Connect with us

Washington

Barry Sussman, Washington Post editor who oversaw Watergate reporting, dies at 87

Published

on

Barry Sussman, Washington Post editor who oversaw Watergate reporting, dies at 87


Placeholder whereas article actions load

Barry Sussman, the Washington Put up editor who immediately oversaw the Watergate investigation by reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, offering invaluable — if at instances unheralded — contributions to the information protection that helped power President Richard M. Nixon from workplace, died June 1 at his dwelling in Rockville, Md. He was 87.

The trigger was an obvious gastrointestinal bleed, stated his daughter Shari Sussman Golob.

In Hollywood and within the public eye, newspapering is commonly imagined as a solitary enterprise, the work of shabbily dressed reporters hunched over their keyboards with telephones cradled between shoulder and ear, barricaded in by notepads and papers piled excessive atop their desks.

In fact, journalism is a much more collective enterprise, with essential roles performed by folks whose names don’t seem under headlines within the area identified in newspaper jargon because the byline. One such particular person, and maybe the chief instance in The Put up’s unraveling of the Watergate affair, was Mr. Sussman.

Advertisement

A Brooklynite, Mr. Sussman started his journalism profession scribbling movie opinions within the darkened film homes of New York and got here to Washington by means of Appalachia, the place he landed his first full-time newspaper job in his late 20s on the Bristol Herald Courier on the Virginia-Tennessee border. Rapaciously curious, and with a savant-like recall of element, he rose in simply over a 12 months to turn out to be the newspaper’s managing editor. The Put up employed him in 1965 as a suburban editor on the Metropolitan desk.

By Saturday, June 17, 1972, when 5 burglars carrying enterprise fits broke into the Democratic nationwide headquarters on the Watergate complicated in Washington, Mr. Sussman was The Put up’s metropolis editor, accountable for 40 to 45 reporters and editors liable for protection of D.C.

One standout Metro reporter was 29-year-old Woodward. A button-down former Navy lieutenant, he had been with The Put up solely 9 months however had already distinguished himself together with his inexhaustible work ethic and investigative zeal, though not together with his literary aptitude. Mr. Sussman took Woodward on as a protege and private pal, journalist and Watergate scholar Alicia C. Shepard reported, serving to him enhance his writing “at a time when colleagues joked that for Woodward, English was a second language” and instructing him “easy methods to take his hard-earned info and therapeutic massage them into readable tales.” The morning of the Watergate break-in, Mr. Sussman instantly phoned Woodward at dwelling and known as him into the newsroom.

The extra renegade Bernstein, 11 months youthful than Woodward however with greater than a decade of further expertise, sensed intrigue within the Watergate housebreaking and needed in on the motion. Whereas different editors at The Put up had grown exasperated by Bernstein’s extra attempting habits — he was allergic to deadlines and as soon as rented a automotive on The Put up’s dime, parked it in a storage and forgot about it — Mr. Sussman acknowledged his worth as each a reporter and a author and argued efficiently to maintain him on the Watergate story.

Paired by Mr. Sussman, Woodward and Bernstein — identified collectively as Woodstein — grew to become essentially the most well-known reporters in American journalism with their incremental and inexorable revelations of the political sabotage, corruption and coverup that started with the Watergate break-in, despatched quite a few Nixon associates to jail and finally precipitated Nixon’s resignation on Aug. 9, 1974. Throughout their reporting, Mr. Sussman was detailed to function particular Watergate editor.

Advertisement

“Should you have a look at the reporting, it wasn’t simply stringing collectively info,” Bernstein stated in an interview. “It wasn’t simply the knocking on doorways. It was additionally … an mental course of, and he had his finger on that in a manner that not one of the [other editors] did.”

The Put up’s Watergate protection obtained the 1973 Pulitzer Prize for public service, the best honor in journalism, and was dramatized in “All of the President’s Males,” the 1976 Hollywood film directed by Alan J. Pakula. Robert Redford performed Woodward, convening by evening in a parking storage together with his extremely positioned supply known as Deep Throat. Dustin Hoffman performed the shaggy-haired Bernstein. Mr. Sussman was omitted totally.

In her 2007 e-book “Woodward and Bernstein: Life within the Shadow of Watergate,” Shepard wrote that the filmmakers excised Mr. Sussman “for dramatic causes.” The story already had three editors — govt editor Benjamin C. Bradlee, portrayed in an Oscar-winning flip by Jason Robards; managing editor Howard Simons, whose real-life function the film diminished, performed by Martin Balsam; and Metropolitan editor Harry M. Rosenfeld, performed by Jack Warden.

If Mr. Sussman was deemed superfluous for the film — a choice that deeply wounded him, in line with Shepard’s reporting — he was by all accounts the other within the precise occasions that impressed it.

“Barry was important for The Put up’s Watergate” protection, stated former govt editor Leonard Downie Jr., who labored as an editor on the Watergate investigation, “simply as important as Bob and Carl.”

Advertisement

Journalist David Halberstam, writing in his 1979 e-book about American media “The Powers That Be,” described Mr. Sussman as “the proper working editor at precisely the proper degree.”

“Nearly from the beginning, earlier than anybody else at The Put up,” Halberstam wrote, Mr. Sussman “noticed Watergate as a bigger story, noticed that particular person occasions have been half of a bigger sample, the results of hidden selections from someplace within the prime of presidency which despatched smaller males to run soiled errands.”

Woodward and Bernstein, for his or her half, described Mr. Sussman as “Talmudic” in his mastery of essentially the most arcane particulars of the Watergate affair and “Socratic” in his capability to elicit leads from them by his insightful questioning.

“Greater than another editor at The Put up, or Bernstein and Woodward, Sussman grew to become a strolling compendium of Watergate information, a reference supply to be summoned when even the library failed,” the 2 reporters wrote in “All of the President’s Males,” their 1974 e-book upon which the film was based mostly.

“On deadline, he would pump these info right into a story in a relentless infusion, working up a physique of great data to assist what in any other case appeared just like the weakest of revelations. In Sussman’s thoughts, all the things fitted. Watergate was a puzzle and he was a collector of the items.”

Advertisement

The e-book “All of the President’s Males” reportedly contributed to a rift that opened between Mr. Sussman and the 2 reporters he had supported by essentially the most troublesome days of the Watergate investigation, when an error of their reporting involving grand jury testimony invited questions on their credibility, and when Nixon was privately threatening “damnable, damnable” penalties for The Put up in retaliation for its protection.

Mr. Sussman had hoped to co-author the account of Watergate with Woodward and Bernstein, Shepard wrote, however the reporters finally moved ahead alone with “All of the President’s Males,” which grew to become a bestseller. Shepard quoted Woodward as saying that “it was a reporter’s story to inform, not an editor’s,” and that Mr. Sussman’s “function is totally specified by the e-book.”

By the point the e-book was printed, Shepard wrote, Mr. Sussman had stopped talking to Woodward and Bernstein. In response to Mr. Sussman, they have been “improper usually on element” within the e-book and had a bent to “sentimentalize” the Watergate story.

Mr. Sussman wrote his personal e-book about Watergate, “The Nice Cowl-Up” (1974), which broadcast journalist Brit Hume, writing within the New York Occasions, praised as establishing “with readability the compelling case for Nixon’s complicity within the Watergate coverup.”

A long time later, when Shepard known as Mr. Sussman to inquire about his two former colleagues, he replied, “I don’t have something good to say about both of them.”

Advertisement

Reached after Mr. Sussman’s dying, Woodward stated in an interview that “Barry was one of many nice imaginative, aggressive editors at The Washington Put up throughout Watergate. All of us owe him a debt of gratitude, significantly Carl Bernstein and myself.”

Barry Sussman was born in Brooklyn on July 10, 1934. His mom, an immigrant from what was then the Russian Empire, was a homemaker. His father, who was born in the USA, was a civil servant.

Mr. Sussman graduated in 1956 from Brooklyn School, the place he obtained a bachelor’s diploma in English and historical past, and the place he was an editor and columnist on a faculty newspaper.

His first job post-college was at a New York promoting company. He hated the work however reveled in moonlighting as a film reviewer. He positioned an advert within the commerce publication Editor and Writer — “freelance author seeks first newspaper job” — and acquired one on the Bristol Herald Courier, greater than 500 miles and a universe away from New York.

In Bristol he met his future spouse, Peggy Earhart, whom he married in 1962. Survivors embody his spouse, of Rockville; two daughters, Seena Sussman Gudelsky, additionally of Rockville, and Shari Sussman Golob of Potomac, Md.; and 4 grandchildren.

Advertisement

At The Put up, Mr. Sussman grew to become a favourite amongst his reporters. One in all them, John Hanrahan, who went on to turn out to be govt director of the Fund for Investigative Journalism, described Mr. Sussman in an interview as “by far the most effective editor I ever had on any newspaper or any undertaking I used to be ever concerned with.”

“He was great to price with on deadline,” one other, Lawrence Meyer recalled. “When there have been holes within the story, he would ship you again to fill them and handle to do all the things with none type of rancor.”

Mr. Sussman had lengthy cultivated an curiosity in public opinion. After Watergate, he grew to become The Put up’s first in-house pollster, serving to to discovered the Washington Put up-ABC Information ballot.

“If presidential elections are the center of the political course of on this nation,” he as soon as wrote, “political polls have turn out to be the chief instrument by which that coronary heart’s beat is measured.”

Mr. Sussman penned a column on polling for The Washington Put up Nationwide Weekly version in addition to a e-book on the topic, “What Individuals Actually Assume and Why Our Politicians Pay No Consideration” (1988).

Advertisement

His different books included “Maverick: A Life in Politics” (1995) written with Lowell P. Weicker Jr., the Republican turned impartial Connecticut congressman, senator and governor who had served on the Senate Watergate Committee.

In 1987, Mr. Sussman was employed by United Press Worldwide as managing editor for nationwide information; he resigned inside months in opposition to large-scale employees cuts on the troubled information company.

He later ran a non-public survey analysis agency, was a marketing consultant to newspapers in Spain, Portugal and Latin America and served as editor of the Nieman Watchdog Venture at Harvard College. Because the Web upended the newspaper enterprise mannequin and hollowed out newsrooms throughout the USA, he cited the shortage of overarching editors as “the one best failing of newspaper investigations nowadays.”

“There’s no cohesion within the reporting,” he advised Investigating Energy, a web-based historical past of investigative journalism. It appeared, he stated, that when new scandals arose, “there’s not an editor who’s advised ‘[this] is your story,’ the best way I used to be advised Watergate was my story, and also you’re going to resolve it.”

A long time after Watergate, Mr. Sussman was typically known as on to talk about Nixon’s undoing and the continued function of a free press in a democracy. All these years later — the fiftieth anniversary of the Watergate break-in will fall simply weeks after his dying — Mr. Sussman, ever the attentive editor, nonetheless had command of essentially the most granular particulars of the investigation he had overseen, and had at his fingertips the names of all of the president’s males.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Washington lawmakers revive plan for state cap on rent increases • Washington State Standard

Published

on

Washington lawmakers revive plan for state cap on rent increases • Washington State Standard


Democratic state lawmakers are again pushing a proposal to restrict rent hikes across Washington.

Despite the rent cap bill’s dramatic failure last session, backers say its prospects this year are better given new lawmakers, revamped legislative committees and growing public support. The road to final passage, however, could still be tough.

Rep. Emily Alvarado, D-Seattle, prefiled a “rent stabilization” bill in the House on Thursday. It is similar to where the plan left off last year

The bill includes a 7% cap on yearly rent increases for existing tenants, with some exceptions, including buildings operated by nonprofits and residential construction that is 10 years old or less. It also requires landlords to give 180 days notice before an increase of 3% or more and limits some move-in and deposit fees.

Advertisement

“People are suffering, and I don’t know how anyone comes back to the legislative session and doesn’t want to support relief,” said Sen. Yasmin Trudeau, D-Tacoma, who will sponsor the legislation in the Senate.

Supporters say the proposal would help tenants and alleviate homelessness, but opponents say a rent cap could only worsen Washington’s housing shortage by disincentivizing new development.

Democratic leaders said Thursday that the proposal will likely be heard quickly in the House after the session kicks off next week but could move slowly in the Senate where it died last year. 

Trudeau said the new makeup of the chamber and the membership of key committees could be in the bill’s favor. Last year,  supporters blamed moderate Democrats on committees like Ways and Means and Housing for killing the bill. Two of those moderates — Sens. Mark Mullet and Kevin Van De Wege — did not run for reelection last year and will no longer be in the Senate. 

Trudeau also said that because the policy is being named early as a priority for their caucus, it will give lawmakers more time to consider it. 

Advertisement

“We’re still going to have conflict, just hopefully not as dramatic as last year,” she said. 

Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, told reporters Thursday that he believes his caucus is ready to support the bill, but that it would take passing other legislation to increase housing supply and improve affordability. 

In the House, the outlook is more certain. “We passed it off the floor in the House last year, and we will pass it off the floor this year,” House Speaker Laurie Jinkins, D-Tacoma, said.

The bill is sure to cause some heavy debate.

Last year, it had support from affordable housing advocates, tenants and labor unions. 

Advertisement

Michele Thomas, at the Washington Low Income Housing Alliance, said stabilizing rents is essential to help prevent evictions and homelessness. 

“I think lawmakers understand how much rising rents are contributing to housing instability, to homelessness, and to our state’s eviction crisis,” Thomas said.

Among those against the proposal are business groups, landlords and developers. 

Sean Flynn, board president and executive director at the Rental Housing Association of Washington, an industry group, criticized the idea, saying it would drive developers out of the state and lead to less home construction. 

“The fundamental problem that we have in our housing market is a lack of supply,” Flynn said. “This chokes off supply.”

Advertisement

Instead of a cap on all rents, Flynn said the Legislature should try to target tenants who need assistance most and specific landlords who use predatory rent increases without cause. 

One idea that has support from Republicans is creating a tenant assistance program that would give rental assistance vouchers to low-income tenants who may need help paying rent during a given month. Rep. Sam Low, R-Lake Stevens, is sponsoring that bill. 

House Minority Leader Drew Stokesbary, R-Auburn, told reporters Thursday his caucus is working on similar proposals with a more targeted approach to helping tenants. 

Stokesbary and Senate Minority Leader John Braun, R-Centralia, said their members likely will not support a rent cap policy this session. Stokesbary said he understands the short-term relief of the proposal but that the state ultimately needs more housing.

“In the long-run, this is a much worse deal for renters,” he said.  

Advertisement

Braun said lawmakers should find ways to make permitting easier and increase available land for home construction. He said there is “no quick solution” to the state’s housing and homelessness crisis.

But supporters of the rent cap bill push back on the idea that solely building more housing will solve the state’s problems.

Thomas said lawmakers have put a lot of emphasis in recent years on increasing the supply of homes and alleviating homelessness, but they have not passed legislation to help tenants struggling to keep their homes. Failing to do so will only result in higher levels of eviction and homelessness, Thomas said. 

“Rent stabilization stands alone,” she said. “Each of these issues are important, and the Legislature needs to address the entire housing ecosystem.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Michigan State basketball wallops Washington at Breslin in 88-54 rout

Published

on

Michigan State basketball wallops Washington at Breslin in 88-54 rout


EAST LANSING — Welcome to the Big Ten, Washington.

Michigan State basketball rolled out the red carpet Tom Izzo-style, with one of the most concise displays of his principles of basketball, looking every bit like the Izzone alumni in the stands remembered from the program’s embryonic era.

A defense that smothered from the outset. An offense that ran in transition and elevated the electricity. Rebounding in punishing fashion.

Advertisement

In short, a physical assertion of everything No. 14 MSU has been about for three decades, and a completely possessed performance obsessed with the details — a swagger-flashing, muscle-flexing, all-around 88-54 domination of the Huskies on Thursday night.

“The last two games, I think what we learned about ourselves is just the toughness of this team,” said freshman guard Jase Richardson, who had 12 points and five of the Spartans’ 10 steals and two of their six blocked shots. “We battled in that Ohio State game. And then today, I felt like our toughness kind of overpowered (the Huskies).”

The Spartans (13-2, 4-0 Big Ten) won their eighth straight game and held Washington (10- 6, 1-4) without a field goal for more than 10 minutes to open the game and then scoreless for another nine-plus minute stretch after an early free throw. Their lead grew to as many as 29 points by halftime thanks to continued well-rounded scoring and smothering team defense, moving Izzo to 347 victories in Big Ten play, second-most all-time and six behind Bob Knight’s record 353 at Indiana.   

Advertisement

Jaden Akins led the Spartans with 20 points on 8-for-13 shooting, with Jeremy Fears Jr. adding 12 points and 10 assists for his first career double-double and Tre Holloman scoring 11 points with six more of their 24 assists on 32 made baskets. Along with Richardson, the four guards also turned it over just four times between them.

MSU outscored Washington 28-2 on the fastbreak and shot a sizzling 52.5% as all 10 regulars scored; 12 of the 13 players in green and white who stepped on the court grabbed at least one rebound. The Spartans also hit 7 of 21 3-point attempts and committed just 12 turnovers.

“I thought we we played awfully well,” Izzo said. “We stayed focused. … Yeah, I did see it in their eyes. That was, it was fun to see that.”

MSU travels to Northwestern for its third road game of the conference season. Tipoff is noon Sunday (Fox) at Welsh-Ryan Arena in Evanston, Illinois.

Advertisement

Tyler Harris had 14 points for for the Huskies (10-5, 1-3), who shot just 32.7% and committed 15 turnovers. MSU held leading scorer and rebounder Great Osobor to just six points on 0-for-8 shooting with just four rebounds as the Huskies were outrebounded, 40-30.

Huskies just dog-gone confounded

Izzo’s players took the court before the game wearing new “Strength in Numbers” warmup shirts. Then they delivered a “dialed-in” look and performance that Izzo said started to emerge in practice Wednesday.

Everything the Spartans showed in the first 20 minutes is everything Izzo has demanded from his teams for 30 years. So much of it that the game felt in the win column in the first seven minutes.

Nothing Washington could do went right, including, at one point, Washington’s “Zoom” Diallo slamming into teammate Mekhi Mason at the top of the key on offense with no MSU player within 2 feet of the collision. Huskies first-year coach Danny Sprinkle spun toward his bench and shook his head in frustration and disgust.

Advertisement

After Osobor’s free throw opened the scoring, MSU ripped off the next 16 points, starting with a Fears 3-pointer and another by Akins. A Coen Carr breakaway dunk in transition prompted Sprinkle to call a timeout as the alumni Izzone erupted into a cacophonous din of celebration.

The Huskies went scoreless for 9:10 and played the first 10:27 without making a field goal. And the rout was on.

“Just trying to slow the momentum,” Sprinkle said of his timeout. “I mean, the game was actually kind of a little bit out of reach, even at that point.”

From 16-1, when Washington finally made a basket and scored three straight points, the Spartans pushed it to 29-8 thanks to a strong stretch that included contributions from two fairly forgotten faces — a 3-pointer from struggling Frankie Fidler and strong defense and four free throws from Carson Cooper.

By halftime, things started to get really out of hand.

Advertisement

MSU danced and smiled its way into halftime with a 42-13 cushion by holding the Huskies to 5-for-29 shooting and without a 3-pointer in nine attempts. The Spartans turned eight Washington turnovers into nine points and had a 25-19 rebounding edge, as well as a 20-10 scoring edge in the paint while shooting 45.2%.

There wasn’t much to say in the locker room, and it might have been one of the shortest talks in Izzo’s tenure. The players came bouncing back onto the court with more than five minutes to get in shots. And they maintained the same locked-in intensity and pushed it to a 37-point lead a little over four minutes into the second half and led by as many as 41 before Izzo summoned his deep-bench reserves.

Izzo’s truncated halftime message?

“To keep it rolling,” said Akins, who went 8-for-13. “Whatever we do, keep our foot on the gas keep it rolling. And that’s what we did.”

Advertisement

A green-and-white party

Perhaps most importantly was the confidence with which MSU played. It was a bravado his best teams showed in abundance and something that has been lacking in recent years, maybe longer.

Fears got in the head of Washington’s young point guard, with a dose of trash-talking and watching the Huskies freshman in foul trouble. In doing so, that allowed the Spartans’ redshirt freshman to dictate the tone of the toughness and the pace of play all night.

Coen Carr shook off a hard foul that prevented him launching for a dunk in transition early in the first half, nearly getting tackled, only to pogo-stick and hammer one down in transition after a poke-away steal by Booker and feed from Richardson.

Richardson continued to show moxie beyond his freshman year, with his father Jason in the stands seeing a slaughtering not unlike his 2000 national championship team’s 114-63 blowout nearly 25 years ago on the same court. 

“Our competitive spirit wasn’t there tonight, our physicality and our toughness,” Sprinkle said. “And in order to play against Michigan State, you know what their program is built on. We knew what we’re coming into as a staff, we tried to convey that to the players. And obviously, we didn’t do a good enough job of doing that.”

Advertisement

Everyone took a turn going on runs, including Holloman, who also had six assists. Jaxon Kohler had six points, seven rebounds and four more assists. Cooper finished with six points and seven boards, while Carr grabbed five rebounds. The Spartans went 17-for-18 at the free-throw line, finished with a 44-26 edge in paint points and got 37 points from their reserves.

Even Nick Sanders gave the alumni in the Izzone one more thing to get loud about before their belated bedtime, sinking a jumper to seal it with a minute to play, a thorough thrashing complete.

“We still got a long way to go. I mean, it was one of those nights tonight,” Izzo said. “But this team is getting better —the camaraderie, the fastbreak, the strength in numbers, the constantly coming at you. There’s some pluses to that right now.”

Contact Chris Solari: csolari@freepress.com. Follow him @chrissolari.

 Subscribe to the “Spartan Speak” podcast for new episodes weekly on Apple PodcastsSpotify or anywhere you listen to podcasts. And catch all of our podcasts and daily voice briefing at freep.com/podcasts.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

‘The worst I've seen': Some Prince George's residents still waiting for snow plows

Published

on

‘The worst I've seen': Some Prince George's residents still waiting for snow plows


“I hope they come by today.”

That’s what Temple Hills resident Eunice Hill said as she looked out on her icy street on Thursday.

Days after major snowfall, the Prince George’s County street she’s called home for 40 years since hasn’t been plowed.

“They’ve always come and cleared the streets in the past. This is the worst I’ve seen,” she said.

Advertisement

A few doors down, News4 spoke with Jerome. He’s lived on the block for almost three decades. He said he’s tried to remain patient but that’s wearing thin.

“I would have appreciated to see trucks by now,” he said.

Here’s what the public works director said about plowing and salting

The county’s Department of Public Works and Transportation said the agency has a snow protocol they activate before and after a storm. First up: the primary roads, to ensure emergency personnel can access passable roads. Next up are the residential and neighborhood roads.

“They started working on the residentials yesterday and they’ve continued on multiple shifts, been continuing on that. As we continue, the low temperatures have not been helpful,” Director Michael Johnson said.

Crews are using chemicals to help treat roads and still have plenty of salt. They started the storm with 43,500 tons of salt and have used a little over 6,600 tons so far, Johnson said.

Advertisement

“They’ll be bringing the enhanced chemicals, and we’ll be applying them this evening,” he said about Thursday night.

As crews prepare for another snow event, residents hope their streets will be treated soon.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending