Connect with us

World

COP27: EU intends to oppose separate fund for climate reparations

Published

on

COP27: EU intends to oppose separate fund for climate reparations

The European Union, the world’s wealthiest single market, intends to oppose the creation of a brand-new worldwide fund for local weather reparations, the exact same matter anticipated to dominate talks at COP27.

“We don’t need discussions to focus on a brand new fund,” a senior EU official mentioned on Friday, talking on situation of anonymity.

“It is a a lot greater story than a selected fund.”

Local weather reparations, also called loss and injury, consult with the monetary funds that creating nations from the International South demand from the industrialised International North in an effort to compensate the irreversible havoc wreaked by the local weather disaster.

Low-income international locations argue they’re disproportionally affected by excessive climate phenomena, resembling devastating floods and longer-than-usual droughts, regardless that their launch of greenhouse gasoline emissions has been negligible in comparison with that of the North.

Advertisement

A 2020 examine printed in The Lancet revealed the International North was accountable for 92% of extra world carbon emissions for the reason that creation of the Industrial Revolution, when burning fossil fuels turned the norm.

The EU and the UK contributed to about 29% of all emitted gasses.

The worldwide neighborhood has already dedicated to boost €100 billion per 12 months for creating international locations, however this cash is designed to give attention to mitigation (lowering the impression on greenhouse gasoline emissions) and adaption (stopping and minimising the adversarial results of local weather change.)

The annual goal has by no means been met. 

The International South considers local weather reparations, which relate to everlasting destruction, as a 3rd, separate pillar on this equation. For that purpose, they demand the creation of a brand-new fund, completely distinct from the €100 billon destined for mitigation and adaptation.

Advertisement

There is no such thing as a agreed-upon determine that displays the precise extent of loss and injury, though some research have put the quantity between €290 billion and €580 billion per 12 months by 2030, and as much as €1.8 trillion by 2050.

“Loss and injury are taking place now, hurting folks and economies now, and have to be addressed now,” UN Secretary-Basic António Guterres mentioned final month.

“This can be a elementary query of local weather justice, worldwide solidarity and belief.”

The contentious difficulty stoke tensions final 12 months at COP26 in Glasgow, when a coalition of 134 creating international locations, along with China, pushed to incorporate reparations within the conclusions, solely to be met with American and European resistance.

The talk is now anticipated to return again, probably stronger than ever, at COP27 in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt.

Advertisement

“We’d like precise cash,” Avinash Persaud, particular envoy to the Barbados prime minister, mentioned forward of the summit.

‘Nobody-size-fits-all answer’

Regardless of the rising calls coming from all corners of the South, the EU intends to carry its floor and oppose, a minimum of in the interim, the institution of a monetary fund.

It’s believed that such a fund might open the door for countless authorized claims towards the EU, the UK, the US and different rich nations, whose carbon footprint dates again centuries.

The bloc, nevertheless, seems to be prepared to maneuver ahead the dialog across the hot-button matter and establish the precise wants of every creating nation on the frontline.

This course of ought to happen by means of the so-called Santiago Community, a system of technical help launched in 2019 that’s but to change into totally operational.

Advertisement

“The wants of nations are very completely different. There is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all answer for loss and injury,” mentioned the senior EU official.

An identical tone was struck by John Kerry, the US’ particular local weather envoy, who final month admitted his nation had a “duty” and wouldn’t be “obstructing” the dialogue on loss and injury at COP27.

Kerry, like his European counterparts, averted the time period “reparation,” which has politically delicate implications.

Officers in Brussels insist that any potential compensation ought to be first addressed by means of current mechanisms, together with humanitarian and growth assist, earlier than any recent cash is placed on the desk. 

“There is a concern that, if we focus solely on creating a brand new fund with out finishing the required dialog, we are going to spend the following years negotiating that fund,” mentioned one other EU official.

Advertisement

“We get lots of pushback from creating nations. That is type of counter-intuitive as a result of all of the monetary flows should be reformed in an effort to handle the entire problem of local weather motion.”

Officers additionally stress that the main focus of local weather finance ought to stay, before everything, on local weather mitigation, which is supposed to deal with present-day threats and will help scale back residual injury.

However cracks within the EU’s adamant opposition have begun exhibiting.

In September, Denmark turned the primary Western nation to supply loss and injury compensation: 100 million Danish crowns (€13.4 million) to creating nations.

Final month, German Overseas Minister Annalena Baerbock mentioned her nation would “work towards a good sharing of the prices” at COP27 and attempt to place loss and injury “on the agenda.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Kremlin condemns NATO boss's appeal for Ukraine to use Western arms in Russia

Published

on

Kremlin condemns NATO boss's appeal for Ukraine to use Western arms in Russia
The Kremlin scolded NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg on Monday for suggesting alliance members should let Ukraine strike deep into Russia with Western weapons, and said it was clear that NATO was in a direct confrontation with Russia.
Continue Reading

World

Memorial Day ceremony held in Baghdad to honor US Army soldiers killed in Iranian-backed drone attack

Published

on

Memorial Day ceremony held in Baghdad to honor US Army soldiers killed in Iranian-backed drone attack

U.S. Military personnel stationed in Baghdad, Iraq held a Memorial Day service Monday to honor the three U.S. Army soldiers who were killed in a drone attack in Jordan earlier this year. 

Combined Joint Task Force Operation Inherent Resolve presented the ceremonial wreath at the Memorial Day ceremony at the Union III base, in Baghdad’s Green Zone. Those in attendance paid their respects to the fallen service members. 

U.S. Army Maj. Gen. J.B. Vowell, Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve Commanding General, writes the name of a fallen service member on the Memorial Day wall during a ceremony at Union III in Baghdad, Iraq, May 27, 2024.  (U.S. Army)

Staff Sgt. William Rivers, 46, Sgt. Kennedy Sanders, 24, and Sgt. Breonna Moffett, 23, were killed Jan. 28 after a drone attack by an Iranian proxy group hit Tower 22, a small U.S. outpost in northeast Jordan, on the Iraq, Syria, Jordan tri-border, where they were stationed. 

BIDEN ADMIN REVERSES COURSE, GRANTS PERMIT FOR CATHOLIC GROUP’S MEMORIAL DAY MASS AT NATIONAL CEMETERY

Advertisement
us soldiers killed in jordan

L-R: Sgt. William Rivers, Spc. Breonna Moffett, and Spc. Kennedy Sanders.  (Fox News )

The soldiers had been stationed at Tower 22 just across the border from Syria to support the mission to defeat ISIS. 

At its height, over 100,000 people lived there, blocked by Jordan from entering into the kingdom at a time when concerns about infiltration by the extremist group were rampant. Those concerns grew out of a 2016 car bomb attack there, that killed seven Jordanian border guards.

Operation Inherent Resolve soldiers stand in formation and salute the United States flag during a Memorial Day ceremony at Union III in Baghdad, Iraq, May 27, 2024. (U.S. Army)

The camp has dwindled in the time since to some 7,500 people because of a lack of supplies, per United Nations estimates.

The Memorial Day Wall at Union III in Baghdad, Iraq, May 27, 2024.  (U.S. Army)

The base began as a Jordanian border observation outpost, then saw an increased U.S. presence after American forces entered Syria in late 2015. The small installation includes U.S. engineering, aviation, logistics and security troops with about 350 U.S. Army and Air Force personnel deployed there.

A U.S Army soldier assigned to 1st Battalion, 181st Infantry Regiment, 44th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, New Jersey National Guard, plays Amazing Grace on bagpipes during the Memorial Day ceremony at Union III in Baghdad, Iraq, May 27, 2024. (U.S. Army)

Advertisement

Rivers, Sanders and Moffett were all assigned to the 718th Engineer Company, an Army Reserve unit based in Fort Moore, Georgia, previously known as Fort Benning.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

World

EU convenes Israel to discuss respect of human rights, ICJ ruling

Published

on

EU convenes Israel to discuss respect of human rights, ICJ ruling

The breakthrough comes three month after Ireland and Spain first pressed on the EU executive to re-open its trade deal with Israel.

ADVERTISEMENT

European Union foreign ministers unanimously agreed on Monday to call for an Association Council with Israel to discuss the country’s compliance with its human rights obligations under the EU-Israel trade deal, also known as the Association Agreement.

The bloc also intends to use the meeting to confront Netanyahu’s government about its compliance with Friday’s ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which ordered Israel to halt its intended military offensive in the city of Rafah.

The move comes three months after Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and the then Taoiseach Leo Varadkar first made a plea for the urgent review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, citing serious concerns over Israel’s military campaign in Gaza and potential violations of human rights and international law.

Article 2 of that agreement, struck in 2000, stipulates that the agreement is “based on respect for human rights and democratic principles.”

Europe is Israel’s main trading partner, accounting for just under a third of all commerce, meaning the Agreement is seen as a powerful tool for the bloc to exert pressure on Netanyahu’s war cabinet to refrain from its offensive in the war-torn Gaza Strip.

Advertisement

Despite the firm backing of human rights groups and the UN’s special rapporteur on Palestine, the EU had failed to garner political backing for the move until the breakthrough on Monday.

“We got the necessary unanimity to call for an Association Council with Israel to discuss the situation in Gaza (…) and the respect of human rights under the obligations that Israel has assumed under the Association Council and how they plan to implement the ruling of the court,” Borrell told reporters, referring to Friday’s ruling by the Hague-based court.

“But what we have seen since the court has issued its ruling (is) not the stop of military activities but on the contrary an increase in the military activities, an increase in the bombing and an increase in the casualties to the civilian people, as we have seen last night,” Borrell added.

On Sunday, an Israeli air strike on a camp of displaced Palestinians in the southern Gazan town of Rafah left at least 45 dead, including women and children, prompting global condemnation.

“The last figure seems to be around 40 people, including a small children being burned. I condemn this in the strongest terms. It proves that there is no safe place in Gaza,” Borrell said, describing the images, including those of burnt children, coming out of Rafah as “shocking.”

Advertisement

The IDF has since opened an investigation into the massacre, claiming it was targeting two senior Hamas officials.

EU foreign ministries have harshly criticised the attack, with the German foreign ministry saying the “images of charred bodies” are “unbearable.”

Bloc ups pressure on Israel amid diplomatic spats

Responding to the decision to convene an Association Council, Belgian foreign minister Hadja Lahbib said the move was a “strong signal.”

“We must ensure that our rules and values are respected by all, and above all by our partners like Israel. Our credibility depends on it,” Lahbib, whose government is a staunch supporter of the Palestinians, added.

Other foreign ministers, such as Slovenia’s Tanja Fajon, called for the bloc to go further by slapping sanctions on Israel for its continued violations of international law in its Gaza offensive.

Advertisement

“I strongly condemn Israel’s attack last night on the displaced Palestinians, in which many children were also burned to death,” Fajon, whose government is taking steps to recognise the State of Palestine, said on social media platform X.

“In Brussels (…) today I will stand up for respect for international humanitarian law and decision (of the) ICJ. In case of continuing violations, (the) EU must react uniformly and decisively, including sanctions,” Fajon added.

Borrell declined to comment on whether he believed his Israeli counterparts would agree to attend the Association Council, amid increasing diplomatic tensions with two member states – Ireland and Spain – which announced last Wednesday they would formally recognise the State of Palestine tomorrow, May 28.

ADVERTISEMENT

A diplomatic row has since erupted, particularly between Israel and Borrell’s native Spain, with Israeli foreign minister Israel Katz issuing a statement Monday morning announcing his government would prohibit Spain from providing consular services to Palestinians in the West Bank.

Katz has also accused Spain’s recognition of Palestine as a “reward for terrorism.”

Borrell described the escalation as “everything but diplomatic.” “This is a completely unjustified and extreme verbal aggression,” he added.

Advertisement

The bloc’s top diplomat also acknowledged there was no unanimous appetite to consider sanctioning Israel for its actions in Gaza but suggested their stance could shift if Netanyahu’s government “continues to ignore” the ICJ’s ruling.

Continue Reading

Trending