Washington, D.C
Washington, DC Tops List Of 'America's Hardest-Working Cities'
In a nation known for its strong work ethic, some cities stand out as shining examples of the American spirit. After all, work is the backbone of the American dream. A recent study by WalletHub set out to identify the hardest-working cities in the United States, comparing 116 of the most populated cities across 11 key metrics. Who came out on top? Results point to our nation’s capital, Washington, DC!
The study offers a fascinating insight into the work habits of Americans and the factors that contribute to a city’s overall work ethic. Conducted in February 2024, researchers looked at two main dimensions: “Direct Work Factors” and “Indirect Work Factors.” Direct Work Factors, which accounted for 80% of the total score, included metrics such as average workweek hours, employment rate, and the share of households where no adults work. Indirect Work Factors, which made up the remaining 20%, considered aspects like average commute time, the share of workers with multiple jobs, and annual volunteer hours per resident.
With that said, let’s take a look at the full list!
Hardest-Working Cities in the U.S.
| Overall Rank* | City | Total Score | Direct Work Factors Rank | Indirect Work Factors Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Washington, DC | 76.97 | 4 | 9 |
| 2 | Irving, TX | 76.39 | 1 | 46 |
| 3 | Cheyenne, WY | 76.15 | 7 | 27 |
| 4 | Virginia Beach, VA | 75.79 | 8 | 11 |
| 5 | Anchorage, AK | 75.55 | 3 | 85 |
| 6 | Norfolk, VA | 75.27 | 9 | 14 |
| 7 | Dallas, TX | 75.21 | 5 | 32 |
| 8 | San Francisco, CA | 74.67 | 6 | 40 |
| 9 | Denver, CO | 73.93 | 12 | 22 |
| 10 | Austin, TX | 73.82 | 2 | 79 |
| 11 | Sioux Falls, SD | 73.56 | 11 | 74 |
| 12 | Corpus Christi, TX | 73.44 | 10 | 76 |
| 13 | Plano, TX | 72.84 | 14 | 38 |
| 14 | Fort Worth, TX | 72.14 | 16 | 30 |
| 15 | Arlington, TX | 72.12 | 15 | 31 |
| 16 | Chesapeake, VA | 71.85 | 30 | 7 |
| 17 | Aurora, CO | 71.68 | 24 | 16 |
| 18 | Laredo, TX | 70.98 | 23 | 62 |
| 19 | Garland, TX | 70.90 | 25 | 21 |
| 20 | Nashville, TN | 70.52 | 13 | 77 |
| 21 | Manchester, NH | 70.24 | 34 | 35 |
| 22 | Omaha, NE | 70.00 | 36 | 25 |
| 23 | Raleigh, NC | 69.92 | 29 | 29 |
| 24 | Charlotte, NC | 69.89 | 33 | 24 |
| 25 | Chandler, AZ | 69.74 | 20 | 64 |
| 26 | Scottsdale, AZ | 69.70 | 17 | 78 |
| 27 | Houston, TX | 69.24 | 26 | 51 |
| 28 | Gilbert, AZ | 68.75 | 31 | 50 |
| 29 | Tampa, FL | 68.55 | 19 | 97 |
| 30 | Boston, MA | 68.45 | 49 | 3 |
| 31 | Fremont, CA | 68.22 | 37 | 33 |
| 32 | Seattle, WA | 68.05 | 51 | 6 |
| 33 | Atlanta, GA | 67.86 | 32 | 69 |
| 34 | Portland, ME | 67.72 | 40 | 57 |
| 35 | Colorado Springs, CO | 67.43 | 52 | 17 |
| 36 | Oklahoma City, OK | 66.95 | 22 | 101 |
| 37 | Indianapolis, IN | 66.91 | 47 | 18 |
| 38 | St. Petersburg, FL | 66.78 | 28 | 100 |
| 39 | Orlando, FL | 66.71 | 21 | 107 |
| 40 | Jacksonville, FL | 66.42 | 18 | 109 |
| 41 | Lubbock, TX | 66.40 | 39 | 98 |
| 42 | Baltimore, MD | 66.38 | 71 | 2 |
| 43 | San Antonio, TX | 66.14 | 35 | 86 |
| 44 | Salt Lake City, UT | 66.02 | 66 | 5 |
| 45 | Phoenix, AZ | 65.90 | 41 | 54 |
| 46 | Durham, NC | 65.80 | 43 | 88 |
| 47 | Fargo, ND | 65.52 | 48 | 63 |
| 48 | Little Rock, AR | 65.32 | 38 | 115 |
| 49 | Kansas City, MO | 65.25 | 50 | 41 |
| 50 | San Jose, CA | 65.19 | 42 | 55 |
| 51 | Miami, FL | 64.91 | 27 | 114 |
| 52 | Oakland, CA | 64.67 | 53 | 42 |
| 53 | Boise, ID | 64.18 | 63 | 48 |
| 54 | Portland, OR | 64.17 | 83 | 1 |
| 55 | El Paso, TX | 64.13 | 64 | 43 |
| 56 | Jersey City, NJ | 63.89 | 58 | 37 |
| 57 | Louisville, KY | 63.82 | 57 | 34 |
| 58 | Honolulu, HI | 63.72 | 46 | 110 |
| 59 | Tulsa, OK | 63.57 | 45 | 111 |
| 60 | Billings, MT | 63.48 | 62 | 66 |
| 61 | Minneapolis, MN | 62.77 | 77 | 13 |
| 62 | Des Moines, IA | 62.75 | 69 | 67 |
| 63 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 62.52 | 54 | 102 |
| 64 | Wichita, KS | 62.36 | 56 | 105 |
| 65 | Glendale, AZ | 62.34 | 70 | 47 |
| 66 | Jackson, MS | 62.11 | 60 | 106 |
| 67 | San Diego, CA | 61.95 | 59 | 80 |
| 68 | Columbus, OH | 61.94 | 65 | 59 |
| 69 | Irvine, CA | 61.62 | 55 | 89 |
| 70 | Fort Wayne, IN | 61.56 | 68 | 93 |
| 71 | Hialeah, FL | 61.44 | 44 | 112 |
| 72 | Santa Ana, CA | 61.29 | 61 | 87 |
| 73 | Lincoln, NE | 61.25 | 82 | 28 |
| 74 | Mesa, AZ | 61.13 | 72 | 61 |
| 75 | Long Beach, CA | 60.69 | 74 | 65 |
| 76 | St. Louis, MO | 60.65 | 81 | 36 |
| 77 | St. Paul, MN | 60.56 | 85 | 12 |
| 78 | Anaheim, CA | 60.49 | 73 | 75 |
| 79 | Reno, NV | 60.45 | 75 | 90 |
| 80 | Los Angeles, CA | 60.14 | 76 | 60 |
| 81 | Chula Vista, CA | 60.11 | 78 | 53 |
| 82 | Winston-Salem, NC | 59.59 | 79 | 92 |
| 83 | Henderson, NV | 59.19 | 80 | 71 |
| 84 | Philadelphia, PA | 58.52 | 98 | 8 |
| 85 | Birmingham, AL | 58.29 | 67 | 108 |
| 86 | North Las Vegas, NV | 58.14 | 84 | 49 |
| 87 | Chicago, IL | 57.71 | 89 | 39 |
| 88 | Las Vegas, NV | 57.28 | 88 | 58 |
| 89 | Cincinnati, OH | 57.23 | 97 | 20 |
| 90 | Bakersfield, CA | 56.29 | 93 | 72 |
| 91 | Albuquerque, NM | 56.16 | 92 | 84 |
| 92 | Memphis, TN | 55.91 | 91 | 73 |
| 93 | Riverside, CA | 55.36 | 94 | 68 |
| 94 | New Orleans, LA | 55.26 | 87 | 96 |
| 95 | Greensboro, NC | 55.08 | 96 | 94 |
| 96 | Sacramento, CA | 54.96 | 90 | 95 |
| 97 | Wilmington, DE | 54.60 | 95 | 81 |
| 98 | Pittsburgh, PA | 54.41 | 104 | 19 |
| 99 | New York, NY | 53.70 | 101 | 44 |
| 100 | Baton Rouge, LA | 53.43 | 100 | 91 |
| 101 | Madison, WI | 52.98 | 99 | 104 |
| 102 | Milwaukee, WI | 52.85 | 108 | 10 |
| 103 | Charleston, WV | 52.61 | 86 | 116 |
| 104 | Stockton, CA | 52.28 | 106 | 15 |
| 105 | Tucson, AZ | 51.94 | 102 | 99 |
| 106 | Providence, RI | 51.60 | 107 | 26 |
| 107 | San Bernardino, CA | 50.62 | 105 | 83 |
| 108 | Columbia, SC | 50.33 | 103 | 113 |
| 109 | Cleveland, OH | 50.00 | 110 | 23 |
| 110 | Fresno, CA | 48.86 | 109 | 82 |
| 111 | Bridgeport, CT | 48.31 | 112 | 4 |
| 112 | Toledo, OH | 47.50 | 111 | 52 |
| 113 | Newark, NJ | 43.19 | 113 | 45 |
| 114 | Buffalo, NY | 39.22 | 114 | 103 |
| 115 | Detroit, MI | 39.08 | 115 | 70 |
| 116 | Burlington, VT | 34.43 | 116 | 56 |
With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.
A Closer Look At The Top 3
So why did Washington, D.C. emerge as the hardest-working city? This is due, in part, to the city having the highest share of workers who leave vacation time unused at 64%. Residents of D.C. also work the third-most hours per week on average and are willing to take relatively long commutes to work, adding over 30 minutes to their workday. Additionally, more than 30% of the District’s residents are members of local volunteer groups or organizations, showcasing their dedication to their community.
Irving, TX, secured the second spot on the list, largely because it has the lowest share of households where no adults work, at only 11%. Irving also ranks ninth in the country for the mean number of hours worked per week. However, this hard work comes at a cost, with Irving residents having significantly less leisure time compared to people in most other cities.
Cheyenne, WY, rounded out the top three, with residents putting in the third-most hours per week, on average. The city boasts one of the highest employment rates in the country, at over 97%, meaning nearly all working-age residents are employed. Cheyenne also has the seventh-highest rate of workers with multiple jobs, at nearly 7%. As a result, people in Cheyenne have the third-lowest amount of leisure time, on average.
Methodology
The WalletHub study employed a comprehensive methodology to determine the hardest-working cities in America. The research team evaluated 116 of the most populated cities using two key dimensions: “Direct Work Factors” and “Indirect Work Factors.” These dimensions were assessed using 11 key metrics, each graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the “hardest-working.”
The Direct Work Factors dimension, which accounted for 80% of the total score, included six metrics. The average workweek hours were given the highest weight (triple weight, ~36.92 points), as this metric directly measures the time spent working. The employment rate and the share of households where no adults work were both given full weight (~12.31 points each), as they provide insight into the overall employment situation in each city. The share of workers leaving vacation time unused and the share of engaged workers (a state-level metric) were assigned half weight (~6.15 points each), as they relate to work dedication and engagement. Finally, the idle youth (16-24) rate was also given half weight, as it indicates the proportion of young people not engaged in work or education.
The Indirect Work Factors dimension, which made up the remaining 20% of the total score, included five metrics, each given full weight (~4.00 points). The average commute time was included as it can significantly impact the total time spent on work-related activities. The share of workers with multiple jobs (a state-level metric) was considered as it reflects the need for some individuals to work more than one job. Annual volunteer hours per resident and the share of residents who participate in local groups or organizations were included to account for community engagement and additional time commitments outside of paid work. Lastly, the average leisure time spent per day (a state-level metric) was considered as it relates to work-life balance.
To calculate the overall score for each city, the researchers determined the weighted average across all 11 metrics. The resulting scores were then used to rank-order the cities from hardest-working to least hard-working. To ensure a geographically diverse sample, the study included at least one city from each of the 50 states. It is important to note that the term “city” in this study refers specifically to the city proper and does not include the surrounding metropolitan area.
By employing this multi-faceted approach, the WalletHub study aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the work ethic in American cities. The methodology takes into account both direct measures of work, such as hours worked and employment rates, as well as indirect factors that can impact work-life balance and overall quality of life. This detailed analysis allows for a nuanced understanding of the factors contributing to a city’s overall work ethic and provides valuable insights for policymakers, employers, and residents alike.
Washington, D.C
Now streaming: ’51st State’ documentary on a young activist’s fight for DC statehood – WTOP News
One of D.C.’s most personal statehood activism stories can now be seen by a larger audience, two years after its premiere.
This page contains a video which is being blocked by your ad blocker.
In order to view the video you must disable your ad blocker.
WETA+ adds ’51st State’ documentary as DC voters choose new leadership
One of D.C.’s most personal statehood activism stories can now be seen by a larger audience, two years after its premiere.
WETA has added the documentary “51st State” to its District Docs collection, now streaming on WETA+. The station has also posted the documentary on its YouTube channel.
Voters in last week’s D.C. Democratic primary selected nominees for mayor and delegate who have vowed to keep up the fight for the District’s autonomy, so it’s a fitting time to revisit the film, which follows a young Washingtonian whose life has been shaped by the fight for representation.
D.C. statehood movement is personal for Jamal Holtz. It started long before he became the face of a movement or the subject of a documentary. It began at home.
“When my mom talked about having lack of access to health insurance and the impacts on me and going to school, that was all rooted in our lack of being a state,” Holtz said. “The fact that we didn’t have a vote on the matter of the Affordable Care Act was to show people that, like, people in D.C. actually experience real issues and real problems.”
“51st State” director Hannah Rosenzweig first met Holtz at a 2021 event in Brooklyn organized by 51 for 51 and New Yorkers for D.C. Statehood. The group pushes for D.C. to become a state with 51 votes in the Senate instead of the 60‑vote filibuster threshold.
Rosenzweig said one part of the movement immediately caught her attention.
“I just love the framing of young native Washingtonians,” Rosenzweig said. “Really looking at them as part of a voting rights and civil rights movement.”
She said Holtz stood out from the beginning, saying she knew “he was going places.”
“He’s a leader,” Rosenzweig said. “He’s charismatic — people listen when he talks.”
Filming began in June 2021, when Holtz was 23.
Holtz, who is now 28, said: “You had me when I had braces, to me with facial hair and no braces.”
Serving the community isn’t new to Holtz. He was a member of the Marion Barry Youth Leadership Institute, the city’s long‑running program that trains D.C. teenagers in leadership and public service.
The documentary, which premiered June 16, 2024, at the DC/DOX Film Festival, follows the push for statehood through the House’s passage of H.R. 51, the advocacy campaign in the Senate and the everyday life of a fourth‑generation Washingtonian.
“It talks about D.C. statehood through a different lens,” Holtz said. “What does lack of statehood look like in people’s day‑to‑day lives?”
Rosenzweig said she wanted viewers to see the real Washington — the neighborhoods and the families who rarely appear in national conversations about the city.
“There’s a culture of D.C. that most people don’t know about,” she said. “I love that. In fact, I wanted to move there.”
Holtz spoke to WTOP outside the Wilson Building by the Marion Barry statue, and was asked where he saw himself in 20 years.
“I’ll be standing on the grounds of the 51st state,” Holtz said. “Helping to govern our state and helping live up to the American dream and democracy that the people of D.C. want.”
When the question turned to which office sounded more fun, governor or senator, Holtz smiled and said, “The title will figure it out.”
Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.
© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
Washington, D.C
Reflecting pool to be drained again as Trump claims five vandalism arrests
The Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool is set to be drained again after Donald Trump said on Monday – without providing proof – that five people were arrested for vandalism and five more are under investigation in connection to the algae blooms and peeling paint that appeared weeks after his ill-fated $14m renovation attempt.
“It’s not a lot of damage, but we’ll probably have to let the water out and refix it. They went in there with a knife,” Trump told reporters, describing what he first said was a 290- to 300ft slit in the paint but then later amended to a 350ft slit. He also said someone had put fertilizer into the water, which caused the algae to grow.
Reporters who visited the pool on Sunday could see no evidence of such damage, the Washington Post reported.
The newspaper also interviewed three-time Olympic cyclist David Hearn, who said he had been arrested by US park police on a misdemeanor charge after stopping by the refurbished pool and, out of curiosity, touching one of the pieces of peeling paint liner.
Trump has sought to turn the monument “American flag blue” in time for the for the country’s 250th birthday, which included painting the bottom of the pool a dark shade of navy officially called “Old Glory Blue”.
He awarded a no-bid contract to a company he said had previously done work on swimming pools at one of his golf clubs, and within days of the completion of the work, the water started to appear green from algae plaguing the standing water and the coating of paint applied during the renovation also started to detach.
On Monday, Trump was adamant it was not the pool company to blame for the algae blooms and peeling paint, but “vandals”. When pushed to provide evidence of his claims, he told reporters to call the Department of the Interior and the National Park Service. Neither agency responded immediately to a request for comment, nor did the US park police.
When asked how alleged vandals were able to get so close to one of Washington DC’s most historically symbolic attractions, where there is a heavy police presence, Trump responded that “we didn’t have a lot” of police then.
“Who would think that somebody would go into a pool and take a knife and start cutting it?” he asked.
It’s unclear when the pool will be drained, but a spokesperson with the DC Water Authority said the agency has issued the national parks service a temporary permit to discharge water into a sewer that flows into a local treatment facility. The permit was issued 16 June and expires 2 July, the spokesperson said.
Trump had earlier posted on social media that “there is a 10-year prison sentence for the destruction, or even the attempted destruction, of such things – Which will be fully enforced!”
Destruction of federal property can carry a maximum prison sentence of 10 years.
Washington, D.C
Alan Greenspan, the legendary former Federal Reserve chair, dies
Former Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan delivers the keynote address at the IMF Statistical Forum/Statistics for Policy Making in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 18, 2014. Greenspan died on Monday at age 100.
Paul J. Richards/AFP via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Paul J. Richards/AFP via Getty Images
Former Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan delivers the keynote address at the IMF Statistical Forum/Statistics for Policy Making in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 18, 2014. Greenspan died on Monday at age 100.
Paul J. Richards/AFP via Getty Images
Sign up for the Planet Money newsletter. The world is confusing. Economics can help.
Alan Greenspan, who steered the Federal Reserve for nearly two decades, through some of the longest economic booms in U.S. history, has died. Greenspan died Monday at his home in Washington. He was 100.
Greenspan was the rare celebrity among central bankers, lionized for his economic stewardship in the 1990s. At a time when it seemed every barbershop had a television tuned to the stock market channel, ordinary Americans hung on the Fed chairman’s every word.
His reputation was tarnished, however, by the global financial crisis which struck a decade later.


Greenspan liked to write speeches in the bathtub, but it was his listeners who were sometimes left feeling underwater by the unfamiliar dialect known as “Fedspeak.”
Greenspan later acknowledged that he would deliberately garble his syntax to avoid saying anything that might move financial markets.
A notorious exception came in 1996, when Greenspan seemed to suggest that stock prices might be getting ahead of themselves.
“How do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset prices,” he asked during a speech at the American Enterprise Institute.
The warning that exuberant investors might not be quite rational sent temporary shivers through global stock markets. But Greenspan’s own stock continued to climb.
Fed Chair Alan Greenspan testifies before the Joint Economic Committee in Congress in Washington, D.C., on June 17, 1999.
Tim Sloan/AFP via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Tim Sloan/AFP via Getty Images
Fed Chair Alan Greenspan testifies before the Joint Economic Committee in Congress in Washington, D.C., on June 17, 1999.
Tim Sloan/AFP via Getty Images
Greenspan dabbled in jazz
He was married to NBC news anchor Andrea Mitchell, who anounced his death in a statement, and the two made a somewhat unlikely power couple. Comedian Jay Leno once joked during a White House Correspondents Association dinner that Mitchell, not then-First Lady Hillary Clinton, was married to “the most powerful man in the world.”
Greenspan was a talented jazz musician who studied clarinet and saxophone at Juilliard. But it was economics that made him a rock star and a symbol of the widely-shared prosperity at the end of the 20th century.
A master of monetary policy, Greenspan led the central bank under four different presidents, beginning in 1987.
Much of his tenure was marked by falling unemployment. Traditionally, central bankers respond to low unemployment by raising interest rates to ward off inflation. But Greenspan broke with that tradition and kept borrowing costs low.
“He was willing to watch and wait as the unemployment rate drifted lower and lower and lower and lower, and we still had no inflation,” recalled Princeton economist Alan Blinder, who served under Greenspan on the Fed’s governing board.
Former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan and his wife television journalist Andrea Mitchell attend a reception with Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda at the Japanese embassy in Washington, D.C., on April 29, 2012.
Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images
Former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan and his wife television journalist Andrea Mitchell attend a reception with Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda at the Japanese embassy in Washington, D.C., on April 29, 2012.
Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images
Greenspan oversaw an economic boom
Greenspan’s gamble with low rates paid off, and the economy kept booming for a decade, although critics argue his easy-money policies also helped inflate the dot-com bubble and later fueled the subprime mortgage meltdown.


In addition to low interest rates, Greenspan pursued a light touch on regulation, refusing to use the Fed’s powers to crack down on risky lending. His libertarian philosophy was shaped in part by the novelist Ayn Rand.
Greenspan had been a member of Rand’s inner circle, contributing chapters to her book, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal. When Greenspan joined the Ford administration as an economic adviser, Rand attended his swearing-in ceremony.
“Greenspan said that Ayn Rand put the moral foundation under capitalism for him,” said Rand’s biographer, Anne Heller.
Greenspan believed bankers didn’t need heavy-handed regulation because their own self-interest would prevent them from taking undue risks. Only after risky banking helped trigger the global financial crisis in 2008 — two years after he left the Fed — would Greenspan sheepishly admit that he’d been wrong.
“I was shocked because I had going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well,” Greenspan told a congressional committee investigating the financial meltdown.
Then-President Bill Clinton talks with then-Fed Chair Greenspan during the receiving line at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 31, 1999.
Tim Sloan/AFP via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Tim Sloan/AFP via Getty Images
Then-President Bill Clinton talks with then-Fed Chair Greenspan during the receiving line at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 31, 1999.
Tim Sloan/AFP via Getty Images
Greenspan long advocated for a light regulatory touch
The idea that bankers will sometimes take dangerous risks if they’re allowed to should not have come as a surprise to Greenspan, however.
Decades earlier, he’d played a bit part in the savings-and-loan crisis, which was a kind of dress rehearsal for the 2008 financial crisis.
As a private economist in the 1980s, Greenspan provided a testimonial for what he called “seasoned and expert” management at Lincoln Savings and Loan, in an effort to ward of regulation of the thrift.
Lincoln later collapsed, costing taxpayers billions. And its boss, Charles Keating, went to prison for fraud.
Economist Vincent Reinhart said it took courage for Greenspan to acknowledge, however belatedly, that self-interest is not always enough to protect taxpayers and investors from the risky behavior of bankers.
“For Alan Greenspan to say, ‘Well, maybe markets don’t always get it right,’ is a reflection on his entire career, not just his tenure at the Fed,” Reinhart said.
Ultimately, Greenspan’s will be remembered as both a maestro of monetary policy and a reluctant regulator. His legacy is shaped by the boom he fostered, and by the bust he failed to prevent.
John Ydstie contributed to this report.
-
Iowa4 minutes agoState officials continue to recommend no swimming at one Iowa lake
-
Kansas7 minutes ago
Kansas City police bring in extra help for World Cup events
-
Kentucky12 minutes agoKentucky’s schematic changes on defense in 2026
-
Louisiana19 minutes agoThe Supreme Court’s campaign to expand religious liberty now has a glaring exception
-
Maine19 minutes ago
Rains bring relief to drought in Maine
-
Maryland27 minutes agoSCOTUS holds the fates of 20,000 Haitian TPS recipients on Maryland’s Eastern Shore
-
Michigan34 minutes ago5 Michigan-themed coffee mugs to browse during Prime Day 2026
-
Massachusetts37 minutes agoRent control question tossed from ballot, SJC cites religious exemptions