Connect with us

World

MEPs to debate Spain’s amnesty deal over rule of law fears

Published

on

MEPs to debate Spain’s amnesty deal over rule of law fears

The European Parliament will hold a debate next week on the controversial amnesty deal struck between the Spanish socialists and Catalan separatists to make Pedro Sánchez prime minister.

ADVERTISEMENT

The debate has been requested by the parliament’s biggest group – the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP) – amid concerns about what it describes as “the beginning of the end for the rule of law” in Spain.

In a joint statement, the EPP’s president Manfred Weber and the head of its Spanish delegation Dolors Montserrat said that the “amnesty pact risks breaching the separation of powers and undermining judicial independence,” echoing concerns voiced in recent days by Spain’s national council of the judiciary.

The EPP will likely secure the support of other right-leaning and centrist groups before the debate can be formally included in the agenda for next week’s plenary sitting.

The Spanish socialists’ deal, announced in Brussels last Thursday following weeks of intense negotiations, will see Catalan separatist party Junts per Catalunya (JxCat) offer seven of its votes to back a Sánchez-led government in exchange for a future amnesty for Catalan politicians and activists who participated in a failed attempt at secession from Spain in 2017.

Advertisement

It has drawn fierce criticism from opposition parties, who accuse Sánchez of undermining the rule of law by absolving crimes including embezzlement and maladministration for political gains. 

Tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets in Spain over the weekend in protest.

The amnesty bill was submitted before the Spanish parliament by the socialist party (PSOE) on Monday ahead of the vote on Sánchez’s investiture, scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday this week (15 and 16 November).

A draft version of the bill shared by Spanish outlet eldiario.es on Monday suggests that the controversial concept of “lawfare”, included in the political deal with JxCat in a major concession to Puigdemont, will not feature in the legal text of the amnesty bill.

Twenty right-leaning and centrist Spanish members of the European Parliament (MEPs) also wrote to European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen on Monday to denounce the deal for undermining the principle of equality before the law, and call on the EU institutions to “monitor and follow” the situation in Spain.

Advertisement

“The European Union should safeguard its fundamental principles and values and take steps to protect the rule of law,” in accordance with the Union’s treaties, the letter also says.

The MEPs claim that judicial proceedings and sanctions against 3,000 people would be scrapped as a result of the amnesty, including for crimes relating to corruption and terrorism.

‘Lawfare’ under scrutiny

The EPP-requested debate in the European Parliament will likely focus on the clause in the political deal that refers to ‘lawfare’ – the strategic use of the law as an instrument to target political opponents – included under the request of JxCat’s leader Carles Puigdemont, who fled in exile to Belgium following the failed 2017 referendum.

According to the deal, parliamentary commissions would be established specifically to investigate whether any of the legal convictions made in relation to the 2017 secession attempt could be considered attempts at “lawfare”.

But leaked drafts of the amnesty bill shared by Spanish media on Monday suggest the term will not appear in the legal text, as previously affirmed by Jaume Asens, the negotiator on behalf of the socialists’ coalition partner Sumar.

Advertisement

The inclusion of “lawfare” in the political deal has nonetheless been at the heart of criticism from analysts and legal experts, who say it would allow judicial decisions to be subjected to political interpretation, thereby significantly undermining the independence of the judiciary.

“As the associations of judges and prosecutors have claimed, it is nothing less than a serious threat to the judicial independence in Spain,” the EPP group said on X.

“We have seen this before in Poland and we expect the European Commission to immediately make clear that for example the lawfare provisions are totally unacceptable,” the group also said.

In their letter to von der Leyen, 20 MEPs say that all Spain’s judicial associations, “from the most progressive to the most conservative” have rejected the reference to lawfare in a joint statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

The European Commission has refrained from commenting on the deal until the legal text of the amnesty bill is made available.

A letter sent last week by the EU justice commissioner Didier Reynders to Spanish ministers requested “more detailed information, notably as regards the personal, material and temporal scope of this envisaged law.”

Advertisement

In response, Spain’s Presidency Minister Félix Bolaños said that the amnesty bill was a proposal from the parliamentary groups, and that the current caretaker status of the government prevented it from submitting bills to the parliament.

But with an investiture pencilled in for this week and the bill expected to be registered on Monday, the EU institutions will come under increasing pressure to take a position on the deal.

The bloc has in the past taken a strong stance on laws considered to undermine the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary in countries such as Poland.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We count on the European institutions as a space of democracy and freedom to stop this pact, which breaks the rule of law and the equality of citizens in Spain, as they have done before in other countries,” the EPP said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Rupert Murdoch's UK tabloids offer a rare apology in a legal settlement with Prince Harry

Published

on

Rupert Murdoch's UK tabloids offer a rare apology in a legal settlement with Prince Harry

LONDON (AP) — Rupert Murdoch’s U.K. tabloids made a rare apology to Prince Harry in settling his privacy invasion lawsuit and will pay him a substantial sum, his lawyer said Wednesday.

Harry’s lawyer David Sherborne read a statement in court saying News Group offers a “full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex” for years of unlawful intrusion.

The bombshell announcement in London’s High Court came as the Duke of Sussex’s trial was about to start against the publishers of The Sun and the now-defunct News of the World for unlawfully snooping on him over decades.

Harry, 40, the younger son of King Charles III, and one other man were the only two remaining claimants out of more than 1,300 others who had settled lawsuits against News Group Newspapers over allegations their phones were hacked and investigators unlawfully intruded in their lives.

In all the cases that have been brought against the publisher since a widespread phone hacking scandal forced Murdoch to close News of the World in 2011, Harry’s case got the closest to trial.

Advertisement

Murdoch shut down the News of the World after the Guardian reported that the tabloid’s reporters had hacked the phone of Milly Dowler, a murdered 13-year-old schoolgirl, while police were searching for her in 2002.

As the case was about to start Tuesday morning, his lawyer asked for a one-hour recess, then got a longer adjournment and finally asked to have the rest of the day as it became clear a settlement was in the works.

The case was one of three lawsuits Harry has brought accusing British tabloids of violating his privacy by eavesdropping on phone messages or using private investigators to unlawfully help them score scoops.

His case against the publisher of the Daily Mirror ended in victory when the judge ruled that phone hacking was “widespread and habitual” at the newspaper and its sister publications.

During that trial in 2023, Harry became the first senior member of the royal family to testify in court since the late 19th century, putting him at odds with the monarchy’s desire to keep its problems out of view.

Advertisement

His feud with the press dates back to his youth, when the tabloids took glee in reporting on everything from his injuries to his girlfriends to dabbling with drugs.

But his fury with the tabloids goes much deeper.

He blames the media for the death of his mother, Princess Diana, who was killed in a car crash in 1997 while being chased by paparazzi in Paris. He also blames them for the persistent attacks on his wife, actor Meghan Markle, that led them to leave royal life and flee to the U.S. in 2020.

The litigation has been a source of friction in his family, Harry said in the documentary “Tabloids On Trial.”

He revealed in court papers that his father opposed his lawsuit. He also said his older brother William, Prince of Wales and heir to the throne, had settled a private complaint against News Group that his lawyer has said was worth over 1 million pounds ($1.23 million).

Advertisement

“I’m doing this for my reasons,” Harry told the documentary makers, though he said he wished his family had joined him.

Harry was originally one among dozens of claimants, including actor Hugh Grant, who alleged that News Group journalists and investigators they hired violated their privacy between 1994 and 2016 by intercepting voicemails, tapping phones, bugging cars and using deception to access confidential information.

Of the original group, Harry and Tom Watson, a former Labour Party member of Parliament, were the holdouts headed to trial.

News Group had denied the allegations.

NGN had issued an unreserved apology to victims of voicemail interception by the News of the World and said it settled more than 1,300 claims. The Sun has never accepted liability.

Advertisement

The outcome in the News Group case raises questions about how Harry’s third case — against the publisher of the Daily Mail — will proceed. That trial is scheduled next year.

Continue Reading

World

Putin, Xi vow to ‘deepen’ alliance hours after Trump re-enters the White House

Published

on

Putin, Xi vow to ‘deepen’ alliance hours after Trump re-enters the White House

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday pledged to “deepen strategic coordination” in a video call less than a day after President Donald Trump re-entered the White House.

A transcript of the call posted to the Kremlin’s website showed that both Putin and Xi referred to one another as “friends” and vowed to back one another’s strategic interests, no matter the “current global situation.”

Advertisement

“This year, I am ready, together with you, to elevate Chinese-Russian relations to a new level, to counter external uncertainties by preserving stability and resilience of Chinese-Russian relations,” Xi said while addressing Putin.

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin holds a video call with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence outside Moscow on Jan. 21, 2025. (Gavriil Grigorov/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

TRUMP WANTS TO VISIT CHINA AGAIN AFTER HE TAKES OFFICE: REPORT

The pair both vowed to back the U.N.-centered international system ahead of the 80th anniversary this year, and to defend the post-World War II global order – a nod to Putin’s pursuit to reclaim Ukraine in what many have argued is an attempt to re-establish the Soviet Union. 

Xi also told Putin about a call he had with Trump on Friday regarding TikTok, trade and Taiwan, according to a report by Reuters.

Advertisement

The Chinese and Russian leaders also reportedly “indicated a willingness to build relations with the United States on a mutually beneficial, mutually respectful basis,” Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters, adding this will happen “if the Trump team really shows interest in this.”

“It was also noted from our side that we are ready for dialogue with the new U.S. administration on the Ukrainian conflict,” he added.

Putin Xi

Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping attend a reception during the BRICS summit in Kazan, Russia, Oct. 23, 2024. (Alexander Zemlianichenko/Pool via Reuters)

RUSSIA, IRAN TO SEAL PARTNERSHIP TREATY DAYS BEFORE TRUMP TAKES OFFICE

Neither readouts of the call issued by China or Russia directly mentioned Ukraine, though Russia highlighted that Beijing has remained a major supporter of Moscow’s economy as it is the largest consumer of Russian energy resources – a major earner for Putin’s war effort.

“Five years ago, we launched the Power of Siberia gas pipeline together, and today, Russia has become the leading supplier of natural gas to China,” the Kremlin said in a readout.

Advertisement
Russia Victory Day

Russian President Vladimir Putin delivers a speech during a Victory Day military parade marking the 79th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany in World War II in Moscow. (Tian Bing/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)

 

Though according to Beijing, Moscow did directly address China’s interests in Taiwan and, according to the readout issued by the Chinese Communist Party, “Russia firmly supports Taiwan as an integral part of China’s territory and firmly opposes any form of ‘Taiwan independence.’”

“I believe that the past year was very good for us,” Putin said. “It can be said confidently that our foreign policy ties and Russia and China’s joint efforts objectively play a major stabilizing role in international affairs.”

Continue Reading

World

With Trump in power, Europe may buy LNG, planes, and cut car tariffs

Published

on

With Trump in power, Europe may buy LNG, planes, and cut car tariffs

Bernd Lange, the president of the European Parliament’s trade committee, told Euronews how Europe could negotiate with US president Donald Trump if tariffs hit on European goods.

ADVERTISEMENT

Today Radio Schuman speaks with Bernd Lange, chairman of the European Parliament’s Trade Committee, who noted that Europe still has room to respond to Trump’s policies.

In his inauguration speech, Donald Trump provided little detail regarding his earlier threats to impose tariffs on the European Union. His previously stated demand that Europe face tariffs unless it increased purchases of US oil and gas was already well-known, with many European politicians asserting they are prepared to respond proportionately.

Potential measures the EU could apply include increasing LNG imports and reducing car tariffs, the MEP says. Lange also stressed that the EU’s future trade agreements could be shaped in reaction to shifts in US trade policy.

Radio Schuman also has a quick look at the European Parliament’s agenda today and at the most depressed country in Europe.

Radio Schuman is hosted and produced by Maïa de la Baume, with journalist and production assistant Eleonora Vasques, audio editing by  David Brodheim. Music by Alexandre Jas.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending