Connect with us

Texas

Texas School Accountability: Good For kids? Parents? Texas? – Reform Austin

Published

on

Texas School Accountability: Good For kids? Parents? Texas? – Reform Austin


What’s in a name? That which we (Texans) call an accountability system would smell just as foul. My apologies to Shakespeare, but the dilemma of our public schools certainly feels tragic.  You might wonder how this issue climbed to the top of the “story of the day” under the Texas education section. After all, it would be easy to delve into public education’s lack of funding or the battle over educational savings accounts, aka vouchers. While those issues are certainly on the minds of anyone connected to public schools and being written about and discussed quite frequently, the issue up for review is the A-F accountability system- our state’s not-so-sneaky plan to punish or, even worse, attempt to extinguish Texas public school districts.

I spent 30 years in public schools as a teacher and campus administrator. In that time, I watched our state move from TAAS to TAKS to STAAR tests. Throughout that time, I remember hearing how each assessment was so much “better” and more rigorous than the previous one.  I remember hearing how each assessment would hold schools accountable for student learning, which I always found interesting.  In my mind, I always felt accountable to my students for their success or lack thereof.  I never felt like I needed the state of Texas to make me feel that.  The many people I worked alongside throughout my career seemed to hold the same belief.  We all felt accountable. 

I want to go on record and say I am not against some form of formal accountability.  We are all vested in ensuring children learn and can be successful adults.  My contention lies within the system and its ultimate intent.  I don’t think most people would believe one multiple-choice test a year would be a valid and reliable indicator of a student’s success beyond their formative years into adulthood.  None of those assessments tests for empathy, perseverance, or being able to work cooperatively with others.  Traits I hear many employers talk about needing in today’s world. 

I could go on and on about my issues with the tests themselves, but that’s not my intent.  My concern lies with the accountability system itself.  I recently read an article about school districts suing TEA over accountability ratings for the second year in a row, and I began to reflect on how ridiculous the system has become. 

Advertisement

In my last year as a high school principal, we had the “pleasure” of implementing the state’s remediation plan for students who did not pass the STAAR.  The plan, which was basically untenable for 99.9% of all school districts, had a prescribed directive requiring more time and staff than schools had.  Ironically, schools have had plans in place for years for students who did not pass these tests, and while I won’t pretend all plans were successful for all students, campuses and districts working in tandem were able to show significant gains from year to year. Again, the people working each day with kids feel accountable.

This lawsuit from five districts across Texas against TEA stems from yet another example of punitive measures against public school districts.  The initial lawsuit from a year ago included over 100 school districts across the state.  Superintendent Brent Jaco from Pecos-Barstow-Toyah ISD said, “We wholeheartedly believe that accountability is a good process to measure a district’s success.  However, we also believe the proposed adjustments to the A-F Accountability Ratings system do not accurately reflect our students and staff’s hard work and progress.”  According to the current suit, the districts assert, “Commissioner Morath did not provide notice of the measures, methods, and procedures he would use to evaluate school districts and campuses.” The other issue involved College, Career, and Military Readiness (CCMR) accountability scores- particularly that “students who already graduated were being measured against new standards that were not even in place when they were in school.”  Yes, that’s correct.  Students who have already finished their high school careers would have their scores recorded on their CCMR.  Except, not really.  Students were not going to be called back to high school because of the new scoring formula. 

What was going to happen and would have happened if not for the lawsuit and the TRO issued by a Travis County judge was districts and campuses would be penalized retroactively.  The worst part is schools are unable to even help the students who now no longer meet the standards because they’re off to… college or military or to perform a trade/start a career. What’s the saying? From the ridiculous to the sublime.  

I encourage you to read the article I mentioned earlier to get a full perspective of what is involved in this suit.  TEA says the A-F accountability system is “good for kids and gives parents a clear understanding of how well their schools are performing.  I agree that parents can understand that an A is a good score and an F is a bad one; what parents don’t understand is the convoluted, unfair way TEA arrives at those ratings.  As far as “good for kids,” the only people who would say and actually believe this are folks who have spent little to no time in a public school talking to public school children, their teachers, or their parents.  Trust me when I tell you, none of those people would ever say that current state testing is good for kids without their tongues planted firmly in their cheeks. 

In case you’re wondering if other options/solutions to the current accountability system have been presented.  They have.  Many and often.  And disappointingly, our state continues to not listen to the very folks who work with kids every day.  Until that day comes, I am not hopeful that it will happen anytime soon.  The system that’s supposed to be good for kids is the one that continues to punish them.  The system that’s supposed to give parents a clear understanding does no such thing. 

Advertisement

I can tell you Texas public schools are not afraid of accountability.  They thrive in it.  They feel it every day they step into a classroom, on campus, or in a district administration building.  All working together to hold themselves accountable to the children and to the parents of the very community they serve.  That accountability by any other name would smell…well, you know the rest.





Source link

Texas

Texas school board to vote on required Bible readings in public education

Published

on

Texas school board to vote on required Bible readings in public education


AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The Texas education board will vote Friday on a required reading list for more than 5 million public school students that includes Bible passages, widening conservative efforts to push Christian teachings in U.S. classrooms.

The proposal in Texas — which would mandate literary works such as Charles Dickens’ “Great Expectations” alongside parables from the New Testament — has been closely followed by education observers who say it appears to be the first of its kind in the nation.

If approved by the Texas State Board of Education, which is controlled by Republicans, the reading list would take effect in 2030.

Texas, which educates roughly 1 in 10 of the nation’s public school students, has been at the forefront of a charge by conservatives to incorporate more religion into classrooms. The state already allows public schools to hire chaplains to counsel students, mandates the display of the Ten Commandments in classrooms and has approved an optional Bible-infused curriculum.

Advertisement

For months, critics have blasted both the push to require Bible readings and the state mandating what books are read by students, which are decisions typically left up to teachers. Teachers could still assign students other books to read on top of the required titles.

A focus on Christianity

Critics say the reading list lacks diversity, blurs the separation of church and state that is enshrined in the Constitution and leaves teachers and students with little room to decide what to read.

“Kids of all faith backgrounds and no faith are served by Texas schools and they should all feel welcome in Texas schools,” said Elva Mendoza, legislative communications associate for the progressive Texas Freedom Network. “But this is sending the message to children that one and only one religious text — a Christian one — is worthy of making this required reading list.”

Others have applauded the possibility of mandated Christian religious reading in public schools. Brooke Mazel, a retiree from Lubbock, encouraged the board to adopt biblical materials, saying her children and grandchildren grew up with “strong faith and family values.”

“America should celebrate our 250 years that started as a nation of unwavering Christian values,” Mazel said.

Advertisement

The board is also set to vote Friday on a social studies curriculum that links Bible stories with American history.

Texas may be a trailblazer

A state law passed in 2023 required a mandatory list of at least one literary work be taught in each grade level. The proposed new list contains around 200 texts, including Bible passages, essays and books, far in excess of that requirement.

Antero Garcia, president of the National Council of Teachers of English and a Stanford University professor, said he doesn’t know of any other state with a mandatory reading list that includes religious texts. Educators at the district and school level usually choose the texts their students will read, Garcia said.

Advertisement

Sign up for Morning Wire:
Our flagship newsletter breaks down the biggest headlines of the day.

Kasey Meehan, director of PEN America’s Freedom to Read program, agrees the move is “unique” to Texas.

Picture-book stories for elementary students including “David and Goliath” and “Daniel and the Lion’s Den” are on the required reading list. By fourth grade, students would encounter passages about Jesus in the New Testament.

Advertisement

By middle school, students would be expected to read several passages about Jesus, including passages from his most famous sermon, and another where he instructs people to cast aside earthly anxiety and seek the kingdom of God.

For high schoolers, the list requires the reading of specific Bible passages as supportive materials for literary works including works by Dickens and Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice.”

Holding diversity in check

Such strict requirements amount to “almost de facto censorship,” Meehan said, comparing the list to book bans.

“It certainly leans ideologically more conservative,” she said. “It excludes a lot of diverse voices from the reading list.”

The list mandates that students reading Shakespeare’s “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” also read a eulogy for President Ronald Reagan written by former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a staunch conservative.

Advertisement

Frank Strong, an English and journalism teacher and co-founder of the student advocacy group Texas Freedom to Read, said diversity is not only important for students needing to see themselves in what they read but also as a way to learn about different cultures.

Many of the books on the reading list are not controversial, but Mendoza asks why books like “Chicka Chicka Boom Boom” need to be required for kindergartners.

“Can’t our kindergarten teachers be trusted to choose board books?” Mendoza asks.

___

Stengle reported from Dallas.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

A Judge Issued a Rebuke to the Texas GOP’s Claims About the East Plano Islamic Center

Published

on

A Judge Issued a Rebuke to the Texas GOP’s Claims About the East Plano Islamic Center


For more than a year, high-profile Texas Republicans have argued that Muslims are secretly plotting to take over Texas, centering their outrage on the East Plano Islamic Center, a mosque and Muslim community in North Texas known as EPIC. That hysteria resulted in a range of government enforcement actions last year, including a probe by the Texas Funeral Service Commission that barred EPIC from performing funeral rites. Last July EPIC sued the state, alleging Texas had violated its religious freedom. Late Wednesday, a federal judge in the Western District of Texas ruled that the mosque’s lawsuit can proceed despite the state’s attempt to dismiss it. In his ruling, the judge also issued a strong rebuke to claims made by Governor Greg Abbott and other state officials, writing that “no evidence has been presented” that EPIC intends to impose “Sharia law,” Islamic teachings based on the Quran and words of the Prophet Muhammad, on Texans.  

The case stems from last March, when the funeral commission issued a cease and desist order that barred the mosque from performing traditional cleansing, shrouding, and prayer over bodies, on the grounds that EPIC may have been unlawfully conducting such rites without a license. (EPIC denies this allegation.) As Texas Monthly has reported, the agency was pushed to issue the order by some of Abbott’s closest advisers, who had made unsupported claims that EPIC and a proposed housing development it was affiliated with, EPIC City, was building a “no go zone” exclusive to Muslims (it was not).

EPIC sued the funeral commission in July 2025, arguing that the cease and desist order was an unconstitutional prohibition on religious practices. In Islam, preparing bodies for funerals stands as one of the most sacred rites; by the time of EPIC’s lawsuit, according to the petition, at least eleven congregants had been forced to receive rites elsewhere—away from their home mosque. 

EPIC later amended its lawsuit to include former funeral commission chair Kristin Tips after text messages were released showing she had shared anti-Muslim messages and videos as the agency’s investigation unfolded. Among the examples was a graphic Tips had sent to the commission’s then–executive director, Scott Bingaman, that accused Islam of allowing child marriage and pedophilia. After sending it, Tips texted Bingaman a YouTube video with the title: “EPIC CITY TEXAS! Are Muslims planning a TAKEOVER?”

Advertisement

For nearly a year, the case has been locked in a procedural back-and-forth as Tips and the agency—represented by Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office—have pushed for the court to dismiss the case. Late Wednesday evening, Judge David Alan Ezra, a Ronald Reagan appointee, issued an order denying Tips’s attempt to dismiss the lawsuit. He also rejected Tips’s claim of qualified immunity, which can shield government officials from personal liability in civil cases. That rejection is rare in courts, such as this one, that appeal to the Fifth Circuit, which is one of the most conservative federal appellate courts in the country and is typically welcoming to government defendants. 

In his ruling, Ezra cited the funeral commission’s deviation from historical norm in the EPIC case, as the agency has repeatedly asserted—first in 1987 and again in 2014—that Islamic religious organizations could conduct funeral and burial services without government oversight. The judge also affirmed that the alleged conduct—including the cease and desist order and Tips’s anti-Muslim messages—was seemingly “the result of religious discrimination” that violated EPIC’s clearly established religious rights under the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause and other laws protecting religious liberty. In a rather remarkable footnote, the judge added that, based on the evidence offered, the court firmly rejected claims “suggesting that EPIC has applied, or intends to apply, ‘Sharia law’ in its practices.”

Though the case will now continue to wind through the courts, the judge’s ruling is a firm rebuke of the anti-Muslim political hysteria fueled by Abbott and his team of advisers. As Texas Monthly reported this month, the governor’s inner circle took an unusually active role in the funeral commission’s regulatory case against EPIC. After being looped into the agency’s pending investigation, which stemmed from an April 2024 complaint levied by a private individual, the governor’s attorneys, including Abbott’s general counsel, Trevor Ezell, edited the boilerplate cease and desist order the commission was ready to issue to make it more severe and punitive. 

The original document, drafted by a funeral commission staffer, included a line warning that noncompliance would result in the agency taking “legal action.” Abbott’s team struck that line and suggested replacing it with a “criminal referral” to the Collin County district attorney—in what amounted to a hijacking of the agency’s usual independent regulatory process. At one point, a close adviser of Abbott even reported to a commission staffer that Abbott had texted him that after the cease and desist order was sent out, the funeral commission was his new favorite agency.

Over the following months, the governor’s advisers, including Ezell and a budget and policy adviser, Alex Aragon, weighed in often on the EPIC probe, requesting regular updates, coordinating public statements, and, at times, directing regulatory action. When the agency investigated other cases—such as a high-profile incident in which a Dallas funeral home allegedly accidentally shipped a stillborn baby to a Louisiana laundry facility—the governor’s team exhibited no similar interest. More than a year after the funeral commission’s cease and desist order, its investigation remains ongoing. No violations have been found. 

Advertisement

Tips, the agency’s former chair, led the funeral commission until March 12, when, according to an email obtained by Texas Monthly, she “prayerfully” resigned, effective immediately, late in the night. While the circumstances around her departure remain unknown, she had spent months under fire for allegations that she had illegally lobbied for tort reform in her position as chair, which she denies. But in her absence, the governor’s pursuit of EPIC has continued. In March, the funeral commission issued a broad new subpoena to EPIC, seeking every record of funeral services that the mosque has on file. 

After EPIC’s attorneys pushed back, arguing the order was too large in scope, Paxton’s office got involved—issuing a letter that demanded EPIC comply. Meanwhile, Abbott has continued his crusade against the mosque, going on Fox News earlier this week to deride EPIC and what he alleged were “multiple violations” of the law. The governor has touted that a dozen state agencies have investigated EPIC. To date, no criminal charges have been filed against the mosque, and a federal probe into EPIC by the the Department of Justice was dropped with no findings of malfeasance.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

USDA reports screwworm spread in Texas

Published

on

USDA reports screwworm spread in Texas


The USDA now confirms 20 cases of the New World screwworm in Texas, with the most recent reported outside Medina County, and four more cases reported Tuesday in Terrell County. Officials are releasing millions of sterile flies to slow the parasite’s spread.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending