California
OpenAI joins Silicon Valley companies lobbying against California's AI bill, which includes a 'kill switch'
-
OpenAI opposes California’s AI bill, arguing that it could drive companies out of the state.
-
The bill requires strict safety protocols for AI models, including a “kill switch.”
-
Despite industry opposition, the bill will be voted on in the California Assembly at the end of the month.
OpenAI is joining Silicon Valley’s tech titans in the fight against California’s landmark artificial intelligence regulation bill, Bloomberg reported on Thursday.
SB 1047, introduced by California State Sen. Scott Wiener in February, seeks to establish “common sense safety standards” for AI systems that cost over $100 million to develop, Business Insider reported on Monday.
The bill mandates that companies implement protocols to prevent their AI models from causing “critical harms,” such as being used in cyberattacks or leading to the development of weapons of mass destruction.
The bill also specified the provision of a “full shutdown,” which functions as a kill switch for AI systems.
Jason Kwon, OpenAI’s chief strategy officer, warned that the bill could stifle progress and drive companies out of California, in a letter addressed to Wiener on Wednesday.
Kwon also wrote that regulation of AI concerning national security is “best managed at the federal level” rather than through a “patchwork of state laws.”
Silicon Valley tech heavyweights like Meta and Anthropic have been lobbying against the bill, too.
Meta warned that the bill might discourage the open-source movement by exposing developers to significant legal liabilities, wrote Rob Sherman, vice president of policy and deputy chief privacy officer at Meta, in a letter in June. Sherman wrote that regulation could hamper the broader tech ecosystem because smaller businesses rely on these freely available models to innovate.
Anthropic also resisted the bill’s stringent preemptive regulations, advocating instead for a more balanced approach that wouldn’t stymie progress, BI reported on Monday.
OpenAI previously lobbied against similar legislation by the European Union. The company sought to ease the regulatory requirements on general-purpose AI systems like GPT-3, Time reported last year.
The EU had since altered its final draft of the AI Act to exclude language that would classify general-purpose AI as high risk, instead focusing on “foundation models” with more limited requirements, according to Time.
Despite the industry opposition, Sen. Wiener argued that it is a “highly reasonable bill that asks large AI labs to do what they’ve already committed to doing,” the senator wrote in response to OpenAI’s letter on Wednesday.
The bill had passed a vote in the state Senate and is set for a final vote in the California Assembly at the end of the month.
OpenAI and Sen. Weiner didn’t respond to a request for comment sent outside standard business hours.
Read the original article on Business Insider
California
California Highway Patrol warns against attempted ‘Amber Alert' scam
The California Highway Patrol is warning the public to beware of fraudsters posing as “AMBER Alert representatives” offering to “register” children.
“They ask for confidential info and to meet at your home,” the CHP said Saturday on social media. “This is not how the AMBER Alert system works.”
No registration is ever required, the CHP said.
AMBER — which stands for America’s Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response — is only activated by law enforcement agencies investigating reports of an abducted or missing child.
The alerts are intended to provide the public with immediate information about a child abduction.
The CHP said it is the only agency authorized to activate AMBER Alerts.
“Never provide personal information or answer calls from unknown or ‘possible scam’ numbers,” the highway patrol said.
If contacted by a scammer, the CHP said, report it to your local law enforcement agency immediately.
California
Opinion: California utilities have lofty climate goals. Too bad their customers are in the dark
Regardless of the presidential election results, the clean energy transition is still a major priority for the nation’s electric utilities. Perhaps nowhere in the world is the pressure more intense than in Southern California, where the demands on the power grid are high and many residents are well acquainted with the consequences of aging, unsuitable infrastructure.
Many electric utilities now consider sustainability crucial to their overall strategy. However, as evidenced by countless examples of conservatives being elected on anti-environmental platforms, the majority of consumers just aren’t thinking that much about clean energy.
For the past four years, my team at J.D. Power and I have been analyzing customer awareness of and support for utilities’ climate programs and goals in an annual Sustainability Index. Without fail, we found that very few customers have any awareness of their utilities’ clean energy goals. This year’s index found that just 22% of customers knew their utilities had such goals, a figure that was even lower in previous years.
I experienced one aspect of this phenomenon as a consumer when I went through the grueling process of learning about and applying for California and federal rebates for an energy-efficient heat pump system I installed in my home last year. Even though I wrote about that ordeal for The Times and heard from consumers who had similar experiences, I have yet to get any response from my utility. Heat pumps have been a cornerstone of clean energy transition efforts, but when it comes to installing and using them and understanding their benefits, utilities are leaving consumers on their own.
A deep dive into my combined electric and gas bills showed that my total expenses dropped 3% in 2024 compared with the same period in 2022, before I began installing the system. And because average unit electricity prices increased by more than 20% in the interim, my adjusted heating costs are down more than 23%. In addition, I now have the benefit of air conditioning during summer heat waves, which I did not have prior to the conversion.
But before I could even begin to understand the extent of these benefits, I had to download reams of data from Pacific Gas & Electric Co.’s data hub, build a spreadsheet to organize and chart my energy use and utility billing trends, and cross-reference everything with federal greenhouse gas equivalency calculations. Does anyone think an average consumer would go through all this?
The experience illustrated the chasm between the way utilities communicate about environmental responsibility and the way consumers live it. The fact is, if any utilities are ever going to meet their sustainability targets — many of which call for reaching net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 — they are going to need their customers to change their behavior. But given that few customers are even aware of these priorities, and that most are far more concerned about affordability than they are about sustainability, there is a complete disconnect between utility and customer goals.
But these goals can be aligned if the companies explain and promote them clearly and convincingly. We’re living through a historic transformation that has the potential to reinvent heating and cooling, travel and more. Smart-grid technologies can put individual homeowners at the center of the energy storage and transmission system. None of that will happen without massive consumer buy-in.
Utilities should be launching bold outreach strategies, investing in customer education on how to save money (and pollution) by adopting new technologies, and making it easy for consumers to help them reach their environmental goals. But most utilities are instead wasting their time talking about lofty sustainability targets that lack the substance and support they need to become reality.
Electric utilities have a huge opportunity to help customers save money and improve their experience, increase their own revenue and meet their clean energy goals. To do so, they need to start understanding and communicating effectively with their customers.
Andrew Heath is the vice president of utilities intelligence at J.D. Power.
California
California’s new ‘Daylighting’ law forces change to Davis parking
-
Health1 week ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
Business5 days ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Politics1 week ago
'Politics is bad for business.' Why Disney's Bob Iger is trying to avoid hot buttons
-
Culture5 days ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports4 days ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics3 days ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics3 days ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country