Connect with us

World

Dutch activists sue the king and ask for his powers to be reduced

Published

on

Dutch activists sue the king and ask for his powers to be reduced

Dutch activists have introduced the nation’s king to courtroom in an try to show that his function within the authorized system contravenes Europe’s human rights conventions.

Republiek, an anti-monarchist group, is arguing that the Dutch state ought to take away any provisions that enable the monarch to partake within the authorized system, together with appointing judges and approving authorized selections.

In a listening to on Wednesday, Republiek’s authorized consultant Ewout Jansen introduced the case in entrance of the Hague District Courtroom.

King Willem-Alexander exercised his proper to not seem in individual, having his private lawyer Reimer Veldhuis symbolize him as an alternative — one other privilege the activist group believes offers him an unfair benefit.

Veldhuis can also be the nation’s legal professional common.

Advertisement

As an alternative of attending the listening to, King Willem-Alexander opted to swear in two new judges to the Dutch Supreme Courtroom, mere kilometres away at his Noordeinde Palace in The Hague centre.

The king’s portrait was, nevertheless, prominently displayed within the courtroom — one other customized Republiek wish to see abolished.

Betraying the folks’s belief?

As Jansen defined to Euronews, his shoppers have put collectively a listing of 18 procedural points that they imagine will not be merely symbolic, because the nation’s authorities claims.

In accordance with him, Willem-Alexander’s delayed response in signing off on emergency measures in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic is indicative of how the monarch’s function is much from simply figurative.

Two nameless sources near the king tipped off the group that the king stalled in making the choice, which put stress on the federal government and the well being providers within the nation as circumstances soared.

Advertisement

“He requested for a few weeks’ time to contemplate it. And this was very tense to the federal government due to the urgency of the matter — the lockdown needed to come into impact shortly,” Jansen stated.

“We imagine that this (reveals it) will not be a symbolic matter because the state argued. Though I’ve to confess it largely is, typically apparently it isn’t.”

The Dutch king had come beneath fireplace for his actions in the course of the pandemic twice in 2020 — first, in August, when he and Queen Maxima have been pictured breaking social distancing guidelines throughout a visit to Greece.

They travelled to Greece once more in October of the identical yr however needed to lower their journey quick as many within the Netherlands felt it was unfair for the royals to hunt leisure because the nation underwent partial lockdown.

Willem-Alexander apologised in a video assertion along with Maxima, saying it “hurts to have betrayed (the folks’s) belief in us”.

Advertisement

Whereas different royals, just like the Belgian prince who contracted COVID-19 whereas vacationing in Spain, have been penalised for his or her disregard of measures in place, the Dutch royal courtroom was not sanctioned in both of the 2 circumstances.

The Netherlands are one of many final remaining kingdoms in Europe the place the monarch is legally inviolable — which means that they can’t be held accountable for his or her actions by any state physique.

In political issues, as co-signatories to any legal guidelines and selections, it’s, in actual fact, the ministers who’re seen as accountable in entrance of the parliament.

However in authorized proceedings, akin to Republiek’s case, the decide can’t query the king, solely his legal professional. 

‘A human being in spite of everything’

In accordance with Jansen, different examples from the previous additionally level to the truth that the monarch’s selections might be subjective and inclined to vary.

Advertisement

Within the aftermath of World Struggle II, the Netherlands prosecuted quite a lot of Nazi German collaborators and warfare criminals, with some receiving the dying penalty.

Nevertheless, Queen Juliana had grown more and more reluctant to authorise the executions, as an alternative commuting them to life in jail.

Jansen believes that this created a discrepancy the place shorter courtroom circumstances for small-fry collaborators meant that they ended up getting executed, whereas their higher-ups — whose trials have been extra sophisticated and went on for longer — have been, in actual fact, spared.

“It was a bizarre request from the start. The federal government needed to on the one hand ask for the dying penalty for many who collaborated with the Germans.”

“However, they felt that it could be greatest if the queen would pardon them after the judgements — to channel the anger of the Dutch folks, but additionally to not execute everybody. However the queen refused this, and so they have been shot,” he defined.

Advertisement

“However later within the ‘70s, the queen refused to signal the dying penalty for the people who have been collaborating as a result of she believed it was mistaken — in each circumstances, I imagine this was the sentiment of the entire nation.”

“However it turned out that the circumstances that have been shortly completed have been regarding these with much less duty for the crimes. So on the finish of the day, the individuals who did the nastiest stuff lived, and the decrease working folks have been shot,” Jansen stated.

In at the moment’s phrases, this goes to indicate that though the monarch’s resolution would possibly mirror fashionable opinion, it nonetheless permits for a subjective studying of the regulation by the sovereign, “which could be very human”, Jansen identified. 

But it additionally illustrates that the Dutch monarch can have an affect on judicial proceedings as they act as a decide themselves. Moreover, their selections may not symbolize the need of the voters.

How fashionable is the Dutch king as of late?

In the meantime, an argument is being made by the activists that the royals’ reputation among the many Dutch has been on the lower.

Advertisement

Republiek introduced the lawsuit in 2020 and raised €35,000 by crowdfunding for the proceedings inside mere days. 

“You see extra folks being crucial of the royal home, and fewer folks assist the monarchy,” the group’s chairperson Floris Müller stated in the course of the press convention on Wednesday.

An April 2022 ballot by Statista reveals that Dutch residents need the nation to stay a monarchy, with 58% selecting that over it changing into a republic.

But, it is a important dip compared to the overwhelming assist for the royal home through the years, with information from survey company TNS NIPO suggesting that between 85-90% of individuals within the Netherlands have been in favour of it remaining a kingdom because the Sixties.

The Republiek’s case, nevertheless, will not be searching for to strip the king of his title or rid the nation of its royal household. 

Advertisement

As an alternative, the listening to on Wednesday and the choice — set for 8 March 2023 — are about seeing the monarch’s affect on the judicial system minimised or eliminated altogether.

And in response to Jansen, the group is able to take the case to the Strasbourg-based European Courtroom of Human Rights if want be.

“This isn’t about this king or that king being fashionable or not fashionable,” he stated. “He isn’t a one-man supreme courtroom.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

US Supreme Court's slow pace on immunity makes Trump trial before election unlikely

Published

on

US Supreme Court's slow pace on immunity makes Trump trial before election unlikely
Donald Trump’s bid for criminal immunity from prosecution for trying to overturn his 2020 election loss is set to be decided on Monday by the U.S. Supreme Court. But however it rules, the court already has helped the former president in his effort to avoid trial before the Nov. 5 election.
Continue Reading

World

Bolivia grapples with aftermath of failed coup attempt as nation strives to restore stability

Published

on

Bolivia grapples with aftermath of failed coup attempt as nation strives to restore stability
  • Bolivia has been left reeling after troops, led by General Juan José Zúñiga, briefly seized the presidential palace in La Paz during an attempted coup.
  • Military forces seized control of La Paz using armored vehicles and tear gas against protesters.
  • Authorities arrested Zúñiga as his soldiers retreated from central La Paz.

Calm returned to Bolivia’s capital on Thursday after troops led by a top general stormed the presidential palace, then quickly retreated, tumultuous scenes that threatened to pitch the long-troubled South American democracy into chaos.

The nation of 12 million watched in shock and bewilderment Wednesday as Bolivian military forces appeared to turn on the government of President Luis Arce, seizing control of the capital’s main square with armored personnel carriers, crashing a tank into the palace and unleashing tear gas on protesters who flooded the streets.

The country’s army chief, Gen. Juan José Zúñiga, addressed a scrum of TV reporters from the palace, vowing to “restore democracy,” replace the cabinet, and free political prisoners.

BOLIVIAN PRESIDENT SURVIVES FAILED COUP, CALLS FOR ‘DEMOCRACY TO BE RESPECTED,’ ARMY GENERAL ARRESTED

But as opposition leaders condemned the apparent coup attempt, it became clear that the coup had no meaningful political support. Arce refused to relent and named a new army commander, who immediately ordered troops to stand down, ending the rebellion after just three chaotic and head-snapping hours. Hundreds of Arce’s supporters rushed the square outside the palace, waving Bolivian flags, singing the national anthem and cheering.

Bolivian police hold the detained Juan Jose Zuniga, former general commander of the Army, in La Paz, Bolivia, on June 26, 2024. Calm returned to Bolivia’s capital on Thursday after troops led by a top general stormed the presidential palace, then quickly retreated, tumultuous scenes that threatened to pitch the long-troubled South American democracy into chaos. (AP Photo/Juan Karita)

Advertisement

“Here we are, firm, in the presidential palace, to confront any coup attempt,” Arce said after facing down Gen. Zúñiga, calling on Bolivians to mobilize in defense of democracy.

Authorities swiftly arrested Zúñiga as his soldiers retreated from central La Paz, crushing the apparent coup attempt and defusing the latest crisis in a country wracked by a bitter political rivalry and economic crisis.

“Their goal was to overturn the democratically elected authority,” Government Minister Eduardo del Castillo told journalists in announcing the arrests of Zúñiga along with an alleged co-conspirator, former navy Vice Adm. Juan Arnez Salvador.

BOLIVIAN PRESIDENT WARNS ‘IRREGULAR’ MILITARY DEPLOYMENT UNDERWAY IN CAPITAL, RAISING COUP FEARS

The short-lived rebellion followed months of mounting tensions between Arce and his one-time ally, former President Evo Morales. Bolivia’s first Indigenous president, Morales remains a global leftist icon and towering figure in national politics years after mass protests that prompted him to resign and flee in 2019 — an ouster his supporters view as a coup.

Advertisement

Since returning from exile, Morales has staged a dramatic political comeback. Threatening to challenge Arce in 2025 primaries, Morales has sparked an unprecedented rift in their ruling socialist party. The feud has paralyzed efforts to resolve a spiraling economic crisis, with the country’s foreign currency reserves diminishing, its natural gas exports plummeting and its currency peg collapsing.

Juan Arnez Salvador

Police hold the detained Juan Arnez Salvador, ex-commander general of the Bolivian Navy, in La Paz, Bolivia, on June 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Juan Karita)

As police in riot gear set up blockades outside the presidential palace, Bolivians — though no stranger to political conflict in a country that has witnessed some 190 coups by one count — thronged ATMs, formed long lines outside gas stations and emptied shelves in grocery stores and pharmacies.

Flanked by the newly appointed military chiefs late Wednesday, Defense Minister Edmundo Novillo sought to reassure the rattled public and shed light on what had happened.

The turmoil began earlier this week, Novillo said, when Arce dismissed Zuñiga in a private meeting Tuesday over the army chief’s threats to arrest Morales if he proceeded with his presidential bid in 2025. In their meeting, Novillo said that Zuñiga gave officials no indication he was preparing to seize power.

“He admitted that he had committed some excesses,” Novillo said of Zuñiga. “We said goodbye in the most friendly way, with hugs. Zuñiga said that he would always be at the side of the president.”

Advertisement

The frantic palace takeover began hours later. Tailed by armored vehicles and supporters, Zuñiga burst into government headquarters and declared that he was sick of political infighting. “The armed forces intend to restore the democracy,” he said.

Supporters of Bolivian President Luis Arce enter Plaza Murillo

Supporters of Bolivian President Luis Arce enter Plaza Murillo amid tear gas launched by military police in La Paz, Bolivia, on June 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Juan Karita)

Members of the country’s fragmented opposition, which Zuñiga claimed to support, rejected the coup before it was clear it had failed. Former interim President Jeanine Áñez, detained for her role in Morales’ 2019 ouster, said that soldiers sought to “destroy the constitutional order” but appealed to both Arce and Morales not to run in the 2025 elections.

The mutiny by a lifelong member of the military with a low political profile stirred confusion. Just before his arrest, Zúñiga claimed that President Arce himself had asked the general to storm the palace in a ploy to boost the embattled leader’s popularity.

“The president told me: ‘The situation is very screwed up, very critical. It is necessary to prepare something to raise my popularity,’” Zúñiga quoted the Bolivian leader as saying.

Advertisement

Justice Minister Iván Lima denied Zúñiga’s claims, insisting the general was lying to justify his actions. Prosecutors will seek the maximum sentence of 15 to 20 years in prison for Zúñiga on charges of “attacking the constitution,” he said.

Analysts said that, more than anything, Wednesday’s events underscored the weakness of Bolivia’s democratic institutions.

“This grants control to the military and erodes democracy and is an important signpost that the problems of the 2019 coup have not been addressed,” said Kathryn Ledebur, director of the Andean Information Network, a Bolivia-based research group. “Bolivia’s democracy remains very fragile, and definitely a great deal more fragile today than it was yesterday.”

Continue Reading

World

Caribbean braces for ‘very dangerous’ Hurricane Beryl

Published

on

Caribbean braces for ‘very dangerous’ Hurricane Beryl

DEVELOPING STORY,

Storm begins to shut down southeast Caribbean amid urgent pleas from government officials for people to take shelter.

Much of the southeast Caribbean is on alert as Beryl strengthens into the first hurricane of the 2024 Atlantic season, with forecasters warning of a “very dangerous” Category 3 storm.

The US National Hurricane Center (NHC) said Beryl – churning in the Atlantic Ocean about 675km (420 miles) east of Barbados – at 12:30 GMT on Sunday was expected to bring “life-threatening winds and storm surge” when it reaches the Windward Islands early on Monday.

Barbados, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Grenada were all under hurricane warnings, while tropical storm warnings or watches were in effect for Martinique, Tobago and Dominica, the NHC said in its latest advisory.

Advertisement

Cars were seen lined up at filling stations in the Barbadian capital, Bridgetown, while supermarkets and grocery stores were crowded with shoppers buying food, water and other supplies. Some households were already boarding up their properties.

Beryl is now only the third Category 3 hurricane ever recorded in the Atlantic in June, following Audrey in 1957 and Alma in 1966, according to hurricane expert Michael Lowry.

“Only five major [Category 3+] hurricanes have been recorded in the Atlantic before the first week of July. Beryl would be the sixth and earliest this far east in the tropical Atlantic,” Lowry posted on X.

‘Devastating wind damage expected’

The NHC said by about 5am (09:00 GMT) on Sunday, Beryl’s maximum sustained wind speed had increased to nearly 100mph (160kmph) with higher gusts. Such a powerful storm forming this early in the Atlantic hurricane season – which runs from early June to late November – is extremely rare, experts said.

“Hurricane conditions are expected in the hurricane warning area beginning early on Monday,” the NHC said, warning of heavy rain, flooding and storm surge that could raise water levels as much as 9 feet (2.7 metres) above normal.

Advertisement

“Devastating wind damage is expected where the eyewall of Beryl moves through portions of the Windward Islands,” the NHC added, indicating wind speeds in some locations could be 30 percent stronger than those listed in their advisory.

Beryl is likely to pass just south of Barbados early on Monday and then head into the Caribbean Sea as a major hurricane on a path towards Jamaica. It is expected to weaken by midweek but remain a hurricane as it heads towards Mexico.

Forecasters warned of a life-threatening storm surge in areas where Beryl will make landfall, with up to 6 inches (150mm) of rain for Barbados and nearby islands.

The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said in late May that it expects this year to be an “extraordinary” hurricane season, with up to seven storms of Category 3 or higher.

The agency cited warm Atlantic Ocean temperatures and conditions related to the weather phenomenon La Nina in the Pacific for the expected increase in storms.

Advertisement

Extreme weather events including hurricanes have become more frequent and devastating in recent years as a result of climate change.

Continue Reading

Trending