road? It opens up a lot of questions about the relationship between the Goodwin and the Landry families. Don’t forget, Louis Goodwin already knows that the will exists —KC showed it to him in Season 2. What will it mean if it comes back to haunt him? Those are exciting questions to be faced with. 

KC returns in this episode and confirmed that they not Alice’s daughter. We still don’t know exactly who they are though, so why did you want to give that tidbit of information?

Conkie: This clears the slate for Alice. She’s been ruminating and dreading all season that she ends up with Max Goodwin. Is that really the future and is everything preordained, or does she have a choice left in this world? Then she finds herself actually being attracted to this guy and it’s a relief to her to know she still has a future she can choose, just like Elliot and Kat now have a future they can choose together. 

Advertisement

Clarke: In the writers’ room, we always try to associate these three incredible female characters with the past, present, and future. This was a season where Del was questioning her past. Kat was questioning her present and where she fit now that her mission to bring Jacob home was over. Alice was really questioning her future because of the existence of KC and what that meant. At the end, we wanted to see these characters get a sense of freedom from those questions. Del was free of her questions because she got to go back to her wedding and it was exactly like she remembered. Kat and Elliot having this incredible conversation, and arguably through her experiences with Thomas this season, she was able to free herself to be in the present. Alice — because of the KC of it all, and the closure they give her — is free of any doubt she may have had about the future. It was important to show in our finale that they are now all free. 

The idea comes up this season that the pond can punish people for breaking the rules. Obviously the pond makes choices about when and where to send people back in time, but is it a thing that can punish or reward travelers for their behavior in the past? 

Clarke: That was Colton’s explanation to Alice and his logic for why he kept it to himself, why he was ashamed, and why he thought it didn’t work for his family. These are all lessons in communication. Colton didn’t know the full story about the pond. I think the pond teaches lessons, but it is all about reflection. It takes you where you need to go. I think it’s a passive entity versus an aggressive one. Colton tells Alice he made a terrible mistake, and he did. We are all capable of making terrible mistakes, even an incredible character like Colton. That’s why this show resonates with people because even the characters with the best intentions that are nothing but pure good are also capable of falling down and getting it wrong. And that’s okay. I think that’s a very powerful message.  

This interview has been edited and condensed.

World

Israel sees no certainty Iran’s government will fall despite war

Published

on

Israel sees no certainty Iran’s government will fall despite war
Israeli officials in closed discussions have acknowledged there is no certainty the war against Iran will lead to a collapse of its clerical government, a senior Israeli official told Reuters, with no sign ​of an Iranian uprising amid the bombardment.
Continue Reading

World

Canada’s Carney under pressure to act after synagogues shot at in latest antisemitic incidents

Published

on

Canada’s Carney under pressure to act after synagogues shot at in latest antisemitic incidents

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Over the weekend, two Toronto synagogues were attacked by gunfire. Several days earlier, another synagogue was hit by around twenty gunshots on the Jewish holiday of Purim. 

Though the three attacks caused no injuries, many in the Jewish community are demanding concrete action from Prime Minister Mark Carney — not just words of comfort that have typically followed such antisemitic incidents.

Carney took to X saying that the “antisemitic and criminal attacks violate the right of Canadian Jewish men and women to live and pray in complete safety” and “represent a serious assault on the way of life of all Canadians.”

ISRAELI MINISTER WARNS CANADA IS ‘MARCHING TOWARD THE ABYSS’ AFTER JEWISH MAN ATTACKED IN FRONT OF CHILDREN

Advertisement

Temple Emanu-El in Toronto, Canada was shot at on March 3, 2026. No injuries were reported. (Nick Lachance/Toronto Star via Getty Images)

In the aftermath of the first synagogue attack, Israel’s National Security Council warned Israelis overseas to “maintain vigilance and adhere to safety precautions.” Among their suggestions were for Israelis to “conceal Jewish and Israeli identifiers while in public spaces,” to be aware of surroundings “in areas associated with Israel or Judaism,” and to “avoid visiting sites identified as Jewish or Israeli.”

On X, Israeli President Isaac Herzog said that “all eyes are on Canada: it’s time to halt the unprecedented wave of Jew-hatred that has erupted since October 7th.”

Anti-Israel demonstrators gather outside Union Station during a rally in Toronto, Ontario on Jan. 4, 2024.  (Mert Alper Dervis/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Like many Western countries, Canada has seen a marked rise in annual antisemitic incidents since the Hamas terror attack in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. The League for Human Rights B’nai Brith Canada found that there were 6,219 incidents of antisemitism in Canada in 2024. This constituted an average of 17 incidents per day, more than double the eight incidents per day calculated in 2022. 

Advertisement

CANADA’S ANTISEMITISM ENVOY RESIGNS, CITING EXHAUSTION AMID HATE SURGE

While figures for 2025 have yet to be released, Public Safety Canada noted that from April to June 2025, “Among hate crimes targeting religion… the majority were directed at the Jewish community (69%).”

Conservative MP Roman Baber, said the behavior of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and other liberal Canadian politicians have been “adding fuel to the fire of Jew hatred in Canada.”

Baber aimed further criticism at Carney, saying, “When the Prime Minister on the campaign trail says he knows there is genocide in Gaza, he engages in Jew hatred.”

General view of Beth Avraham Yoseph of Toronto synagogue in Thornhill, north of Toronto, Ontario. The place of worship was one of three synagogues attacked in early March 2026.

Advertisement

Baber was referring to an event in April 2025 during which a heckler yelled over a bustling crowd that “there is a genocide happening in Gaza.” Carney responded, “I’m aware, that’s why we have an arms embargo.”

SKYROCKETING ANTISEMITISM IN CANADA SPARKS CONCERN FOR COUNTRY’S JEWS AHEAD OF ELECTION

Carney later said that he did not hear the heckler use the term “genocide.”

Baber noted that “when the Prime Minister recognized the Palestinian state, he rewarded the brutality of Hamas, and he did so on the eve of Rosh Hashanah.”

In his announcement, released the day prior to the Jewish holiday, Carney claimed that recognizing “the State of Palestine, led by the Palestinian Authority, empowers those who seek peaceful coexistence and the end of Hamas,” and “in no way legitimizes terrorism, nor is it any reward for it.” He also claimed recognition “in no way compromises Canada’s steadfast support for the State of Israel, its people, and their security.” 

Advertisement

Anti-Israel protesters gather outside the Beth Avraham Yoseph of Toronto synagogue on March 7, 2024. The place of worship was one of three synagogues shot at in the first week of March 2026. (Mert Alper Dervis/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Watchdog organization StopAntisemitism told Fox News Digital that “every day we are seeing painful reminders that antisemitism remains a real and dangerous threat. Acts of violence meant to intimidate or silence our community will not succeed. Loud and proud Jews will not allow hatred or fear to deter our Jewish way of life or our presence in the world. Not in Canada, in the United States, in Europe, and certainly not in Israel.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

StopAntisemitism called for the perpetrators to “be punished to the fullest extent of the law so that justice is served and deterrence is clear.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Not ‘a litre of oil’ to pass Strait of Hormuz, expect $200 price tag: Iran

Published

on

Not ‘a litre of oil’ to pass Strait of Hormuz, expect 0 price tag: Iran

Warning comes as 400 million barrels of oil are being released from global reserves during waterway’s closure.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) says it will not allow “a litre of oil” through the Strait of Hormuz as the closure of the key Gulf waterway continues to roil global energy markets during the US-Israeli war on Iran.

A spokesperson for the IRGC’s Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters said on Wednesday that any vessel linked to the United States and Israel or their allies “will be considered a legitimate target”.

Advertisement

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“You will not be able to artificially lower the price of oil. Expect oil at $200 per barrel,” the spokesperson said in a statement. “The price of oil depends on regional security, and you are the main source of insecurity in the region.”

Global oil prices have fluctuated wildly this week during continued US-Israeli attacks against Iran, which has retaliated by firing missiles and drones at targets across the wider Middle East.

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which about one-fifth of the world’s oil supplies transit, and production slowdowns in some Gulf countries have raised concerns of further disruptions.

Concerns around the duration of the war, which began on February 28 and has shown no sign of abating, are also adding to uncertainty, sending oil prices soaring.

On Wednesday, three ships were hit by projectiles in the Strait of Hormuz, maritime security and risk firms said, including a Thai-flagged cargo vessel that came under attack about 11 nautical miles (18km) north of Oman.

Advertisement

Release of oil reserves

World leaders, including members of the Group of Seven (G7) and the European Union, have been mulling what action to take in response to the war’s impact on global economies.

Christian Bueger, a professor of international relations at the University of Copenhagen and an expert in maritime security, said Europe will be facing “a major energy supply crisis” if the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened.

“For the shipping industry right now, it’s impossible to go through the Strait of Hormuz,” Bueger told Al Jazeera. “And if there are not stronger signals in the near future that they can at least try to go through the strait, then we are looking at a major shipping crisis, which can last weeks if not months.”

On Wednesday, the International Energy Agency (IEA) announced that its 32 member countries had unanimously agreed to release 400 million barrels of oil from their emergency reserves to try to lower prices.

“This is a major action aiming to alleviate the immediate impacts of the disruption in markets,” IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said during an address from the agency’s headquarters in Paris.

Advertisement

“But to be clear, the most important thing for a return to stable flows of oil and gas is the resumption of transit through the Strait of Hormuz,” he added.

The reserve supplies will be made available “over a timeframe that is appropriate” for each member state, the IEA said in a statement without providing details.

German Economy and Energy Minister Katherina Reiche said earlier in the day that the country would comply with the release while Austria also said it would make part of its emergency oil reserve available and extend its national strategic gas reserve.

Meanwhile, Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry said it would release about 80 million barrels from its private and national oil reserves.

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said the country, which gets about 70 percent of its oil imports through the Strait of Hormuz, would begin releasing the reserves on Monday.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending