California
California wants more tiny homes
A Democratic senator in California is trying to pass legislation that would speed up the construction of temporary tiny homes to shelter homeless people, relieving the Golden State’s ongoing crisis.
Senator Josh Becker, who represents California’s Senate District 13, introduced Senate Bill 1395 in February, in an attempt to streamline interim housing projects on a statewide level and house homeless people quickly.
The measure, also called the Interim Housing Act, would make relocatable, non-congregate interim housing eligible for streamline zoning, reducing construction time and costs, as well as cutting red tape and speeds up approvals for local governments that want to build them.
“It expedites the process for cities and counties to build more housing options and significantly increase the inventory,” Becker said of the bill. “With the development of more interim housing, we can put a roof over the heads of our unhoused neighbors faster so that they can get back on their feet and on track towards permanent housing.”
Newsweek contacted Becker for comment by phone on Wednesday morning, outside of standard working hours.
ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images
California has one of the highest rates of homelessness in the country. In 2023, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development reported that there were 181,399 unhoused Californians—28 percent of the country’s total homeless population.
Between 2007 and 2023 the homelessness rate surged by 30.5 percent in California; between 2022 and 2023 alone, it rose by 5.8 percent.
According to the department, last year the Golden State accounted for 48 percent of all unsheltered people in the country, with a total of 123,423 homeless people without a roof over their heads. “This is nearly eight times the number of unsheltered people in the state with the next highest number, Florida,” the department wrote.
Becker said that “despite concerted efforts to increase housing production, California’s budget, land, and zoning limitations inhibit sufficient permanent housing construction.”
“This is really a California issue,” Becker said during a press conference on August 6. “Over the last 10 years, people on the street are suffering much worse outcomes. They’re dying on the street, they’re being insulted on the street, they’re becoming addicted to drugs on the street,” he added.
“And the key is how can we move people into shelters? How can we help them rebuild their lives quickly?[…]SB 1395 will help save lives by bridging the gap between being unsheltered and finding permanent housing.”
SB 1395 puts interim housing—like temporary small homes shelters—at the center of a short-term solution that could save lives in California. Several cities across different states in the U.S. have built temporary tiny homes shelters to address the urgent issue of housing people at a time when the U.S. housing market is particularly unaffordable.
Last year, California Governor Gavin Newsom promised the construction of 1,200 tiny homes to shelter the state’s homeless population as part of a $1-billion initiative, but until now only 150 have reportedly been purchased. Los Angeles is expected to receive 500 units; Sacramento 350 units; San Jose 200 units; and San Diego County 150 units.
The slow progress of the initiative is due to the fact that the responsibility to buy and place the tiny homes was moved from the state to the jurisdiction of each city and county, Fortune reported. Last month, Newsom notified San Diego that the state was withdrawing its $10-million grant after the county moved too slowly to build the tiny home shelters.
The problem of housing homeless people has become particularly urgent after the Supreme Court ruled in July to allow local governments to enforce laws against people sleeping in public spaces. At the end of the same month, Newsom issued an executive order calling for the removal of homeless encampments across the state—whether the people living there can found a shelter to stay in or not—with the idea of putting additional pressure on local governments to address the crisis.
Tiny homes—which normally measure an average 400 square feet or less—are usually fitted with a bed, a small toilet, WiFi, and air conditioning or electric fans. Experts told Newsweek that while they are a key part of the solution, they can only be considered a temporary option before housing homeless people permanently in bigger spaces.
“Tiny homes are in many ways safer than being on the streets unsheltered. However, they are not a long-term solution,” Jamie Chang, an associate professor at the School of Social Welfare at the University of California, Berkeley, previously told Newsweek.
“It is essential to view tiny homes as a temporary option that should be a stepping stone to more stable housing in a larger, permanent unit.”
SB 1395 is sponsored by San Jose’s Mayor Matt Mahan, Dignity Moves, the Bay Area Council, and the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association. It also has the backing of San Francisco’s Mayor London Breed.
California
California governor race heats up with uncertainty and potential surprises
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KBAK/KBFX) As the race for California’s next governor intensifies, uncertainty looms with the primary election just six months away.
A recent Emerson College poll shows Republican Chad Bianco leading by a narrow margin of one point, while 31% of voters remain undecided.
“The field remains wide open,” said Tal Eslick, owner of Vista Consulting. “There’s a half dozen credible Democrats in the race. There’s really a couple – two – namely Republicans.”
Eslick noted that Bianco’s lead is more reflective of the crowded Democratic field than a shift toward Republicans statewide.
California governor race heats up with uncertainty and potential surprises (Photo: AdobeStock)
He suggested a “black horse candidate” could still emerge, possibly from Hollywood or outside politics.
With rising energy and gas prices, affordability is expected to be a key issue for voters.
California governor race heats up with uncertainty and potential surprises (AP Photo/Juliana Yamada, File)
“I think that you could also see voters vote with their pockets,” Eslick said, highlighting the potential for a non-traditional candidate to gain traction.
California
California threatens Tesla with 30-day suspension of sales license for deceptive self-driving claims
SAN FRANCISCO — California regulators are threatening to suspend Tesla’s license to sell its electric cars in the state early next year unless the automaker tones down its marketing tactics for its self-driving features after a judge concluded the Elon Musk-led company has been misleading consumers about the technology’s capabilities.
The potential 30-day blackout of Tesla’s California sales is the primary punishment being recommended to the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles in a decision released late Tuesday. The ruling by Administrative Law Judge Juliet Cox determined that Tesla had for years engaged in deceptive marketing practices by using the terms “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” to promote the autonomous technology available in many of its cars.
After presiding over five days of hearings held in Oakland, California in July, Cox also recommended suspending Tesla’s license to manufacture cars at its plant in Fremont, California. But California regulators aren’t going to impose that part of the judge’s proposed penalty.
Tesla will have a 90-day window to make changes that more clearly convey the limits of its self-driving technology to avoid having its California sales license suspended. After California regulators filed its action against Tesla in 2023, the Austin, Texas, company already made one significant change by putting in wording that made it clear its Full Self-Driving package still required supervision by a human driver while it’s deployed.
“Tesla can take simple steps to pause this decision and permanently resolve this issue — steps autonomous vehicle companies and other automakers have been able to achieve,” said Steve Gordon, the director of the California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Tesla didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
The automaker has already been plagued by a global downturn in demand that began during a backlash to Musk’s high-profile role overseeing cuts in the U.S. government budget overseeing the Department of Government that President Donald Trump created in his administration. Increased competition and an older lineup of vehicles also weighed on Tesla sales, although the company did revamp its Model Y, the world’s bestselling vehicle, and unveil less-expensive versions of the Model Y and Model X.
Although Musk left Washington after a falling out with Trump, the fallout has continued to weigh on Tesla’s auto sales, which had decreased by 9% from 2024 through the first nine months of this year.
Despite the slump and the threatened sales suspension in California, Tesla’s stock price touched an all-time high $495.28 during Wednesday’s early trading before backtracking later to fall below $470. Despite that reversal, Tesla’s shares are still worth slightly more than they were before Musk’s ill-fated stint in the Trump administration — a “somewhat successful” assignment he recently said he wouldn’t take on again.
The performance of Tesla’s stock against the backdrop of eroding auto sales reflects the increasing emphasis that investors are placing on Musk’s efforts to develop artificial intelligence technology to implant into humanoid robots and a fleet of self-driving Teslas that will operate as robotaxis across the U.S.
Musk has been promising Tesla’s self-driving technology would fulfill his robotaxi vision for years without delivering on the promise, but the company finally began testing the concept in Austin earlier this year, albeit with a human supervisor in the car to take over if something went awry. Just a few days ago, Musk disclosed Tesla had started tests of its robotaxis without a safety monitor in the vehicle.
California regulators are far from the first critic to accuse Tesla of exaggerating the capabilities of its self-driving technology in a potentially dangerous manner. The company has steadfastly insisted that information contained in its vehicle’s owner’s manual on its website have made it clear that its self-driving technology still requires human supervision, even while releasing a 2020 video depicting one of its cars purportedly driving on its own. The video, cited as evidence against Tesla in the decision recommending a suspension of the company’s California sales license, remained on its website for nearly four years.
Tesla has been targeted in a variety of lawsuits alleging its mischaracterizations about self-driving technology have lulled humans into a false of security that have resulted in lethal accidents. The company has settled or prevailed in several cases, but earlier this year a Miami jury held Tesla partly responsible for a lethal crash in Florida that occurred while Autopilot was deployed and ordered the automaker to pay more than $240 million in damages.
California
California warns Tesla faces 30-day sale ban for misleading use of
The California DMV on Tuesday said Tesla Motors faces a possible 30-day sale ban over its misleading use of the term “autopilot” in its marketing of electric vehicles.
On Nov. 20, an administrative judge ruled that Tesla Motors’ use of “autopilot ” and “full self-driving capability” was a misleading description of its “advanced driving assistant features,” and that it violated state law, the DMV said.
In their decision, the judge proposed suspending Tesla’s manufacturing and dealer license for 30 days. However, the DMV is giving Tesla 60 days to address its use of the term “autopilot” before temporarily suspending its dealer license.
“Tesla can take simple steps to pause this decision and permanently resolve this issue — steps autonomous vehicle companies and other automakers have been able to achieve in California’s nation-leading and supportive innovation marketplace,” DMV Director Steve Gordon said.
Tesla had already stopped its use of “full self-driving capability” and switched to “full self-driving (supervised)” after the DMV filed accusations against it in November 2023.
The DMV said its decision to file those accusations stretches back to Tesla’s 2021 marketing of its advanced driver assistance system. Besides the two terms, the DMV said it also took issue with the phrase, “The system is designed to be able to conduct short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver’s seat.”
“Vehicles equipped with those ADAS features could not at the time of those advertisements, and cannot now, operate as autonomous vehicles,” the DMV said.
As for the manufacturing license suspension, the DMV issued a permanent stay on that proposal.
-
Iowa3 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Washington1 week agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa5 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Maine2 days agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland4 days agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
Technology1 week agoThe Game Awards are losing their luster
-
South Dakota4 days agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Nebraska1 week agoNebraska lands commitment from DL Jayden Travers adding to early Top 5 recruiting class