Washington, D.C
Washington, DC Tops List Of 'America's Hardest-Working Cities'
In a nation known for its strong work ethic, some cities stand out as shining examples of the American spirit. After all, work is the backbone of the American dream. A recent study by WalletHub set out to identify the hardest-working cities in the United States, comparing 116 of the most populated cities across 11 key metrics. Who came out on top? Results point to our nation’s capital, Washington, DC!
The study offers a fascinating insight into the work habits of Americans and the factors that contribute to a city’s overall work ethic. Conducted in February 2024, researchers looked at two main dimensions: “Direct Work Factors” and “Indirect Work Factors.” Direct Work Factors, which accounted for 80% of the total score, included metrics such as average workweek hours, employment rate, and the share of households where no adults work. Indirect Work Factors, which made up the remaining 20%, considered aspects like average commute time, the share of workers with multiple jobs, and annual volunteer hours per resident.
With that said, let’s take a look at the full list!
Hardest-Working Cities in the U.S.
| Overall Rank* | City | Total Score | Direct Work Factors Rank | Indirect Work Factors Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Washington, DC | 76.97 | 4 | 9 |
| 2 | Irving, TX | 76.39 | 1 | 46 |
| 3 | Cheyenne, WY | 76.15 | 7 | 27 |
| 4 | Virginia Beach, VA | 75.79 | 8 | 11 |
| 5 | Anchorage, AK | 75.55 | 3 | 85 |
| 6 | Norfolk, VA | 75.27 | 9 | 14 |
| 7 | Dallas, TX | 75.21 | 5 | 32 |
| 8 | San Francisco, CA | 74.67 | 6 | 40 |
| 9 | Denver, CO | 73.93 | 12 | 22 |
| 10 | Austin, TX | 73.82 | 2 | 79 |
| 11 | Sioux Falls, SD | 73.56 | 11 | 74 |
| 12 | Corpus Christi, TX | 73.44 | 10 | 76 |
| 13 | Plano, TX | 72.84 | 14 | 38 |
| 14 | Fort Worth, TX | 72.14 | 16 | 30 |
| 15 | Arlington, TX | 72.12 | 15 | 31 |
| 16 | Chesapeake, VA | 71.85 | 30 | 7 |
| 17 | Aurora, CO | 71.68 | 24 | 16 |
| 18 | Laredo, TX | 70.98 | 23 | 62 |
| 19 | Garland, TX | 70.90 | 25 | 21 |
| 20 | Nashville, TN | 70.52 | 13 | 77 |
| 21 | Manchester, NH | 70.24 | 34 | 35 |
| 22 | Omaha, NE | 70.00 | 36 | 25 |
| 23 | Raleigh, NC | 69.92 | 29 | 29 |
| 24 | Charlotte, NC | 69.89 | 33 | 24 |
| 25 | Chandler, AZ | 69.74 | 20 | 64 |
| 26 | Scottsdale, AZ | 69.70 | 17 | 78 |
| 27 | Houston, TX | 69.24 | 26 | 51 |
| 28 | Gilbert, AZ | 68.75 | 31 | 50 |
| 29 | Tampa, FL | 68.55 | 19 | 97 |
| 30 | Boston, MA | 68.45 | 49 | 3 |
| 31 | Fremont, CA | 68.22 | 37 | 33 |
| 32 | Seattle, WA | 68.05 | 51 | 6 |
| 33 | Atlanta, GA | 67.86 | 32 | 69 |
| 34 | Portland, ME | 67.72 | 40 | 57 |
| 35 | Colorado Springs, CO | 67.43 | 52 | 17 |
| 36 | Oklahoma City, OK | 66.95 | 22 | 101 |
| 37 | Indianapolis, IN | 66.91 | 47 | 18 |
| 38 | St. Petersburg, FL | 66.78 | 28 | 100 |
| 39 | Orlando, FL | 66.71 | 21 | 107 |
| 40 | Jacksonville, FL | 66.42 | 18 | 109 |
| 41 | Lubbock, TX | 66.40 | 39 | 98 |
| 42 | Baltimore, MD | 66.38 | 71 | 2 |
| 43 | San Antonio, TX | 66.14 | 35 | 86 |
| 44 | Salt Lake City, UT | 66.02 | 66 | 5 |
| 45 | Phoenix, AZ | 65.90 | 41 | 54 |
| 46 | Durham, NC | 65.80 | 43 | 88 |
| 47 | Fargo, ND | 65.52 | 48 | 63 |
| 48 | Little Rock, AR | 65.32 | 38 | 115 |
| 49 | Kansas City, MO | 65.25 | 50 | 41 |
| 50 | San Jose, CA | 65.19 | 42 | 55 |
| 51 | Miami, FL | 64.91 | 27 | 114 |
| 52 | Oakland, CA | 64.67 | 53 | 42 |
| 53 | Boise, ID | 64.18 | 63 | 48 |
| 54 | Portland, OR | 64.17 | 83 | 1 |
| 55 | El Paso, TX | 64.13 | 64 | 43 |
| 56 | Jersey City, NJ | 63.89 | 58 | 37 |
| 57 | Louisville, KY | 63.82 | 57 | 34 |
| 58 | Honolulu, HI | 63.72 | 46 | 110 |
| 59 | Tulsa, OK | 63.57 | 45 | 111 |
| 60 | Billings, MT | 63.48 | 62 | 66 |
| 61 | Minneapolis, MN | 62.77 | 77 | 13 |
| 62 | Des Moines, IA | 62.75 | 69 | 67 |
| 63 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 62.52 | 54 | 102 |
| 64 | Wichita, KS | 62.36 | 56 | 105 |
| 65 | Glendale, AZ | 62.34 | 70 | 47 |
| 66 | Jackson, MS | 62.11 | 60 | 106 |
| 67 | San Diego, CA | 61.95 | 59 | 80 |
| 68 | Columbus, OH | 61.94 | 65 | 59 |
| 69 | Irvine, CA | 61.62 | 55 | 89 |
| 70 | Fort Wayne, IN | 61.56 | 68 | 93 |
| 71 | Hialeah, FL | 61.44 | 44 | 112 |
| 72 | Santa Ana, CA | 61.29 | 61 | 87 |
| 73 | Lincoln, NE | 61.25 | 82 | 28 |
| 74 | Mesa, AZ | 61.13 | 72 | 61 |
| 75 | Long Beach, CA | 60.69 | 74 | 65 |
| 76 | St. Louis, MO | 60.65 | 81 | 36 |
| 77 | St. Paul, MN | 60.56 | 85 | 12 |
| 78 | Anaheim, CA | 60.49 | 73 | 75 |
| 79 | Reno, NV | 60.45 | 75 | 90 |
| 80 | Los Angeles, CA | 60.14 | 76 | 60 |
| 81 | Chula Vista, CA | 60.11 | 78 | 53 |
| 82 | Winston-Salem, NC | 59.59 | 79 | 92 |
| 83 | Henderson, NV | 59.19 | 80 | 71 |
| 84 | Philadelphia, PA | 58.52 | 98 | 8 |
| 85 | Birmingham, AL | 58.29 | 67 | 108 |
| 86 | North Las Vegas, NV | 58.14 | 84 | 49 |
| 87 | Chicago, IL | 57.71 | 89 | 39 |
| 88 | Las Vegas, NV | 57.28 | 88 | 58 |
| 89 | Cincinnati, OH | 57.23 | 97 | 20 |
| 90 | Bakersfield, CA | 56.29 | 93 | 72 |
| 91 | Albuquerque, NM | 56.16 | 92 | 84 |
| 92 | Memphis, TN | 55.91 | 91 | 73 |
| 93 | Riverside, CA | 55.36 | 94 | 68 |
| 94 | New Orleans, LA | 55.26 | 87 | 96 |
| 95 | Greensboro, NC | 55.08 | 96 | 94 |
| 96 | Sacramento, CA | 54.96 | 90 | 95 |
| 97 | Wilmington, DE | 54.60 | 95 | 81 |
| 98 | Pittsburgh, PA | 54.41 | 104 | 19 |
| 99 | New York, NY | 53.70 | 101 | 44 |
| 100 | Baton Rouge, LA | 53.43 | 100 | 91 |
| 101 | Madison, WI | 52.98 | 99 | 104 |
| 102 | Milwaukee, WI | 52.85 | 108 | 10 |
| 103 | Charleston, WV | 52.61 | 86 | 116 |
| 104 | Stockton, CA | 52.28 | 106 | 15 |
| 105 | Tucson, AZ | 51.94 | 102 | 99 |
| 106 | Providence, RI | 51.60 | 107 | 26 |
| 107 | San Bernardino, CA | 50.62 | 105 | 83 |
| 108 | Columbia, SC | 50.33 | 103 | 113 |
| 109 | Cleveland, OH | 50.00 | 110 | 23 |
| 110 | Fresno, CA | 48.86 | 109 | 82 |
| 111 | Bridgeport, CT | 48.31 | 112 | 4 |
| 112 | Toledo, OH | 47.50 | 111 | 52 |
| 113 | Newark, NJ | 43.19 | 113 | 45 |
| 114 | Buffalo, NY | 39.22 | 114 | 103 |
| 115 | Detroit, MI | 39.08 | 115 | 70 |
| 116 | Burlington, VT | 34.43 | 116 | 56 |
With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.
A Closer Look At The Top 3
So why did Washington, D.C. emerge as the hardest-working city? This is due, in part, to the city having the highest share of workers who leave vacation time unused at 64%. Residents of D.C. also work the third-most hours per week on average and are willing to take relatively long commutes to work, adding over 30 minutes to their workday. Additionally, more than 30% of the District’s residents are members of local volunteer groups or organizations, showcasing their dedication to their community.
Irving, TX, secured the second spot on the list, largely because it has the lowest share of households where no adults work, at only 11%. Irving also ranks ninth in the country for the mean number of hours worked per week. However, this hard work comes at a cost, with Irving residents having significantly less leisure time compared to people in most other cities.
Cheyenne, WY, rounded out the top three, with residents putting in the third-most hours per week, on average. The city boasts one of the highest employment rates in the country, at over 97%, meaning nearly all working-age residents are employed. Cheyenne also has the seventh-highest rate of workers with multiple jobs, at nearly 7%. As a result, people in Cheyenne have the third-lowest amount of leisure time, on average.
Methodology
The WalletHub study employed a comprehensive methodology to determine the hardest-working cities in America. The research team evaluated 116 of the most populated cities using two key dimensions: “Direct Work Factors” and “Indirect Work Factors.” These dimensions were assessed using 11 key metrics, each graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the “hardest-working.”
The Direct Work Factors dimension, which accounted for 80% of the total score, included six metrics. The average workweek hours were given the highest weight (triple weight, ~36.92 points), as this metric directly measures the time spent working. The employment rate and the share of households where no adults work were both given full weight (~12.31 points each), as they provide insight into the overall employment situation in each city. The share of workers leaving vacation time unused and the share of engaged workers (a state-level metric) were assigned half weight (~6.15 points each), as they relate to work dedication and engagement. Finally, the idle youth (16-24) rate was also given half weight, as it indicates the proportion of young people not engaged in work or education.
The Indirect Work Factors dimension, which made up the remaining 20% of the total score, included five metrics, each given full weight (~4.00 points). The average commute time was included as it can significantly impact the total time spent on work-related activities. The share of workers with multiple jobs (a state-level metric) was considered as it reflects the need for some individuals to work more than one job. Annual volunteer hours per resident and the share of residents who participate in local groups or organizations were included to account for community engagement and additional time commitments outside of paid work. Lastly, the average leisure time spent per day (a state-level metric) was considered as it relates to work-life balance.
To calculate the overall score for each city, the researchers determined the weighted average across all 11 metrics. The resulting scores were then used to rank-order the cities from hardest-working to least hard-working. To ensure a geographically diverse sample, the study included at least one city from each of the 50 states. It is important to note that the term “city” in this study refers specifically to the city proper and does not include the surrounding metropolitan area.
By employing this multi-faceted approach, the WalletHub study aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the work ethic in American cities. The methodology takes into account both direct measures of work, such as hours worked and employment rates, as well as indirect factors that can impact work-life balance and overall quality of life. This detailed analysis allows for a nuanced understanding of the factors contributing to a city’s overall work ethic and provides valuable insights for policymakers, employers, and residents alike.
Washington, D.C
Pop-up museum in DC features the scandal that changed American history – WTOP News
Among the liquor store, barber shop and dry cleaners at the Watergate Complex’s retail plaza, there is a new pop-up museum dedicated to the scene of the crime that toppled Richard Nixon’s presidency.
Among the liquor store, barber shop and dry cleaners at the Watergate Complex’s retail plaza, there is a new pop-up museum dedicated to the scene of the crime that toppled Richard Nixon’s presidency.
The temporary exhibit features the work of artist Laurie Munn — portraits of members of the Nixon administration and those connected to the Watergate break-in. The exhibit features members of Congress, the media and some who were on Nixon’s enemies list.
Keith Krom, chair of the Board of Directors of the Watergate Museum, told WTOP the exhibit was first featured in the gallery in 2012 for the 40th anniversary of the break-in at the Democratic National Committee.
“When she (Munn) learned about our museum effort, she offered to reassemble them as a way for us to expand awareness of the museum,” Krom said.
Krom, who lives in the Watergate, said his favorite portrait is of one of the special prosecutors, whose firing sparked the “Saturday Night Massacre” in 1973.
“I had the pleasure of being a student of Archibald Cox,” Krom said. “He served as my mentor for my third-year writing project.”
Krom said during this time, at the Boston University School of Law, he spent a great deal of time with him.
“I didn’t realize how much he must have gone through. Here he was, this one man, who was challenging the president of the United States over something pretty serious,” Krom said.
The pop-up opened in October and was recently extended to stay open until April 25. Krom said the hope is to find it a permanent location within the Watergate Complex, where they can “present the history of Watergate, but with two perspectives.”
The first would be on the building’s “architectural significance to D.C.,” he said.
“You may not like the design, you actually may hate it,” Krom said. “But you cannot deny that it changed D.C.’s skyline.”
The secondary focus would, of course, be on the mother of all presidential scandals that changed the course of American history.
“That’s where that suffix ‘-gate’ started and continues to be used for almost every scandal that comes out today,” Krom said.
The inspiration for the museum spawned from an interaction from a tourist outside the Watergate.
“He says, ‘This is the Watergate, right?’ And I was like, ‘Yeah, it’s one of the buildings,’” Krom recalled.
The tourist then asked Krom, “So where’s the museum?”
“I was like, ‘Oh, we don’t have a museum.’ And he literally just looked at me and said, ‘That’s so sad.’ And he got on his bike and rode away,” Krom said.
While the self-proclaimed political history nerd said he “still gets goose bumps” when he drives by the Capitol at night, Krom hopes that when people leave the museum, “they’ll walk away with a new appreciation for how our government works, the guardrails that are in place.”
“Maybe an understanding that those guardrails themselves are kind of frail, and they probably need our collective help in making sure they last — that’s what we hope to accomplish,” Krom said.
Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.
© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
Washington, D.C
Cherry Blossoms Hit Peak Bloom in Washington DC
According to the National Park Service at the National Mall, famous cherry blossoms around the nation’s capital have hit peak bloom conditions. The National Park Service X account for the National Mall proclaimed this morning, “PEAK BLOOM! PEAK BLOOM! PEAK BLOOM!”
It became apparent yesterday that the bloom would be at peak today. “Despite a sunny afternoon and patches of blue sky, the cherry blossoms remain at Stage 5: Puffy White,” the Park Service wrote on X yesterday. Stage 5, “Puffy White”, is the final stage blossoms go through before being in full bloom. They start at Stage 1 as a “Green Bud”, grow into Stage 2 with “Florets Visible”, and then florets become extended at Stage 3. In Stage 4, there is “Peduncle Elongation” which sets the stage for the puffy blossoms to appear in Stage 5. Puffy White and Peak Bloom are defined as when 70% of the blossoms on the trees reach that stage.
Peak bloom varies annually depending on weather conditions; the most likely time to reach peak bloom is between the last week of March and the first week of April. According to the Park Service, extraordinary warm or cool temperatures have resulted in peak bloom as early as March 15 in 1990 and as late as April 18 in 1958.
The planting of cherry trees in Washington DC originated in 1912 as a gift of friendship to the People of the United States from the People of Japan. In Japan, the flowering cherry tree, or “Sakura,” is an important flowering plant. The beauty of the cherry blossom is a symbol with rich meaning in Japanese culture.
Dr. David Fairchild, plant explorer and U.S. Department of Agriculture official, imported seventy-five flowering cherry trees and twenty-five single-flowered weeping types from the Yokohama Nursery Company in Japan. After experimenting with growing them on his own property in Maryland, he deemed that the cherry tree would be perfect to plant around the Washington DC area. This triggered an interest by a variety of individuals to plant the tree around Washington. In 1909 the Mayor of Tokyo, Yukio Ozaki, donated 2,000 trees to the United States on behalf of his city. When the trees arrived, they were riddled with disease and insects and to protect other agriculture, they were burned. The Tokyo Mayor made a second donation of trees in 1910, this time amounting to 3,020 trees. This started the forest of cherry trees that now line the Potomac basin around Washington DC. In a gesture of gratitude back to Japan, President Taft sent a gift in 1915 of flowering dogwood trees to the people of Japan. Thousands of trees have been added since, including another gift of 3,800 trees from Japan in 1965.
Washington, D.C
BREAKING | MPD officer struck by hit-and-run driver in Southwest DC
WASHINGTON (7NEWS) — Authorities are searching for an SUV after an officer with the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) was struck by a hit-and-run driver in Southwest D.C. on Wednesday night.
The crash happened just before 10 p.m. at Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue and Forrester Street, SW.
Police confirmed the officer, an adult man, was conscious and breathing when he was rushed to a nearby hospital for treatment of his injuries. There is no word on his condition.
The driver involved fled the scene, and investigators are looking for a white Range Rover with a partial South Carolina tag of “403.”
Anyone with information is urged to call 202-727-9099 or text tips at 50411.
This is a developing story that will be updated as more information becomes available.
-
Detroit, MI1 week agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Science1 week agoHow a Melting Glacier in Antarctica Could Affect Tens of Millions Around the Globe
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago‘Youth’ Twitter review: Ken Karunaas impresses audiences; Suraj Venjaramoodu adds charm; music wins praise | – The Times of India
-
Science1 week agoI had to man up and get a mammogram
-
Sports6 days agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
New Mexico5 days agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Business1 week agoDisney’s new CEO says his focus is on storytelling and creativity
-
Texas1 week agoHow to buy Houston vs. Texas A&M 2026 March Madness tickets


