Science
What Trump’s Pledge to Plant the U.S. Flag on Mars Really Means
During his Inaugural Address on Monday, President Donald J. Trump again promised to launch American astronauts to Mars.
Seated nearby, Elon Musk, a political benefactor of Mr. Trump who founded SpaceX in the hope that it would one day be able to send colonists to Mars, beamed with enthusiasm and offered two thumbs up. The gargantuan Starship rocket that Mr. Musk’s company is currently developing is meant for that task.
Mr. Trump left a number of specifics unsaid, including what the new initiative would mean for NASA’s existing moon program, when astronauts would get to Mars and what other NASA programs might be cut to pay for it.
What Trump has said about Mars
Mr. Trump has mentioned landing on Mars before. During a campaign rally in Reading, Pa., on Oct. 9, he promised that this would occur during his presidency. “We will lead the world in space and reach Mars before the end of my term,” he said.
He did not specify whether he meant landing American astronauts on Mars by Jan. 20, 2029, his last day in the White House, or whether just sending a prototype of the spacecraft that would take astronauts someday further in the future would suffice.
On Monday, he said that American astronauts would “plant the stars and stripes on the planet Mars,” but left out when.
Separately, Mr. Musk has not been shy in making his own proclamations. In September, he said that SpaceX would launch five Starships to Mars in 2026, albeit with no one aboard, to test their ability to survive re-entry through the thin Martian atmosphere and to arrive on the surface in one piece.
Earth and Mars pass relatively close to each other once every 26 months; the next time they will be in alignment will be in late 2026. If those landers succeeded, the first people would travel at the next opportunity, in 2028, Mr. Musk said.
Mr. Musk’s timeline is thus possible, at least in terms of orbital dynamics. But many other questions remain to be answered.
What happened to the moon?
Mr. Trump did not mention the moon, even though the centerpiece for the space program during his first term was returning astronauts to the moon as part of NASA’s Artemis program. There are already signs that the new administration is planning major changes to Artemis.
One hint involves who is running NASA right now.
During a change of presidential administrations, NASA’s top political appointees typically resign, and a career official, the associate administrator, fills in until a new administrator is confirmed by the Senate. Mr. Trump has nominated Jared Isaacman, a billionaire who has flown two private astronaut missions on SpaceX rockets and who is a close associate of Mr. Musk.
On Monday, Mr. Trump said that Janet Petro, the director of NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, would serve as acting administrator. In doing that, he bypassed James Free, the third-highest official at NASA.
Mr. Free has been a defender of the current Artemis program.
“Jim Free made it clear that Artemis was perfect and didn’t need to be changed,” said James Muncy, a Republican space policy consultant who was not involved with the NASA transition for Mr. Trump. “Which is disqualifying to a president that wants to change things.”
Crucial parts of the current Artemis program include the Space Launch System, a powerful but expensive NASA rocket, and the Orion capsule where the astronauts would travel between the Earth and the moon.
Many in the space industry expect the incoming Trump administration to cancel S.L.S., and possibly Orion as well.
On Christmas, Mr. Musk wrote on X, “The Artemis architecture is extremely inefficient, as it is a jobs-maximizing program, not a results-maximizing program. Something entirely new is needed.”
The next day, Mr. Musk, who has met repeatedly with Mr. Trump, appeared to call for skipping the moon altogether: “No, we’re going straight to Mars. The Moon is a distraction.”
Mr. Musk downplayed the moon, even though SpaceX holds a $4 billion contract to build a version of Starship to take astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon.
A cancellation of Artemis would also cancel SpaceX’s contract.
“We will see whether or not there is no money for the moon at all in the budget when it comes out,” said Mr. Muncy, who said he would prefer that NASA continue the moon program using commercial alternatives to S.L.S.
Can American astronauts really get to Mars?
Mr. Musk has a long history of offering unrealistic, overly optimistic schedules for his rocket developments. In 2016, he predicted that the first uncrewed SpaceX missions on Mars would launch in 2022, and that astronauts would be headed there this year.
SpaceX has made technological strides, but they remain far short of what is needed to pull off a Mars journey. Some of the most significant hurdles include quick turnarounds between launches and refueling Starships while in orbit.
The life-support system on Mars-bound versions of Mr. Musk’s Starship would also have to work reliably — scrubbing carbon dioxide from the air, recycling water and performing other tasks to keep the ship habitable — for more than a year.
If the astronauts successfully landed on Mars, the return trip would require more yet-to-be-proven technologies.
For one, the Starship would have to be refueled with methane and oxygen.
The technology for extracting those gases from Martian air is still mostly hypothetical. SpaceX could conceivably send additional Starships with the propellants for the return trip, but that would add complexity.
Then there is the question of who would pay for all this. These Mars flights would occur at a time when NASA would be busy with its Artemis moon missions, presumably with SpaceX fulfilling its contractual obligations to build a moon lander.
At least on paper, it thus might make sense for Mr. Musk for the Artemis moon missions to be canceled and for NASA to pay him instead to aim for Mars.
Science
Physicians, politicians, activists call for emergency declaration on the Tijuana River
The heinously polluted Tijuana River, which has sickened residents and even researchers with its hydrogen sulfide fumes, is gaining attention, and now a coalition of politicians, activists, physicians and economists are pushing California Gov. Gavin Newsom to declare the fetid and toxic river valley a public health emergency.
They’ve also put together a plan to clean it up and are pleading with state lawmakers to fund it, even as the state faces a multibillion-dollar deficit.
“We’re only starting to understand the full reach of the environmental and health impacts and they’re getting worse every day,” Sarah Davidson, clean border water manager for the ocean protection group Surfrider, said at a news conference Thursday. “There’s no saying how far-reaching they are or how far-reaching they will be. So every lawmaker and resident in California should be concerned.”
In 2024, Newsom said in an interview that a state emergency declaration “would not have availed us to any real benefit except symbolism and then ultimately frustration that it didn’t mean anything.”
Four of the gubernatorial candidates — Katie Porter, Antonio Villaraigosa, Tom Steyer and Xavier Becerra — have pledged to treat the issue as a top priority.
Despite his resistance, Newsom has secured funding for the river and region, including $38 million for water quality improvements in 2019 and an additional $100 million in federal funds for the area’s infrastructure in 2025.
Among the elements in the package announced Thursday: state Senate Bill 58, which would establish air quality standards for hydrogen sulfide, a toxic pollutant emitted from the river, and Senate Bill 1046, which would set standards and guidelines for workers employed near the river.
They’re also pushing for $23 million in state transportation funds to upgrade the Saturn Boulevard crossing near San Ysidro, where the river cascades through a small channel and is considered a hot spot for spewing toxic air pollutants. Other items include $5 million for air purifiers for people in heavily affected ZIP Codes, and $2 million to update a boom on the river that collects trash moving downstream.
Support for addressing the Tijuana River crisis has been bipartisan.
Last summer, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin committed the Trump administration to “a permanent, 100% solution to the decades-old Tijuana River sewage crisis,” signing a memorandum of understanding with Mexico.
“I smelled for myself that foul smell that so many residents of Southern California have been complaining about for so long,” Zeldin said, adding that President Trump was highly motivated after hearing from Navy SEALs who must train in the polluted waters of the Pacific Ocean where the Tijuana River meets the sea.
A recent Department of Defense report showed 1,100 reported cases of illness among Navy SEALs and other service members exposed to high levels of bacteria when they trained in and around the mouth of the river near the border.
In 2024, California voters also approved Proposition 4, which allocated nearly $50 million for projects addressing water quality problems along the Mexico border and coastal areas. But most of that money has yet to be released, waiting for various agency reviews and approvals.
Trump also took an interest in the river during his first administration, committing $300 million in federal funding to the San Diego region for a new U.S. facility to capture Tijuana sewage spills before they foul shorelines.
Advocates for an emergency declaration, including those representing local communities, say an emergency declaration could help release those funds and prompt interagency action. For example, funds could be used for road and tunnel construction to improve the flow of the river, addressing several public health issues plaguing the region.
Nearly three-quarters of the Tijuana River watershed is in Mexico, with the last five miles flowing into the U.S. before emptying into the Pacific Ocean at Imperial Beach.
Pollution in the 120-mile-long river has been so egregious that recent studies have shown that even the air above the river, or the spray where it reaches the surf, is dangerous.
Using an air quality monitor nearly half a mile from the river in the community of Nestor, Calif., last year, scientists found extremely high levels of hydrogen sulfide, a gas linked to sewage that smells like rotten eggs. Their paper was published in the journal Science.
Last year, American Rivers, an environmental group, declared the Tijuana River the second-most endangered river in the nation.
Science
What My Father’s Experience Taught Me About Memory and the Brain
A couple of years ago, in the middle of the night, I crept downstairs to find my father sitting at the kitchen table, sobbing like a child.
My mother was beside him, trying to comfort him, an activity that took up more and more of her time. He was 87 and had dementia. It wasn’t unusual to find him upset or confused. But on this night, something seemed to be happening to him in real time — in 1941.
He was 6 years old, and was leaving Pittsburgh, the only home he had ever known, for an Air Force base in San Antonio, where his father had been ordered for duty. He and his parents were traveling there by train, transferring in Chicago.
It was the beginning of a lonely, difficult time for my father’s family, moving between Air Force bases in the South, where landlords sometimes turned them away because they were Catholic. An only child, he had been allowed to take one pet with him, a canary he was carrying in a birdcage.
As they were changing trains in Chicago, the bottom fell out of the cage. The canary flew out, up into the vaulted atrium of the station’s Great Hall. There was no way to get the bird — there was no time, they had to board a train to Texas. So my 6-year-old father shuffled after his parents, holding an empty cage.
In the years that had elapsed, he had negotiated arms treaties with the Soviets, had advised presidents, had served as a U.S. ambassador, all with the same watchful, wisecracking reserve. I thought I knew who he was. I could count on one hand the times I had seen him cry. Now here he was, sobbing over the canary as if it were yesterday.
This was all, it seemed, because of his brain. He had fallen hard in their house in Washington, D.C., smacking his head on the hardwood floor. Blood rushed into spaces in his brain, and cells starved of oxygen began to die. Eventually, he was diagnosed with vascular dementia, which is most often caused by strokes.
For five years after that, my parents lived with my family outside Boston, and we learned firsthand how brain injury affects behavior. My father recovered in some ways, but he became chaotic, his thoughts broken into mirror shards.
The biggest problem was that he had no idea where he was. Specifically, he did not know why he was living with us in Massachusetts, and no matter how many times we tried to remind him, over and over, he tried to leave. We would catch him packing the car, and gently — or not so gently — guide him back into the house.
This child-father was full of surprises. He bought surprising things: Five laptops! A cruise on the Norwegian fjords! Recurring $2 donations to every Democrat running for any office, anywhere! Once, in a weeklong cascade of Amazon deliveries, we received seven identical birdbaths from China.
Science
Dirty mind? Study suggests gut movement may flush excess material from our brains
With each step you take, coordinated contractions in your abdominal muscles help keep you stable and upright.
Now, new research finds that those gentle changes in tension and pressure also affect your brain, and may play a role in the organ’s overall health.
Imaging in humans and other animal species has long shown that the brain gently moves inside the fluid-filled skull cavity, but it’s never been clear what, exactly, is propelling this motion, said neuroscientist Patrick Drew, a Penn State University professor and associate director of the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences.
Using advanced imaging, Drew’s team observed mice brains before and after the animals began walking. They realized that the brain actually moved just milliseconds before a mouse took a step — the brief moment when the animal’s abdominal muscles contracted in preparation for movement.
To test the observation, they strapped pressure sensors around the bellies of lightly anesthetized mice and observed the brain when slight pressure was applied only to the abdominal muscles. The same motion followed. Breathing or cardiac activity didn’t trigger the same response.
The connection, Drew and his colleagues determined, is the vertebral venous plexus, a network of veins that connects the abdomen to the spine in mice and humans alike.
“It’s like a hydraulic system. It really is very much like the jacks that push your car up, or something that an excavator might have,” Drew said. “Whenever you tense those muscles, which you do whenever you make a movement … that pushes blood into the spinal cord, it increases the pressure on your brain, and it moves your brain forward.”
The paper, which was published April 27 in Nature Neuroscience, answers a puzzling question about the mechanism controlling this long-observed cerebral movement.
It also puts forward hypotheses about why this belly-brain choreography exists.
Drew and his team ran computer simulations of fluid’s motion in and around mouse brains. The kind of contraction generated by walking moves cerebrospinal fluid out of the brain, leading Drew to hypothesize that the mechanism plays an important role in flushing out protein waste and other unnecessary material.
“It’s more speculative, but using simulations, we can see that this sort of motion should drive fluid movement and could help clear waste in the brain,” Drew said.
In future research, Drew said, the team would like to explore whether the brain is detecting these mechanical signals, and how physical conditions like obesity affect the hydraulic relationship between the abdominal muscles and the brain.
These current findings clarify the relationship between the brain and physical movement, illuminating fundamental mechanics that can apply to other research, said Michael Goard, an associate professor at UC Santa Barbara who studies sensory and spatial processing.
“He did, what I think is a very thorough job figuring out what’s causing this movement in the case of locomotion and tying down the mechanical elements,” Goard said.
-
Lifestyle5 minutes agoPrimm was a cheap, beloved Vegas alternative. Then new California casinos killed it
-
Politics11 minutes agoPress freedom groups allege Larry Ellison promised to fire CNN anchors
-
Science17 minutes agoPhysicians, politicians, activists call for emergency declaration on the Tijuana River
-
Sports23 minutes ago‘That’s what we need’: Austin Reaves bounces back in Lakers’ Game 2 loss
-
World35 minutes agoBulgarian parliament confirms Rumen Radev as new prime minister
-
News1 hour agoOhio deputy who fatally shot Black man entering his grandmother’s house is convicted of reckless homicide
-
New York3 hours agoNew York’s Budget Deal Is Still Hazy. Here Are 5 Key Questions.
-
Detroit, MI3 hours agoApproval poll: Do you approve of Lions GM Brad Holmes? (post-2026 draft)