Connect with us

California

California votes to keep forced prison labor

Published

on

California votes to keep forced prison labor


On November 5, Californians rejected a ballot measure banning forced prison labor, voting instead to keep the practice legal in state prisons.

Proposition 6, which moved to eliminate the “constitutional provision allowing involuntary servitude for incarcerated persons,” is projected to fail, the Associated Press reported. With 72 percent of the vote counted, 54 percent of California voters said no to the ballot measure.

The Golden State’s constitution has what some describe as a “slavery loophole.” While slavery is illegal in the state, California’s 199,000 prisoners can be required to work jobs that earn them less than $1 an hour. Prisoners who decline these jobs can face severe consequences, such as delays in their parole eligibility, Politico reported.

One of the critical jobs that prisoners can be required to work is fighting wildfires. While salaried firefighters in California receive $74,000 on average plus benefits, prisoners receive $2 a day and an extra $1 an hour when fighting active fires.

Advertisement
Inmate firefighters from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation at the Station Fire Incident Command Post in the Lake View Terrace area of Los Angeles on September 3, 2009. On Tuesday, Californians voted against…


Jae C. Hong/Associated Press

The Anti-Recidivism Coalition, a grassroots organization working to end mass incarceration in California, led the push to remove the “slavery loophole” from the state’s constitution.

Esteban Nunez, ARC’s chief strategy consultant and lobbyist, spoke with Newsweek about the result, saying voters might not have understood the magnitude of the proposition because of its language.

“One of the most significant challenges was the ballot title and summary itself, which used the term ‘involuntary servitude’ without referencing ‘slavery,’” Nunez said.

“Despite our advocacy for including ‘slavery’ in the ballot language to capture the full moral weight of the issue, the official language used only ‘involuntary servitude.’ This choice likely diluted the urgency of the measure for voters who may not fully understand the historical context and human rights implications of forced labor in prisons,” he continued.

Nunez added that ARC was working to convince people that “even within a carceral system, forced labor is inhumane, counterproductive, and fundamentally wrong.”

Advertisement

He said: “The focus here needs to be on the benefits of rehabilitation over forced labor. Studies and real-life examples show that when incarcerated individuals have the opportunity to pursue education, therapy, and voluntary work, they are far more likely to re-enter society as law-abiding, contributing citizens.

“Forced labor, however, disrupts these opportunities, perpetuating cycles of harm, poverty, and recidivism.”

Inmates working as firefighters, CA
Prisoners cutting down trees along the Highway 29 while fighting a wildfire near Calistoga, California, on October 12, 2017. As a ballot measure to end forced prison labor did not pass, Californian prisoners could still…


Jae C. Hong/Associated Press

Nevadans also had the chance to vote on an antislavery ballot measure on Tuesday, and unlike their neighbors to the West, voters in the Silver State chose to abolish slavery in their prison system.

Nevada’s Question 4, which moved to repeal the state’s provision allowing slavery and involuntary servitude as punishment for a crime, passed with 61 percent of the vote, the Associated Press reported.

Alabama and Tennessee also recently removed provisions for forced prison labor from their state constitutions.

Proposition 6 was not the only prison-related measure on California’s ballot. Californians also voted on Proposition 36, which moved to “increase penalties for repeated theft offenses and certain drug crimes, including some involving fentanyl,” and “create a drug court treatment program for people with multiple drug possession convictions.”

Advertisement

As Newsweek previously reported, the “tough on crime” measure received support from Californians who wanted a stronger response from their government on street drug use and what they saw as a growing homelessness problem, as Proposition 36 would enable law enforcement to act more decisively against repeat offenders and drug-related offenses.

Anne Marie Schubert, a co-chair of the coalition supporting the measure, said, “This is a resounding message that Californians are ready to have safer communities.”

Do you have a story we should be covering? Do you have any questions about this article? Contact  LiveNews@newsweek.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California insurance department accused of hiding information on life insurance complaints

Published

on

California insurance department accused of hiding information on life insurance complaints


A Bay Area consumer-advocacy group claims California’s Department of Insurance is violating state public-records law by refusing to hand over important data on consumer complaints about life insurance.

The Pleasant Hill-based non-profit Life Insurance Consumer Advocacy Center called the department’s purported violation of the California Public Records Act “inexcusable.”

The department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Numbers and types of consumer complaints about life insurance and annuities, plus the reports and data the department used for the complaints section of its 2023 annual report, would help the non-profit promote the interests of life insurance customers, and provide key information to establish a baseline on consumer complaints.

Advertisement

“Why is (the department) trying to hide this information?” said the group’s executive director Brian Brosnahan.

Of particular interest to the group is assessing consumers’ responses after passage this year of California Senate Bill 263, which imposes requirements for agents selling life insurance, including that they not put their own interest ahead of a customer’s. The group alleges that the the bill, now law, lets agents “falsely tell” a consumer they do not have conflicts of interest with the consumer, even if they stand to make substantial commissions if the customer follows their guidance.

The Department of Insurance’s alleged stonewalling has gone on for months, the group said in a news release Tuesday. An initial request in August drew a response from the department that it did not have the information, according to the group, which responded by pointing out that the department’s annual report contained charts showing total complaints and the top 10 complaint topics. The department “obviously did possess the requested information,” the group claimed.

Another back-and-forth followed, with the department saying the requested data was “not maintained by the Department,” the group said.

“This statement is obviously false since (the department) necessarily maintains the underlying data and reports from which the charts in the Annual Report were generated,” the group claimed.

Advertisement

In October, the department “finally admitted that it possessed the requested data,” the group said, but now is refusing to provide it, saying it is confidential, the group said.

 

 

Originally Published:



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Kamala’s California problem

Published

on

Kamala’s California problem


In the final days of the presidential election, President-elect Donald Trump never missed a chance to tie his opponent to California. It was a critique that required no elaboration—though true to form, Trump didn’t shy away from providing an overheated one. At his Madison Square Garden rally in October, he proclaimed that Vice President Kamala Harris was a “radical-left lunatic” who “destroyed California.”

Breathless rhetoric notwithstanding, it is a problem for national Democratic ambitions that California—the state most associated with the party’s rule—is now synonymous with the top issue of the election: the rising cost of living. 

For the first time in recent memory, housing costs emerged as a major presidential election issue. (Experts agree that it’s the last major driver of inflation.) And while Harris promised to oversee the construction of 3 million homes over her term, that wasn’t enough to shake the California stigma.

As of 2024, California has the most expensive housing of any continental U.S. state, with a median home price that is more than eight times the state median household income. (A healthy ratio is considered between three to five times the state median income. The ratio in Texas is four.) As a result, working- and middle-class Californians have virtually no path to homeownership.

Advertisement

Locked out of homeownership, half of California renters spend at least a third of their income—for many, up to 50 percent—on rent. And they’re the lucky ones: Nearly 200,000 Californians and counting are homeless.

On some level, rank-and-file Democrats understand that the state is a problem. Ask a progressive in swing states like North Carolina or Wisconsin what she thinks about California, and she will likely try to change the topic of conversation. (Could you imagine a conservative having the same reluctance about Texas?)

Where millions of Americans—myself included—once knew California as a place where friends and family went off and claimed their slice of the dream, the Golden State is today better known as the source of embittered migrants making cash offers on homes. 

Over the past 25 years, hundreds of thousands of people have voted with their feet and left the state. Sluggish population growth over the 2010s led California to lose a congressional seat after the 2020 reapportionment. (On net, red states picked up three seats in that election.) Amid declining immigration, the state has started losing population for the first time in history.

In 2022 alone, an estimated 102,000 Californians moved to Texas. They weren’t fleeing the perfect weather or the high-paying jobs—by and large, they were pushed out by the cost of living.

Advertisement

Occasionally, California’s progressive NIMBYs celebrate this unhappy exodus as a way of flipping other Mountain West states blue. Yet this year, Nevada voted for a Republican presidential candidate for the first time in 20 years. Even before the election, the polls acknowledged that Arizona was a lost cause for the Democrats.

It turns out that forcing people to abandon their home state in search of an affordable home doesn’t exactly engender party loyalty. Indeed, it may be having the opposite effect: Surveys out of states like Texas suggest that new arrivals from California might actually be more conservative than the locals. 

 Of course, Kamala Harris isn’t the reason California has a housing crisis. Democrats aren’t even solely to blame—the zoning that has made it illegal to build housing in California has been backed by NIMBYs of the right and left, and it was Republican Gov. Ronald Reagan who signed the state’s infamous environmental review act into law. 

But the state has been under Democratic supermajority control since 2011. Outside of the unusual case of former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a moderate Republican who backed Harris for president, they have effectively run the state since 1999. The undecided voter might be forgiven for wondering why this issue has only gotten worse under a quarter century of Democratic governance.

Immediately after the election, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom—who has made no secret of his presidential ambitions—called for a special session to address how California will respond to anticipated attacks on reproductive rights, immigrants, and the state’s climate policies by the Trump administration. The proclamation makes no mention whatsoever of the cost-of-living issues that likely handed the election to Trump. 

Advertisement

There is a small but growing cadre of pro-housing Democratic state legislators who have taken up the cause of cutting through the red tape and getting California building again. And they’ve had some successes: Since 2017, the state has legalized granny flats, abolished parking mandates, and streamlined permitting. But all too often, reform efforts have been stymied by members of their own party.

It’s too late for Kamala Harris. But the next Democratic nominee for president had better hope those reformers are successful.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Lottery Powerball, Daily 3 Midday winning numbers for Nov. 11, 2024

Published

on


The California Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Nov. 11, 2024, results for each game:

Powerball

03-21-24-34-46, Powerball: 09, Power Play: 3

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Daily 3

Midday: 9-4-2

Advertisement

Evening: 5-6-3

Check Daily 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Daily Derby

1st:4 Big Ben-2nd:12 Lucky Charms-3rd:6 Whirl Win, Race Time: 1:44.41

Check Daily Derby payouts and previous drawings here.

Fantasy 5

07-10-29-30-34

Advertisement

Check Fantasy 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Daily 4

3-7-9-7

Check Daily 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Desert Sun producer. You can send feedback using this form.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending