Connect with us

Technology

Tech giants unite to fight online scams

Published

on

Tech giants unite to fight online scams

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

If you’ve ever gotten a suspicious text, a fake delivery alert or a message that felt just a little too convincing, you’ve already seen how fast scams are evolving. Now, some of the biggest names in tech and retail are scrambling to catch up.

Eleven major companies across those industries, including Google, Amazon, OpenAI, Adobe, Pinterest, LinkedIn, Match Group, Meta, Microsoft, Target and Levi Strauss & Co., have signed a new agreement to share information about scams and fraud.

At first glance, it sounds like a strong step forward. But this is more than a coordinated effort. It is a response to how modern scams actually work today.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter  

Advertisement

SCAMMERS USING AI MEET THEIR MATCH AS OPENAI, TECH INDUSTRY FIGHT BACK
 

A new industry agreement aims to block scam accounts, fake domains and fraud patterns before they spread across platforms. (Tristan Spinski for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Why online scams are getting harder to stop

Scammers no longer operate in one place. They might find you on social media, move the conversation to a messaging app, then push you to send money through a fake website or payment service. It is all connected. That’s exactly what this new agreement, called the Industry Accord Against Online Scams & Fraud, is trying to address.

Instead of companies working in isolation, they are promising to share threat data in near real time. That includes things like scam accounts, fake domains and patterns tied to organized fraud. The idea is that if one company spots a scam early, others can block it before it spreads. 

What the companies are actually promising

This is not just about talking. The companies outlined a few concrete steps they plan to take:

Advertisement

Share intelligence faster

They will exchange information about scam networks, tactics and accounts across platforms and with law enforcement.

Use AI to detect scams earlier

Many companies already rely on AI to flag suspicious behavior. Now they want to expand those systems to catch scams faster and more accurately.

Add stronger verification

Expect tighter checks for financial transactions to confirm both sides are legitimate.

Improve reporting tools

Users should see clearer ways to report scams and get help.

Push governments to act

Companies are also calling for scam prevention to become a national priority in more countries.

Advertisement

That all sounds promising. But there is a catch.

The biggest limitation you should know

This agreement is voluntary. There are no penalties if companies fail to follow through. That means success depends entirely on how seriously each company takes it.

Still, even a loose collaboration could make a difference. Scammers thrive in gaps between platforms. Closing those gaps, even partially, could slow them down.

YOUTUBE JOB SCAM TEXT: HOW TO SPOT IT FAST
 

Big Tech and retail leaders are promising faster scam detection, stronger verification and better reporting tools for consumers. (Halfpoint/Getty Images)

Advertisement

How AI is making online scams more dangerous

This push comes as scams are becoming more sophisticated and harder to detect. AI is a big reason why. Scammers can now:

At the same time, companies are using AI to fight back. Google alone blocks hundreds of millions of scam-related results daily, while Meta has removed massive numbers of scam ads using automated systems. It’s essentially an arms race.

What this means for your online safety

In theory, this agreement could lead to fewer scams slipping through the cracks.

You might start to notice:

  • Faster removal of scam accounts
  • More warnings when something looks suspicious
  • Fewer fake ads or impersonation attempts

But this won’t eliminate scams entirely. Criminal networks are global, coordinated and constantly adapting. So while companies are stepping up, your own awareness still matters.

Cybersecurity expert warns scams are evolving fast

To understand what this really means in practice, it helps to hear from people who track these threats every day. Trend Micro, a global cybersecurity company, says this kind of collaboration is long overdue.

Advertisement

Trend Micro’s VP of Consumer Marketing and Education, Lynette Owens, believes cross-industry coordination is a critical step forward as scams increasingly unfold across multiple platforms. She tells CyberGuy:

“It’s encouraging to see major platforms like Google, Meta and Amazon coming together to share intelligence and disrupt scam networks. Cross-industry collaboration has proven to be helpful in fighting other types of online harms and has been a fruitful counter-measure against scams and fraud in other countries. Anything that moves us more towards prevention is a win, as so much effort is currently directed at what happens after the harm is done. 

“But while it’s a useful step forward, it’s not a complete solution. Scammers are constantly evolving, using AI and multi-channel tactics to create more convincing, personalized attacks that are harder for people to recognize in the moment. 

“What consumers really need is intervention that alerts them where scams actually happen, with clear, timely signals that something isn’t right. In today’s environment, scams don’t come as a single message. They unfold over time and adapt faster than ever to changing consumer habits or platform best practices. Collaboration is an important piece of the puzzle, but the more tools consumers have at their fingertips to fight back, the better their chances at stopping a scam before any real damage is done.”

Her takeaway is clear. Collaboration helps, but it will not be enough on its own.

Advertisement

SPRING CLEAN YOUR DIGITAL FOOTPRINT: WHY RETIREES ARE SCAM TARGETS
 

Google, Amazon, Meta and other major brands are teaming up as AI-powered scams grow more convincing and harder to stop. (John Keeble/Getty Images)

How to protect yourself from online scams

Even as companies step up their defenses, there are still simple steps you can take right now to reduce your risk and stay one step ahead of scammers.

1) Avoid unknown links

Do not click links in unexpected texts, emails or messages. Instead, go directly to the official website by typing the address yourself.

2) Use strong security software

Install strong antivirus software to help detect malicious links, phishing attempts and suspicious apps before they cause harm. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android & iOS devices at Cyberguy.com

Advertisement

3) Turn on two-factor authentication

Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) on your accounts whenever possible. This adds an extra layer of protection even if your password is exposed.

4) Limit where your personal data appears

The more your personal information is available online, the easier it is for scammers to target you. Consider using a data removal service to reduce your exposure on data broker and people-search sites. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com 

5) Monitor your accounts regularly

Check your bank, credit card and online accounts often so you can catch suspicious activity early and act quickly.

Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com     

Advertisement

Kurt’s key takeaways

This new alliance signals a shift. Tech companies are starting to treat scams as a shared problem rather than isolated incidents. That’s a big step in the right direction. But whether it actually slows down scammers will depend on execution, not promises. Coordination helps, but enforcement and accountability matter just as much.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

If scams keep getting smarter, should tech companies be required to do more than just cooperate voluntarily?  Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter 

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Technology

Aurzen’s tiny trifold projector is almost 40 percent off right now

Published

on

Aurzen’s tiny trifold projector is almost 40 percent off right now

Not all trifolds are created equal — just ask our own Allison Johnson, who recently spent time with Samsung’s ill-fated Galaxy phone. Aurzen’s Zip projector is the kind of trifold gadget we can fully get behind, though, and it’s currently on sale at Amazon for $259.99 ($140 off). You can also pick it up in several colors directly from Aurzen for the same price, or in the gold shade for a new low of $249.99.

While not nearly as powerful as Anker’s Nebula P1 and other portable projectors we’ve recently tested, the Zip is surprisingly capable despite its small stature and battery-powered operation. The snake-like 720p projector offers up to 100 lumens of brightness — meaning it will work best in dark environments, or in brighter rooms when viewing a smaller image — while its built-in battery should last about 80 minutes based on our real-world testing. That’s not exactly marathon battery life, but it’s easy enough to top off the Zip using a power bank or wall adapter.

In terms of support, the Zip can quickly connect to iPhones via AirPlay and to Android devices over Miracast, Smart View, and similar standards, allowing you to wirelessly mirror everything you can see on your phone. You can use it to watch any movies you’ve downloaded on your device, peruse your social feeds, or get in a quick session with your favorite game. It works in both landscape and portrait orientations, too, and supports Bluetooth, letting you listen privately with headphones or pair it to your favorite speaker.

The biggest downside to the Zip, at least for some folks, is that you won’t be able to use it to watch content from services like Netflix, Hulu, and HBO Max due to copyright restrictions. Aurzen does make a USB-C dongle that allows you to stream DRM-protected content, if you truly can’t get by without watching the latest episode of Euphoria. You’ll have to pay a whopping $109 for the privilege, or find another way.

Continue Reading

Technology

Fox News AI Newsletter: The AI model that’s too dangerous to go public

Published

on

Fox News AI Newsletter: The AI model that’s too dangerous to go public

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Welcome to Fox News’ Artificial Intelligence newsletter with the latest AI technology advancements.

IN TODAY’S NEWSLETTER:

Anthropic has an AI model that’s too dangerous to go public

Melania Trump turns White House tennis pavilion into AI lab for students

Advertisement

Florida murder suspect asked ChatGPT about dumping human remains days before killings: docs

LOCKS WIDE OPEN: Anthropic’s Mythos AI model, too dangerous to release publicly, is changing digital security faster than anyone is ready for – There is a new AI model called Mythos. Anthropic built it for defensive cybersecurity research. It is so effective at finding software vulnerabilities that Anthropic decided the general public cannot have it.

FUNDAMENTAL SHIFT: From rogue AI blackmailing humans to condensing school days, AI revolution already reshaping lifeFox Business explores how the artificial intelligence revolution is already fundamentally reshaping everyday life, ranging from alarming scenarios of rogue AI blackmailing humans to innovative applications condensing traditional school days.

DIVERSITY FIGHT: Trump DOJ jumps into Musk xAI court battleThe Trump Department of Justice has formally intervened in a high-profile court battle involving Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company xAI, as a broader legal and political fight over corporate diversity initiatives rapidly heats up.

FIRST LADY FUTURE: Melania Trump embraces AI education initiative in White House tech push she’s been championing – First lady Melania Trump is actively embracing a new artificial intelligence education initiative as part of a broader White House technology push that she has long been championing.

Advertisement

Melania Trump an immersive event AI event this week where students used Meta virtual reality headsets and AI-powered glasses to explore British landmarks and examine historical artifacts. (Andrea Hanks)

PRICE PAIN SPREADS: AI boom tests GOP’s midterm affordability pitchThe rapid artificial intelligence boom and its associated energy costs are beginning to test the Republican Party’s midterm pitch on affordability as economic price pain spreads among voters.

CHILLING QUERY: Florida murder suspect asked ChatGPT about dumping human remains days before killings: docsNewly released court documents revealing that a Florida murder suspect allegedly asked the artificial intelligence program ChatGPT for advice on dumping human remains just days before the killings occurred.

RACE IS ON: Kevin O’Leary details massive Utah AI data center to rival China’s tech dominanceBusiness mogul Kevin O’Leary detailed plans for a massive artificial intelligence data center in Utah designed specifically to rival China’s growing global tech dominance.

TECH FIGHT: Former Apple CEO sees OpenAI poses largest competitive threat to tech giant in years – Former Apple CEO John Sculley is sounding the alarm on artificial intelligence, warning that OpenAI currently poses the largest competitive threat the massive tech giant has faced in years.

Advertisement

BOUNCING BACK: US economic growth rebounds as AI buildout and consumer spending fuel first quarter – U.S. economic growth rebounded in the first quarter of the year from a sluggish fourth quarter, according to the Commerce Department’s latest estimate.

JOB IMPACT: Zuckerberg says Meta layoffs tied to AI spending, won’t rule out future cuts – Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has explicitly tied recent staff layoffs to the company’s massive spending on artificial intelligence, while pointedly refusing to rule out the possibility of future workforce cuts.

HEAVYWEIGHT LEGAL BATTLE: Elon Musk tells court he was fool for funding OpenAI: reportTech billionaire Elon Musk told a court that he was a “fool” for his early financial role in funding the artificial intelligence research organization OpenAI.

Elon Musk testifies during the OpenAI trial in Oakland, Calif., on April 29, 2026. (Vicki Behringer)

LEARNING ON THE JOB: Meta tracks workers to train AI agentsSocial media giant Meta is actively tracking its own workers and analyzing their internal communications in an effort to train its advanced new artificial intelligence agents.

Advertisement

Subscribe now to get the Fox News Artificial Intelligence Newsletter in your inbox.

FOLLOW FOX NEWS ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Facebook

Instagram

YouTube

X

Advertisement

LinkedIn

SIGN UP FOR OUR OTHER NEWSLETTERS

Fox News First

Fox News Opinion

Fox News Lifestyle

Advertisement

Fox News Health

DOWNLOAD OUR APPS

Fox News

Fox Business

Fox Weather

Advertisement

Fox Sports

Tubi

WATCH FOX NEWS ONLINE

Fox News Go

STREAM FOX NATION

Advertisement

Fox Nation

Stay up to date on the latest AI technology advancements and learn about the challenges and opportunities AI presents now and for the future with Fox News here.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

The craziest part of Musk v. Altman happened while the jury was out of the room

Published

on

The craziest part of Musk v. Altman happened while the jury was out of the room

Okay, I am not a lawyer so I only understood about half of what just happened. But I am fairly sure, given the context, that Elon Musk’s lawyers may have just fucked up big.

Jared “James Brickhouse” Birchall, Musk’s finance guy and all-around fixer, took the stand after Musk today. Most of his testimony was dull and seemed to exist primarily to get some documents read into the record, which sucks but is a normal part of sitting through trials. But at the very end of his boring testimony something interesting happened. I believe we all got a surprise, something that rarely happens in courtrooms.

The lawyer conducting his direct examination was passed a note by another member of the team, and asked Birchall what was apparently contained on the note: was he familiar with the xAI bid for OpenAI’s assets?

“Sam Altman was on both sides of the table.”

“As I recall, a lawyer we were working with had asked the attorney general of California to ensure that in their fiduciary duty, proper value was being given to the assets of the nonprofit of OpenAI,” Birchall said. In his understanding, there was a negotiation “between Sam Altman and himself on both sides of the table, the for-profit and the non-profit, attempting to discount the value of the non-profit assets. And we made that bid in an attempt to properly account for the value the foundation had, and create a market bid that would need to be considered by the attorney general.”

Advertisement

Here’s some lore: in February 2025, a Musk-led coalition made a $97.4 billion bid for the non-profit that controls OpenAI. The bid was submitted by Marc Toberoff, one of Musk’s lawyers in the current case. This bid happened as OpenAI was restructuring itself so that the for-profit arm could be cleared to go public. In Birchall’s testimony, that bid was made because Musk, Birchall, and others, thought Altman might undervalue the nonprofit as the company restructured itself. (I’m not really sure why that would be a problem for Musk and xAI, frankly, but whatever.)

The defense counsel objected, and Birchall’s rant was struck for lack of foundation. So we did this piece by piece to establish the foundation, ending with Birchall saying, again, “Sam Altman was on both sides of the table.”

On cross-examination, Bradley Wilson from Wachtell Lipton — OpenAI’s lawyers — picked the thread back up. Wilson asked how much of this Birchall had learned from sources other than lawyers. Birchall said he’d have a hard time being able to untangle that. After a few more exchanges, Wilson moved to strike all of Birchall’s testimony about the xAI bid on grounds that would not be discussed in front of the jury.

“You must have been very convincing. You’re not very convincing today.”

The jury got to leave early while the lawyers duked it out, and this is where it got weird. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers started asking Birchall questions herself, and it clearly was making Birchall nervous. Birchall said he doesn’t remember discussing the xAI bid with Musk or Shivon Zilis or any other principal of the Musk organization. It sure sounded like Musk’s lawyers hadn’t given OpenAI proper discovery on this topic in the depositions, and so we were doing a fast and dirty deposition with the judge right then. At one point, Gonzalez Rogers told the plaintiff’s counsel to quit coaching the witness.

Advertisement

Birchall said he’d spoken to the other members of the consortium about the bid, but that he wasn’t involved in discussions with Musk about when to send the bid letter. He claimed he’d heard some things from Toberoff, but that he wasn’t aware that Toberoff represented some of the other bidders. He didn’t know if xAI was aware that Toberoff represented some of the other bidders, either.

Birchall didn’t know whether other investors had first-hand information about OpenAI, he claimed. No one had documents from inside OpenAI as far as he knew. Gonzalez Rogers remained unconvinced. “I’m still struggling with how you can have conversations with these individuals to raise $97.5 billion but have no recollections even in a general sense,” she said. Birchall said he had a general sense — he called each of the people involved to see if they were interested in joining Musk on the bid.

“Why would they do that?” Gonzales Rogers asked. Birchall said these were people with whom Musk et al had longstanding relationships. “You must have been very convincing,” she said. “You’re not very convincing today.”

Birchall said there were no numbers besides the topline one floated when he called prospective investors, and that after speaking with him, they were passed off to lawyers. He didn’t remember who chose the $97.4 billion number, and said he got it from the legal team, telling Gonzalez Rogers he didn’t get it from Musk. Gonzalez Rogers asked if that analysis was created by anyone besides Toberoff. Birchall said not that he could recall.

“Did a lawyer tell you this was part of litigation?” Gonzalez Rogers asked.

Advertisement

No, Birchall said. It was strictly a business deal.

Apparently Steven Molo, who’d been defending Musk during the deposition, had made multiple objections to questions about the deal, citing privileged communications. Business deals, apparently, aren’t privileged. But all discovery into the xAI bid for OpenAI had been blocked before the trial began. Unfortunately, by asking Birchall about the xAI deal at the very end of the direct examination, Musk’s team may have opened the door for more digging into it. You may be wondering, “open the door to what” and your guess is as good as mine. More discovery? Maybe something about anticompetitive behavior from Musk? It doesn’t sound like it’s going to be good for Musk, I can tell you that much.

Gonzalez Rogers then asked who’d passed the note, and all the lawyers just sat there like guilty children. Finally, the guy responsible said he’d passed it, but he didn’t write it; a junior lawyer did. Who wrote it? More silence. Finally Toberoff — hardly a junior lawyer — stood up and took responsibility. Why had he done it? “I thought it was appropriate.”

“Sounds like you wanted to open the door, then,” Gonzalez Rogers said. We adjourned while she said she’d consider what to do with this testimony. She will probably rule on it tomorrow.

Correction, April 30th: It is Shivon Zilis, not Sharon Zilis.

Advertisement
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending