California
California Moves To Delay Corporate Climate Reporting Requirement Until 2028
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA – OCTOBER 06: (L-R) California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a press … [+]
In September 2023, California passed legislation requiring large companies to file sustainability disclosures beginning in 2026. The move was part of a global trend of sustainability reporting and environmental, social and governance reporting focused on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. However, a new proposal by Governor Gavin Newsom will delay implementation by two years.
As international focus on climate change increased in the wake of the Paris Agreement, there was a simultaneous increase in pressure on businesses to be more accountable for their climate and environmental policies. This translated into a rise in ESG reports and sustainability reports created by companies to attempt to showcase their green initiatives.
Around 2020, the production of these reports became standard practice by both publicly traded and privately held companies. However, there was no standardization of content. Regulators scrambled to create sustainability reporting standards. This was generally done at a national or international level.
In 2021, the International Sustainability Standards Board drafted the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation’s Sustainability Disclosure Standards. The IFRS Standards were adopted in June 2023 as the global standard for sustainability and climate change reporting, including GHG emissions.
That same month, the European Union announced the adoption of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards. The ESRS incorporated the IFSR Standards for climate related disclosure
In March 2022, the SEC proposed the development of a Climate-Related Disclosure Rule. The final rule, adopted in March, 2024, required large publicly traded companies to disclose climate action, GHG emissions, and the financial impacts of severe weather events. The rule was initially set to go into effect in 2026.
In September 2023, California approved the Climate Accountability Package, a pair of bills aimed at creating sustainability reporting requirements. The bills require reporting standards far beyond the SEC standards.
Senate Bill 253 requires companies who do business in California and have an excess of $1 billion in revenue, defined as “reporting entities”, to submit an annual report for Scope 1 and Scope 2 starting in 2026. Scope 3 reporting will begin in 2027. The State Air Resources Board must create the details of the reporting requirement by January 1, 2025.
Senate Bill 261 requires companies who do business in California and an excess of $500 million in revenue, defined as “covered entities”, to submit a biennial climate-related financial risk report. The report is based on the work of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, established by the Financial Stability Board.
Implementation of sustainability reporting standards has been bumpy at best. The drafting of the regulations was more complicated than lawmakers originally envisioned. The result has been delays in the implementation timelines as governments struggle to find a balance between the desire to require reporting and the complexities of a regulatory scheme. The EU has delayed parts of the ESRS to allow companies to adjust to the existing standards and to allow time for additional drafting.
This became even more problematic, especially in the U.S., as regulations were challenged in the courts. The SEC rule was delayed indefinitely as challenges work through the legal system.
The California requirements faced similar challenges. However, it was not the legal challenges that delayed implementation, but rather the inability to draft the details in time. This is not a new concern, and it is not surprising the Newsom is now pushing the delay.
Newsom signed the bill into law on October 7 but questioned the feasibility of implementation at the time. The Governor’s message with the bill singing, which becomes part of the official record, stated (in full).
“I am signing Senate Bill 253 which would require, among other things, the California Air resources Board (CARB), by January 1, 2025, to develop and adopt regulations requiring businesses with total annual revenues over $1 billion and operating in California to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions to an emissions reporting organization.
“This important policy, once again, demonstrates California’s continued leadership with bold responses to the climate crisis, turning information transparency into climate action. However, the implementation deadlines in this bill are likely infeasible, and the reporting protocol specified could result in inconsistent reporting across businesses subject to the measure. I am directing my Administration to work with the bill’s author and the Legislature next year to address these issues.
“Additionally, I am concerned about the overall financial impact of this bill on businesses, so I am instructing CARB to closely monitor the cost impact as it implements this new bill and to make recommendations to streamline the program. I look forward to working with the Legislature on these modifications to ensure we achieve this bill’s goals of ‘full transparency and consistency’.”
The proposal will delay Scope 1 and Scope 2 reporting until 2028. Scope 3 will be delayed until 2029. It is unclear if the delays will be adopted. However, given the global trend of delays in implementation, it is not unreasonable to assume that California will follow the same path.
California
Amber Alert issued for 3-year-old out of California City in Kern County
CALIFORNIA CITY, Calif. (KABC) — An Amber Alert was issued Friday by the California Highway Patrol for a 3-year-old child out of California City believed to be in imminent danger.
Emaria Peel, 3, was last seen Friday at about 7:17 p.m. in the area of Redwood Boulevard and 83rd Street in California City, according to police.
Authorities believe 31-year-old Charnay Mclin took Emaria. Investigators have not yet said what relationship, if any, Mclin has to the child.
The suspect was described as being 5 feet 9 inches tall, 185 pounds, with black hair and brown eyes.
The child was described as being 1 foot 6 inches, 20 pounds, with black hair and brown eyes.
Police believe they’re traveling in a gold-colored 2021 Kia Sorento with the California license plate: 36095DV
Mclin is considered armed and dangerous. Authorities wants anyone who sees them to call 911.
No further details were immediately known.
Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.
California
Northern California high school graduation shooting suspect arrested in Texas
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in Texas in connection with the deadly shooting after a high school graduation ceremony in Fairfield, California last month, police said.
Fairfield police said U.S. Marshals, accompanied by department detectives, served search and arrest warrants Friday morning at a home in the greater Dallas-Fort Worth area.
The teen was taken into custody without incident on suspicion of murder and related offenses.
Investigators said the suspect fled California and traveled to Texas within days of the June 3 shooting. He will remain in custody while awaiting extradition to Solano County.
The shooting happened after Sem Yeto Continuation High School’s graduation ceremony, which was held on the Fairfield High School campus.
Police said 18-year-old graduate Jamario Baker died at the scene. Three others – an 11-year-old child and two adults, ages 20 and 25 – were wounded.
Authorities have not released the suspect’s name because he is a minor.
Although an arrest has been made, police said the investigation remains active and detectives continue to pursue additional leads.
“While today’s announcement may provide a measure of relief to some, it does not lessen the pain felt by our community,” the Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District said in a statement.
Police plan to hold a news conference Monday at 4 p.m. to discuss the case and arrest.
Fairfield is a Northern California city about 40 miles northwest of San Francisco.
California
California bill would let insurers monitor driving data for discounts
A California bill would let insurers monitor customers’ driving data in exchange for discounted premiums.
Assemblymember Tina McKinnor, the author of AB 311, said the digital monitoring, known as telematics, rewards good driving and would improve safety. In real time, telematics technology would track data such as speed, location and how a vehicle is being driven.
“We have to slow people down,” McKinnor said. “That is the whole purpose for this bill, is driver safety.”
A voter-approved law from 1988, Prop 103, required insurance rates to be based mainly on driving record, miles driven and experience. It made California the only state in the country to prohibit telematics.
McKinnor believes the law is outdated. She argued that her bill would also help good drivers who pay higher rates because of where they live.
“Where I live definitely brings my insurance up,” McKinnor said. “If we both drive the same way, we’ll get charged the same way, instead of by our ZIP code.”
California’s Department of Insurance and consumer groups oppose the bill, citing privacy concerns.
“We can’t look behind the algorithm and see what weight it’s giving to different criteria, which is a big problem,” said Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog. “Auto insurance, otherwise, is transparent. This is why the Department of Insurance is opposed, because of the lack of transparency in the algorithm.”
The proposed savings in exchange for good driving might not be guaranteed. Telematics data from the Maryland Insurance Administration showed that 31% of drivers who opted into the program saw a drop in rates, 24% saw an increase and 45% saw no change to their premiums.
“This collects an awful lot of data about people, more than they know, and it’s like having Big Brother in your back seat,” Court said.
McKinnor insisted that drivers will not be forced to enroll in the program.
“It’s still opt-in in the other 49 states,” she said. “We’re not going to make this mandatory. It’ll be a per-volunteer situation.”
McKinnor’s bill passed through the legislature’s insurance committee. It’s expected to be presented to the full Senate in August.
-
North Dakota2 minutes agoNorth Dakota State looks awesome on College Football 27
-
Ohio9 minutes agoHas there been an explosion of chipmunks this year? Yes. Here’s why
-
Oklahoma12 minutes agoHow Will Oklahoma Softball Benefit From SEC Revenue Distribution?
-
Oregon17 minutes agoRazor clam harvesting set to close soon on north Oregon Coast
-
Pennsylvania24 minutes agoPennsylvania Wins “Best in Show” at The Great American State Fair – Tri-State Alert
-
Rhode Island27 minutes agoHow Federal Hill became Rhode Island’s iconic Little Italy food hub
-
South-Carolina32 minutes agoEditorial: SC Legislature left DUI and THC bills for dead; DUI restrictions can be revived
-
South Dakota39 minutes agoSouth Dakota GFP Commission Holds July Meeting