Business
Travel 2025: A New Emphasis on Local Communities in Travel
A recent Booking.com global survey of 31,000 travelers found that 71 percent of respondents “want to leave the places they visit better than when they arrived.” Eighty-three percent said that sustainable travel is important to them. Now, as travelers wake up to the social effects of tourism, travel businesses are responding in kind, helping visitors maximize the positive — and minimize the negative — impacts of their trips.
The Kind Traveler platform, for example, has started a program in which every guest stay helps fund a local charity. StayAltered offers a “community-powered” accommodation booking platform that connects travelers with independent hosts in more than 30 countries on six continents. Home-swapping platforms like Kindred offer alternatives for travelers who are looking to avoid some of the negative impacts associated with short-term tourist rentals.
Tour operators are also empowering travelers to engage in difficult social issues in the communities they visit. The nonprofit Abara has three-day “listening trips” along the United States-Mexico border, with a focus on helping visitors understand the social and human dynamics at play in the region. Telos Group offers tours of South Africa, the U.S. South, and Ireland and Northern Ireland, with an eye to helping travelers engage in difficult social histories. Organizations like Unseen Tours, Invisible Cities and Migrant Tour have devised walking tours whose guides offer visitors alternative perspectives on social issues in cities like London, Edinburgh, Paris and Rome.
There are also new resources for travelers who want to educate themselves about the social impacts of their travels. The RISE Travel Institute offers online classes on responsible travel and other topics; the organization has also recently released a free e-book on decolonizing travel. The nonprofit Tourism Cares has created a meaningful travel map that features organizations, accommodations and tours that are designed to have a positive impact on communities and the environment.
Vincie Ho, the executive director of RISE, acknowledges the growing public awareness about tourism’s impacts on communities and the environment, but noted that “the say-do gap is still huge.”
Travelers should be wary of green-washing and “ethics washing,” Ms. Ho said.
“We really need to dig deeper and think critically, and not just be sold on something because a company says they’re doing the right thing,” she said.
Business
California consumers accuse popular Italian food brand of tomato fraud
A popular U.S. food distributor has long promised premium, Italian tomatoes in its products. Two Californians claim the company is committing tomato fraud.
A lawsuit filed this month alleges that Cento Fine Foods, a U.S.-based Italian food distributor, falsely labels its products as containing San Marzano tomatoes.
The tomatoes in question are a premium variety that can be grown only in Italy’s Campania region and are recognized by the food industry as the “Ferrari or Prada” of tomatoes, the lawsuit claims.
Cento, which has won in a similar case in New York, says its tomatoes are from the right region though they do not have the same Italian government certification.
The complaint alleged that the company is falsely branding its tomato products because they lack the proper certification required to use the name.
“They lack the taste, consistency, and other physical characteristics associated by consumers with certified San Marzano Tomatoes,” the lawsuit states.
The plaintiffs in the California suit claim they were misled by deceptive labeling when purchasing the product more than a dozen times in California stores. The lawsuit seeks class-action certification and asks the judge to award more than $25 million to customers.
Cento refuted the claims made in the complaint and will seek dismissal of the lawsuit in court, a company spokesperson told The Times on Monday.
The ongoing battle to define who may use the San Marzano name underscores the importance of food branding at every level.
The case goes beyond regional requirements, such as calling something Champagne because it is made in that part of France. It is more akin to Washington Apples. The Washington Apple label is backed by a system of requirements and checks. Apple growers, even if they are in the Western state, can only label their fruit as a Washington Apple if they have gone through that process. Otherwise, have to use Apples from Washington.
San Marzano tomatoes have protected status in the European Union, meaning that an independent consortium must regulate and certify that the product is grown in the right region and with the proper techniques before it is sold.
Cento says it has the right to use the name as its tomatoes are grown in the same region. Its website offers a detailed description of its harvesting and packaging process, which it says are in line with the consortium’s guidelines. Cento’s tomatoes, however, are certified by an independent third-party agency not affiliated with the consortium.
The lawsuit is meritless, said the company spokesperson, who added that the harvesting process is subject to strict quality controls and is regularly audited.
“We take nothing more seriously than the quality and integrity of our products,” A company spokesperson said. “We take pride in the fact that our labels accurately describe the products inside. Cento is a brand consumers can trust.”
Cento had the consortium’s certification until the 2010s.
A similar case against the company filed in New York was dismissed by a federal judge in 2020. The judge ruled in favor of Cento, ruling that a reasonable customer wasn’t likely to seek tomatoes certified by the consortium over a product that matched the same standards but was certified by a different agency.
The company defended its harvesting methods at the time, claiming the tomatoes are grown in the right region and with the right techniques.
The company’s tomatoes are grown in the Sarnese-Nocerino area of Italy, located near Mt. Vesuvius, according to its website. The tomatoes have an elongated plum shape and a pointed tip.
The third-party certifying body administers random testing throughout the growing process and tests each product that arrives at the company’s New Jersey warehouse before it is released to stores, according to the website.
The website also has a traceability feature, which enables customers to use a can’s lot number to find the field in Italy where the tomatoes were grown.
Business
China Increasingly Views Trump’s America as an Empire in Decline
When President Trump visited China in late 2017, Xi Jinping welcomed him with a grand display of Chinese history and culture: a four-hour private tour of the Forbidden City culminating in a performance by the Peking Opera.
Eight years, a pandemic and two trade wars later, Mr. Trump is returning to Beijing, where the theme of future dominance, not ancient majesty, has filled domestic and international headlines with articles about dancing robots, drone swarms and the quiet hum of electric vehicles.
China increasingly casts itself not as a fading civilization trying to catch up to the West but as a superpower poised to surpass it. Chinese nationalists and state-linked commentators say they have Mr. Trump to thank. America under his rule, they say, validates Mr. Xi’s worldview centered on “the rise of the East and decline of the West.”
For decades, many Chinese viewed the United States with a mix of admiration, envy and resentment. America represented wealth, technological sophistication and institutional confidence. Even critics of Washington who reviled the American system often assumed that it worked.
Mr. Trump’s ascent and his volatile second term shattered that image.
In January, a nationalistic Beijing think tank affiliated with Renmin University published a triumphant report about Mr. Trump’s first year back in office. The report argued that his tariffs, attacks on allies, anti-immigration policies and assaults on the American political establishment had inadvertently strengthened China while weakening the United States. Its title: “Thank Trump.”
The report called Mr. Trump an “accelerator of American political decay,” with the United States sliding toward polarization, institutional dysfunction and even “Latin American-style instability.” His hostility toward China, the authors argued, was a “reverse booster” that unified the country and helped bring about its strategic self-reliance.
“At this turning point in history,” the authors wrote, “what we hear is the heavy and haunting toll of an empire’s evening bell.”
Such language, once confined largely to nationalist corners of the Chinese internet, has increasingly entered mainstream political discourse.
Evidence of this shift is measurable: The use of terms related to “American decline” in official Chinese sources nearly doubled in 2025, according to a study by two Brookings Institution researchers.
The narrative of American decline did not begin with Mr. Trump. For years, Chinese state media and nationalist pundits have highlighted mass shootings, homelessness, political polarization and economic inequality in the United States as evidence of the failures of Western democracy. More recently, official outlets embraced the viral phrase “kill line,” borrowed from video game culture, to describe what they portrayed as the irreversible downward spiral facing America’s working poor. It’s a familiar tactic of the Communist Party to distract the Chinese public from the country’s own issues.
But Mr. Trump’s return to office and his administration’s erratic decision-making in both domestic and foreign policy have supplied the propaganda machine with plentiful fresh material. Images of immigration raids, the Minneapolis shootings and bitter political infighting circulate widely on Chinese social media alongside triumphant commentary about American dysfunction. What once sounded to many educated Chinese like exaggerated propaganda increasingly feels, to some, observational.
A 31-year-old education consultant in northern China who advises families on overseas study told me that parents who had once aspired to Ivy League degrees for their children now saw America as “too chaotic.” A decade ago, more than 80 percent of his students considered the United States for study abroad, said the consultant, who asked me to use only his family name, Wang, for fear of government retribution. Now, he estimated, the figure has fallen to 45 percent.
Mr. Wang described watching footage of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol and finding himself thinking of the Red Guards that Mao Zedong dispatched to tear apart China’s institutions during the Cultural Revolution. That feeling returned more insistently with the immigration raids and the targeting of perceived enemies during Mr. Trump’s second term.
“The America that represented wealth, freedom and institutional confidence feels like it belonged to a different era,” Mr. Wang said.
Among China’s foreign policy analysts, the conversation has turned to what Beijing can gain from the bilateral relationship, which has become more transactional under Mr. Trump than under President Joseph R. Biden Jr.
“Only China can save Trump,” said Huang Jing, a professor at Shanghai International Studies University, during a media event that was livestreamed in late 2025. With the U.S. midterm elections approaching, he argued, Mr. Trump needed visible wins such as Chinese purchases of American soybeans, corn and natural gas that could play well in swing states.
“Since Trump,” Mr. Huang said at the event, “the United States has become increasingly prone to compromise.”
Wu Xinbo, a leading American studies scholar at Fudan University, offered a similar assessment. If Republicans lose control of the House this fall, he said at the same event, Mr. Trump is likely to pivot toward his foreign policy legacy, creating space for a larger accommodation with Beijing.
China, he said, “should make good use of this opportunity.”
The war in Iran has reinforced the view that China has the upper hand with Mr. Trump. At a conference in late April, Mr. Wu argued that the war reduced Washington’s leverage against China while increasing Beijing’s by consuming American military and diplomatic attention in the Middle East.
The logic helps explain why China’s official language regarding Mr. Trump has often been less hostile than it was regarding Mr. Biden. According to a project by the Tracking People’s Daily newsletter, which used artificial intelligence to analyze nearly 7,000 Chinese official statements since 2021, Mr. Biden was presented as a more systemic threat — so serious that Mr. Xi accused Washington of “encirclement and suppression,” unusually confrontational language for a Chinese leader.
By contrast, the study noted, “Trump’s transactionalism is something Beijing understands and can work with.”
Yet belief in U.S. decline has not translated into aggressive Chinese foreign policy, at least not the kind of overt geopolitical gamble that Russia made before invading Ukraine.
China has become more assertive, pressuring U.S. allies, expanding military activity around Taiwan and restricting rare-earth exports in response to Mr. Trump’s tariffs. But even as Beijing advances the idea of the decline of American power, it appears wary of directly confronting what many Chinese analysts describe as a still dangerous superpower.
Two factors play into this circumspection. First, many Chinese strategists believe Beijing can do better by sitting back while the Trump administration fumbles. Second, an unstable and distracted United States may also be a more unpredictable one.
Beijing’s export-dependent economy needs a stable international order to function. An erratic United States threatens that stability in ways a confident, predictable America never did, Zongyuan Zoe Liu, an economist at the Council for Foreign Relations, told me.
Mr. Xi “is getting the United States he always wanted,” she said, “and the America he most feared at the same time.”
Business
L.A. port traffic rises in April despite trade disruption, higher fuel costs
The Port of Los Angeles recorded its second-busiest April on record, despite the war in Iran, a related rise in shipping fuel costs and continued trade uncertainty.
The port processed more than 890,00 container units last month, 5.7% higher than a year ago. That was driven by a strong growth in imports, which totaled about 460,000 20-foot container units, or TEUs, an increase of 5% compared with a year ago and 21% higher than March.
“And what’s driving this, generally speaking, is the American consumer, still resilient, still spending,” Gene Seroka, port executive director, said during a news conference. “And based on what we’re seeing in Asia, the next wave of imports — from back-to-school to early holiday merchandise — is already beginning to build.”
The solid numbers brought the year-to-date trade figures to 3.28 million TEUs, about 2% over its five-year average and 2% below last year’s pace, which was abnormally high earlier last year as importers tried to get ahead of President Trump’s tariffs.
More than 95% of the port’s trade is with Asian partners, with China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam the top five countries, Seroka said.
Still, uncertainty over tariffs has beset international trade.
Last week, the 10% global tariffs that President Trump imposed after his “Liberation Day” tariffs were struck down in February, also were declared unlawful by a federal judge. Trump imposed the duties under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which had never previously been invoked.
It wasn’t immediately clear what the ruling would mean for importers that had been paying the levies. The Justice Department could challenge the trade court’s latest ruling by taking the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
While imports have continued to hold up, the tariffs have affected export markets. The number of outbound TEUs fell 0.5% to about 128,000 in April.
“Tariff‑rich environments will continue, and the uncertainty around how those tariffs are deployed will also continue,” said Katherine Tai, former U.S. trade representative under President Biden, who spoke at the briefing. “It’s a deeply disruptive time.”
Meanwhile, cargo ships that call on the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach are facing much higher fuel costs due to the Iran war’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
The cost of shipping fuel at the twin ports has risen sharply and is close to 20% higher than at other major ports in the U.S. and worldwide — which adds up quickly as ships need the equivalent of millions of gallons of fuel to fill up.
Shippers are trying to reduce fuel consumption and avoid expensive routes, but much of that extra cost is expected to show up in the prices of the products that pass through the ports every month in hundreds of thousands of containers.
Times staff writer Caroline Petrow-Cohen contributed to this report.
-
World5 minutes agoMacron takes the stage uninvited at Africa summit to scold crowd for ‘total lack of respect’
-
Politics11 minutes agoPelosi, other Dems, and former Rep MTG dogpile on Trump over inflation, Iran war
-
Health17 minutes agoAlzheimer’s drugs slammed as ‘ineffective’ in major review, but critics push back
-
Sports23 minutes agoFlorida judge rules prosecutors can access Tiger Woods’ prescription drug history after DUI arrest: report
-
Technology29 minutes agoAI robot changes your tires and balances them too
-
Business35 minutes agoCalifornia consumers accuse popular Italian food brand of tomato fraud
-
Entertainment41 minutes ago
Is ‘Blue Dot Fever’ a real problem for the concert industry?
-
Lifestyle47 minutes agoWhat the postcards leave out: 5 moments in history that still echo along Route 66