World
How COVID is still hitting Europe hard and what the EU can do next

With practically three-quarters of the European Union’s inhabitants now totally vaccinated towards COVID and the Omicron wave receding, international locations have been rolling again restrictions.
However whereas wall-to-wall protection of the pandemic has receded amid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the illness is continuous to kill.
Within the seven days to 27 March, greater than 6,900 individuals misplaced their lives to COVID-19 within the EU/EEA, based on Our World in Information. Within the previous week, 33,000 individuals worldwide had died, 40% of which — 13,047 — had been within the World Well being Group’s (WHO) European area, which spans 53 international locations stretching to Central Asia.
The worldwide demise toll now stands over 6.1 million with greater than 1 million within the 31 international locations of the EU/EEA alone.
“I believe it is necessary to clarify that this pandemic isn’t over although many restrictions are being lifted throughout a number of higher-income international locations,” Rebecca Forman, a well being coverage advisor on the London Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences (LSE), pressured to Euronews.
Free testing and obligatory self-isolation for suspected circumstances or individuals with gentle signs have been dropped in quite a lot of international locations as have face masks necessities with some caveats similar to on public transport or in medical amenities. Using COVID passes — testifying that the holder has examined destructive, submitted to a full course of vaccination or recovered from the illness — has been drastically diminished domestically.
That is largely right down to the Omicron wave beginning to attract again from Europe and the area’s excessive vaccination fee.
Greater than 72% of the EU/EEA’s inhabitants have now acquired two doses of the vaccines, with greater than half additionally getting a booster shot. The numbers rise to 83.2% and 63.2% when solely individuals over the age of 18.
Vaccination fee won’t be excessive sufficient
For Forman, chopping obligatory testing and self-isolation may imply “governments are making themselves extra susceptible to being blindsided by this illness once more” and danger exacerbating inequalities as soon as extra with individuals not financially in a position to independently get examined and self-isolating more likely to be most impacted by the illness.
Moreover, the excessive vaccination fee may simply not be excessive sufficient.
“The issue is that as we speak Omicron BA1 (pressure) and much more so BA2 have a virological profile fairly near the measles virus which requires a vaccination protection near 95%,” Anne Senequier, a researcher at IRIS, a assume tank, advised Euronews.
So the EU’s vaccination fee “is sweet, however it’s nonetheless not sufficient”, she mentioned.
And, as Vasco Ricoca Peixoto, a researcher at Portugal’s Nationwide Faculty of Public Well being on the College of Lisboa, advised Euronews, the BA2 pressure of Omicron was fast to emerge, suggesting “the virus is mutating quick sufficient to scale back earlier immunity from mass vaccination and boosters and from numerous beforehand contaminated inhabitants”.
“That is nothing like different widespread respiratory virus patterns. COVID is turning into some of the infectious illness recognized to people (R0 above 8) even with earlier immunity,” he added.
And Europe at present stays the epicentre of the pandemic, with most EU international locations among the many minority of countries worldwide painted a brilliant pink within the European Centre for Illness Prevention and Management’s (ECDC) 14-day incidence fee map, which means there are a minimum of 960 circumstances per 100,000 habitants.
This means European healthcare methods proceed to be underneath necessary pressure.
One dose, two doses, three doses… 4 doses?
Regardless of this, EU leaders barely addressed the pandemic at their final summit in Brussels on 24 and 25 March. The 11-page-long conclusions of their assembly dedicate simply two paragraphs to COVID-19 to attest that leaders “reviewed coordination efforts” in response to the pandemic and “took inventory” of progress within the deployment of worldwide cooperation on world well being governance, together with on work to develop a future instrument to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
When the COVID-19 vaccines had been first rolled out, well being authorities worldwide emphasised that they weren’t a silver bullet towards the illness and as high-income international locations bought the vast majority of accessible doses, many consultants highlighted the pandemic wouldn’t be derailed till a big proportion of the world’s inhabitants had been additionally inoculated.
The emergence of the successive, extra transmissible variants has confirmed them proper.
Regardless of its excessive vaccination fee, Europeans are nonetheless susceptible to future variants which can be extra virulent and much more vaccine-resistant.
“It is true that immunity on these first-generation vaccines isn’t very efficient by way of time. We noticed this over the previous two and a half months. Already, with the Omicron variant, we have now an effectivity diminished to 50%,” Senequier mentioned. “It is good however we are able to see that it is not sustainable in the long run. There may be nonetheless a must generate second-generation vaccines.”
This, in fact, would imply that sooner or later within the close to future, Europeans will as soon as extra need to obtain a shot.
And the EU, which has to this point pledged to donate greater than 401 million doses to lower-income international locations — 344 million have been delivered — may and may donate extra, consultants say.
The EU Fee advised Euronews that “the EU has exported over half of the vaccines doses produced in Europe, over 2 billion doses, to 166 international locations all over the world”.
“At this level over 50% of the world inhabitants is vaccinated and a big a part of the doses mandatory for these vaccinations had been exported or shared by Europe. And we are going to do extra.”
“We are going to step up our effort to help Africa the place vaccination is decrease than in different elements of the world. Our intention is to make sure that 70% of the world’s inhabitants is vaccinated by the center of the 12 months.
“To win the battle towards this pandemic, it’s essential to hurry up the vaccination campaigns all over the place. Nobody will probably be protected till everyone seems to be protected,” the spokesperson additionally mentioned.
The EU’s well being sovereignty
Brussels and EU leaders, scarred by the primary few weeks of the pandemic when medical shortages had been rife, have in the meantime additionally pledged to achieve strategic well being sovereignty and to make healthcare methods on the Outdated Continent extra resilient and modern. This, in view to make sure it’s higher ready to react to future epidemics and pandemics.
However to this point, not a lot has been introduced. France, which at present holds the rotating EU presidency, has unveiled a €1.5 billion funding for an Essential Challenge of Frequent European Curiosity on Well being which goals, amongst different issues, to develop modern and greener applied sciences and manufacturing processes fof manufacturing medicines and to develop gene and cell therapies.
But the specter of extra harmful COVID-19 variants is actual and that is compounded by local weather change which boosts the danger of infectious ailments like COVID-19 as disease-carrying animals — similar to mosquitos and different biting bugs — more and more enterprise exterior their conventional habitats. whereas globalisation will do the remaining, because it did for COVID.
In the case of its preparedness for the present pandemic and what it may well subsequent unleash, Peixoto mentioned the EU “ought to agree widespread minimal really helpful measures for COVID-19 prevention. It is clear we nonetheless have one thing to achieve from it as a complete, our economies, our well being methods and our long run well being.”
“Undoubtedly the EU will need to have the aptitude of making, testing and producing its personal vaccines for public well being causes and for autonomy,” he additionally mentioned.
However Senequier pressured that in terms of well being, no nation or continent will be totally sovereign as a result of “the medical area may be very high-tech” and analysis requires a number of investments. At greatest, the EU may safe manufacturing for a few of the most used medication for a few of the commonest ailments however it would not be capable to produce the whole lot it wanted itself.
Well being methods ought to brace for extra shocks
However the EU may make a listing of who does what greatest — for example, France is famend for its medical analysis whereas Germany’s chemical trade is among the many world’s greatest — and develop networks to faucet into when one other pandemic hits.
“There can’t be a typical (sanitary) protocol within the area. We’ve got totally different well being methods, She mentioned. “The thought is to know what to do. As a result of what marked the start of COVID-19 in Europe is that everybody checked out one another dumbfounded, saying to themselves: “Rattling, it is occurring to us, and we’re not ready”,” she mentioned.
“Each disaster is all the time totally different and we’re all the time a step behind. So as we speak, to have the ability to come out with a protocol and say we will do it this manner, as a result of that is how it’s, that will maybe be one of many largest errors to make as a result of it could be too inflexible to withstand the subsequent disaster.
“I believe that we should deal with flexibility, on the interconnection between the totally different EU international locations to have the ability to take care of as a lot as attainable. We can’t be capable to be good for the subsequent crises, that is apparent, however in any case, we are able to begin to attempt to capitalise on the capacities of every nation and coordinate the whole lot in order that it is extra fluid,” she added.
Chief amongst that, in fact, is deciding who to observe. COVID-19 confirmed that the ECDC didn’t have the suitable sources to observe and implement measures to deal with the pandemic on the European degree whereas governments worldwide listened to the WHO however then relied totally on their very own nationwide well being authorities leading to very totally different and disparate measures.
Moreover, Foreman pressured, “it’s necessary to recognise {that a} shock to the well being system doesn’t all the time come within the type of an infectious sickness.”
“We’re two years into this pandemic and we’ve seen how a lot stress that’s placed on our well being methods and now we’re seeing elevated pressures on many European international locations’ well being methods because of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
“These occasions reveal how necessary it’s for our well being methods to be resilient to shocks – whether or not they’re infectious outbreaks, conflicts, pure disasters, or the rest. And sadly, with local weather change we’re more likely to face much more of those ‘shocks’ going ahead,” she added.

World
Video: U.K. Plans to Lower Voting Age in Major Electoral Reform

new video loaded: U.K. Plans to Lower Voting Age in Major Electoral Reform
transcript
transcript
U.K. Plans to Lower Voting Age in Major Electoral Reform
The British government said it wants to lower the voting age to 16 as part of a plan that has been described as the country’s largest expansion of voting rights in decades.
-
“I’m really happy about it because I’ve always been kind of frustrated just watching politics and not being able to do anything. And I know loads of other people who feel the same, who are really interested in politics and get frustrated at watching all the older people vote. And I just think it would be really amazing because so many of these policies affect younger people.” “I think it’s really important to give the younger generation an opinion and a vote on a lot of the issues that are facing the U.K. today. So yeah, if I was back in my day, if I was 16 or 17 and I got the opportunity to vote, I think that would be really, really good. It would have got me thinking about the political issues, the economical issues as well, at an early age.” “I think it’s a great opportunity for us to have more of a say in our future. And because at the end of the day, we decide who we vote in, and then this affects our decisions that affect us, whether it be health care, education and ultimately, jobs in the end.”
Recent episodes in International
International video coverage from The New York Times.
International video coverage from The New York Times.
World
Police search former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro's home, political headquarters

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Brazilian police have reportedly searched the home and political headquarters of former President Jair Bolsonaro. On Friday, police confirmed they carried out “two search and seizure warrants,” but did not specify whether Bolsonaro was the target, but local media outlets are reporting that he was.
Bolsonaro has been ordered to wear an ankle monitor, according to the Associated Press. Additionally, Bolsonaro has reportedly been banned from using social media or contacting others under investigation, the Associated Press reported, citing local media. This would include his son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, a Brazilian lawmaker residing in the U.S. who is known for having ties to President Donald Trump.
Criminal police agents stand in front State Secretariat of Penitentiary Administration headquarters as the former President Jair Bolsonaro in Brasilia, Brazil July 18, 2025. (REUTERS/Adriano)
RUBIO BANS OUTPOSTS COMMENTING ON ELECTIONS UNLESS ‘CLEAR & COMPELLING’ US INTEREST

Brazil’s former President Jair Bolsonaro arrives to the State Secretariat of Penitentiary Administration headquarters in Brasilia, Brazil July 18, 2025. (REUTERS/Adriano Machado)
Media outlets in Brazil are also reporting that the former president has been forbidden from leaving home between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Additionally, Bolsonaro is reportedly prohibited from contacting foreign ambassadors and diplomats.

Brazilian federal police searched former President Jair Bolsonaro’s home and political headquarters on July 18, 2025. (Reuters)
TRUMP CALLS FOR IMMEDIATE END TO ‘UNJUST’ TRIAL OF FORMER BRAZILIAN PRESIDENT JAIR BOLSONARO
On Thursday, Trump called for an immediate end to the trial, saying that Bolsonaro is the victim of an “unjust system.”
“I have seen the terrible treatment you are receiving at the hands of an unjust system turned against you. This should end immediately!” Trump wrote in a letter he sent to Bolsonaro, which the president posted on his Truth Social account Thursday evening.
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
World
Can Donald Trump fire Jerome Powell, US Federal Reserve chair?

President Donald Trump is sending mixed messages about whether he will fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
Trump said on July 16 he is “not planning on doing anything” when asked if he would fire Powell. However, he also said he doesn’t “rule out anything” and mentioned a renovation project with ballooning costs.
“I think it’s highly unlikely unless he has to leave for fraud,” Trump said. “And it’s possible there’s fraud involved with the $2.5, $2.7 billion renovation. This is a renovation, how do you spend $2.7 billion? And he didn’t have proper clearance.”
The Federal Reserve has been undergoing building renovations since 2021 on a project that the board that controls the Fed first approved in 2017. The project’s cost of $2.5bn is about $600m above the original budget, according to The Associated Press.
The cost has increased because of design changes, increasing labour and material costs and “unforeseen conditions”, such as “more asbestos than anticipated”, the Fed said in an FAQ.
But Trump’s administration seems to be using the renovation as a possible reason to oust Powell. Russ Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, sent Powell a July 10 letter saying the project is “out of compliance with the approved plan” and “in violation of” the National Capital Planning Act, which outlines how agencies can make changes to federal buildings.
Trump’s feud with Powell isn’t new. For months, the president has criticised Powell, whom he appointed to the role in 2017, for refusing to drop interest rates. The Fed raised interest rates in 2022 and 2023 during former President Joe Biden’s administration as a response to inflation.
Since Trump entered the White House in January, he has told Powell to resign and threatened to fire him.
“If I want him out, he’ll be out of there real fast, believe me,” Trump said in April. “I’m not happy with him.”
In November, after the 2024 election, reporters asked Powell if he would step down or whether he thought Trump had the authority to fire him.
“Not permitted under the law,” Powell said.
Trump spoke to a group of Republican lawmakers on July 15 about firing the chair, several news organisations reported. Trump showed lawmakers a draft letter firing Powell, The New York Times reported.
Trump denied having written a letter.
“No, I talked about the concept of firing him. I said, ‘What do you think?’ Almost every one of them said I should,” Trump said. “But I’m more conservative than they are.”
While Trump attributed his reticence to fire Powell to his “conservatism”, the bigger impediment is a question of legality. Here’s why.
What is the role of the Federal Reserve; who appoints its chair?
The Federal Reserve is the country’s central bank. Its responsibilities include setting interest rates and supervising and regulating banks. It was created in 1913 as part of the Federal Reserve Act and is run by an independent board of governors. The seven governors that make up the board are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The president selects the chair and two vice chairs from among the seven, according to the Congressional Research Service.
While talking to reporters, Trump appeared to overlook that he was the person who nominated Powell to be the chair in 2017: “I’m surprised he was appointed,” Trump said. “I was surprised, frankly, that Biden put him in and extended him.”
In 2021, Biden nominated him for a second four-year term, which is set to end in May 2026. After that, Powell can remain on the board of governors until January 2028.
Can the president fire the Federal Reserve chair?
Unlike other government agencies, the Fed has a lot of independence from Congress and the White House, the Congressional Research Service said in a January report.
According to the report, economists have justified the independence, saying that decisions about monetary policy shouldn’t be influenced by political pressures. To ensure Fed accountability, the chair testifies before Congress, much like other government agencies.
The Fed chair can be removed “for cause by the President”, according to the law. This refers to “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office”, according to a Supreme Court decision about the Federal Trade Commission.
In May, the Supreme Court ruled on Trump’s authority to fire members of two different independent agencies. In its 6-3 ruling, the Court granted the Trump administration’s emergency request to fire the heads of the agencies while the case over the legality of firing them played out in the courts.
In its opinion, the Supreme Court addressed the Fed, saying its ruling didn’t affect the agency.
“The Federal Reserve is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks of the United States,” the Supreme Court said.
Some legal experts question the legality of Trump firing Powell. Any move to oust him would likely end up in the courts.
Peter Conti-Brown, a professor of financial regulation at the University of Pennsylvania, said the Fed’s building renovation costs aren’t “cause” for Powell’s dismissal.
“There is no factual basis to support any conclusion that the cost overruns on the renovation project constitute anything like fraud or gross negligence,” Conti-Brown said. “Had Powell committed fraud, in this context or any other, there could well be a case for his removal.”
Conti-Brown said that Trump has long talked about wanting Powell’s removal. A court may consider Trump citing the renovation’s budget as “pretext” for his firing – a legal term used to describe a false reason an employer gives for firing an employee in order to cover the real reason, Conti-Brown said.
“Courts evaluating any attempted removal after the fact will assess both the animus and pretext very heavily against President Trump,” Conti-Brown said.
However, it is unclear how courts would react because “this is uncharted legal territory”, Jeremy Kress, a former Fed banking regulator who is a faculty director of the University of Michigan’s Center on Finance, Law and Policy, told The New York Times.
Lev Menand, a legal scholar at Columbia University, agreed with Kress.
“In normal times, I would say Powell wins 10 times out of 10,” Menand told The New York Times. “But these aren’t normal times, because this court has shown that it is willing to look the other way when the president engages in illegal conduct and it is willing to construe the president’s power under the Constitution as so broad as to allow the president to flout laws.”
-
News1 week ago
Video: Clashes After Immigration Raid at California Cannabis Farm
-
News1 week ago
Trump heads to Texas as recovery efforts from deadly flood continue
-
World1 week ago
New amnesty law for human rights abuses in Peru prompts fury, action
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Maalik Movie Review – Gulte
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
‘Doora Theera Yaana’ movie review: Mansore’s mature take on relationships is filled with relatable moments
-
Technology1 week ago
It’s the final day of Prime Day 2025, and the deals are still live
-
Politics1 week ago
Democrat John Fetterman declares support for ICE, condemning any calls for abolition as 'outrageous'
-
World1 week ago
Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,235