The West Virginia Racing Fee (WVRC) on Tuesday opted to take no motion both means on whether or not to gather and remit charges on behalf of the brand new Authority created by the federal Horseracing Integrity and Security Act (HISA).

States are dealing with a Could 1 deadline to declare “in or out” intermediary standing pertaining to the protection portion of the HISA program that may go into impact July 1. This primary phase-in of oversight doesn’t embrace HISA’s drug testing and drugs management applications, which are not anticipated to be up and operating till 2023.

“I am not going to decide to say sure to that at present,” mentioned WVRC chairman Ken Lowe Jr., including that he desires suggestions from the state lawyer basic and/or the governor’s workplace on the best way to proceed on the matter.

Over the course of the previous yr, Lowe has repeatedly spoken out in opposition to HISA, portraying it as a federal statute crafted by elitists throughout the racing business whose pursuits aren’t aligned with the realities of small-circuit racing in West Virginia.

However because the enter that Lowe desires from West Virginia’s state officers is unlikely to materialize within the subsequent 4 days, the HISA Authority will probably deal with the WVRC’s in-limbo response to the Could 1 opt-in deadline as a “no.”

Based on WVRC government director Joe Moore, “The one actual subject right here by not agreeing to it, what [the HISA Authority] will do is now go [responsibility and costs] to every of our tracks, Charles City and Mountaineer.”

Final week California and Minnesota grew to become the primary two state racing commissions to conform to work with HISA by paying their pro-rated parts of prices. In addition they have to determine the best way to use state workers (like stewards) to implement federal-level security guidelines (like whip-use pointers).

Racing commissions in New Jersey, Maryland and Texas have already mentioned no to HISA, with a number of citing as a motive that they do not have the statutory means to make budgetary and spending adjustments that contain federal or non-public entities.

West Virginia can be a plaintiff in an lively federal lawsuit joined by a number of different states aiming to get HISA voided for alleged constitutional violations earlier than the Authority even goes into impact.

That case is at present dealing with a movement to dismiss; it’s separate from the federal lawsuit spearheaded by the Nationwide Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protecting Affiliation (HBPA) that obtained thrown out of court docket a number of weeks in the past.

Charles City HBPA president Jim Miller informed commissioners that HISA was “a fantastic overreach” that amounted to an “abomination.”

However Miller was additionally cognizant that by not signing off on appearing as an middleman, the WVRC will likely be primarily passing on the Authority’s prices to the horsemen on a per-start foundation.

“If [the commission or the tracks] do not pay HISA, we lose our proper by the Interstate Horse Racing Act to simulcast, which, after all, is a giant subject for us as nicely,” Miller mentioned.

“We’re what revenues we commerce one option to go the opposite means,” Miller continued. “This will likely be a giant burden for each the tracks and an enormous burden on horsemen. We positively can not afford it at a time when, hay, oats, feed, veterinary; all these prices have gone up dramatically up to now couple months.”

Moore additionally articulated a priority that opting into the protection a part of the Authority’s program would bind the WVRC to additionally go together with the treatment and doping controls, too.

“We won’t even inform anybody how a lot that is going to value,” commissioner J.B. Akers added, alluding to the drug and drugs management assessments that may observe.

Akers additionally questioned “the so-called equitable nature of this evaluation,” which he mentioned appeared to be calculated too excessive for a comparatively small state like West Virginia.

Added Moore: “This can be a mess whether or not you conform to do their work for them [via] this voluntary settlement or not. As a result of whether or not or not our stewards are finishing up their features, if here is a violation beneath their code, the recourse of attraction is to not our stewards at Charles City or Mountaineer Park. It mechanically goes to a HISA-appointed Authority.”

With regard to the prices borne by the horsemen and the tracks, Moore mentioned there might be a potential state legislative answer within the pipeline, however that it will be a minimum of two years earlier than it might be applied.

Tracks and horsemen having to pay instantly “might be averted in future years ought to all of us agree on some further income stream to the racing fee handed by laws,” Moore defined.

“We may work collectively on determining a income stream that gave the racing fee an amount of cash to soak up that evaluation that may then come again from the racetracks and the horsemen [in a way that] would not be as sudden and impactful as perhaps only a direct evaluation,” Moore mentioned.