Connect with us

World

In war-torn states hurt by climate, scant hope for new funds

Published

on

In war-torn states hurt by climate, scant hope for new funds

SHARM EL-SHEIKH, Egypt (AP) — In conflict-ravaged nations like Yemen and Somalia, devastating floods and droughts kill a whole lot of individuals and uproot tens of hundreds from their properties.

These international locations and plenty of others within the Center East and Africa have been plunged into turmoil and wars for a number of years. Now local weather change is an added catastrophe for these already struggling for survival.

The United Nations’ local weather convention, which wrapped up final weekend in Egypt, established a brand new fund to assist poor, weak international locations hit laborious by local weather change. International locations like Yemen and Somalia are among the many world’s poorest and extra weak to local weather change impacts as they’re much less capable of adapt to climate extremes.

However they’ve little or no entry to local weather financing.

Battle-hit international locations are unlikely to obtain funds as a result of they lack secure governments, mentioned Nisreen el-Saim, chair of the U.N. Secretary-Basic Youth Advisory Group.

Advertisement

“They don’t have establishments with a purpose to have local weather finance,” she mentioned. “You need to have sturdy establishments, which don’t exist in lots of international locations.”

Robert Mardini, the director normal of the Worldwide Committee for the Crimson Cross, mentioned that “near zero quantity of local weather finance” is reaching conflict-affected nations “as a result of determination makers who determine to allocate these funds take into account that it’s too dangerous to speculate” there.

He warned that the worst is but to come back for Yemenis and Somalis amid worsening meals shortages.

These determination makers “have to rethink the chance urge for food as a result of there are additionally massive dangers in not investing in these international locations and big (human) prices that needs to be averted,” he mentioned.

In Yemen, a 3rd of the inhabitants — 19 million folks — are usually not capable of finding ample meals in 2022, up from 15 million final yr. These embody 161,000 dwelling in famine-like circumstances, in accordance with the U.N. meals company.

Advertisement

Youngsters and ladies are essentially the most affected, with 1.3 million pregnant and breastfeeding ladies and a couple of.2 million kids beneath 5 years acutely malnourished. Of these, 538,000 kids undergo from extreme acute malnutrition, mentioned the U.N. Workplace for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.

Yemen has endured a brutal civil struggle since 2014, when the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels seized the capital, Sanaa, forcing the federal government into exile. A Saudi-led coalition entered the struggle in early 2015 to strive restore the internationally acknowledged authorities to energy.

The battle devastated the nation, created one of many world’s worst humanitarian crises and over time, became a regional proxy struggle between Saudi Arabia and Iran. Greater than 150,000 folks have been killed, together with over 14,500 civilians.

The nation has additionally suffered from droughts, soil erosion and but worsening floods yearly. In response to the U.N. agriculture company, this yr’s rainfall was 45% increased in comparison with 2021.

At the very least 72 folks have been killed in flooding this yr, and a few 74,000 households in 19 of the nation’s 22 provinces have been affected, with these dwelling in displacement camps bearing the brunt of the deluge. There are 4.3 million folks displaced, most made homelss by the raging battle, in accordance with U.N. figures.

Advertisement

To fulfill the growing humanitarian wants, the World Meals Program says it wants greater than $1 billion till March 2023.

The scenario is worse in Somalia. The nation is inching in the direction of famine, the U.N. says. Extended drought has introduced starvation and loss of life to a whole lot of hundreds.

The nation skilled its fifth consecutive failed wet season this yr, forcing at the very least 700,000 folks from their properties, mentioned Mohamed Osman, an financial advisor to the Somali president.

He mentioned Somalia wants $55.5 billion in funding and help within the subsequent 10 years to have the ability to get better from climatic shocks.

“Somalia is paying the worth already,” he mentioned. “We have now obtained thus far nothing and in complete, Africa has obtained much less.”

Advertisement

Prior to now two months alone, greater than 55,000 Somalis fled drought and battle to neighboring Kenya, and the quantity is anticipated to succeed in 120,000 within the subsequent few months, in accordance with the Worldwide Rescue Committee.

“A whole bunch of hundreds of Somali refugees will battle to seek out life-saving help by fleeing to Kenya this yr until pressing steps are taken,” mentioned IRC’s director in Kenya, Mohamed El Montassir Hussein.

Somalia descended into chaos following the 1991 ousting of longtime dictator Siad Barre by warlords who then turned on one another. The al-Shabab militants, who’re affiliated with al-Qaida, are additionally energetic within the nation which occupied a strategically essential place within the Horn of Africa.

In Nigeria, seasonal rainfall and flooding killed greater than 55 folks in excessive climate scientists say was made 80 occasions extra probably due to local weather change. Round 20 million folks within the nation are estimated to face acute meals insecurity amid crop losses and decrease yields, in accordance with official figures.

The ICRC has warned about an outbreak of cholera and different waterborne ailments amid dire a scarcity of live-saving assist, together with shelter, water, sanitation, meals, and emergency healthcare.

Advertisement

The nation’s northeastern areas the place yearslong preventing towards Islamic insurgency are centered have been the worst hit.

“With greater than 440,000 hectares of land already impacted by this flood, the magnitude of its impact on meals safety will be higher imagined,” mentioned Benson Agbro, head of the Nigerian Crimson Cross Society’s catastrophe response.

Agbro added they urgently want greater than $13.5 million to handle dire humanitarian circumstances in essentially the most laborious hit areas.

“However long run, we additionally have to construct resilience to local weather shocks as we all know that communities affected by battle are among the many most weak to local weather change,” he mentioned.

The Russian struggle in Ukraine has additionally doubled the challenges and prices of dwelling for folks in conflict-hit international locations, in accordance Mardini of the Crimson Cross.

Advertisement

“There’s a knock-on impact of the Ukraine worldwide armed battle,” he mentioned, pointing to the skyrocketing costs of meals, vitality, fertilizers and the straining provide chain.

“So doing the identical factor in a spot like Somalia or Mali is extra expensive for us, and we have to mobilize extra funds from our donors to do the identical kind of mission that we used to do a yr in the past,” he mentioned.

Osman, the Somali official, mentioned higher efforts are additionally wanted for conflict-hit international locations to entry funds past the brand new proposed compensation deal. The package deal is only one a part of a proposed “mosaic of funding preparations” for local weather weak nations.

He known as for “revolutionary methods” to obtain funds, together with initiatives on debt reduction and assist to construct authorities establishments.

“No nation needs to be left behind,” he mentioned.

Advertisement

___

Observe AP’s local weather and surroundings protection at https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

How ‘The Good Doctor’ Series Finale Handled the Death of [SPOILER] — and Took Shape After a ‘Downsized’ Season 7

Published

on

How ‘The Good Doctor’ Series Finale Handled the Death of [SPOILER] — and Took Shape After a ‘Downsized’ Season 7

Spoiler Alert: The following interview discusses events from “The Good Doctor” series finale “Goodbye,” streaming on Hulu as of May 22.

If you’re looking for the right prescription for a solid series finale consisting of high emotional stakes, happy and sad tearful moments followed by a big dose of hope, then “The Good Doctor” delivered on all of those elements in Tuesday’s series finale, which wrapped up seven seasons on ABC.

The drama, which premiered on September 20, 2017, followed the journey of autistic surgeon Shaun Murphy (Freddie Highmore) as he grew from surgical resident not only to being a successful doctor at San Jose’s St. Bonaventure Hospital, but also a husband, father and friend to the colleagues he worked with over the years. In the series, created by David Shore and developed from the 2013 South Korean drama “Good Doctor,” Shaun’s autism often saw him face conflicts in which he was torn between logic and emotion with the show’s finale digging deep once again into that arena.

In the episode, Shaun is faced with two of his closest friends – mentor and father figure Dr. Aaron Glassman (Richard Schiff) and returning friend Dr. Claire Browne (Antonia Thomas, who left the series as a regular after its fourth season) – facing life or death situations that Shaun felt the utmost responsibility to solve. This dramatic situation for Shaun drove the show’s final hour, as the last few episodes efficiently locked down happy endings for several cast members like colleagues Dr. Morgan Reznick (Fiona Gubelmann) and Dr. Alex Park (Will Yun Lee) finally being wed in last week’s episode.

Shore and executive producer Liz Friedman helped us dissect the show’s last episode, including how the shortened 10-episode final season impacted its conclusion, why Claire was the past cast member they chose to bring back and how they handled the death of Glassman in the episode — while keeping an upbeat end.

Advertisement

Once you found out the show would be ending after Season 7, did it change the end point you had been thinking about, or did you know this was coming so had time to plan?

Liz Friedman: I had planned for a season ender that either was in the ballpark of something that could wrap it up, or there were certain ideas I had of that if you included this little thread, it could launch into next season. I knew [the show ending] was a possibility. I was trying to keep everyone’s options open for as long as possible. I’m sad the show is ending, but I’m glad that we had enough notice. We were able to adjust, and do a true finale. I’m very happy with how we wrapped up the show.

Were there any adjustments you needed to do just because of the writers strike, with fewer episodes for the season?

Friedman: No, that was not in the planning. I mean, part of going through the writers strike was a repeated calculation of how many episodes we could do if it ended next week. And it was hard, honestly, because even when we came back, we had the ability to do 15 [episodes]. ABC initially said, no, we only want 13 and then that number got reduced to 10. But we figured it out, and downsized our story to make it work for that many episodes.

Did either of you go back and watch the pilot in preparation for this final episode?

Advertisement

David Shore: Yeah, we did. Liz watched right away, and told me I should watch it, too. I was going to watch it anyways, but she just said, “Yeah, it’s really good.”

Friedman: We had also watched it for when we did “The Good Lawyer” spinoff [last year]. There are definitely moments that refer back to [the pilot]. Honestly, it was a bit of an accident, but we came up with the story, and then I took a look at the Season 1 finale, which was really about Shaun learning that Glassman had cancer. And those two stories speak to each other quite a bit in a way that really pleases me. It really gives a very good measure of Shaun’s progress over the course of these seven years.

How much did Freddie Highmore weigh in on the finale and how things wrapped up? Was he involved with a lot of the choices?

Friedman: Freddie’s great in that. Over the past few years, I talked to him as I get the next section of stories and I talk him through what’s coming, and he’s a writer’s dream audience. He says, “Oh, that sounds good,” and then he throws in a, “Oh, that sort of reminds me of this…” He’s such a dream to work with. We would go through every script with him, and he asks us about any things he wants to change. And almost every change he wants to make makes the script better.

As a viewer, the show’s true love story is Shaun and Glassman, especially with how that relationship has unfolded and where it ends up in at the end of Season 7. Has that always been in the forefront of your minds, as well?

Advertisement

Shore: Certainly that relationship has been absolutely essential to the show from day one, and it was the one constant to the show throughout, adding to the sadness at the end. But it’s very much a father-son relationship, and we were aware of that right from the beginning and we wanted to play that out to the end. The role of a father and handing that off, and getting your child ready for the world.

Let’s talk about the finale with this conundrum that Shaun is in with the lives of both Glassman and Claire at precarious points. Can you talk about crafting that story?

Friedman: We found this medical story about microphages, and that seemed like a very interesting one to tell. From there, we had been thinking about the idea of having Claire return, and that we’ll have her come back for a relatively mundane medical procedure in [the May 14 episode] and then it will fan into this great mystery in the second [episode]. That worked very well to have Claire at the center of both a dramatic medical story, but also have her comment on all the change that’s happened in these people she’s known.

The Glassman story that we were going to have his cancer come back had been brewing for a while. What ended up working out really nicely was to be able to have the finale and have the two patients be characters that were a key part of our cast. That really allowed us to just keep the focus on what the audience wants, rather than trying to introduce an outside patient.

There are a lot of people from the show’s past that you could have brought back. Did you consider bringing some other people back, and how did you settle on Claire?

Advertisement

Friedman: There had been talk about bringing another character back that wasn’t possible, and that really sort of set up that it should be clear and we should really focus on Claire. Although, Perez [Brandon Larracuente] does make an appearance at the end.

Shore: But we didn’t want it to just be somebody coming in for a cameo and saying goodbye. We wanted to bring them back and utilize them properly.

It was a nice twist that Glassman steps in to do this unapproved procedure to save Claire so Shaun wouldn’t have to jeopardize his career. But would you say he’s saving Shaun one more time, or is he thanking Shaun for everything he’s done for him? I kept going back and forth on that.

Friedman: How did you see it, David?

Shore: He’s doing one last gesture for Shaun. Shaun cannot give up being a doctor. Shaun deserves to be a doctor. We wanted Shaun to be ready to fully sacrifice himself and we wanted Glassman to recognize, ‘no, I have to sacrifice myself for Shaun.’

Advertisement

How about you, Liz?

Friedman: Yeah, much the same. I think it’s definitely a mitzvah because what Shaun has accomplished is quite amazing and Glassman has been a key part of that. So this was really a sacrifice that allows Shaun to keep utilizing a pretty miraculous gift that he has in terms of his ability as a doctor.

Shore: I should add that, speaking of thanks, there was more dialogue in that scene at one point and it all worked very nicely, but in editing it all just got boiled down to the thank you. Shaun has so much to thank Glassman for, and they’ve reached a point that they had trouble reaching where Shaun is no longer fighting against Glassman. He’s just accepting Glassman.

Friedman: You can tell that David has moved into director mode, because he’s advocating for less words, but I totally agree. In fact, I was the one who said, “I think we should just make it that — that’s all we have to say.”

Was there ever a scenario when you thought you might have more episodes or more time and would actually see Glassman die and you could do the funeral? Or was that never something you wanted to touch?

Advertisement

Friedman: In a different scenario where there are more seasons of the show? Yeah, I would say that’s distinctly a possibility.

Shore: I remember thinking on the day when we were doing that carousel and that moment where Shaun’s alone on the carousel. It was about Glassman dying but the larger thing was about the end of the relationship and that Shaun is going to be OK. We shot at that carousel many seasons ago.

Shaun in the future giving a TED Talk was a great way to start seeing where he and everyone else end up. How did that scenario come to the episode?

Shore: I don’t know where it started from, but I know it wasn’t me. I just heard about it. That’s a good idea.

Friedman: I actually think it came out of when Freddie and I were talking at one point. It was before they had decided that it was going to end at 10 [episodes], but it had started to form in our minds of what would the ending be? And Freddie talked about Shaun standing up and giving a speech and he talked about it in the context of it being a nod to the pilot, that there’s that whole great section in in the boardroom. Glassman gives this great speech, and ultimately Shaun gives his great speech.

Advertisement

From that, I was thinking about speeches and trying to think about a context that suggested where Shaun had landed [in the future] and then I said, “Oh, OK, it’s a TED talk.” What I think is interesting is then independently, David came up with the idea of Shaun going back to the room where he did, in fact, that speech in the pilot, so that all the roads kept connecting to the beginning.

The names that are scrolling as Shaun is giving the TED talk, were those actual patient names from the show, or was there another significance to those names?

Shore: Actual patient names from scripts past. We did 126 episodes, so there’s a theoretically 1500 names on that list.

Friedman: And the first name that comes up, Adam, that’s the boy Shaun saved in the pilot.

In the last moments, after the TED talk and the entire cast has gathered and embracing, was that the last scene you shot for the show?

Advertisement

Shore: I wish it had been, in some ways, but we would have never gotten through the day. So scheduling stuff prevented that, but we were well aware of it as we were shooting it, and it was a rough time in that regard anyways. But it was lovely. It was actually really nice.

This interview has been edited and condensed.

Continue Reading

World

Rare tornado hits Haiti, injuring more than 50 people and leaving hundreds homeless

Published

on

Rare tornado hits Haiti, injuring more than 50 people and leaving hundreds homeless

A rare tornado in northern Haiti has injured more than 50 people and destroyed more than 200 homes, the U.N. said Wednesday.

HAITI’S MAIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT REOPENS NEARLY THREE MONTHS AFTER GANG VIOLENCE FORCED IT TO CLOSE

The tornado hit the community of Bassin-Bleu on Tuesday, leaving more than 300 families homeless, according to the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.

A rare tornado in northern Haiti has injured more than 50 people and destroyed more than 200 homes. (Photo by THONY BELIZAIRE/AFP via Getty Images)

The office noted that at least 10 people are seriously injured, with local media reporting they were hospitalized.

Advertisement

The office said Haiti’s civil protection agency and the Red Cross were the first responders and are evaluating the damage.

The civil protection agency said heavy rain is expected for most of Haiti, including the area hit by the tornado, warning of possible flooding and landslides.

Continue Reading

World

Uvalde settles for $2m with school shooting victims’ families

Published

on

Uvalde settles for $2m with school shooting victims’ families

Announcement comes two days before the two-year anniversary of the massacre at the elementary school in the Texas city.

The city of Uvalde has reached a $2m settlement with most of the families of the victims of a mass shooting at an elementary school in Texas city, one of their lawyers has said.

The announcement on Wednesday came two days before the second anniversary of the massacre.

In one of the deadliest school shootings in US history, 19 children and two teachers were killed on May 24, 2022, when a gunman entered Robb Elementary School in Uvalde and barricaded himself inside adjoining classrooms with dozens of students.

A US Department of Justice review found local police ignored accepted practices by failing to confront the attacker, instead waiting outside the classroom for more than an hour despite calls for help from the children.

Advertisement

“The city of Uvalde has agreed to pay its insurance of $2m, which is all that there was,” Josh Koskoff, who represented families of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, said at a briefing to announce the agreement.

He said the settlement involved the families of 17 of the children who were killed and two children who survived.

Another lawyer announced that the families of 19 of the victims launched a $500m federal lawsuit against nearly 100 state police officers who were part of the botched law enforcement response to one of the deadliest school shootings in United States history.

Families are suing 92 Texas Department of Public Safety officers who were at the incident, said Erin Rogiers, partner at Guerra LLP, who is representing families together with Koskoff and Bieder PC, in a statement.

State and federal officers made up the majority of the 376 law enforcement operatives who waited 77 minutes before confronting and killing the 18-year-old gunman, Koskoff said.

Advertisement

The lawsuit, seeking at least $500m in damages, is the latest of several seeking accountability for the law enforcement response.

It is the first lawsuit to be filed after a 600-page Justice Department report was released in January that catalogued “cascading failures” in training, communication, leadership and technology problems on the day of the shooting.

The lawsuit notes that state troopers did not follow their active shooter training or confront the shooter, even as the students and teachers inside were following their own lockdown protocols of turning off lights, locking doors and staying silent.

“The protocols trap teachers and students inside, leaving them fully reliant on law enforcement to respond quickly and effectively,” the families and their lawyers said in a statement.

Families of victims filed a separate lawsuit in December 2022 against local and state police, the city, and other school and law enforcement officials seeking at least $27bn and class-action status for survivors.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending