Connect with us

Virginia

Virginia voters just handed Democrats another win in the Great Redistricting Wars

Published

on

Virginia voters just handed Democrats another win in the Great Redistricting Wars


Voters have once again handed President Donald Trump a loss in one of the defining fights of his second administration: the national congressional redistricting race.

Tuesday night, Virginia approved a ballot measure to redraw the state’s 11 congressional districts to give Democrats a significant edge — salvaging Democratic hopes of flipping control of the House of Representatives in the fall.

In case you need a refresher, congressional redistricting — or the process by which states define the districts that House members represent — usually happens once per decade, after a new census.

That all changed over the summer when President Donald Trump urged Republicans in Texas to redraw their congressional maps early, to shore up the GOP’s tiny (currently one-seat) congressional majority and give the national party a boost during 2026 midterms. Texas Republicans created new maps in the summer, giving the GOP a new edge in five districts.

Advertisement

Democrats in some blue states also mobilized, kicking off a wave of mid-decade redistricting in both Democratic and Republican-controlled states that has undone some of the final remaining electoral norms of the Trump era. In November 2025, California voters approved a ballot measure that redrew maps to add up to five Democratic seats — neutralizing the Texas GOP gerrymander.

Virginia is not California, however. Though it has tended to vote for Democrats in presidential and gubernatorial elections since 2000, the state is swingy and had a Republican governor, Glenn Youngkin, until January. That made the Virginia redistricting campaign — a vote on a constitutional amendment to bypass the state’s normal mapping process until the next census — even more complicated and unpredictable.

Voters complained about confusing messaging from both sides of the campaign, and many independent voters were uncomfortable with a partisan power grab. The “Yes” side relied heavily on direct appeals from former President Barack Obama, who reassured voters that the move was a justified response to Trump’s moves to tilt the House election. The “No” side ran ads that also featured earlier clips of Obama decrying gerrymandering in prior years, and ads and mailers aimed at Black voters that portrayed the referendum as a betrayal of civil rights activism to protect voting rights.

Republicans also appealed to regional concerns, warning rural residents that they would be put into awkward districts that lumped them with distant Northern Virginia suburbs.

That was reflected in the final results of the election — rural regions of the state turned out at a high rate. The electorate, overall, was more Republican than the electorate that swept in complete Democratic control of the state government during last year’s elections. Meanwhile, big urban centers, like Richmond, Virginia Beach, and the Washington, DC suburbs of northern Virginia, would turn out enough Democratic and independent votes to carry the measure statewide. In the end, the race was closer than expected, but the “Yes” side was comfortably on track for a majority win as of publication time.

Advertisement

While the “Yes” victory in Virginia is another major win for Democrats nationwide, the results of the 2026 redistricting wars have been more haphazard.

Across the country, political infighting, reluctant legislators, and timing constraints have headed off other redistricting efforts on both sides of the aisle. Now time is running out for any additional efforts: Primaries are already beginning across the country, and election preparation has to begin soon in those that haven’t started yet.

The state of the redistricting wars

Currently, Virginia’s congressional delegation is split 6-5 in Democrats’ favor; the referendum approved on Tuesday night asked voters to rejigger the map to favor Democrats in 10 districts, netting four seats.

Combined with redrawn maps in California, Missouri, North Carolina, Texas, Ohio (mandated by the state constitution), and Utah (due to a court decision), the Virginia vote creates the possibility that Democrats enter the midterm elections with a one-seat edge based on past voting patterns.

Advertisement

At the moment, Democrats stand to gain one seat

  • California: -5 GOP seats (+5 DEM seats)
  • Missouri: +1 GOP seat
  • North Carolina: +1 GOP seat
  • Ohio: +1/2 GOP seats
  • Texas: +5 GOP seats
  • Utah: -1 GOP seat (+1 DEM seat)
  • Virginia: -4 GOP seats (+4 DEM seats)

Up until now, this electoral arms race had become a “close to a wash,” Barry C. Burden, an elections expert and political science professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, told me.

“Even though Republicans are doing it in more states than Democrats are, they’re not making big gains outside of Texas,” Burden said. “And there are so many other factors in play that I think make it difficult to know exactly how the maps will play out.”

Not every state has thrown itself into the mix. Despite intense pressure from national parties, Democrats have so far turned down opportunities to squeeze out seats in Illinois, Maryland, and New York, while Republicans stood down in Indiana, Kansas, and Nebraska.

That leaves one last big redistricting wild card: Florida.

Gov. Ron DeSantis has wanted to redraw his state’s maps since Trump made his appeals, yet the effort has been mired in GOP infighting, a lack of preparation, and faces a state constitution that bars partisan redistricting, although the courts approved Republican-friendly maps in its last redraw. The state legislature was supposed to meet for a special session this week to create anywhere from one to five seats, but that meeting was delayed until April 28.

Advertisement

“It’s a big state, so that would give Republicans a lot of opportunity,” Burden said. “But they already have a map that’s pretty favorable to Republicans, and there’s a little more concern that spreading Republican voters more thinly across more districts might really put them at risk.”

That’s related to one big electoral wild card: whether the rightward shift of Latino and Hispanic voters since 2020 holds firm in a midterm year. In redrawing at least two districts, Texas Republicans bet that this trend will hold firm. Yet polling of these voters nationally, and some off-year election results, suggests that Trump’s 2024 gains may have evaporated, or reversed, because of discontent over the economy, Trump’s mass deportation agenda, and a general sense of chaos and instability that many of these voters trusted Trump to steady. That opens the possibility for the Texas gerrymander to come up short — a scenario Florida Republicans might not want to risk.

“Texas acted earlier, so it was at a time when maybe Trump and Republicans didn’t look as vulnerable going into 2026,” Burden said. “But now that we’re just months away, it’s clear Republicans are going to have a difficult environment in November.”

None of this factors in the effects of a potential Voting Rights Act decision by the Supreme Court this year or future redistricting efforts ahead of 2028. The Court has so far declined to issue a ruling on provisions of the landmark 1965 law that prohibited states from breaking up communities of minority voters, which led to the rise of majority-minority districts to boost nonwhite representation. A handful of states could still redraw their districts were the Supreme Court to decide the case during this term.

With the latest vote, though, we may be nearing the end of the redistricting wars — for this cycle, at least.

Advertisement



Source link

Virginia

Three Things We Hope to Learn About Virginia Tech At ACC Media Days

Published

on

Three Things We Hope to Learn About Virginia Tech At ACC Media Days


Virginia Tech football head coach James Franklin and three players — defensive tackle Kemari Copeland, safety Tyson Flowers and running back Marcellous Hawkins — will be present Thursday at the 2026 ACC Kickoff at the Hilton Charlotte Uptown (Charlotte, N.C.). Here are three things I think Hokies fans should hope to learn about the Hokies at media days, centered around which players will be taking questions.

Advertisement

No. 1: How has it been incorporating new athletic director Brian White?

White was named the university’s new athletic director and vice president in June; he previously served in the same roles at Florida Atlantic University. Under the helm of White, the men’s basketball team, coached by Dusty May — he later won a NCAA title with Michigan, and he’s now the head coach of the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks — made it to the Final Four in the 2022-23 season. While White’s chops lie more in hoops, his influence on football could also arrive via the chips that he’s surrounded with around the Hokie Club. Virginia Tech has made an effort in finding replacements for its university president (Tim Sands) and athletic director (Whit Babcock), and it’s also procured a record $75 million investment, the majority of which is directed towards the athletic department. How that process of integrating White, who specializes in finances, is going is one of the more intriguing notes to cover.

No. 2: Is there anyone on the secondary that jumps out to either Franklin or Flowers?

The secondary remains one of the more fascinating position groups on Virginia Tech’s roster entering the 2026 season. While Flowers is the established veteran and unquestioned leader of the unit, there are plenty of snaps available around him following offseason departures. Media days won’t provide a depth chart, but they can offer insight into which younger defensive backs have separated themselves during summer workouts.

It will be interesting to hear if there’s a specific player who has caught his attention. Cornerback Joshua Clarke could be one to watch given that he projects into the two-deep after a torn ACL cost him the 2025 campaign. Whether it’s Clarke, an experienced transfer acclimating to Blacksburg like Troy transfer Jaquez White or a younger corner beginning to emerge, those types of comments often provide an early indication of how the coaching staff and players view the rotation before preseason camp begins.

Advertisement

The same goes for Franklin. Coaches are naturally careful with personnel discussions in July, but even subtle praise can be revealing.

No. 3: How does the running back/defensive line depth shape up?

Virginia Tech operated slightly short-handed at running back for the duration of fall camp, missing true freshman Messiah Mickens throughout. Hawkins was hobbled, and though he went through several individual workouts, he did not play in the spring game. How he’s doing is one of the points to note, and while it doesn’t appear to be a serious injury at first glance, clarity is always helpful.

As for the defensive tackle room, Emmett Laws is currently out with an undisclosed injury that defensive coordinator Brent Pry did not go into more detail on. Any update on his availability would be encouraging, particularly for a defensive front that is counting on developing quality depth behind its projected starters. Kemari Copeland and Elhadj Fall appear to be the likely starters at tackle, but beyond Aycen Stevens being at one of the edge spots, who starts at the other is yet to be determined.

Advertisement

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Pete Eshelman appointed to Virginia Tourism Authority by Gov. Spanberger

Published

on

Pete Eshelman appointed to Virginia Tourism Authority by Gov. Spanberger


As Roanoke hosts the USA Cycling Mountain Bike National Championships this week, one of the region’s leading advocates for outdoor recreation is taking on a new role at the state level.

Gov. Abigail Spanberger has appointed Pete Eshelman to the Virginia Tourism Authority, marking his second term on the board after previously serving from 2018 to 2023.

For the past 15 years, Eshelman has helped lead the Roanoke Regional Partnership and the Roanoke Outside Foundation, promoting outdoor recreation as an economic development strategy. He said the region’s mountains, rivers and trails have become more than tourism assets; they have become tools for attracting businesses and new residents.

“We took for granted where we live—the beauty, the lakes, the mountains, the rivers, the trails—and we treated them like wallpaper,” Eshelman said. “But then we became intentional with them.”

Advertisement

Eshelman said investing in quality of life has helped distinguish the Roanoke Valley from competing communities.

“I always say quality of life is an economic sector,” he said. “When we invest in that, we see how it attracts companies like RINGANA. We see how it attracts people that can choose wherever they want to move to and live, but they’re choosing to move here over Asheville, North Carolina or Charlottesville because of that quality of life.”

That strategy has helped shape events including the Blue Ridge Marathon, GO Outside Festival and continued investments in parks, trails and outdoor recreation throughout the region.

“It’s not that Roanoke had a bad image; we just didn’t have an image,” Eshelman said. “What we’ve been able to do is show people these are our strengths as a community.”

Now, Eshelman hopes to bring that same approach to communities across Virginia through his appointment to the Virginia Tourism Authority.

Advertisement

“It’s really important that as decisions and policy decisions are being made at the state level that Roanoke has a voice and a say,” said Eshelman. ”I am very proud to do that.”

Eshelman believes the model that has helped transform Roanoke’s reputation can be replicated elsewhere.

“The work we’re doing here, this model, is replicable across other communities,” he said. “I think that whole ‘rising tides lift all ships’ mentality is really strong across economic development, across tourism, across our region and across the state.”

Despite Roanoke’s growing national recognition as an outdoor destination, Eshelman said the work is far from finished.

“We haven’t arrived,” he said. “We have a lot more that we can do. We have to put our foot down on the gas and do even more to kind of keep this competitive edge.”

Advertisement

As communities across the country compete for businesses, workers and visitors, Eshelman said he believes Roanoke’s greatest advantage has been in its own backyard all along.

Copyright 2026 by WSLS 10 – All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Study: VA the fourth most ‘retirement-friendly’ state

Published

on

Study: VA the fourth most ‘retirement-friendly’ state


PORTSMOUTH, Va. (WAVY) – A new study ranks Virginia fourth among the best states for retirees.

The study by home care agency Polaris Home Care analyzed social and economic factors, including crime rates, annual medical costs, housing costs, and state salaries. This analysis revealed an index score out of 100 for every state based on retirement accessibility.

Virginia received a score of 87.48/100.

Virginia performs well across key factors, notably benefitting from one of the highest average annual earnings of $68,597.

Advertisement

The agency says the state has one of the lowest violent crime rates at 208 incidents per 100,000 people and a total crime rate around 24% lower than the national average at 1,850.7 incidents per 100,000 population, highlighting the above-average safety levels offered in the state.

Idaho ranks as the most retirement-friendly state, with Arizona and North Dakota coming in second and third, respectively.

Complete rankings:

Rank  State  Retirement Index Score (/100) 
Idaho  100.00 
Arizona  90.67 
North Dakota  90.48 
Virginia  87.48 
Alabama  86.34 
Wyoming  84.42 
Florida  83.77 
Mississippi  83.56 
Minnesota  82.98 
10  Michigan  82.88 
11  North Carolina  82.50 
12  Kentucky  81.84 
13  Utah  81.74 
14  Nevada  81.67 
15  Rhode Island  81.36 
16  West Virginia  81.24 
17  Wisconsin  78.93 
18  New York  78.16 
19  Hawaii  77.83 
20  South Dakota  76.52 
21  Colorado  76.12 
22  Connecticut  75.82 
23  Maryland  74.96 
24  Washington  74.74 
25  Indiana  74.32 
26  Pennsylvania  73.93 
27  Tennessee  73.73 
28  Massachusetts  73.23 
29  Maine  73.13 
30  Iowa  73.07 
31  Delaware  70.50 
32  Arkansas  70.20 
33  Vermont  69.22 
34  South Carolina  68.94 
35  New Mexico  68.43 
36  Oklahoma  68.38 
37  Montana  68.20 
38  New Hampshire  67.28 
39  Ohio  66.60 
40  Georgia  66.35 
41  Kansas  64.41 
42  New Jersey  63.38 
43  California  63.26 
44  Oregon  62.86 
45  Illinois  62.64 
46  Louisiana  61.55 
47  Nebraska  61.52 
48  Texas  53.49 
49  Missouri  49.69 
50  Alaska  41.44 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending