Connect with us

Idaho

Will Idaho's push for mandatory minimum criminal sentences for fentanyl be a deterrent? – Idaho Capital Sun

Published

on

Will Idaho's push for mandatory minimum criminal sentences for fentanyl be a deterrent? – Idaho Capital Sun


Growing up on the Boise Bench, Rob Crisler was taller than most of his 12-year-old classmates and one of the few biracial students at his school. For fun, he painted designs on his shirts and hats. However, his family said local law enforcement quickly began associating him and his artwork with gangs, leading to him feeling frequently singled out.

From his teenage years until his late 40s, Crisler struggled with addiction, and he spent years in the Idaho correctional system on drug charges. In between his time in corrections, he would volunteer for the ACLU of Idaho to advocate for criminal justice reform, often testifying in front of Idaho legislators on initiatives such as increasing public defense funding; ban the box, a campaign aimed to remove the check box that asks applicants if they have a criminal record on hiring applications; and ending mandatory minimum sentences. These issues held personal significance to him as he struggled to secure employment because of his felony convictions and often chose plea bargains to avoid serving a mandatory minimum sentence.

Cheryl Van De Grift-Edson looks through a box containing pictures of her son. Her son, Rob Crisler, died in October from a fentanyl overdose. Crisler struggled with addiction for most of his life, but in his free time, he would advocate with the ACLU of Idaho to ease mandatory minimum sentence policies in Idaho. (Mia Maldonado/Idaho Capital Sun)

But Crisler struggled with recovery, and in October, he died from a fentanyl overdose.  

“I can’t imagine what he could have accomplished if he hadn’t spent years locked up in prison, a lot of it on charges that he had to take a plea bargain,” his mother, Cheryl Van De Grift-Edson, told the Idaho Capital Sun.

Advertisement

Despite spending years in the Idaho correctional system on plea deals, time in prison did not rehabilitate Crisler, his mother said. Instead, he struggled with mental health issues and regularly faced homelessness.  

Van De Grift-Edson hopes to continue her son’s advocacy in criminal justice, particularly as Republicans in the Idaho Legislature push House Bill 406 through the final stages of the legislative process. The bill would add fentanyl to the list of substances subject to mandatory minimum sentences.

Many Idaho officials say the bill embodies the state’s “tough on crime” policies.

“Part of the reason Idaho is a great state is because we’ve made strong, clear policy decisions that we don’t support drug dealers by making it easier for them to do business in Idaho,” bill sponsor Sen. Todd Lakey, R-Nampa, said during a hearing in the Senate Judiciary and Rules Committee. “We’re not talking about eliminating fentanyl in Idaho, we’re talking about reducing the flood.”

But critics of the legislation, including academics, criminal justice advocates and members of both political parties, argue that those policies are ineffective, impede judicial discretion, and marginalize certain groups including drug users, victims of human trafficking and women. 

Advertisement

Deterrence? Experts versus sponsors

In the midst of the war on drugs, the Idaho Legislature in 1992, following the lead of other states, introduced measures to deter drug trafficking within the state. These policies sought to enforce mandatory minimum sentences based on the quantities of heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine and marijuana carried by individuals. 

What does House Bill 406 say?

House Bill 406 would implement mandatory minimum sentences for “those who traffic fentanyl.”

Advertisement

This means that if someone were found guilty of trafficking fentanyl in Idaho, a mandatory minimum sentence would include three years in prison and a minimum $10,000 fine for possessing 4 to 13 grams, or 100-249 pills; five years in prison and a minimum $15,000 fine for 14 to 27 grams, or 250-499 pills; and 10 years in prison and a minimum $25,000 fine for more than 38 grams, or 500 pills or more.

The bill also adds provisions for the crime of a “drug-induced homicide,” meaning a person could be charged with a felony if they supply drugs that later kills someone.

Advertisement

During the 2023 legislative session, at least 46 states introduced or enacted similar legislation to set penalties for fentanyl possession, according to the National Conference on State Legislatures. 

As reported by the New York Times, states in 2023 including Virginia codified fentanyl as “a weapon of terrorism.” In Iowa, lawmakers enacted laws that impose up to 10 years in prison for the sale or manufacture of less than five grams of fentanyl. Arkansas and Texas also joined 30 states, including Pennsylvania, Colorado and Wyoming, to enact drug-induced homicide statutes, allowing the prosecution for murder in cases where people share drugs socially that contain lethal fentanyl doses.

But studies show that practices based on deterrence, like mandatory minimums, aren’t effective, according to Boise State University professor Linsey Belisle. 

“Generally speaking, research finds mandatory minimum sentencing practices are largely ineffective at reducing crime and have greatly contributed to mass incarceration,” Belisle said in an email.  

In at least 29 states, there has been movement to ease some mandatory minimum policies an effort that in 2019, Idaho participated in with bipartisan support that did not make it past the House. 

Advertisement

But today, sponsors, with the support of Idaho law enforcement, argue that adding fentanyl to the list is the next step to deter people from trafficking fentanyl in Idaho. 

During the Senate Judiciary and Rules Committee hearing, Sen. James Ruchti, D-Pocatello, questioned the bill’s co-sponsor, Rep. Ted Hill, R-Eagle, about whether he thinks it’s important to base legislation on data or if he feels comfortable with basing the effectiveness of the mandatory minimum sentences on anecdotal evidence. 

“Would you agree with me that we’re the policy makers, and so when we make these decisions for the state of Idaho, that could put more people in our prisons … that it’s important that we have done our homework and we’ve based it on data, facts and science?” Ruchti asked.

Idaho Rep. Edward H. “Ted” Hill, R- Eagle,
Idaho Rep. Edward H. “Ted” Hill, R- Eagle, listens to proceedings on the House floor at the State Capitol building on Jan. 8, 2024. (Otto Kitsinger for Idaho Capital Sun)

In response, Hill said he did not refer to data when drafting this bill, but that he trusts law enforcement workers’ support for mandatory minimum sentences.

“Is there a metric that I can give you a number for?” Hill said. “All you got to do is look at the TV, drive through L.A… It’s one of the worst places I’ve ever seen. So that’s my metric, and it’s a pretty accurate one. I just can’t give any number. It’s a visual measurement.”

In a meeting with the Idaho Press Club on Tuesday, Idaho Gov. Brad Little said he was surprised that bill sponsors could not point to evidence on the effectiveness of mandatory minimums, but that he understands the message behind the legislation.  

Advertisement

“The one thing that the sponsors want to do is send a message to the various people that are doing the trafficking to not come to Idaho to do it,” Little said. “Are there going to be some unintended consequences? I worry about that, and I’ll have discussions when it gets closer to my desk.” 

‘I don’t have any choice’: judge transcripts show distaste for mandatory minimums

David High, a former Idaho deputy attorney general, also opposes mandatory minimum sentences. His son, who has been in prison three times on drug charges, pleaded down a mandatory minimum sentence in his most recent conviction. 

“It was very offensive to me that the sentence was, in essence, pronounced by the prosecutor, not by the judge,” High said in an interview. “The judge had no discretion to the minimum, and to me that is simply wrong.”

Advertisement

While judges under their judicial code of ethics cannot provide feedback on legislation that impacts their profession, Idaho judges throughout the years have spoken against mandatory minimum sentences while sentencing people on drug crimes. 

“I don’t have any choice,” First District Judge Steve Verby said in 2012 while sentencing a North Idaho man to prison after he pleaded guilty to attempting to manufacture methamphetamine.

“The Legislature has said, regardless of what kind of a person that individual is, regardless of their good works, regardless of what should be done under the circumstances, regardless of the fact that use of certain illicit drugs becomes an addiction of which the person is powerless to control, regardless of the fact that there are other methods of dealing with this type of addiction, the Legislature has said, ‘Judge, thou shalt put people in prison, regardless of what you want to do and regardless of what should be done.’ And I have no control. I cannot give you less than two years mandatory minimum.”

In another case, Sixth District Judge Robert Naftz said in a 2016 sentencing for a man who pleaded guilty to trafficking heroin, that he is “not a fan of mandatory sentences.”

“I really do think you’re an example of why mandatory sentences should be abolished by the Legislature and sentencing discretion be placed back in the hands of the judge,” he told the defendant. “This is not a one-sentence-fits-all world. It requires the common sense of judges who can carefully weigh the mitigating and aggravating factors to impose sentences that best protects society, punishes, deters, and rehabilitates, but until that changes, this is what we’re left with.”

Advertisement

House Minority Leader Ilana Rubel, D-Boise, who previously spearheaded legislation to ease mandatory minimum policies in Idaho for seven years, said during the House debate that the bill “reeked of injustice.”

Idaho House passes bill to enforce mandatory minimum sentences on fentanyl

“Judicial discretion does not mean you’re soft on anything,” she told the Sun. “All it does is it gives the judges the flexibility to lock up the people who really need to be locked up and to occasionally have the option to not wake up people when they don’t think they need to be locked up.”

Rubel worked on her previous legislation with Boise-based criminal defense lawyer, Scott McKay, who in an interview, told the Sun he agreed that mandatory minimum sentences often prompt his clientsmany of whom are heavy drug users with illegal drug possession chargesto choose plea bargains. And those individuals, he said, are not members of the cartel or drug kingpins.

“Fentanyl is a terrible drug,” he said. “With that said, we can trust Idaho’s judges to deal with people who are trafficking fentanyl.” 

Advertisement

Human trafficking victims, women among most vulnerable, opponents say

Many criminal justice academics have argued that mandatory minimum policies exacerbate racial and social disparities and fail to advance community safety. In Idaho, criminal justice advocates also argue that victims of human trafficking and women are among the most vulnerable to the legislation.

Jennifer Zielinski, the executive director of the Idaho Anti-Trafficking Coalition, told the Sun that the nonprofit estimates about 70 to 75% of its clients have been used as drug mules, meaning they have been forced to transport or deal drugs. The coalition’s clients include people of all ages and diverse gender identities, she said. 

Implementing mandatory minimum sentences would target many victims of human trafficking rather than their abusers who coerce them into dealing drugs, she said. 

Advertisement

Many human trafficking victims end up convicted of crimes, she said, pointing out that many victims coerced into drug dealing face life-threatening situations, with threats to their lives or their families if they disclose their human trafficking situation to law enforcement. Additionally, traffickers often are the ones bailing their victims out of jail, she said.

“We know that mandatory minimums have already been critical for victims,” Zielinski said. “They are convicted of the crimes, and if they’re drug related, these are the individuals who are dealing with those consequences and sitting in prison and serving that time with a criminal record.”

Erica Marshall, the executive director of the Idaho Justice Project and a defense attorney, agreed with Zielinski, adding that the bill would incarcerate more women who struggle with addiction and are victims of crimes themselves whether it be sexual abuse, domestic abuse, or victims of human trafficking. 

“For two of the last three years, Idaho has been the only state in the country where the most people in our prisons are there for a drug crime rather than a violent offense,” she told the Sun. “In every other state, the most people in prison are there for violent crimes. This percentage is even worse for women.” 

Idaho has had the highest incarceration rate for women in the nation since 2019, and the state’s incarceration rate for women is nearly three times the national average, according to data from the Federal Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Advertisement

“Eighty percent of women in jail in America are moms, and we know that a child is six times more likely to be incarcerated themselves when they have lost a parent to incarceration,” Marshall said. “If we really want to decrease drug use in our state, we need more resources allocated to prevention and treatment for substance use disorder.”

Flawed, bad policy: Former prosecutor speaks against ‘drug-induced homicide’ provision

In addition to concerns about who would be most impacted by the bill, Right on Crime state director Jean Fisher testified against the bill, noting that her main concern is the “drug-induced homicide” provision. 

Fisher, a former Ada County prosecutor, told the Sun the provision does not belong in House Bill 406.

Advertisement
Jean Fisher
Jean Fisher, a former Ada County prosecutor, is the Idaho state director for Right On Crime. (Courtesy of Right on Crime)

“(The bill) says that if you deliver any controlled substance drug and that person dies, you could be charged for drug-induced homicide,” she said. “That could be any drug such as cocaine, heroin, marijuana. It doesn’t really have anything to do with fentanyl.”

Fisher said the provision is unnecessary, noting that manslaughter laws are already in place if someone wanted to build a case where someone was intentionally harming or passing drugs. 

There are at least 25 states with “drug-induced homicide” laws, many of which include exceptions for juveniles and provide for good Samaritan — meaning individuals who are experiencing or witnessing an overdose are immune from arrest when they summon emergency services.

Under House Bill 406, Fisher is concerned the drug-induced homicide provision would disincentivize people from calling emergency services while witnessing an overdose out of fear of prosecution. 

“I don’t think that people who share cocaine, who don’t know that it’s laced with fentanyl, and their buddy dies, that that person should be subject to a homicide conviction,” she said.

Senate Bill 406 is making its way through the final stages of the legislative process. After passing the Idaho House of Representatives in a 54-13 vote on Jan. 29 and receiving a 6-3 vote with a passing recommendation from the Senate Judiciary and Rules Committee on Wednesday, the bill is now set to advance to the Senate floor.  

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Idaho

This is How to Identify an Idaho Christian Nationalist

Published

on

This is How to Identify an Idaho Christian Nationalist


You’ve heard that our federal Constitution was made for a moral people.  The line is attributed to the founding father and second President, John Adams.  Notice he said “moral,” not “Christian.”  One of my friends was a graduate of Liberty University, a prestigious Christian school.  His mission in life was to evangelize, but he always cautioned his listeners that our founders spoke of a Creator, and not Jesus.  Some of our early leaders were devout Christians.  Many of them were also womanizers, drinkers, and gave religion no more than lip service.  They were people who wanted to be left alone, and if they practiced faith, it was personal, and they didn’t believe it was the government’s role to dictate morality.

They Mock Good People of Other Faiths

I’m reminded of a story about the 2024 Republican National Convention.  Harmeet Dhillon, a rising star in the party, spoke.  She referenced her Sikh faith, and someone in the crowd felt compelled to shout “Jesus is Lord!”  Now, maybe a majority believes that, but are you sure He wants you to taunt good and moral people?  Or would God prefer a gentler approach?  For instance, you could pray for conversions.

Where does the Great Commission instruct you to be rude to people of good moral character?

Idaho’s Glenneda Zuiderveld was an alternate delegate, and when a seatmate said the man was rude, the state senator dismissed the argument.  “We’re all going to be judged,” she said.  What’s a Senator’s purpose in politics?

The Pot Calling the Kettle Black

A few days ago, a local church had a men-only event for candidates.  A group of liberal women demonstrated outside.  I don’t know why they can’t organize their own event instead, but apparently, they would rather be confrontational.  They’ve accomplished nothing more than preening and making a claim that they’re more virtuous, but the church is within its rights to hold a men-only event.  If you want a women’s only event, I’m not bothered.  Let me add a caveat.  Some of the men involved believe that it’s okay to berate members of the LDS Church as they enter the temple.  I wouldn’t say screaming at someone that they’re going to hell is a sign of moral people.  Again, if you think they’re wrong, then pray for them.

Advertisement

Some people wonder why they’re called Christian nationalists.  Do we need to draw them some pictures?

Brad Little Through The Years

Gallery Credit: Kevin Miller





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Local non-profit fills Mother’s Day baskets for NICU moms across Idaho

Published

on

Local non-profit fills Mother’s Day baskets for NICU moms across Idaho


KUNA — A sister-duo is filling baskets with blankets, snacks and handwritten notes to spread some extra love to moms spending Mother’s Day in the hospital with their newborns.

The effort is led by “Helping Hands for NICU Moms,” a nonprofit co-founded by sisters Tiffany and Alyssa Higbee. The organization was born from Alyssa’s own experience spending months in the NICU with her firstborn.

Alyssa’s son was initially in the NICU for about two weeks, then was put back in for about 3.5 months. During that time, several holidays passed, making it especially hard as a first-time mom.

“There was people in companies who would bring us stuff and try and cheer up your day, and it really helped, and so when my son was about 6 months old, we decided that it would be best to try and help moms in the NICU somehow,” Alyssa Higbee said.

Advertisement

That inspiration led the sisters to create Mother’s Day gift baskets filled with items to bring comfort and encouragement to moms facing the same journey.

WATCH: Learn more about “Helping Hands for NICU Moms”

Local non-profit fills Mother’s Day baskets for NICU moms across Idaho

Advertisement

The sisters have a 12-year age gap. Tiffany was fresh out of high school when they started the nonprofit in 2023, which meant she had more time to dedicate to the project. Alyssa noted that because of the age gap, they didn’t get to spend a lot of time together growing up, so the project has brought them closer.

“Hopefully, this can bring some hope that you can get out of it … that NICU period, that scary initial phase, it does get easier,” Alyssa Higbee said.

ALSO READ | Fragile beginnings to bright futures: NICU ‘Wall of Hope’ inspires families with stories of strength

Alyssa’s son, who was born in the NICU at St. Luke’s in Twin Falls, is now 3-years-old and healthy. Tiffany said watching her nephew go through the NICU was hard, but seeing him now — jumping, tackling her, and doing everything a little boy does — makes the work even more meaningful.

“It’s cool to see the difference because I know that some kids don’t make it to where he is when they’re in the NICU, and it’s just cool to see that he did,” Tiffany Higbee said.

Advertisement

This year’s baskets are packed with items donated by nearly 25 local companies — up from just 5 donors in the first year. The baskets include soaps from Wild Highland Soaps, claw clips, bibs, hair bows, chapsticks, socks, lotions, hand sanitizers, coloring books, colored pencils, snacks, minky blankets, and stuffed puppies from Scheels.

Gift cards and coupons are also included from Dutch Bros, Flying M Coffee, a pizza company, Wendy’s (free meal coupons for breakfast and lunch), Albertsons, and a $10 coupon to a baby store.

Tiffany started collecting donations for this year’s baskets as early as November of last year, spending a few hours every week for the past 6 to 8 months to prepare — reaching out to companies, picking up donations, and organizing everything.

The assembly process includes last-minute tasks like ironing vinyl onto bags, opening boxes, and putting together gift card envelopes before the full baskets are assembled and delivered.

“We start putting the bags together, making sure we have everything in there, and then we deliver them on Mother’s Day,” Alyssa Higbee said.

Advertisement

The baskets are delivered before noon on Mother’s Day to avoid missing moms who may be discharged after doctors do their rounds. Currently, the organization delivers to St. Luke’s Children’s Hospital in downtown Boise.

Tiffany said delivering the baskets is one of the most rewarding parts of the work.

“I love seeing the moms sometimes we get to watch them come out with their baskets, and they’ll be going through it, and they look really excited and happy,” Tiffany Higbee said.

“Seeing how happy they are or knowing how I cheered them up a little bit for their Mother’s Day because it’s a big holiday, it’s their first with that baby at least,” Tiffany Higbee said.

The first year, the project was funded mostly out of their own pockets. Three years later, as an official nonprofit, they said they no longer have to rely heavily on their own funds thanks to their new partnerships.

Advertisement

The organization accepts both monetary donations via Venmo and their website, as well as in-kind donations of physical items like soaps, claw clips, and other basket items — year-round.

The organization’s future goal is to expand to all the different NICUs in the area, and potentially the PICUs (Pediatric Intensive Care Units) as well, since that was also part of Alyssa’s experience.

To learn how you can donate or get involved with “Helping Hands for NICU Moms,” you can visit their website by clicking here.

Send tips to neighborhood reporter Brady Caskey

Have a story idea from South Boise, West Boise or Kuna? Share it with Brady below —

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho Stop ordinance seen as progress for cyclists, supporters say | Jefferson City News-Tribune

Published

on

Idaho Stop ordinance seen as progress for cyclists, supporters say | Jefferson City News-Tribune


Jefferson City is on pace to see a nearly 65 percent increase in pedestrian and cyclist crashes in 2026 versus 2025, but a new ordinance passed Monday by the Jefferson City Council may help curb that trend.

The Jefferson City Council agreed to pass “Idaho Stop Laws” in Jefferson City, allowing bicyclists to treat stop signs as yield signs and stop lights as stop signs. The ordinance comes as Jefferson City has suffered 11 non-motorist crashes through the first four months of 2026, according to data provided by the Jefferson City Police Department in late April, including a fatal cyclist-car collision on April 21 that took the life of Richard Roebben.

The city saw a total of 20 non-motorist-involved crashes in 2025. At its current rate, it would see about 33 non-motorist-crashes by the end of 2026.

While some city officials are nervous about the new law and the learning curve for Jefferson City drivers, advocates told the News Tribune they believe it will make the city safer for cyclists and less frustrating for drivers.

Advertisement

Arkansas, Delaware, Idaho, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Utah and Washington have all adopted laws allowing cyclists to yield at stop signs. Arkansas, Idaho and Oklahoma also have laws allowing cyclists to treat red stop lights as a stop sign.

Arkansas state Sen. Missy Irvin, R-Mountain View, co-sponsored Arkansas’ Idaho Stop law when it passed in 2019. She said the law has benefits beyond increased pedestrian safety — it serves as a boon to Arkansas’ cycling tourism and engagement on natural cycling trails, a feature it shares with the Show Me State.

“We’ve seen just an incredible increase in cycling. I think it was just looking at what was happening in other states and working with … cyclist enthusiasts that really wanted to be proactive as possible,” Irvin said. “I think we were being more preemptive and just kind of following what other states have done in response so that we can be proactive in our approach.”

According to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) data, bicyclist crashes in Idaho fell by 14.5 percent the year after the law’s adoption in 1982. Delaware in 2017 passed a law that includes the stop-sign-as-yield provision, but did not change rules for red lights. Bicycle crashes at stop-sign intersections in Delaware fell by 23 percent in the 30 months after its passage, according to the NHTSA.

Irvin added that the law is a boon for rural cyclists as well as city cyclists, allowing bike riders to roll through rural roads where motorists wouldn’t expect a cyclist, and spend less cumulative time in harm’s way.

Advertisement

Missouri law allows cyclists to proceed through an intersection with a red light if it’s clear that the traffic signal cannot detect the bicycle and therefore will not change unless there is more weight on the sensor.

The city ordinance states a cyclist may proceed through a stop sign after yielding to pedestrians and vehicles. A cyclist may also stop at a red light and then proceed through without waiting for a green light after yielding to pedestrians and vehicles.

Community feedback

The lone dissenting vote came from Ward 5 Councilman Shane Kampeter, who said he has concerns that drivers would not know about the new ordinance and thus result in more crashes. Lt. Jason Payne of the Jefferson City Police Department also voiced concerns about having more crashes for the same reason.

Andy Besselman, a local cyclist, submitted the original request to the city’s Transportation and Traffic Commission and said he doesn’t expect many drivers would even need to know about the new ordinance. He said cyclists typically only roll through stop signs if there are no vehicles around and added the goal of the ordinance was to eliminate any fear of receiving a ticket for not stopping at a stop sign.

Advertisement

In Besselman’s experience with other cyclists, he said, he doesn’t expect any cyclist to run a stop sign if there is a vehicle approaching.

“Rule No. 1: If there’s a car coming, don’t go,” Besselman said.

Since a cyclist is more vulnerable on the road than somebody in a vehicle, Besselman said most cyclists are already aware of their surroundings.

Besselman said a lot of cyclists have already been practicing the “Idaho Stop” for a while now anyway. Besselman bikes to work every morning and said it’s often safer to roll through an intersection if he knows there are no other vehicles approaching and there is no risk of being hit by a car.

He said he’s heard of other cyclists getting “rear-ended” by a vehicle after sitting at a stop sign and being unable to get back up to speed quick enough.

Advertisement

“So for me, it was always just personal safety,” Besselman said.

He added this ordinance should also keep traffic moving because drivers will not have to wait for the cyclist to get up to speed before proceeding themself.

He added that cyclists do not have to follow the Idaho Stop Law. If a cyclist is more comfortable coming to a complete stop at a stop sign and waiting for a green light, Besselman said, they should do what feels safest.

At the City Council meeting on May 4, Kampeter said he thinks people don’t actually know many of the laws governing cyclists on the road.

Nathan Nickolaus, interim city attorney, said drivers and cyclists should defer to Missouri’s driver’s manual. The 2025 “Driver Guide” from the Missouri Department of Revenue has a section on sharing the road with mopeds and bicycles. That section states crashes with bicyclists occur most often at intersections due to drivers not noticing the cyclist.

Advertisement

The guide states cyclists have the same rights and responsibilities as a motor vehicle operator, and that cyclists should ride with traffic and try to stay as close to the right side of the road as possible.

For drivers who want to pass a cyclist, the driver guide states motorists should give the cyclist a full lane width.

“Do not squeeze past these road users. The bicycle is generally a slow-moving vehicle and this may require you to slow down. Wait for a clear stretch of road before passing a cyclist in a lane too narrow to share,” reads the driver guide.

Besselman said drivers should treat cyclists like “any other vehicle,” and drivers should only pass cyclists if they would also pass a car in the same location.

The next step

Advertisement

The most awkward part of the ordinance, a pedestrian and cyclist safety advocate said, will be the limited scope of the law. If a cyclist were to leave Jefferson City limits, the law would no longer apply to them.

However, the Capital City can serve as a model and leader in bicyclist safety for the rest of state, said Jackson Hotaling, director of policy and programs with Missourians for Responsible Transportation, a non-motorist activist and advocacy group.

“We’re already seeing our bordering states starting to implement these laws,” Hotaling said. “Particularly in Arkansas, there’s so many people that are living right up on the border with Missouri. … A lot of folks on the Arkansas side are probably going to assume that exists within Missouri, and that’s up to the state of Missouri to respond accordingly.”

“I think that having the City of Jefferson’s ordinance as a model will be beneficial for other municipalities in the state,” he added. “… Ultimately, I think it could be a reasonable goal to look at this as an ordinance for the state of Missouri as well.”

Irvin, whose Senate district comprises the northern Ozark region of Arkansas, and thus shares many roads and cycling routes with the Southern region of Missouri, said she’d like to see the state work toward its own Idaho Stop law and was willing to work across state lines to help.

Advertisement

“If you’re trying to be more friendly towards cyclists and take advantage of these (shared) resources, then I think it’s just better to have some consistency with your laws,” Irvin said.

Irvin added that smaller cities would benefit greatly from countywide ordinances to ensure uniform laws across the area. The Cole County Traffic and Safety Advisory Board last met on April 30 and did not discuss any bike safety ordinances. It is slated to next meet on July 16, according to the Cole County website.

Even if neither the state nor the county follow up on Jefferson City’s ordinance, Hotaling said the passage of the law and the support of City Council represent meaningful progress for non-motorists in Jefferson City.

“I just want to applaud the City Council for making this consideration and taking it upon themselves to do the research to get there,” said Hotaling, who spends much of his time cycling in the city. “To be able to have a beautiful downtown and have place that’s enjoyable and safe to walk and bike around, I think it can really inspire a lot of folks in smaller towns and suburban areas to think about what that might look like when they do visit the Capitol.”

News Tribune file
From left, 15-year-old August Newlon and 17-year-old Finley Beyke check for traffic before crossing an intersection on Saturday, April 25, 2026, in downtown Jefferson City.
News Tribune file  Finley Beyke, 17, crosses an intersection Saturday, April 25, 2026, while traveling on High Street in Jefferson City.
News Tribune file
Finley Beyke, 17, crosses an intersection Saturday, April 25, 2026, while traveling on High Street in Jefferson City. “I think they should put more bike lanes and more bike signs,” Beyke said about improving safety for cyclists. “There are a lot of cars that don’t care.” Beyke said his father was struck by a motorist while cycling.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending