Connect with us

World

‘The Way Home’ Bosses on What That Baby Twist in the Finale Means for Season 4, Sam’s Connection to the Pond and Jacob’s Disappearance

Published

on

‘The Way Home’ Bosses on What That Baby Twist in the Finale Means for Season 4, Sam’s Connection to the Pond and Jacob’s Disappearance

SPOILER ALERT: This post contains spoilers from “If You Could Read My Mind,” the Season 3 finale of Hallmark’s “The Way Home,” which streams on Hallmark+ and Peacock.

“The Way Home” kicked off its third season with the abandonment of a mysterious baby, and fans have waited all season to get more information about the enigmatic scene. By the end of the Season 3 finale, we know one key thing about the baby: who he was. It turned out that the cooing infant was Elliot (played by Evan Williams as an adult) as a baby. He was left by the pond by his time-traveling mother, who jumped into the frigid waters with someone who must be a male Landry, but whose face we never see. 

Why they left Elliot by the pond and what connected Elliot’s mother to the as-of-yet unidentified Landry are questions to be explored in “The Way Home” Season 4 — Hallmark announced the show’s renewal the day before the finale. As Kat (Chyler Leigh) and Elliot investigate his family’s relationship with the pond, Del (Andie MacDowell) will be busy looking for Jacob (Spencer Macpherson) who disappeared after Lewis Goodwin (Philip Riccio) threatened to press attempted arson charges against him. We can’t imagine that Del will be too pleased to learn that her boyfriend, Sam (Rob Stewart), knows a lot more about Jacob’s time travels than he’s let on, but it was gratifying for viewers to have it confirmed that Sam has his own relationship with the pond, which was confirmed in the finale as well. 

While many questions still linger about Elliot, Jacob’s disappearance, Sam, and KC Goodwin (Vaughan Murrae), the Season 3 finale did answer a number of them about Colton (Jefferson Brown) and his time-travel adventures. Alice (Sadie Laflamme-Snow) took an unexpected trip to the ’90s to have a heart-to-heart with her grandfather and get answers her family desperately needed about what the patriarch knew about the pond when Jacob disappeared. 

Variety caught up with showrunners Heather Conkie and Alex Clarke to talk about the baby twist, Easter eggs, closure, and what all the finale developments mean for Season 4 and “The Way Home” moving forward. 

Advertisement
What does this ending mean for Elliot and his relationship with time travel? 

Alexandra Clarke: It got a heck of a lot more personal, which is a fun new layer to all of this. It’s a really fun launching pad. As much as he enjoyed his five more minutes with Colton, and he’ll never forget that, Elliot has always been someone who kept time travel at arm’s length. To make this realization, or create this theory that involves his own family, takes that to the next level. 

Elliot and Kat also seem to take their relationship to the next level after an important conversation in this episode. Are they in a better place to actually make this relationship work than they were at the beginning of the season

Heather Conkie: It’s them coming to terms with the reality of who they are as people. They are not the same people that they knew in 1999; they have to shift gears. Alex wrote that wonderful scene. It’s one of those scenes that I think anyone who is having bizarre realignment problems in their relationship should watch, because it’s a master class. 

Clarke: We started this season with them in love. They realized through the course of the season that it’s not a love that’s fully formed yet. They both do a lot of growing in this season and make mistakes, and do impulsive things. All of the arguments that they have aren’t really arguments. They are recognizing they’re at an impasse, and they need to work on themselves before they can work on them as a unit. I think this heartfelt conversation is the crescendo of that. They are realizing that to really love each other, they have to love who they are now and not who they were. 

Going to the past is all well and good, but they can’t love each other with the past in mind. They can travel to the past, but they can’t live there. Elliot acknowledges that he’s always put her on a pedestal because her family was perfect, so any mistake she made he held against her because she was supposed to be perfect. Conversely, Kat realizes that she always took Elliot for granted because that’s how he was when they were kids. He was always there, and he never faltered. Her realizing she needs to appreciate that is really lovely too. 

Courtesy of Peter Stranks/Hallmark Channel

Advertisement
Elliot isn’t the only one we learn has a deeper connection to the pond in this finale. You validated everyone who has theorized that Sam at least knows what the pond can do by showing him standing there when he’s talking to Del. What can you tease about Sam’s relationship with the pond? 

Conkie: We put him in the exact position with almost the exact words as we had Elliot in at the end of the pilot. If you put the two shots together, they’re identical, literally. The lines are identical. 

Clarke: That was a very purposeful choice to mirror. Our show is all about the echoes of the past and the present. The past is never gone. We love the call back to our first episode because the whole finale is about going back to the start, which is why we chose Coldplay’s “The Scientist” right off the top. We’re showing the audience that this has been in the works for a while. We’ve had these ideas since Season 1 and we’re finally showing it to you. 

So many loose threads with Colton were tied up in this finale. Does it fully close the loop on his time traveling, or is there more to discover there?

Clarke: I don’t think you can ever count Colton out. The lore of Colton is the foundation of our show. He is such a fascinating character, and we do definitely reveal a lot between Episodes 9 and 10 about his experience with time travel, and why he made the choices he did. There’s always more to the story with Colton. There are so many questions that I hope people ask about those final moments of the episode with younger Del, and Colton taking Elliot in. What are the implications of that? That’s part of Elliot’s story that certainly our audience hasn’t been aware of. There’s definitely more secrets to unveil. 

One of the things we did confirm in this episode is that Colton knew who Kat was at the crash site and he didn’t just forgive her, but always loved her. What does having that knowledge do for Kat going forward? 

Conkie: It certainly frees her of the intense guilt that she’s been feeling ever since she made that fateful decision to try and change things. I think it’ll change her in some ways, but Kat is also very “onto the next.” 

Clarke: One of the things that’s really intriguing about Season 4 is what Kat looks like after getting closure. Colton knew he was going to die, and he stopped Alice from telling him anything about how it was going to happen. He was willing to do whatever needed to be done in order to bring Alice into this world and have this moment with him in February 2000. He was resolved in his decisions. That is going to free Kat in a way that we haven’t seen her be free before. I’m intrigued to know what that means for her, whether it means looking for the next or whatever it means for her confidence. There’s a lot of roads to go down with her after this. 

Advertisement

Courtesy of Peter Stranks/Hallmark Channel

Del also got some closure in this season. She finally jumped in the pond! What does the trip back to the ’70s do for Del and her relationship to the pond? 

Conkie: The pond has been the enemy. This was the first time she realized it could be absolute magic. The wedding is one of my favorite scenes in the entire life of the show. I loved the music. I love the way it was filmed. It’s really quite something, and very emotional. 

Clarke: She needed that trip to be a gift in order to see the pond in a new way. She’s only ever known it as a vessel that takes people she loves away. Giving her the gift of seeing those people for five more minutes is going to allow her to see it in a different light moving forward. She’s a very practical woman. She’s not going to become obsessed the way that Kat or even Alice are, but she needed to have a positive experience with the pond to move on. 

We also learn that Susannah left Lingermore to the Landry family. What can you tease about what that means for Season 4 and the Goodwin/Landry feud?

Clarke: It’s such a delicious way to end that story right now. They have this paper in hand — what are they going to do with it? Do they actually want to go down that road? It opens up a lot of questions about the relationship between the Goodwin and the Landry families. Don’t forget, Louis Goodwin already knows that the will exists —KC showed it to him in Season 2. What will it mean if it comes back to haunt him? Those are exciting questions to be faced with. 

KC returns in this episode and confirmed that they not Alice’s daughter. We still don’t know exactly who they are though, so why did you want to give that tidbit of information?

Conkie: This clears the slate for Alice. She’s been ruminating and dreading all season that she ends up with Max Goodwin. Is that really the future and is everything preordained, or does she have a choice left in this world? Then she finds herself actually being attracted to this guy and it’s a relief to her to know she still has a future she can choose, just like Elliot and Kat now have a future they can choose together. 

Advertisement

Clarke: In the writers’ room, we always try to associate these three incredible female characters with the past, present, and future. This was a season where Del was questioning her past. Kat was questioning her present and where she fit now that her mission to bring Jacob home was over. Alice was really questioning her future because of the existence of KC and what that meant. At the end, we wanted to see these characters get a sense of freedom from those questions. Del was free of her questions because she got to go back to her wedding and it was exactly like she remembered. Kat and Elliot having this incredible conversation, and arguably through her experiences with Thomas this season, she was able to free herself to be in the present. Alice — because of the KC of it all, and the closure they give her — is free of any doubt she may have had about the future. It was important to show in our finale that they are now all free. 

The idea comes up this season that the pond can punish people for breaking the rules. Obviously the pond makes choices about when and where to send people back in time, but is it a thing that can punish or reward travelers for their behavior in the past? 

Clarke: That was Colton’s explanation to Alice and his logic for why he kept it to himself, why he was ashamed, and why he thought it didn’t work for his family. These are all lessons in communication. Colton didn’t know the full story about the pond. I think the pond teaches lessons, but it is all about reflection. It takes you where you need to go. I think it’s a passive entity versus an aggressive one. Colton tells Alice he made a terrible mistake, and he did. We are all capable of making terrible mistakes, even an incredible character like Colton. That’s why this show resonates with people because even the characters with the best intentions that are nothing but pure good are also capable of falling down and getting it wrong. And that’s okay. I think that’s a very powerful message.  

This interview has been edited and condensed.

World

Video: Fans in Tokyo Visit Twin Pandas Before They Head to China

Published

on

Video: Fans in Tokyo Visit Twin Pandas Before They Head to China

new video loaded: Fans in Tokyo Visit Twin Pandas Before They Head to China

Thousands of people have flocked to Ueno Zoo in Tokyo to see two giant pandas before they leave for China. There were fears in Japan that the twins would not be replaced amid political disputes between the countries.

By Jake Lucas and Axel Boada

December 18, 2025

Continue Reading

World

Zelenskyy calls for US to respond to ‘signals’ Russia is ‘preparing to make next year a year of war’

Published

on

Zelenskyy calls for US to respond to ‘signals’ Russia is ‘preparing to make next year a year of war’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Wednesday called for the U.S. and other allies to respond to bellicose “signals” from Russia.

“Today, we again heard signals from Moscow that they are preparing to make next year a year of war. These signals are not only for us. It is crucial that our partners see them, and not only see them but also respond — especially partners in the United States, who often say that Russia wants to end the war,” Zelenskyy asserted in a post on X.

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment. 

“Over the past few weeks, the President’s team has made tremendous progress with respect to ending the war between Russia and Ukraine, and as the President stated, he believes we are closer now than we have ever been,” a White House official noted.

Advertisement

UKRAINE SAYS IT CARRIED OUT FIRST-EVER UNDERWATER DRONE STRIKE ON RUSSIAN SUBMARINE IN NOVOROSSIYSK

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is pictured during a press conference with Friedrich Merz, Federal Chancellor, on Dec. 15, 2025, in Berlin, Germany. (Florian Gaertner/Photothek via Getty Images)

“Yet the signals coming from Russia are the exact opposite, taking the form of official orders to their army. This Russian mindset must be recognized — and acted upon. When Russia is in this mindset, it will also undermine diplomacy — seeking, through diplomatic language and pressure over specific points in documents — to merely mask its desire to destroy Ukraine and Ukrainians, and the desire to legitimize Russia’s theft of our land. And then come other countries in Europe, which someone in Russia might one day label their so‑called ‘historical lands,’” Zelenskyy asserted in the post.

“Real protection is needed against this Russian case history of madness, and we will continue working with all partners to ensure that protection is in place. Security measures are needed, financial measures are needed — including actions on Russian assets — political measures are needed. And the courage of all partners is required: to see the truth, acknowledge the truth, and act accordingly. I want to thank everyone who supports Ukraine,” his post concluded.

Zelenskyy also conveyed the message in a Ukrainian-language video.

Advertisement

US OFFICIALS TOUT PROGRESS IN TALKS TO REACH ‘LASTING AND DURABLE PEACE’ BETWEEN UKRAINE, RUSSIA

In this photo distributed by the state agency Sputnik, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin speaks during an expanded meeting of the Russian Defense Ministry Board at the National Defense Control Center in Moscow on Dec. 17, 2025. (Mikhail TERESHCHENKO / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)

Russian President Vladimir Putin declared during a Defense Ministry board meeting on Wednesday that Russia will accomplish its goals, through either diplomacy or military force.

“The goals of the special military operation will undoubtedly be achieved. We would prefer to accomplish this and address the root causes of the conflict through diplomatic means. However, if the opposing side and its foreign patrons refuse to engage in substantive dialogue, Russia will achieve the liberation of its historical lands by military means. The task of creating and expanding a security buffer zone will also be carried out consistently,” Putin said, according to a Kremlin transcript.

HEADED FOR THE EXITS: WHY 3 DOZEN HOUSE MEMBERS AREN’T RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION

Advertisement

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., arrives for a House Republican conference meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 6, 2025, in Washington, D.C.  (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., a staunch proponent of U.S. support for Ukraine, asserted in a post on X, “Again… the U.S. should send 200 long-range and extremely accurate cruise missiles to Ukraine. Maybe then, Putin will get serious and seek peace. Putin started this war, and he’ll stop this war once he realizes he cannot win and that the cost of war is too high.”

President Donald Trump’s administration has been attempting to help broker peace between Russia and Ukraine.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Mercosur signature delayed to January after Meloni asks for more time

Published

on

Mercosur signature delayed to January after Meloni asks for more time

Published on
Updated

Following tense negotiations among the 27 member states, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Thursday pushed the signature of the contentious Mercosur agreement to January to the frustration of backers Germany and Spain.

The trade deal dominated the EU summit, with France and Italy pressing for a delay to secure stronger farmer protections, while von der Leyen had hoped to travel to Latin America for a signing ceremony on 20 December after securing member-state support.

Without approval, the ceremony can no longer go ahead. There is not set date.

Advertisement

“The Commission proposed that it postpones to early January the signature to further discuss with the countries who still need a bit more time,” an EU official told reporters.

After a phone call with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said she supported the deal, but added that Rome still needs stronger assurances for Italian farmers. Lula said in separate comments that Meloni assured him the trade deal would be approved in the next 10 days to a month.

The Mercosur agreement would create a free-trade area between the EU and Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. But European farmers fear it would expose them to unfair competition from Latin American imports on pricing and practices.

Meloni’s decision was pivotal to delay

“The Italian government is ready to sign the agreement as soon as the necessary answers are provided to farmers. This would depend on the decisions of the European Commission and can be defined within a short timeframe,” Meloni said after speaking with Lula, who had threatened to walk away from the deal unless an agreement was found this month. He sounded more conciliatory after speaking to Meloni.

Talks among EU leaders were fraught, as backers of the deal – concluded in 2024 after 25 years of negotiations – argued the Mercosur is an imperative as the bloc needs new markets at a time in which the US, its biggest trading partner, pursues an aggressive tariff policy. Duties on European exports to the US have tripled under Donald Trump.

Advertisement

“This is one of the most difficult EU summits since the last negotiation of the long-term budget two years ago,” an EU diplomat said.

France began pushing last Sunday for a delay in the vote amid farmers’ anger.

Paris has long opposed the deal, demanding robust safeguards for farmers and reciprocity on environmental and health production standards with Mercosur countries.

The agreement requires a qualified majority for approval. France, Poland and Hungary oppose the signature, while Austria and Belgium planned to abstain if a vote were held this week. Ireland has also raised concerns over farmer protections.

Italy’s stance was pivotal.

Advertisement

However, supporters of the agreement now fear prolonged hesitation could prompt Mercosur countries to walk away after decades of negotiations for good.

After speaking with Meloni, Lula said he would pass Italy’s request on to Mercosur so that it can “decide what to do.”

An EU official said contacts with Mercosur were “ongoing,” adding: “We need to make sure that everything is accepted by them.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending