Two House committees Thursday passed a bill that would impose more user fees to nonresidents who visit specified state parks and trails.

The House Tourism and Water and Land Committee passed the latest version of Senate Bill 439, which would allow the state Board of Land and Natural Resources to select certain state parks that would require a user fee, be adjusted over time for inflation and contribute to the state parks special fund.

Currently, there are 10 state parks with parking and entry fees, four of which have advance reservation systems for regulated access and collecting fees, according to written testimony by Dawn Chang, state Department of Land and Natural Resources chair.

Chang said another five park units are being evaluated for parking and entry fees and reservation-based access.

At Thursday’s hearing, Tourism Committee Chair Rep. Adrian Tam (D-Waikiki) said the bill would be passed with amendments, including one that would allow the state DLNR to consider seasonal pricing to its trails and parks.

“I know that they’re trying to do that now, but hopefully that language would provide them cover,” Tam said.

Chang wrote in her testimony that DLNR’s Division of State Parks is consulting with the Hawaii Tourism Authority to obtain data to implement the seasonal pricing comparable to the airline and hotel industry.

The “green fees” are in the interest of the organization Kua‘aina Ulu ‘Auamo, which advocates for biocultural, meaning natural and cultural, heritage in Hawaii. KUA advocate Olan Leimomi Fisher and Executive Director Kevin Chang wrote in supportive testimony that the bill aligns with the state Constitution, which “requires the protection and enforcement of Native Hawaiian rights, including the traditional and customary practices that are intrinsically dependent on our threatened natural resources,” according to their statement.

“The funds collected through this bill could help offset some of the environmental and community well-being degradation caused by our historically overly-extractive tourism industry by infusing the state’s (DLNR) with much-needed funds dedicated to the protection, management, and restoration of Hawaii’s natural resources,” Fisher and Kevin Chang wrote.

However, the bill fails to explicitly exempt Native Hawaiians, according to Native Hawaiian resident Cat Orlans, who said in written testimony that the bill would require entry fees for her family members who live on the mainland.

Native Hawaiians, she wrote, “possess inherent rights under both state and federal law to access lands for traditional, cultural and religious practices.”

“Imposing fees, regardless of their residency status, could undermine these protected rights,” Orlans wrote. “This exemption is critical to honor the rights and protections afforded to Native Hawaiians under the state Constitution.”

The push to charge tourists with “green fees” is nothing new, as previous legislative sessions saw a flurry of bills aimed at charging visitor fees. During the 2022 campaign trail, some candidates for governor highlighted the initiative as a way to curb tourism in the post-COVID-19 economy.

According to supportive written testimony from organization Coalition Earth, Hawaii’s current per-tourist investment in its natural environment is approximately $9 per tourist, compared with Palau’s $92, New Zealand’s $188 and the Galapagos Islands’ $373.

“New Zealand, the Maldives, Cancun, and Venice, and numerous other countries have green fee programs for visitors, which vary from $1 per night to a $100 entrance fee for the purpose of environmental conservation,” the organization wrote. “We need to catch up.”

HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) – In the latest edition of “HNN Overtime,” hosts Kyle Chinen, Davis Pitner and Cienna Pilotin are back to talk about the recent sports headlines in the islands.

The crew talk about UH men’s volleyball, baseball and women’s basketball.

They also say aloha to original member Davis Pitner!

Catch new episodes of “Overtime” wherever you get your podcasts or watch our video podcast on HNN’s digital platforms.

Copyright 2024 Hawaii News Now. All rights reserved.

Hawaii’s visitor economy faces a fresh challenge: rising fears among likely international travelers. With stories of weeks-long detentions at U.S. borders and growing anti-American sentiment in key markets like Canada and Japan, a troubling question is surfacing: Will global visitors turn away—and what happens to Hawaii tourism if they do?

In January 2025, of the 792,177 visitors to Hawaii, 197,507 were international guests, making up 25% of the total count. Over 100,00 came from Canada and Japan. Their absence would have consequences far beyond hotel bookings. Hawaii’s flights, local businesses, and even jobs could be at risk.

International visitors on edge.

Hawaii’s top international markets are showing signs of distress. Beat of Hawaii readers echoed the concern seen in mainstream media. Bruce M, a longtime Maui visitor from Canada, wrote, “Due to the treatment of the US to our country, we won’t be returning.” Another visitor added, “We used to go for 14 days. Now we only do 10. Basically, it is your loss.”

These aren’t one-off comments—they reflect a growing mood. Travelers from Vancouver to Tokyo to Western Europe voice concerns about being detained, harassed, or unwelcome. For Hawaii, the impact is compounded by the state’s physical distance and reliance on long-haul flights.

Hawaii tourism leaders recently confirmed in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser that Canadians are rethinking trips. Some Canadians report backlash at home just for coming to Hawaii now. Others cited political tensions, economic retaliation, and a push to avoid U.S. travel as key reasons for staying away.

Detentions of international visitors spark fear.

Recent stories of detained international tourists are chilling. A German man spent 16 days in U.S. detention after a routine border crossing. Another tourist from Wales was held for nearly three weeks. A Canadian woman spent 12 days in custody before being sent home. The exact reasons were not released, but according to Customs and Border Protection, “if statutes or visa terms are violated, travelers may be subject to detention and removal.”

The issue isn’t necessarily about the detentions themselves—it’s the uncertainty and fear they’ve triggered in an unprecedented and widespread way. “Nobody is safe there anymore to come to America as a tourist,” one detainee said after being released.

The unease is spreading beyond those directly affected. Hawaii officials say they’ve received emails from Canadians canceling travel plans due to political tensions and uncertainty at the border.

Even travelers who were never affected now wonder if it could happen to them. For international visitors, Hawaii suddenly doesn’t feel like a separate destination—it feels like part of a country that may not want them.

The transparency gap in Hawaii widens.

Making things worse, Hawaii stopped reporting daily international arrival numbers on March 1, citing a long-overdue system overhaul we previously wrote about. At a time when businesses need clarity, the data gap has left everyone guessing.

Without visibility, it’s impossible to know whether concerns translate into cancellations. The pause in reporting couldn’t come at a worse moment—just as international markets are shifting.

Domestic visitors are under pressure, too.

Mainland travelers, Hawaii’s core audience, are also scaling back. Reader after reader shared frustrations about rising costs, service inconsistencies, and a fading sense of value.

Peterparker22, who brought his family of five to Oahu and the Big Island, said the only way they could afford it was to burn every airline and hotel point they’d saved. “The total cost would have been $25,000 in cash. It’s probably the last time I can afford to bring my family to Hawaii this way.”

Another reader noted, “Two weeks in Hawaii were going to cost more than our three-week cruise next year to three countries.” Others are opting for New Orleans, the Caribbean, or simply staying home.

Hawaii has recently tried to offset this with resident discounts and marketing focused on mindful travel. But affordability remains a sticking point, and even loyal visitors are weighing their options.

Flights and perks could fade.

When international demand drops, it’s not just fewer people—it’s fewer planes, especially widebody aircraft that serve long-haul routes from Japan and Canada. These flights support not just passengers but cargo and interline connections, too.

Reducing these flights could mean fewer total seats to Hawaii, higher prices, and less flexibility for all travelers—including those from the U.S. mainland. Premium experiences like lounges and first-class service also risk being downgraded if high-spend travelers disappear.

The next chapter isn’t written yet.

It’s clear Hawaii’s visitor landscape is rapidly shifting. Rising geopolitical tension, travel anxiety, and domestic cost fatigue could lead to real change. Fewer visitors—international or domestic—could impact everything from air service to hospitality jobs.

But Hawaii’s greatest strength has always been its ability to adapt. If the state and industry leaders respond with openness, cultural grounding, and true hospitality, Hawaii can remain a top destination even in a changing world.

Your comments about how government policies impact travel are appreciated.