Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska Senate’s plan for $5,500 in cash payments is dead, but what happens next?

Published

on

Alaska Senate’s plan for ,500 in cash payments is dead, but what happens next?


JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – The Alaska Home of Representatives voted on Saturday to reject the Senate’s price range with $5,500 in money funds to every eligible Alaskan, sending the invoice to a different spherical of negotiations within the closing days of the legislative session.

A convention committee has been busy negotiating the variations between the Home and Senate’s budgets, so a single invoice can move via each chambers and onto Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s desk. The largest resolution for the six committee members would be the dimension of the Everlasting Fund dividend.

Home Speaker Louise Stutes, R-Kodiak, mentioned on Saturday that she expects the Senate’s $5,500 in money funds to be diminished via negotiations, however she says she doesn’t know what the ultimate quantity will likely be. Sen. Tom Begich, D-Anchorage, mentioned “there isn’t a manner we’re paying out $5,500.”

He mentioned his caucus of six Democrats is pushing for an quantity nearer to a full $4,200 dividend. The Senate’s price range has been referred to as unbalanced and faulty by some legislators as a result of it depends on $1 billion being drawn from financial savings to cowl a deficit. If the oil worth drops, the deficit would develop and not less than one financial savings account might be worn out.

Advertisement

A coalition of Alaska companies urged the Home to reject the Senate’s price range, saying that state financial savings accounts must be replenished and that it dangers taxes being imposed sooner or later. Useful resource improvement teams made an identical plea to legislators and so did Alaska’s unions.

On the Home flooring, some legislators referred to as deficit considerations “concern mongering,” they usually recounted emotional tales from Alaskans combating excessive inflation and the excessive value of gasoline. There are specific considerations concerning the influence of skyrocketing power costs in rural Alaska.

However what’s going to the scale of the PFD be?

Sen. Mike Bathe, R-Wasilla, efficiently launched the amendments to the Senate’s price range to extend the money funds obtained by Alaskans this yr. However he harassed on the time that the $5,500 determine was unlikely to be the ultimate quantity authorized by legislators.

“I additionally need the folks to listen to loud and clear,” Bathe mentioned final Monday. “That if we begin the place we’re, that’s the utmost you’re going to see. You’re most likely going to see much less.”

Advertisement

The Senate’s price range handed with a full statutory Everlasting Fund dividend at over $4,200 and a separate one-time power reduction examine at $1,300, including as much as money funds over $5,500 in whole. The Home’s price range has a $1,250 dividend and the identical $1,300 power reduction examine. Added collectively, each checks can be over $2,500.

Through the three-day Home price range deadlock, a number of lawmakers mentioned that the governor had pledged to veto the $1,300 power reduction examine — and different spending — to cut back the Senate’s price range by $1 billion. The concept, legislators say, was to encourage the Home to move the Senate’s price range.

Dunleavy has stayed silent on any veto guarantees made to legislators. Jeff Turner, a spokesperson for the governor’s workplace, would once more not reply these questions on Monday, and would additionally not reply if there’s a minimal PFD quantity that the governor can help.

“Governor Dunleavy seems ahead to studying what quantity the convention committee determines will likely be appropriated for this yr’s PFD,” Turner mentioned by e-mail.

Firstly of the legislative session, Dunleavy had referred to as on the Legislature to pay a 50-50 PFD at over $2,500 and the rest of a 50-50 dividend for final yr, which is estimated to be over $1,300. Mixed, each checks can be over $3,700.

Advertisement

Late final month, Dunleavy amended that and mentioned that legislators ought to approve “not less than” a $3,700 dividend. He mentioned he wished to see a closing PFD quantity as shut as doable to a full $4,200 dividend.

“We all know that inflation goes via the roof; it’s not simply gasoline, it’s transportation, it’s lumber, it’s nearly every thing throughout the board,” Dunleavy mentioned in April. “We’re seeing inflation like we’ve by no means seen earlier than.”

Some supporters of a full PFD are specializing in delivering that this yr, and are ignoring the power reduction examine. Meaning the $5,500 in checks wouldn’t be paid out and a compromise determine would must be authorized.

The Senate has three members on the price range convention committee. Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka, and Sen. Click on Bishop, R-Fairbanks, are representing the Senate majority caucus. Each senators have opposed large dividends over deficit considerations, and considerations that the Everlasting Fund might be drawn down.

Sen. Invoice Wielechowski, D-Anchorage, is representing the Senate minority caucus. He has been a longtime full PFD supporter, arguing that lowering it disproportionately hurts decrease and center earnings Alaskans. He has mentioned Alaska ought to improve taxes on oil producers to bridge fiscal gaps, which has been strongly opposed by the trade.

Advertisement

On the Home aspect, Reps. Kelly Merrick, R-Eagle River, and Dan Ortiz, a Ketchikan unbiased, are representing the bipartisan Home majority coalition. Rep. Bart LeBon, R-Fairbanks, is representing the Home Republican minority caucus. All three Home legislators voted to reject the Senate’s price range.

However their private positions are arguably much less essential than what nearly all of legislators will finally help. Too excessive a dividend dangers dropping votes on the ultimate price range from fiscal conservatives, too small a dividend and different lawmakers may vote to reject it.

The convention committee members have been cagey on Monday about discussing the ultimate PFD quantity and whether or not the $5,500 determine is useless. Stedman mentioned that the committee hasn’t began speaking concerning the dividend but, however he mentioned he agreed with an Anchorage Each day Information editorial entitled, “Even drunken sailors know higher,” which was crucial of the Senate’s price range.

Bishop wouldn’t touch upon the $5,500 determine however mentioned there aren’t any ensures within the Capitol. Merrick mentioned that dimension of money funds is “unlikely.” LeBon mentioned it’s “much less doubtless than doubtless.” Wielechowski mentioned that it’s a part of negotiations.

There had been a reasonably broad consensus of legislators aiming for a dividend, and power reduction examine, that added as much as round $2,500. The three-day Home price range deadlock and debates over the $5,500 in funds has elevated the determine acceptable to voters, some legislators say, that means the last word dividend determine might be nearer to $3,700 or the total $4,200 dividend.

Advertisement

The November election is an element with the governor up for reelection — together with 59 of 60 legislators — because of redistricting. But when a majority of legislators have agreed to a dividend determine for this yr, they aren’t saying, and time is working out to make a closing resolution.

The legislative session should finish by Wednesday at midnight and the Legislature is constitutionally required to move an working price range. The price range is required to fund state authorities for the subsequent fiscal yr, which begins on July 1, or there can be a shutdown. If a price range doesn’t move earlier than the tip of the session, two-thirds of legislators would wish to help a 10-day extension. The governor may additionally name his personal particular session.

Copyright 2022 KTUU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Close encounters with the Juneau kind: Woman reports strange lights in Southeast Alaska skies

Published

on

Close encounters with the Juneau kind: Woman reports strange lights in Southeast Alaska skies


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – For Juneau resident Tamara Roberts, taking photos of the northern lights was just a hobby — that is until a different light altogether caught her eye.

Capturing what she’s called strange lights in the skies of Juneau near her home on Thunder Mountain, Roberts said she’s taken 30 to 40 different videos and photos of the lights since September 2021.

“Anytime I’m out, I’m pretty sure that I see something at least a couple times a week,” Roberts said. “I’m definitely not the only one that’s seeing them. And if people just pay more attention, they’ll notice that those aren’t stars and those aren’t satellites.”

Roberts has been a professional photographer for over 20 years. She said she changed interests from photographing people to wildlife and landscape when she moved to Juneau 13 years ago.

Advertisement

Once she started making late-night runs trying to capture the northern lights, she said that’s when she started encountering her phenomenon.

Roberts said not every encounter takes place above Thunder Mountain: her most recent sighting happened near the Mendenhall Glacier while her stepmom was visiting from Arizona.

“She’d never been here before, so we got up and we drove up there, and lo and behold, there it was,” Roberts said. “I have some family that absolutely thinks it’s what it is, and I have some family that just doesn’t care.”

Roberts described another recent encounter near the glacier she said was a little too close for comfort. While driving up alone in search of the northern lights, she expected to see other fellow photographers out for the same reason as she normally does.

But this night was different.

Advertisement

“I’ve gone up there a million times by myself, and this night, particularly, it was clear, it was cold and the [aurora] KP index was high … so as I’m driving up and there’s nobody there. And I was like, Okay, I’ll just wait and somebody will show up.’ So I backed up into the parking spot underneath the street light — the only light that’s really there on that side of the parking lot — and I turned all my lights off, left my car running, looked around, and there was that light right there, next to the mountain.”

Roberts said after roughly 10 minutes of filming the glowing light, still not seeing anyone else around, she started to get a strange feeling that maybe she should leave.

“I just got this terrible gut feeling,” Roberts said. “I started to pull out of my parking spot and my car sputtered. [It] scared me so bad that I just gunned the accelerator, but my headlights … started like flashing and getting all crazy.

“I had no headlights, none all the way home, no headlights.”

According to the Juneau Police Department, there haven’t been any reports of strange lights in the sky since Sept. 14, when police say a man was reportedly “yelling about UFOs in the downtown area.”

Advertisement

Responding officers said they did not locate anything unusual, and no arrests were made following the man’s report.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service in Juneau also said within the last seven days, no reports of unusual activity in the skies had been reported. The Federal Aviation Administration in Juneau did not respond.

With more and more whistleblowers coming forward in Congressional hearings, Roberts said she thinks it’s only a matter of time before the truth is out there.

“Everybody stayed so quiet all these years for the fear of being mocked,” Roberts said. “Now that people are starting to come out, I think that people should just let the reality be what it is, and let the evidence speak for itself, because they’re here, and that’s all there is to it.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

‘We’re ready to test ourselves’: UAA women’s hoops faces tallest task yet in another edition of the Great Alaska Shootout

Published

on

‘We’re ready to test ourselves’: UAA women’s hoops faces tallest task yet in another edition of the Great Alaska Shootout


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Heading into Friday’s game with a 6-1 record, Alaska Anchorage women’s basketball is faced with a tall task.

The Seawolves are set to face Division I Troy in the opening round of the 2024 Great Alaska Shootout. Friday’s game is the first meeting between the two in program history.

“We’re gonna get after it, hopefully it goes in the hoop for us,” Seawolves head coach Ryan McCarthy said. “We’re gonna do what we do. We’re not going to change it just because it’s a shootout. We’re going to press these teams and we’re going to try to make them uncomfortable. We’re excited to test ourselves.”

Beginning the season 1-4, the Trojans have faced legitimate competition early. Troy has played two ranked opponents to open the season, including the 2023 national champion and current top-10 ranked Louisiana State University on Nov. 18. The Trojans finished runner-up in the Sun Belt Conference with a 15-3 record last season.

Advertisement

“At the end of the day, they’re women’s basketball players too. They’re the same age as us and they might look bigger, faster and stronger, but we have some great athletes here,” junior guard Elaina Mack said. “We’re more disciplined, we know that we put in a lot of work, and we have just as good of a chance to win this thing as anybody else does.”

The 41st edition of the tournament is also set to feature Vermont and North Dakota State. The two Div. I squads will battle first ahead of UAA’s match Friday night.

All teams will also play Saturday in a winner and loser bracket to determine final results.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Women will make up a majority in Alaska House for first time in state history

Published

on

Women will make up a majority in Alaska House for first time in state history


Six Alaska House seats currently held by men are set to be held by women next year, bringing the overall number of women in the chamber to 21. This will be the first time in the state’s history that one of the legislative chambers is majority women.

The women elected to the Alaska House bring a variety of experiences and perspectives to the chamber. Ten of them are Republicans, including four newly elected this year. Nine are Democrats — including three who are newly elected. Two are independents who caucus with Democrats.

There are also five women in the state Senate, a number that remained unchanged in this year’s election, bringing the total number of women in the Alaska Legislature to 26 out of 60, a new record for the state. The previous record of 23 was set in 2019.

Advertisement

Nationally, around a third of legislative seats were held by women this year, according to researchers at Rutgers University. Nearly two-thirds of women legislators are Democrats. In Alaska, women serving in the Legislature are largely evenly split between the major political parties.

Before this year’s election, only seven states had ever seen gender parity in one of their legislative chambers. They include Arizona, Nevada, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Colorado, New Mexico and Oregon. California is set to join the list after this year’s election.

Three of the women slated to serve in the Alaska House next year are Alaska Native — also a record. Two of them were elected for the first time: Robyn Burke of Utqiagvik, who is of Iñupiaq descent, and Nellie Jimmie of Toksook Bay, who is of Yup’ik descent. They join Rep. Maxine Dibert of Fairbanks, of Koyukon Athabascan descent, who was elected in 2022.

The historic increase in representation of women came in Alaska even as voters did not reelect U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola, the first woman and first Alaska Native person to represent the state in the U.S. House. Peltola was voted out in favor of Republican Nick Begich III.

Women come to the Alaska Legislature from diverse professional backgrounds, but a disproportionate number of them will arrive with some experience in public education.

Advertisement

Three of the newly elected lawmakers — Burke, Jubilee Underwood of Wasilla and Rebecca Schwanke of Glennallen — have served on their local school boards, helping oversee the North Slope Borough, Matanuska-Susitna Borough and Copper River school districts, respectively.

The three bring different perspectives on public education. Burke said she is looking forward to working with a bipartisan caucus that is set to have a majority in the Alaska House this year, with a focus on increasing education funding and improving the retirement options for Alaska’s public employees, including teachers.

Schwanke and Underwood, on the other hand, have indicated they will join the Republican minority caucus, which has shown an interest in conservative social causes such as barring the participation of transgender girls in girls’ school sports teams.

The increase in the number of women serving in the Alaska Legislature comes as public education funding is set to be a key issue when lawmakers convene in January.

Burke said she and the other newly elected women bring different policy perspectives to the topic of education, but their shared experience in serving on school boards reflects a commitment to their children’s education.

Advertisement

“With so many parents and so many moms, I hope that there will be really good legislation that supports working families and children and education,” Burke said.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending