Connect with us

Sports

Artificial intelligence could transform football. So what might the future look like?

Published

on

Artificial intelligence could transform football. So what might the future look like?

“It’s totally feasible that an artificial intelligence (AI) agent could simulate more football in 24 hours than has ever been played professionally in the real world in the entire 150-year history of the game,” says Lee Mooney, who was head of data insights at City Football Group for six years.

“Think about how many games Pep Guardiola can possibly have played in, managed and watched. If you go back every generation which led to him being where he is now, through Johan Cruyff and Rinus Michels, that compound experience could potentially be simulated in just a few hours.

“All that problem-solving knowledge would be built perfectly into a single synthetic brain. It would make for fascinating potential for new tactics, training methods, ways of measuring performance, recognising human coaching skill and talent judgement.”

It may sound futuristic but football is already heading in that direction, the most well-publicised example being Liverpool teaming up with Google DeepMind to improve their corner-kick strategy using AI.

Mooney built an industry-leading department at Manchester City before founding MUD Analytics, which works with clubs in the Premier League, English Championship, Scottish Premiership and MLS. He is as well-versed as anyone in how new technology can be embedded in sport and transform age-old methods.

Advertisement

AI allows computers to learn and perform tasks and solve problems that usually require human intelligence. It is trained on huge amounts of information and simulates billions of variables, identifying and predicting future patterns.

As early as 1997, supercomputers were able to evaluate 200 million chess positions per second and defeat human grandmasters. In Formula 1, teams can spend a few days simulating millions of laps ahead of an upcoming Grand Prix, adjusting for the optimal race strategy.

Although there are still some steps to be made, the advancement in player tracking data means Mooney believes football could reach the point where clubs have trained AI to simulate matches against their upcoming opponents, modelling individual players based on their technical qualities and mechanics and producing 3D animations of how the real-life games might play out.

“You could set up to play Manchester City, train the AI agent to understand how they play and what their individual strengths and weaknesses are, and then play the game millions of times to find the most efficient strategies to beat them with the players you have,” says Mooney.

“We train airline pilots in simulators before flying, because we need to know it is safe. This sort of AI could give coaches their own safe playground to take risks and explore a much broader universe of tactics and solutions, before then risking their jobs. Animation can then show the most effective build-up structures to beat their press, how quickly to press, and what structure to recover back into. You’re training technology to understand the game in a virtual space to then inform real-world decisions.

Advertisement

“My instinct is you’ll end up with a powerful set of general principles which shows the best solutions to counteract their biggest threats. There is also the potential for it to recognise if players are waning in-game or if their decision-making is becoming compromised and so recommend a substitution live.”

The pace of change in technology may have been rapid and opened up the potential for these ambitious ideas to become realistic goals, but there is the caveat of realism when it comes to implementing them. “To execute it within a club setting requires stability of leadership vision and funding — two rare commodities in football,” says Mooney.

It may have felt like a vague, far-off world not too long ago, but the impact of AI is increasingly being felt in the workplace, and football is no exception. Many are unsure how it will manifest itself, but its use in recruitment, coaching, fitness and medical areas is going to accelerate rapidly, as it has in other sports.

The Athletic has spoken to leading figures in football across those areas to understand what AI could mean for the future of the sport, including:

  • 65 per cent of Premier League and Football League scouts surveyed by The Athletic believe AI is going to affect their role in the next five years
  • Clubs have started using large language models to cut out the need for people to read hundreds of scouting reports
  • The data analytics revolution was initially driven by a community outside football and there is a struggle to change the culture
  • Barcelona’s Barca Innovation Hub has invested in a science company, Omniscope, which is aiming to use AI to prevent injuries and extend the peak condition of players.

In November, Premier League side Brighton & Hove Albion, who leverage their owner/chairman Tony Bloom’s data tools for recruitment, dispensed with the majority of their full-time senior scouts.

The proliferation of data analytics in football over the past 15 years means there is not a Premier League club among the 20 now who do not use data as the first filter in their scouting operation.

Advertisement

But the new frontier is AI.

A recruitment source at one major English team, speaking on condition of anonymity to protect relationships, says that one of the main proponents of AI at his club recently remarked that scouts could start to be replaced by AI within the next two years.

A scouting data scientist, whose company works with various clubs across Europe, believes the holy grail will be when clubs no longer have to imagine how a potential signing would fit into their team. Instead, they will be able to use AI to translate all the data and video they have on the player’s style and the buying team’s tactics and use that to visualise just how they would perform in certain situations. “It’s not going to be liked, because there might come a time where it puts jobs at risk,” says a senior figure in a Premier League recruitment team. “It’ll be a cost-saving function in the future.”

Clubs already have huge libraries of scouting reports and performance and physical data, but it comes down to humans to interpret it all. AI can expedite that process by cutting out the need for someone to sit and read 100 different reports, instead rapidly picking out the players who best match the criteria the club’s models are looking for. “You could profile players from matches over a period of time and ask AI for the nearest version of a certain player,” says the Premier League recruitment figure.

GO DEEPER

Advertisement

The state of scouting: Data culture clash, job cuts and an uncertain future

It may not be sexy, but it is time-saving, which has made some scouts anxious that it could see their profession drastically culled.

“This suggestion that AI will get rid of scouts, I don’t get it at all,” says Mooney. “There are things models can’t see or they have wide confidence bands (a range of uncertainty in the estimate). How a player behaves under pressure, small-space ball manipulation, the timing of scans, the softness of their touch, their vision to see a pass: traits that are easy to see on video but hard, or slow, with data.

“There is going to be a delicate dance as these things evolve. For everything a machine can’t see now, there will be a branch of research closing that gap. It’s going to create a healthy tension between human and machine but also a real co-dependency — quality human input is essential for developing stronger and stronger analytical assets.

“I’ve used every experience I’ve had, working with some top forward-thinking coaches and football people, to make our technologies better, but through doing that I value the human side more. One challenge for people in the AI space is that a lot of those who are leading it can be too detached from the human side. They don’t see themselves as being vulnerable to advancements in technology.”

Advertisement

Mooney is already using AI and machine learning computer systems that are able to learn and adapt without following explicit instructions, by using algorithms and statistical models to analyse and draw inferences from patterns in data at MUD Analytics when it comes to financial budgeting and recruitment. He and his team have just built a model which sequenced 25 million player appearances, stretching back to the early 2000s, identifying patterns and traits that can predict the trajectory of potential signings.

The nature of the sport has already been changed by the insights data has delivered. Fewer players take shots from outside the box due to the low probability of them resulting in a goal, while teams generally keep possession and dribble less than they used to, with some fans lamenting that structured systems have reduced the presence of mavericks in the game.

“I’m reminded of the Jurassic Park line about the scientists being so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn’t stop to think whether they should,” Mooney says.

“Is this what sport is meant to be? It is my professional job to help teams win and get as much value from their money as possible, so I’m going to have to do it because if I don’t someone else will, and then you’re in an arms race where you’re bringing a knife to a gunfight.”


Ted Knutson, who founded leading data analytics company StatsBomb in 2013 before selling it to Hudl earlier this year, experienced the resistance to new technologies in football. 

Advertisement

The American was one of the early voices in the data analytics community and had groundbreaking success in his application of set-piece data while working for Midtjylland — controlled at the time by Premier League side Brentford’s owner Matthew Benham — as they scored 25 set-piece goals on their way to a first Danish league title in 2014-15.


Brentford owner Benham – left, with their head coach Thomas Frank – has been at the forefront of data innovation in football (Nick Potts/PA Images via Getty Images)

“I would go into clubs and show them how we improved other teams’ set-piece output but a coach would often say, ‘Yeah, that’s nice… so what?’,” says Knutson. “Football does not like change. We had to push really hard to change things on the event data (passing, shooting) side and using data in recruitment — it took 10 years for it to become really prevalent as the first filter in every Premier League club’s recruitment process.

“I see football teams where so much of what they need to do is just execute the basics, and they can’t do it. We’re asking: could we take really smart people and create sophisticated models like this? You could. Maybe in five years, you could do some of that but who is investing in that and pioneering it?”

StatsBomb’s work on pressing in football took the number of defensive events being measured from 30 per game to 300. Its work on expected goals, which took into account the positioning of all opposition players at the time of the shot, helped explain how Sean Dyche’s Burnley team had been seen as a statistical freak due to conceding a high volume of shots but few goals, when the reality was they smothered shots effectively. 

Knutson, who brought Paris Saint-Germain on board in StatsBomb’s first year, believes the single biggest point in terms of winning over traditional football minds was in quantifying skill sets for each position. By using data and converting the information into radars, which summarised a player’s effectiveness across a range of skills, coaches could better visualise it than hard numbers.

Advertisement

StatsBomb made another leap in 2021 when it launched its 360 product, with Liverpool its first users. This added the location of every team-mate and opposition player to the 3,400 events collected per match. StatsBomb then built on that breakthrough in NFL, tracking every player’s location on the field 30 times per second.

“NFL is harder, because there is much more occlusion (blocking). In football, players are separate and then occasionally at set pieces they run into each other,” Knutson says. “In football, that should get there in the next couple of years.”

Knutson is doubtful clubs will be the true pioneers in the AI space, given the time and resources required to make advancements, but also because the nature of professional sport means those teams who find an edge do everything they can to protect that intellectual property. It is why, at Brighton and Brentford, most scouts do not have visibility of the models working in the background at their owners’ data companies.

The rise of data analytics was organic and not restricted to early adopters inside football such as Liveprool’s former director of research Ian Graham. Amateurs were able to use publicly-available StatsBomb data sets and build upon the work that had been achieved so far. Many of those people now work in recruitment positions within professional football.

“The more challenging space for AI is tactically in training,” says Knutson. “A lot of the analysts don’t have a lot of coach in them, so there is always a credibility gap there.

Advertisement

“If some quantitative people got coaching badges, I think you’d see that change. In American sports, we are seeing statistical analysts become assistant coaches. We’ll probably see it gradually happen over here too. The other problem is the difficulty people who aren’t players find in getting coaching badges. It’s gatekeeping, and certainly holds back some of the coaching elements.”


When Albert Mundet helped launch the Barca Innovation Hub in 2017, the focus was tactical analysis.

Early strides were made in using data models to predict the positioning of individual opposition players and where gaps would appear, but he believes data needs to become more affordable before AI’s full capabilities can be unleashed in that area.

“Our original AI focus was on the tactical side, but we are betting a lot of our investments on injury prevention,” says Mundet, who is now general manager and reports into Barcelona’s club president Joan Laporta.

“The past 10 years, GPS has been at the core of performance monitoring, but we believe this is not enough. It is one piece of the whole cake. We believe the next wave is biomedical data, combining genomics data and other markers in the body. It exists in other industries, but football has not touched it. Mixing it with GPS could help improve the prevention of injuries, which are increasing because of the number of games but also because of how much more intense the games have become.”

Advertisement

Zone7 is a company already working in that area, as previously reported by The Athletic. It uses AI to assess physical data and determine the risk of a muscle injury. Liverpool, Napoli, Rangers and LAFC are among its clients.

Mundet believes Barca’s investment in Made of Genes, a start-up from the surrounding Catalonia region, as part of a €5million (£4.2m, $5.2m) funding round, has given them that forecasting ability too.

We are able to simulate the external load a player will experience at a specific moment in the future using a trained AI model based on historical data. Additionally, we can assess injury risk by combining this with genomic and metabolomic profiles through advanced AI models,” Mundet says. “We can help the coach make decisions on how to keep them healthy by reducing their exposure (in training and games). If we are going to be playing in quarter-finals, semi-finals and finals, we can help ensure the player arrives there with the optimal load and risk of injury”

Barca Innovation Hub’s latest investment could be the most profound yet in terms of its scale. It has invested in Omniscope, a techbio company founded by a disciplinary team in 2021, which is seeking to harness the advancements made in AI and immunology in the past few years to transform the diagnosis and treatment of illness. In sport, it believes it can translate into injury prevention and improved healing.

The human immune system can be difficult to understand given its complexity but Omniscope’s technology means that, via a blood sample, they are able to read millions of cells one-by-one — 100 times more than other technologies are capable of — to give the individual an inflammation score of between zero and 100. By using interpretative AI to identify gaps in the sequencing of the cells, it can diagnose early signs of disease, all while adhering to strict data privacy and ethical standards.

Advertisement

Essentially, it is building a foundational cell-by-cell model of the immune system with the aid of AI, which has never been done before. But the ability to heal quicker or, in the context of football, understand how to maintain healthy athletes, comes from generative AI.

Omniscope is driving the novel concept of piggy-banking healthy cells with the potential to reintroduce them to the body to fight diseases, or using AI to engineer therapeutic immune cells.

In football, Omniscope believes that if it can understand the immune system of a healthy athlete, it can use that knowledge to prevent injuries. It has already developed a specialised AI algorithm to comprehend the inflammation female players experience during their menstrual cycle and so can tailor care accordingly. 

“We’ve sequenced hundreds of samples and found that it works,” says Omniscope CEO and co-founder Vijay Vaswani, speaking to The Athletic. “We believe this technology has the potential to significantly enhance sports medicine and improve athlete health management.

“We collect blood samples during periods of optimal health to establish a baseline and integrate this data with wearable technology to monitor the player’s overall immune health status. Deviations from the baseline are often early signs of inflammation, illnesses and injuries. After injury and during recovery, we track, cell by cell, whether the healing process is working by looking at the immune response. For recurring injuries, I can again leverage comprehensive cellular data to power AI models which predict, monitor treatment effectiveness, and guide personalised future care.

Advertisement

“We can see processes of muscle scarring to complement an MRI. It gives the doctor and physiotherapist a magic window to reassess their strategy in real time. It’s the first time in athletic medicine that you’re not guessing on the return-to-play timeline.”

Using your own immune cells for therapy is approved by the FDA — a U.S. agency that protects public health by regulating the safety of food, drugs, medical devices and other products — but Vaswani says it has not been popularised yet due to high costs, lengthy processing times and requiring years of clinical complexity.

AI has helped speed up the process and made it significantly more affordable.

There is a potential from this that Vaswani believes could be revolutionary, significantly enhancing athletes’ longevity by maintaining their peak for longer.

“Athletes represent significant investments for clubs, and maintaining their career longevity is essential for maximising this investment,” he says. “Imagine if your favourite athlete continued to play many more years beyond traditional expectations. To be able to reintroduce your own biology in a non-artificial manner is unique. I think it will happen in the next five years, because AI learns and catalyses medicine. What we thought was far off is now within our grasp.”

Advertisement

The goal for Barca Innovation Hub in the coming years is to get to the point where it can start to use this convergence of immunology and generative AI to treat Barcelona’s first-team players.

“By integrating regenerative therapies within Barca’s cutting-edge sports medicine practices, we’re not only looking to accelerate recovery and extend playing years, but also to redefine the concept of peak performance,” Mundet says.

If it develops as they hope, the club’s young stars such as Lamine Yamal, Pau Cubarsi, Pedri and Gavi could stand to benefit.

(Top photos: Getty Images; design: Dan Goldfarb)

Advertisement

Sports

Prep talk: Football student-athletes to be honored at annual banquets

Published

on

Prep talk: Football student-athletes to be honored at annual banquets

Local chapters of National Football Foundation and College Hall of Fame have begun honoring the top senior football student-athletes, with the Coastal Canyon area banquet set for Sunday in Agoura.

Players are selected based on their grade-point averages and leadership skills, among other attributes, honoring the best of the best.

Such players as James Moffat from Crespi, Mateo Bilaver from Chaminade, Jacob Paisano of Hart, Diego and James Montes from Granada Hills Kennedy will represent their schools on Sunday.

The Los Angeles chapter will hold its gathering in Manhattan Beach on Friday.

Advertisement

Simi Valley coach Jim Benkert has taken over running the Coastal Canyon group with dozens of individual student-athletes set to be honored.

This is a daily look at the positive happenings in high school sports. To submit any news, please email eric.sondheimer@latimes.com.

Continue Reading

Sports

US Olympic hockey hero Jack Hughes opens up about support for women’s team amid backlash over Trump’s joke

Published

on

US Olympic hockey hero Jack Hughes opens up about support for women’s team amid backlash over Trump’s joke

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Team USA Olympic hockey hero Jack Hughes spoke about his support for his country’s women’s hockey team after his team was the subject of backlash for laughing at a joke by President Donald Trump about the women’s team. 

During an interview on ESPN’s “The Pat McAfee Show” Friday, Hughes opened up about his respect for the women’s team after McAfee appeared to reference the controversy by joking that Hughes and his teammates “hate” the women players. 

“We are hanging out with them so much, the women’s team. We were supporting them. Like, we were at their games, they were at our games,” Hughes said. 

 

Advertisement

Jack Hughes of the United States celebrates after a gold medal win during against Canadaat Milano Santagiulia Ice Hockey Arena during the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Olympic games Feb. 22, 2026, in Milan, Italy.  (Elsa/Getty Images)

Hughes then appeared to address the recent criticism of his team for its response to Trump’s joke.

“Like all these people talking, how many of them watched their gold medal game? Me and Quinn Hughes were at the game. We were at the game until like overtime ended on the glass, and we were jumping up and down so excited for these girls, so excited they won,” Hughes said. 

“And how many of these people watched the gold medal game, watched their semifinals game? Like 10 of the 10 of our players went to their game in the round-robin. Like, we supported them so much, and we’re so proud of them. We’re so happy that they won, and they brought a gold medal back and that, you know, I said it, the men’s and women’s team both brought gold medals back. So, just unbelievable for USA hockey.”

Hughes, who scored the game-winning overtime goal against Canada to win gold, reflected on his interaction with the player on the U.S. women’s team who did the same, Megan Keller.

Advertisement

“Me and her had a great moment in the cafeteria after her gold medal game. We played Slovakia the next night, and it was like a late game. And we were in the pasta line — me and Megan. They were just getting ready to go out again, and I just gave her a massive hug, and I said, ‘I’m so happy for you. I’m so proud of you,’” Hughes said. 

“A couple nights later, saw her again in the [cafeteria], and we took a great picture and, uh, she just gave me a big hug and was so pumped for me as well.” 

Hughes told reporters after the game the first thing he thought about when the puck went in was Keller, who scored the golden goal for the United States women’s team against Canada three days earlier.

US WOMEN’S HOCKEY GOLD MEDALIST SAYS IT’S ‘SAD’ MEN’S TEAM HAD TO APOLOGIZE FOR OLYMPICS CONTROVERSY

The controversy surrounding the men’s team stemmed from a locker room phone call between the players and Trump right after their gold medal win over Canada. 

Advertisement

Trump told the men’s team after inviting them to Tuesday’s State of the Union address that he’d “have” to invite the women’s team, otherwise “I probably would be impeached.” The team laughed in response, prompting immense backlash. 

Several mainstream media outlets penned op-eds condemning the men’s team for laughing at the joke and then visiting the White House to celebrate and Trump’s State of the Union address. 

The United States’ Jack Hughes (86), who scored the winning overtime goal, celebrates after defeating Canada in the men’s ice hockey gold medal game at the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan, Italy Feb. 22, 2026.  (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

U.S. women’s hockey captain Hilary Knight said on Wednesday’s edition of ESPN’s “SportsCenter” that Trump’s “distasteful joke” has “overshadow[ed]” the women’s success.

“I thought it was sort of a distasteful joke, and, unfortunately, that is overshadowing a lot of the success, the success of just women at the Olympics carrying for Team USA and having amazing gold medal feats,” Knight said.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“We’re just focusing on celebrating the women in our room, the extraordinary efforts, and continue to celebrate three gold medals in program history as well as the double gold for both men’s and women’s at the same time. And really not detract from that with a distasteful joke.”

Hughes’ mother, Ellen, a former Team USA player and current player development staff member, said the players only cared about “bring[ing] so much unity to a group and to a country.”

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement

Related Article

Megan Rapinoe ridicules US men’s hockey team, Trump over ‘trash’ remark about women’s team: ‘You’re a clown’

Continue Reading

Sports

USC men routed by Nebraska after building halftime lead

Published

on

USC men routed by Nebraska after building halftime lead

Another winnable game was slipping away, another frustrating performance by USC unraveling in painfully familiar fashion, when Jaden Brownell lifted up from the corner for a wide-open three-pointer, offering a split-second of hope in an otherwise hopeless second half.

But the shot clanked away. A collective sigh from the cardinal-and-gold faithful rippled through Galen Center, only to be swallowed up seconds later when Nebraska’s Pryce Sandfort, who finished with 32 points, knocked down a three-pointer of his own. That’s when USC’s own arena exploded with a deafening Big Red roar, loud enough to make you forget you were in Los Angeles — or that these lifeless Trojans had once looked like a real NCAA tournament team.

There were still more than nine minutes remaining after that in Saturday’s brutal 82-67 loss, though that roar from the Nebraska faithful might as well have been the exclamation point. Whether it becomes the punctuation mark on a frustrating second season for USC under coach Eric Musselman was still to be determined.

The Trojans have lost five consecutive games as of Saturday and sit in a tie for 11th in the Big Ten. They still have two regular-season games remaining to bolster their middling tournament resume, both of which they can ill afford to lose.

A midweek matchup at Washington looms especially large. A loss to the Huskies, who are 14-15, would make climbing back from the bubble brink especially harrowing. A rivalry rematch awaits after that against UCLA.

Advertisement

Nebraska forward Pryce Sandfort (21) drives past USC forward Terrance Williams II (5) during the first half Saturday.

(William Liang / Associated Press)

“I still think we could have a successful season,” forward Terrance Williams II said Saturday . “I had that positive mindset coming into the season. I still have that positive mindset. The season’s not over. … We can change the trajectory of the season very quickly.”

Nothing, though, about Saturday’s second half suggested USC was poised for positive change.

Advertisement

The Trojans positioned themselves in the first half to make a very different statement Saturday. They took advantage of foul trouble from Nebraska point guard Sam Hoiberg and led by five points at halftime. Chad Baker-Mazara had already poured in 14 points, and they barely needed freshman Alijah Arenas, who was left out of the starting lineup and played only nine minutes.
“They had belief,” Musselman said.

Yet after shooting 52% from the field in the first half, the Trojans were suddenly unable to find the target in the second. For the first five minutes of the half, a dunk from Jacob Cofie was USC’s only basket. During another five-minute stretch in the second half, USC couldn’t even manage a dunk.

Its issues only got worse when Baker-Mazara fell hard trying to block a lay-in. He didn’t play the rest of the game, as Musselman said Baker-Mazara told the staff he was unable to go.

“They played great in the second half,” Musselman said, “and we did not play very good.”

The Trojans didn’t fare much better on the glass, either, as Nebraska more than doubled USC’s total rebounds (22 to 10) after halftime.

Advertisement

The defense followed suit, with Nebraska piling up points in the paint at will. Sixteen of the Huskers’ first 20 points in the second half came on either dunks or lay-ins as USC’s defense lacked any semblance of urgency.

“I feel like they came out with more energy to be honest,” Williams said. “The first couple possessions, you could see it. They wanted it more than we did.”

How that’s still the case, after several similarly frustrating second halves this season, is still unclear.

“Second halves, they’re hard,” Brownell said. “We have to accept that and get ready quicker in the locker room, get our mental right and then come in and be ready.”

But with the Trojans on the very brink of the tournament bubble, time is quickly running out on that possibility.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending