Connect with us

World

Spain’s amnesty law sparks heated debate in European Parliament

Published

on

Spain’s amnesty law sparks heated debate in European Parliament

Emotions ran high in the Strasbourg hemicycle on Wednesday as EU lawmakers clashed over Spain’s controversial amnesty law, part of a political deal with Catalan separatists to make Pedro Sánchez prime minister.

ADVERTISEMENT

The debate, convened by the right-leaning European People Party (EPP) saw right-wing lawmakers accuse allies of Sánchez, a socialist, of sacrificing the rule of law for political gains while socialist MEPs defended the amnesty bill as a key step in Spain’s reconciliation with Catalan separatists.

Earlier this month, Catalan separatist party Junts per Catalunya (JxCat) – led by the exiled Carles Puigdemont, also a member of the European Parliament – offered seven of its votes in the Spanish parliament to back a Sánchez-led government in exchange for a controversial amnesty for Catalan politicians and activists who participated in a failed attempt at secession from Spain in 2017.

The law has sparked outrage among the Spanish opposition, who accuse Sánchez of cosying up to separatists and flouting the rule of law. Fierce protests have taken place in Spain’s capital Madrid for the past twenty days.

Speaking to Euronews ahead of the debate, EPP president Manfred Weber said Sánchez had put his “personal egoism” in front of national interests by signing a “legally unthinkable” text.

Advertisement

Weber claimed people in Spain are “no longer equal before the law,” and accused Sánchez of allowing “corruption, violence and terrorism” to go unpunished.

“The socialists and the left have lost all credibility to defend the rule of law in Europe,” he added.

Close Sánchez ally Iratxe García, president of the Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament, accused Weber of lying by claiming crimes of terrorism would be absolved under the plans, citing Article 2c of the draft amnesty bill which explicitly says acts of terrorism would be excluded from the law’s application.

The law could however exonerate an unconfirmed number of crimes including embezzlement, disobedience and maladministration.

“Mr Weber, lying is not ok, and you have lied,” she said to the jeers of the conservatives. “There is no greater attack on the rule of law than your alliance with the extreme right.”

Advertisement

“The main problem of the Partido Popular (PP) and Vox,” she went on, referring to the main political forces on the Spanish right, “is that they are incapable of understanding Spain. They cannot understand that the greatness of Spain lies in its diversity and plurality.”

Sources from Spain’s socialist party (PSOE) told Euronews that the right had “failed in its attempt to get the European Commission to oppose the proposed amnesty law.”

Also in Strasbourg on Wednesday was the leader of Spanish far-right party Vox, Santiago Abascal, who has drawn harsh criticism over recent days for encouraging protesters to disobey police orders during demonstrations.

“We hope the Spanish parliament will be asked to provide explanations and that the Commission will act with the same diligence as in the case of Poland and Hungary,” he told reporters.

All eyes on the Commission

EU justice commissioner Didier Reynders, whose team is currently scrutinising the draft amnesty law to ensure compliance with the bloc’s rule of law rulebook, also intervened during the debate, but refrained from disclosing details of his team’s preliminary assessment.

Advertisement

He reiterated the Commission had received complaints “by a large number of citizens and stakeholders” expressing concerns over whether the law and the “special committees of the parliament” it foresees comply with the EU’s fundamental values.

“We will carry out our analysis carefully, independently, and objectively to determine compliance with EU law,” Reynders affirmed.

Sánchez’s newly-appointed justice minister Félix Bolaños is expected to meet Reynders and values and transparency commissioner Věra Jourová in Brussels next week to provide clarifications on the amnesty bill, after Reynders addressed a letter to Spanish ministers earlier this month requesting more information.

The bloc can sanction member states for rule of law breaches under Article 7 of the EU treaties and is currently withholding funds from both Hungary and Poland for democratic backsliding.

ADVERTISEMENT

PP’s institutional vice-secretary Esteban González Pons accused Sánchez of endangering European funds earlier on Wednesday, including Spain’s staggering €163 billion allocation of the bloc’s flagship ‘Next Generation’ post-Covid recovery funds.

But the Commission has so far refrained from disclosing its assessment of the proposed law, and no concerns regarding the erosion of the rule of law have been raised.

Advertisement

Lawfare under scrutiny

One of the most controversial aspects of the political deal struck between JxCat and the socialists is the reference to the concept of ‘lawfare’, or the strategic use of the law as an instrument to target political opponents.

JxCat’s leader Carles Puigdemont wants Spain to introduce parliamentary commissions to investigate whether its courts had been unnecessarily heavy-handed in sentences made against the separatists in order to persecute pro-independence figures.

Legal experts have voiced concerns that this could significantly undermine the independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers, as enshrined in Spain’s constitution.

ADVERTISEMENT

But although no reference to lawfare is made in the text of the amnesty law, Reynders told the parliament that his team is also investigating the proposal to establish “parliamentary commissions.”

He also called on Spain to implement the urgent judicial reforms made recommended as part of the Commission’s annual rule of law report published in July.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Memes, Jokes and Cats: South Koreans Use Parody for Political Protest

Published

on

Memes, Jokes and Cats: South Koreans Use Parody for Political Protest

As South Koreans took to the streets this month demanding the ousting of their president, some found an unexpected outlet to express their fury: jokes and satire.

They hoisted banners and flags with whimsical messages about cats, sea otters and food. They waved signs joking that President Yoon Suk Yeol’s declaration of martial law had forced them to leave the comfort of their beds. Pictures of the flags spread widely on social media.

The idea was to use humor to build solidarity against Mr. Yoon, who has vowed to fight his impeachment over his ill-fated martial law decree on Dec. 3. Some waved flags for nonexistent groups like the so-called Dumpling Association, a parody of real groups like labor unions, churches or student clubs.

Video by Yu Young Jin/The New York Times

Advertisement

Photos by Weiyi Cai/The New York Times

“I just wanted to show that we were here as part of the people even if we aren’t actually a part of a civic group,” said Kim Sae-rim, 28, who waved the flag of the dumpling group at a recent protest she went to with friends. Some groups referred to other local favorites like pizza and red bean pastries.

Kwon Oh-hyouck, a veteran protester, said that he had first seen such flags emerge during demonstrations in 2016 and 2017 that ultimately resulted in the removal of President Park Geun-hye. Mr. Kwon said that satire was part of the Korean spirit of protest.

“People satirize serious situations, even when those in power come out with guns and knives,” he said. “They are not intimidated.”

Advertisement

In the past month, protesters have come up with a wide range of unorthodox groupings. Some were self-proclaimed homebodies. Still others came together as people who suffered from motion sickness.

Video by Chang W. Lee/The New York Times

Photos by Weiyi Cai/The New York Times

Advertisement

Video by Weiyi Cai/The New York Times

Photo by Chang W. Lee/The New York Times

Lee Kihoon, a professor of modern Korean history at Yonsei University in Seoul, said that he believed the flags at this month’s protests were an expression of the diversity of people galvanized by the president’s attempt to impose military rule.

Advertisement

“They’re trying to say: ‘Even for those of us who have nothing to do with political groups, this situation is unacceptable,’” he said. “‘I’m not a member of a party or anything, but this is outrageous.’”

Some held signs ridiculing Mr. Yoon, saying that he had separated them from their pets at home and disrupted their routine of watching Korean dramas. One group called itself a union of people running behind schedule, referring to the idea that the need to protest over martial law had forced them to reschedule their appointments.

Photo by Weiyi Cai/The New York Times

Photo by Chang W. Lee/The New York Times

Advertisement

And of course, there were animals, both real and fake.

Photos by Weiyi Cai/The New York Times

South Koreans have shown that protests for serious causes — like the ousting of a president — can still have an inviting, optimistic and carnival-like atmosphere.

Advertisement

“I don’t know if the protesters realize it, but even though they’re angry, they haven’t gotten solemn, heavy or moralistic,” Mr. Lee said. “The flags have had an effect of softening and relaxing the tension.”

On the day that lawmakers voted to impeach Mr. Yoon, protesters who were K-pop fans brought lightsticks to rallies and danced to pop songs blasting from speakers. “Even though this is a serious day,” said Lee Jung-min, a 31-year-old fan of the band Big Bang, “we might as well enjoy it and keep spirits up.”

Video by Chang W. Lee/The New York Times

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Two US Navy pilots shot down over Red Sea in apparent 'friendly fire' incident: US military

Published

on

Two US Navy pilots shot down over Red Sea in apparent 'friendly fire' incident: US military

Two U.S. Navy pilots were shot down Sunday over the Red Sea in what appeared to be “friendly fire”, the U.S. military said.

The pilots were found alive after they ejected from their aircraft, with one suffering minor injuries.

The incident demonstrates the pervasive dangers in the Red Sea corridor amid ongoing attacks on shipping by the Iranian-backed Houthis, even as U.S. and European military coalitions patrol the area.

The U.S. military had conducted airstrikes targeting Yemen’s Houthi rebels at the time, but U.S. Central Command did not elaborate on what their mission was.

US NAVY SHIPS REPEL ATTACK FROM HOUTHIS IN GULF OF ADEN

Advertisement

A fighter jet maneuvers on the deck of the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in the Red Sea, June 11, 2024. (AP)

The military said the aircraft shot down was a two-seat F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter jet assigned to the “Red Rippers” of Strike Fighter Squadron 11 out of Naval Air Station Oceana, Virginia.

The F/A-18 shot down had just flown off the deck of the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier, according to Central Command. On Dec. 15, Central Command said the Truman had entered the Mideast, but did not specify that the carrier and its battle group were in the Red Sea.

“The guided missile cruiser USS Gettysburg, which is part of the USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group, mistakenly fired on and hit the F/A-18,” Central Command said in a statement.

It is unclear how the Gettysburg had mistaked an F/A-18 for an enemy aircraft or missile, particularly since ships in a battle group are linked by radar and radio communication.

Advertisement

US MILITARY CONDUCTS SUCCESSFUL AIRSTRIKES ON HOUTHI REBEL FORCES IN YEMEN

USS Gettysburg

The Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser USS Gettysburg (CG 64) steams in the Mediterranean Sea, Dec. 15, 2024. (AP)

Central Command said that warships and aircraft earlier shot down multiple Houthi drones and an anti-ship cruise missile launched by the rebels. Fire from the Houthis has previously forced sailors to make decisions in seconds.

The U.S., since the Truman arrived, has ramped up its airstrikes targeting the Houthis and their missile fire into the Red Sea and the surrounding area. But an American warship group in the region may lead to additional attacks from the rebels.

On Saturday night and into Sunday, U.S. warplanes conducted airstrikes that shook Yemen’s capital of Sanaa, which the Houthis have held for a decade. Central Command said the strikes targeted a “missile storage facility” and a “command-and-control facility.”

Houthi-controlled media reported strikes in both Sanaa and around the port city of Hodeida, but did not disclose details on any casualties or damage.

Advertisement
USS Harry S. Truman

Aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman is moored near Split, Croatia, Feb. 14, 2022. (AP)

The Houthis later acknowledged the aircraft being shot down in the Red Sea.

Since the start of the Israel-Hamas war in October of last year, the Houthis have targeted about 100 merchant vessels with missiles and drones.

The rebels say that they target ships linked to Israel, the U.S. or the U.K. to force an end to Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza, which began after Hamas’ surprise attack against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, although many of the ships the rebels have attacked have little or no connection to the ongoing war, including some headed for Iran.

The Houthis also have increasingly targeted Israel with drones and missiles, leading to retaliatory airstrikes from Israeli forces.

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

World

AfD party calls for big rally after Germany's Christmas market attack

Published

on

AfD party calls for big rally after Germany's Christmas market attack

Leading right-wing figures in Europe have also weighed in, criticising the German authorities for failing to take stronger preventative action.

ADVERTISEMENT

German far-right political party Alternative for Germany (AfD) is calling for a major rally following the attack at a Christmas market in Magdeburg which left several people dead and hundreds injured.

At a memorial site for the victims, AfD co-leader Tino Chrupalla called on Interior Minister Nancy Faeser to take stronger action to ensure the safety of the German public.

“I am now demanding answers from the interior minister: What is actually going on here in this country? What is actually happening in this country? We put up with it week after week, we put up with attacks, we put up with murders of our own people. This has to be cleared up now, and these phrases from politicians that things can’t go on like this, which I’ve heard again today, are actually upsetting,” Chrupalla told the press at the site.

Experts are now raising concerns that far-right groups could exploit the tragedy to fuel their anti-immigration rhetoric after police identified the assailant as a doctor from Saudi Arabia.

“Magdeburg is in eastern Germany where the support for the AfD is quite high. So, in elections usually, they have in the region more than one-third of the votes. So about 30% of the votes in the city, not as much as in the rural areas around,” says Matthias Quent, Professor of Sociology at Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences.

Advertisement

“The region in general, eastern Germany, is a hotspot of far-right mobilisations. And we are facing election campaigns until the federal elections in February. And so this is not just a critical time because of Christmas and the trust that gets destroyed by such an attack but, also, regarding questions of disinformation and polarisation and the spread of hate that will and could happen over these kinds of attacks now,” he added.

Leading right-wing figures in Europe have also weighed in, criticising the German authorities for failing to take stronger preventative action.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán drew a direct link between immigration and Friday’s deadly attack in Germany, telling a news conference on Saturday, “These phenomena have only existed in Europe since the start of the migration crisis. So there is no doubt that there is a link between the changed world in Western Europe, the migration that flows there, especially illegal migration and terrorist acts.”

However, Quent explains that this particular case becomes more complex as further details emerge on the background of the attacker.

Investigators have found that the perpetrator had tried to build connections to far-right organisations in Germany and the UK, including Germany’s far-right AfD party as well as Tommy Robinson, the founder of the far-right English Defence League.

Advertisement

“So it’s a very complicated case we are facing here. And it’s not an Islamist attack. It’s quite sure, a kind of anti-Islam. More like far-right attacks than any other, if you want to search a kind of context on the political radar,” Quent says.

Identified by local media as 50-year-old Taleb A., a psychiatry and psychotherapy specialist, authorities said he had been living in Germany for two decades.

Taleb’s alleged X account is filled with tweets and retweets focusing on anti-Islam themes and criticism of the religion while sharing congratulatory notes to Muslims who left the faith.

He also described himself as a former Muslim.

He was critical of German authorities, saying they had failed to do enough to combat the “Islamism of Europe.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending