Wyoming
Rural Wyoming Co-ops To Get More Green Power From Colorado-Based…
The parent group of several rural electricity cooperatives operating in Wyoming has reached a major milestone in a complex energy transition plan that it hopes will hold the line on wholesale power rates with a boost coming from a growing supply of green power.
Colorado-based Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, a supplier of electricity to cooperatives across the Western United States that was founded more than 75 years ago, has launched a new power buying program to help keep the lid on rates. That’s after its largest member in Colorado paid $627 million to leave Tri-State with the hope of finding cheaper power supply deals elsewhere.
Following the move, a major credit rating agency upgraded the association’s billions of dollars in debt July 31, a move that will improve the organization’s future borrowing costs needed to implement a future green power spending plan.
Tri-State is focused on buying electricity wholesale from suppliers for either their own use, or because they are a supplier to retail or industrial consumers.
Tri-State is optimistic that its new power buying program that relies on green power delivered over hundreds of miles of high-voltage transmission lines in Wyoming and other adjoining states will keep wholesale rates in check.
The new power buying opportunity for rural Wyoming electricity cooperatives is the result of a federal regulatory agency decision made earlier this month.
The agency, called the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission (FERC) regulates high-voltage power lines in the United States, including transmission delivery rates.
This month, FERC approved a plan submitted by Tri-State, the parent of Wyoming’s electric cooperatives, that effectively gives them the flexibility to draw up to 40% of their power needs through a new program designed to move green power over the high-voltage grid, called Bring Your Own Resource (BYOR).
There are eight rural electric cooperatives in Wyoming that are members of Tri-State.
More Renewable Power
The BYOR program is the result of significant guidance and input from Tri-State’s member electric cooperatives and public power districts, which now have increased flexibility to own or contract for their own energy projects.
The electricity is expected to come largely from renewable energy projects, like wind turbines or solar panels.
Tri-State is a nonprofit cooperative with 44 members, including 41 electric distribution cooperatives and public power districts in four states that provide electricity to more than 1 million consumers across nearly 200,000 square miles in Colorado, Nebraska, New Mexico and Wyoming.
In Wyoming, Tri-State’s distribution cooperatives include Big Horn Rural Electric Co. in Basin; Carbon Power & Light Inc. in Saratoga; Garland Light & Power Co. in Powell; High Plains Power Inc. in Riverton; High West Energy Inc. in Pine Bluffs; Niobrara Electric Association Inc. in Lusk; Wheatland Rural Electric Association in Wheatland; and Wyrulec Co. in Torrington.
The general managers of seven of the cooperatives in Wyoming were not immediately available to comment on the benefits of the new green-energy buying opportunity.
Jeff Umphlett, the general manager of Big Horn Rural Electric, declined to comment on the BYOB program until “issues are settled.”
Improved Credit
The BYOB comes on the heels of a major credit rating upgrade by S&P Global Ratings, a New York City-based credit rating agency that has influence over the interest rates companies like Tri-State pay to borrow money.
S&P revised its outlook to stable from negative on a few billions of dollars in debt held by Tri-State.
The outlook revision reflects the withdrawal of United Power Inc., Tri-State’s largest member, from the association on May 1.
The exit was seen as removing an impediment to Tri-State’s energy transition plan.
According to S&P, Tri-State received a $627 million contract termination payment from Brighton, Colorado-based United Power, that was used to pay down debt.
“We view the contract termination payments established by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as a potential disincentive for additional member distribution cooperatives to sever their ties with Tri-State,” said S&P credit analyst David Bodek in a July 31 statement.
Tri-State management has stated that it will apply the proceeds of the exit fee to offset portions of its $2.6 billion, five-year capital improvement plan and to reduce its $3.4 billion in existing debt by about 13%, according to Bodek.
Tri-State spokesman Lee Boughey said that the Bring Your Own Resource plan gives member cooperatives in its network the leeway to draw power resources from local power plants.
The member organizations had been restricted to 5% supplies locally, but now can bring in up to 40%, Boughey said.
“It doesn’t necessarily have to be all green power, but they can self supply their own power.”
Tri-State is clearly taking steps to exit coal-fired power plants over the next few years.
The 1,427-megawatt Craig Station in northwestern Colorado should be fully retired by the beginning of 2028, Boughey said.
Tri-State owns Craig’s Unit 3, and operates Units 1 and 2 with other utility interests involved. The latter two units will be retired in 2025 and 2028, respectively.
Other Tri-State-owned coal-fired plants have been retired in recent years, including the 100-megawatt Nucla Station in 2019 and Escalante Station in northern New Mexico the following year. It plans to close
Tri-State said that there are no plans to retire the 1,710-megawatt coal-fired Laramie River Station in Wheatland, Wyoming, but will close Arizona’s Springerville Station 458-MW Unit 3 in 2031.
The Springerville power plant is a 1,765-megawatt, four-unit generating facility in eastern Arizona near the New Mexico border.
“Our resource plans remain on track and by the end of next year, 50% of the energy our members use will come from clean energy, rising to 70% in 2030, with significant greenhouse gas reductions,” said Tri-State CEO Duane Highley, in a statement in May after United exited from his association.
“Our resource planning establishes a high standard for reliability, even in extreme weather events, and our wholesale rates will remain competitive for our members,” Highley said.
Good Luck
“We wish United Power and its consumer-members well as they go off on their own,” he said.
United Power President and CEO Mark Gabriel was not immediately available for comment.
United Power, which is now Colorado’s third largest utility, served notice to Tri-State in 2022 that it was leaving the cooperative because of Tri-State’s failure to control power costs and invest in more “local generation.”
Tri-State’s 5,800-mile transmission network relies on more than 30 power generation resources and in 2031, members will share more than 50 resources, including more than 2,200-megawatts of wind and solar resources.
Looking ahead, Tri-State is rapidly looking to rely more on alternative sources of power production.
In 2024 and 2025, Tri-State will add 595 megawatts of new solar, according to a Tri-State statement.
This additional power generation will help with iTri-State’s electric resource plan filed with regulators. That plan calls for Tri-State to meet an 89% greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal in Colorado in 2030, the retirement of four coal-fired generation units between 2025 and 2031, and the addition of 1,250-megawatts of additional renewable energy resources and energy storage between 2026 and 2031.
Tri-State managed to hold its rates stable for seven years through 2023 before increasing them about 6.3% for 2024 to $77.91 a delivered megawatt-hour of electricity.
United’s Gabriel has previously stated that he could buy power on the open market at a $60 to $65 price.
The main complaints that co-ops have voiced about Tri-State are that the association’s rates are high, its 50-year contracts are too long and require the
cooperatives to buy 95% of their electricity from the association, thwarting efforts to develop local projects.
Pat Maio can be reached at pat@cowboystatedaily.com.
Wyoming
WHSAA warns of possible changes to statewide athletics and activities following budget cuts
CASPER, Wyo. — High school athletics in Wyoming could see some drastic changes in the coming years following legislative changes to the state’s education budget, the Wyoming High School Activities Association recently announced in a statement.
According to the WHSAA, Wyoming school districts are facing a projected $3.9 million shortfall in activities funding, forcing officials to consider significant cuts to high school sports and extracurricular programs.
The WHSAA shared details regarding a new “silo” funding model implemented by the Legislature, stating that the recalibrated block grant model reduced funding for student activities and extra-duty responsibilities from $46.3 million to $42.4 million, an approximately 8.4% decrease statewide.
WHSAA Commissioner Trevor Wilson said the restructuring also restricts district access to an additional $76.2 million in previously flexible funding.
“A significant portion of the [April 28 WHSAA Board of Directors] meeting was dedicated to discussing the projected funding shortfall,” Wilson wrote.
The WHSAA is weighing several strategies to address rising costs with fewer resources. Proposed changes include eliminating regional tournaments and reducing the number of teams qualifying for state events from eight to four; limiting wrestling to two classes and restricting track and field state participants to the top 16 marks; making cuts to soccer, indoor track and field, Nordic and Alpine skiing, swimming and diving, spring golf and tennis; and reducing in-person speech and debate events by half and centrally locating All-State Music events to minimize travel. The board also recommended increasing gate admission or implementing student participation fees to offset costs.
While the WHSAA release states that no plans have been finalized and the various changes are currently just possibilities, Natrona County School District 1 Board of Trustees member Mary Schmidt criticized the WHSAA’s handling of the news at Monday’s board meeting.
“I take some issues with this, [including] the sheer fact that we as Board of Trustees members have not talked about that at all,” Schmidt said. “It is not our intent and it has not been brought to us to cut our athletics or activities budget for the upcoming school year. … I take issue with them picking sports and getting the community upset and ginning them up to be upset that this is all going to be cut when that hasn’t been discussed.”
Later in the meeting, Superintendent Angela Hensley clarified that Natrona County School District 1’s athletics and activities budget saw a reduction of roughly $550,000 in the coming year’s budget, but said the local school district does not plan to cut any sports.
“Thank you, Trustee Schmidt, for saying this, because I think people are wondering — we are not planning to cut athletics and activities for next year,” Hensley said. “We do have to take a look at our entire budget as we have talked about, as we learn more about these new rules that come in.”
Related
Wyoming
Cheyenne City Council to consider a pause on new data centers
Republished with permission from Wyoming News Now, a TV news outlet covering the Cheyenne and Casper areas.
Cheyenne City Council has introduced a temporary moratorium, or pause, on new data center construction.
“The end goal is to actually have regulations in place, to have really heavy public involvement with this with data centers,” said Councilman Mark Moody.
The proposed ordinance is not a permanent ban on data centers and would not affect data centers currently under construction.
Councilman Moody says this is a bipartisan issue.
“I just want to make this clear, I’m not against data centers. We do need them from a national security perspective,” he said.
He said there needs to be more public input and regulations regarding data centers in Cheyenne.
The ordinance would require city staff to study data center impacts such as electricity usage, electricity tariffs, closed-loop cooling systems, groundwater impacts, agricultural impacts, and land value.
Cheyenne LEADS, the economic development corporation for Cheyenne and Laramie County, reported in November 2025 that there are 12 operational data centers in Wyoming, five under construction and plans for 43 data centers announced across the state.
“There needs to be more public input with this, and also to see how many we can sustain here in this community, cause there are talks of 43, and then another day 70. How many can we sustain here?” said Councilman Moody.
The proposed moratorium will now go to the Public Services Committee on Monday, May 18 at noon in the Municipal Building.
Wyoming
Wyoming High School Softball Regional Tournaments 2026
Sheridan will play in the North Regional Tournament at Gillette, while the South Regional Tournament will be played at Rock Springs.
North Regional Tournament at Gillette:
Checking record vs. highest team in the quadrant not involved in the tie, Thunder Basin gets the #1 Northeast seed over Campbell County, because the Lady Bolts went 3-1 vs. Sheridan, whereas the Lady Camels went 2-2.
Friday, May 15th:
(#1 NE) Thunder Basin vs. (#4 NW) Jackson – 11am
(#2 NW) Natrona County vs. (#3 NE) Sheridan – 11am
(#2 NE) Campbell County vs. (#3 NW) Kelly Walsh – 1pm
(#1 NW) Cody vs. (#4 NE) Worland – 1pm
Semi-Finals:
Thunder Basin/Jackson winner vs. Natrona County/Sheridan winner – 3pm Winner qualifies for the state tournament.
Campbell County/Kelly Walsh winner vs. Cody/Worland winner – 5pm Winner qualifies for the state tournament.
Consolation Round:
Thunder Basin/Jackson loser vs. Natrona County/Sheridan loser – 3pm LOSER OUT!
Campbell County/Kelly Walsh loser vs. Cody/Worland loser – 5pm LOSER OUT!
Saturday, May 16th:
TBA vs. TBA – 10am LOSER OUT! Winner qualifies for the state tournament.
TBA vs. TBA – 10am LOSER OUT! Winner qualifies for the state tournament.
2 10am winners vs. each other – 1pm 3rd Place
TBA vs. TBA – 1pm 1st Place
South Regional Tournament at Rock Springs:
Friday, May 15th:
(#1 SW) Laramie vs. (#4 SE) Torrington – 11am
(#2 SE) Cheyenne East vs. (#3 SW) Green River – 11am
(#2 SW) Rock Springs vs. (#3 SE) Wheatland – 1pm
(#1 SE) Cheyenne Central vs. (#4 SW) Cheyenne South – 1pm
Semi-Finals:
Laramie/Torrington winner vs. Cheyenne East/Green River winner – 3pm Winner qualifies for the state tournament.
Rock Springs/Wheatland winner vs. Cheyenne Central/Cheyenne South winner – 5pm Winner qualifies for the state tournament.
Consolation Round:
Laramie/Torrington loser vs. Cheyenne East/Green River loser – 3pm LOSER OUT!
Rock Springs/Wheatland loser vs. Cheyenne Central/Cheyenne South loser – 5pm LOSER OUT!
Saturday, May 16th:
TBA vs. TBA – 10am LOSER OUT! Winner qualifies for the state tournament.
TBA vs. TBA – 10am LOSER OUT! Winner qualifies for the state tournament.
2 10am winners vs. each other – 1pm 3rd Place
TBA vs. TBA – 1pm 1st Place
-
New Jersey3 minutes ago
Best burgers in New Jersey? 15 spots for classic and inventive burgers
-
New Mexico9 minutes agoFind out how New Mexico hospitals rank for patient safety
-
North Carolina15 minutes agoNorth Carolina couple accused of causing vulture invasion sued by furious town: ‘Not good neighbors’
-
North Dakota21 minutes agoDust storms rage in North Dakota and South Dakota
-
Ohio27 minutes agoManufacturing history unfolds at North Central Ohio Industrial Museum
-
Oklahoma33 minutes agoOklahoma becomes latest state to sue Roblox over child safety concerns
-
Oregon39 minutes agoOregon man shot at In-N-Out drive-thru drove family to safety with bullet lodged in head
-
Pennsylvania45 minutes agoAn Outpouring of Frustration Over Pennsylvania’s Rapid Data Center Growth – Inside Climate News