Connect with us

Nevada

Nikki Haley: Second to none? – Nevada Current

Published

on

Nikki Haley: Second to none? – Nevada Current


Ten years ago, the Nevada State Democratic Party (Harry Reid, proprietor) decided not to run anybody against incumbent Republican Gov. Brian Sandoval. Reid had cooked up a byzantine Reid-protection scheme, the details of which I won’t bore you with, but the results of which were Republican control of both houses of the state legislature, Democratic Rep. Steven Horsford losing his congressional seat, and Nevada voters, especially Democratic ones, made to suffer a peculiarly distinctive strain of inanity. But I digress.

A guy named Bob Goodman filed in the Democratic primary for governor in 2014 anyway, and he came in second to “none of these candidates,” which is an option Nevada voters can choose in statewide races – including presidential races.

After suggesting he’d stay neutral last year, Joe Lombardo earlier this week endorsed Trump for president, and said he would be supporting Trump in the Nevada State Republican Party’s presidential caucus (an event notable only for its needlessness and absurdity, and that is being all but ignored by the rest of the nation).

In the process, Lombardo said he would also vote in the presidential preference primary that the state is required by law to hold, but will vote for the “none of these candidates” option on that ballot. The only candidate who still has an active campaign (active as of the day this column is being published, anyway) whose name is on that primary ballot is Nikki Haley.

Advertisement

(I’m assuming readers of this column don’t need an explanation of the caucus-primary nonsense, but just in case: Don’t be confused: Trump deliberately CHOSE not to be on the Nevada primary ballot.)

Lombardo could have just skipped the state-run primary. After all, that’s what Nevada State Republican Party chair and indicted fake elector Michael McDonald told Republicans to do last month while introducing Trump at a rally in Reno.

It would be interesting to know if Lombardo and his political handlers came up with the idea of voting for “none” all on their own, or if they were nudged in that direction in the course of the Trump team telling Lombardo to quit sitting on his hands and endorse Trump like a good little Republican governor.

Trump passing instructions to Lombardo through surrogates is not unprecedented. During the 2022 campaign when Lombardo renounced his own words and issued a gushing sycophantic statement declaring Trump great mere hours after he had said Trump wasn’t great, Lombardo’s publicly humiliating about-face was on the instructions of the chair of National Republican Committee, who was acting on behalf of a miffed Trump.

Haley, like nearly everyone else in the country, has shown zero interest in Nevada’s third spot on the Republican nominating calendar. And while Nevada polling is slight, what there is of it suggests a substantial majority of Nevada Republican voters suspect Trump is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. If Trump were to instruct Nevada Republicans to vote for “none” in the primary, maybe “none” would get the most votes. Or maybe not. Come to think of, I’d like to see Trump try.

Advertisement

“None” might win even if Trump says nothing, the result of a plurality of Republican voters doing what they think would please Trump Almighty. There’s some social media chatter indicating a little movement in that direction.

But if “none” got the most votes, “none” still wouldn’t “win.”

Under state law, “Only votes cast for the named candidates shall be counted” for the purposes of declaring the winner of an election. In 2014, even though Goodman got fewer votes than “none,” he was still on the general election ballot as the Democratic nominee for governor. Goodman didn’t really have a campaign, but if he did, his campaign slogan totally should have been “Bob Goodman – Second to none!”

Of course, whether Haley wins the Nevada primary or comes in second to none doesn’t matter at all. The state Republican Party insisted on turning Nevada’s third spot on the nominating calendar into a sick joke and a mere quirky asterisk to the 2024 nominating process.

On the bright side (where I’m always looking), part 1…  The Nevada State Republican Party is in charge of its perverse and rigged-from-the-start Trump-bespoke caucus, but neither it nor the Nevada State Democratic Party for that matter will be administering the election the nation will be watching – the general election in Nevada in November. That will be administered by state and county election officials.

Advertisement

On the bright side, part 2… Since Nevada is one of only a handful of battleground states that will decide the presidency, Lombardo is perfectly positioned to get quite a little bit more Trump on him than he would prefer. In what is going to be a repulsive campaign year, at least that part should be fun to watch.

A version of this column originally appeared in the Daily Current newsletter, which is free, and which you can (and should) subscribe to here.



Source link

Advertisement

Nevada

Nevada County Task Force 4101

Published

on

Nevada County Task Force 4101


NEVADA COUNTY, Calif. February 22, 2026 – Nevada County Task Force 4101 had a total of six engines and one task force leader. The following agencies staffed up an engine: Nevada County Consolidated Fire, Peardale Chicago Park Fire, Grass Valley Fire, Ophir Hill Fire, North San Juan Fire and Higgins Fire. We would like to […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada Highway Patrol investigates fatal pedestrian crash in Pahrump

Published

on

Nevada Highway Patrol investigates fatal pedestrian crash in Pahrump


Nevada Highway Patrol is investigating a fatal crash involving a pedestrian Saturday evening in Pahrump.

Troopers responded to a report of a crash at 6:15 p.m. on eastbound Charleston Park Avenue just west of Happy Lane in Nye County.

The crash involved a passenger sedan and a pedestrian, and an adult male pedestrian was confirmed dead at the scene.

According to officials, the driver of the sedan stayed at the scene and is cooperating with investigators.

Advertisement

Happy Lane between Wood Chips was closed, and motorists were advised to use alternate routes and avoid the area.

Nevada Highway Patrol said additional information will be released after the preliminary investigation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

NEVADA VIEWS: Single-family rentals are a bridge to opportunity, not a barrier

Published

on

NEVADA VIEWS: Single-family rentals are a bridge to opportunity, not a barrier


Housing affordability has become one of the most pressing economic challenges facing families across Las Vegas and Nevada. As prices and borrowing costs remain elevated, the debate over why housing feels increasingly out of reach has intensified. In the search for answers, single-family home investors are often singled out as a convenient explanation. But that framing oversimplifies a far more structural problem and risks distracting from the real drivers of affordability.

For many Nevadans, the desire to live in a single-family home hasn’t changed. What has changed is access. Higher interest rates, elevated home prices and limited inventory have reshaped the housing landscape, making traditional ownership more difficult for households at various stages of life. In that environment, single-family rentals have expanded to meet demand — not as a replacement for ownership, but as one of several ways families secure stable housing in constrained markets.

Investor participation in housing is frequently portrayed in binary terms: good or bad. The data, however, is more nuanced.

A recent analysis from the UNLV’s Lied Center for Real Estate documents that investors have represented roughly 1 in 5 home purchases in the Las Vegas area over the past 15 years, with activity peaking in the post-COVID period before easing more recently. Importantly, the study does not assign value judgments. It simply reports a trade-off: Elevated investor participation contributes to greater availability of single-family rental homes while also tightening supply for prospective owner-occupants.

Advertisement

That distinction matters, particularly when data is used to inform public policy. Much of the investor data cited in public discourse relies on standardized national datasets that are often sourced from firms such as Redfin and that classify buyers based on ownership structures such as LLCs or trusts. These classifications are necessary for consistency and privacy, but they inherently limit visibility into who is behind a purchase and how a home is ultimately used. This does not make the data inaccurate. But it does not tell the full story, and caution is warranted when drawing policy conclusions from ownership labels alone.

What can be measured clearly, and consistently, is housing supply and housing prices. On those metrics, the evidence is decisive. A 2025 Lied Center study shows Southern Nevada has experienced nearly 15 years of chronic underbuilding. Since 2010, residential construction in the Las Vegas area has declined by more than 60 percent compared with historical norms, even as population growth continued. Had construction merely kept pace with prior trends, the region would have tens of thousands more homes today.

National research reaches the same conclusion. Studies from the National Bureau of Economic Research consistently find that prolonged underbuilding and restrictive land-use policies are primary drivers of rising home prices. Nevada’s affordability challenges are not unique, but the constraints shaping them are especially pronounced.

Nowhere is that clearer than land availability. Roughly 80 percent of Nevada’s land is controlled by the federal government, with much of Southern Nevada controlled by the Bureau of Land Management. This structure limits where housing can be built, extends development timelines and increases land costs long before a home is ever constructed. Those costs ripple through the market, affecting renters and buyers. Any serious conversation about affordability in Nevada must account for this reality. Issues like this are of far greater impact than the portion of investors who own housing units.

There is no single cause of today’s housing challenges, and there will be no single solution. But the direction is clear. Expanding housing options requires addressing the barriers that constrain supply: permitting delays, zoning limitations, regulatory complexity, land access and the cumulative friction that slows housing production. Focusing narrowly on who owns homes, rather than how many homes exist, risks missing the larger picture.

Advertisement

Single-family rentals and homeownership are not opposing forces. They are interconnected outcomes of a housing system shaped by policy choices, market conditions and long-term supply decisions. If Nevada wants a more affordable, resilient housing market, the focus must remain on increasing supply and removing the obstacles that prevent it. We should not be focused on regulating areas of the market where data sets aren’t clear, unintended negative consequences may occur and our business-friendly environment will be harmed.

Zach WalkerLieb is a housing policy advocate, the managing partner of Willow Manor and chairman of the Board of Habitat for Humanity Las Vegas.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending