Connect with us

Texas

Texas preparing to face either Virginia or Colorado State to open NCAA Tournament

Published

on

Texas preparing to face either Virginia or Colorado State to open NCAA Tournament


AUSTIN, Texas — The excitement of the Texas Longhorns upon earning a No. 7 seed in the NCAA Tournament on Selection Sunday quickly turned towards senior forward Kadin Shedrick when the Virginia Cavaliers were paired with the Longhorns as one of the No. 10 seeds facing a First Four play-in game on Tuesday.

Shedrick, in his first year at Texas, spent his first three college seasons under head coach Tony Bennett in Charlottesville, setting up a potential matchup with his old team if Virginia advances on Tuesday by beating the Colorado State Rams in Dayton at 8:10 p.m. Central on truTV.

Might Shedrick be in charge of preparing that scouting report as the Longhorns staff gets ready for both teams ahead of Thursday’s first-round game in Charlotte on TNT at 5:50 p.m. Central?

“He’s very familiar with those guys,” laughed Texas head coach Rodney Terry.

Advertisement

Facing a play-in team is a first for Texas in the NCAA Tournament that departed the Big 12 Tournament early and projected as a No. 8 or No. 9 seed by most bracketologists, allowing Terry’s team to escape a potential second-round matchup against a No. 1 seed and set up the possibility of an intriguing contest with former head coach Rick Barnes and No. 2 seed Tennessee.

Barnes left the Forty Acres following a string of disappointing early exists from the Big Dance, a continuing trend in Knoxville in three of the five tournaments since Barnes took over in addition to a Sweet 16 upset by No. 13 seed Purdue as a No. 2 seed in 2019.

With 16 years of experience coaching teams in the NCAA Tournament as an assistant and a head coach, Terry isn’t looking ahead to the Round of 32 and that likely looming matchup with Barnes, who hired him away from UNC-Wilmington in 2002, the start of Terry’s 10-year stint at Texas that included runs to the Final Four in 2003 and the Elite Eight in 2006 and 2008.

“The first game is always the hardest game,” said Terry. “If you don’t win the first game, there is no second game. So you’ve got to put everything you have into game number one and if you’re fortunate and blessed to get to the next game, you’ll deal with that one then.”

For now, Texas is starting to hone in on the details of both potential opponents, teams that Terry called well coached and successful this season. Foregoing plans to have a watch party for Tuesday’s game — they’ve already had their watch party, Terry said — the Horns will instead have an intense, competitive practice before backing off on Wednesday.

Advertisement

And although Virginia is arguably the worst at-large team in the NCAA Tournament field with an adjusted efficiency rating of No. 69 by KenPom.com and a NET ranking of No. 54 thanks to a 2-7 record against Quad 1 opponents, Bennett’s team does present a consistent challenge.

In addition to a transition defense that Terry termed elite, what always makes the Cavaliers dangerous, even in a down year, is Bennett’s signature pack-line defense, a philosophy directly opposed to the no-middle defense that Chris Beard popularized at Texas Tech — the pack line uses hard hedges on ball screens and asks on-ball defenders to force opponents into the middle and away from the baseline with off-ball defenders staying inside the so-called pack line, an arc one step in from the three-point line roughly 16 or 17 feet from the basket, to help take away dribble drives without having to recover to three-point shooters.

Even this year’s comparatively mediocre Virginia team executes defensively at a high rate, ranking fifth in adjusted efficiency, allowing opponents to shoot just 30.4 percent from three, 17th nationally, posting the fourth-best block rate in the country, and allowing a free-throw rate of 25.7 percent that ranks 22nd.

The elite defense combined with a regressive offensive mindset produces laborious basketball at an adjusted tempo that ranks as the slowest in the country. Bennett’s teams never play aesthetically-pleasing basketball, but this year’s group is outright bad beyond limiting ambition to the extent that turnovers are virtually non-existent — declining to attack the offensive glass, ranking among the worst teams in the country at getting to the line free-throw line and converting on those rare opportunities, and generally bricking shots inside the arc. The Cavaliers do shoot well from three-point range, ranking 47th at 36.3 percent, but also take them at the 293rd rate in the country because Tony Bennett.

Gross.

Advertisement

The Rams are a two-point favorite, according to DraftKings, with a 55-percent win probability from BartTorvik.com thanks to a more balanced statistical profile that includes a NET ranking of No. 36 on the strength of six Quad 1 wins and the No. 49 offense and No. 40 defense in adjusted efficiency.

In the Mountain West Tournament, Colorado State made it to the semifinals before falling to New Mexico, the eventual champions. During non-conference play, CSU notched a 21-point win over then-No. 8 Creighton, the program’s first win over an AP top-10 opponent in almost 40 years, in addition to conference home victories over San Diego State and New Mexico.

The Mountain West may be a mid-major league, but the top of the conference is high-major quality and the Rams slot just outside that grouping.

Terry is familiar with the engine of the Colorado State offense, senior point guard Isaiah Stewart, an Allen product who received an offer from Terry’s staff at UTEP as a member of the 2019 class and emerged as one of the Mountain West’s best players over the last several seasons, averaging 16.5 points and 7.0 assists per game this year while shooting 44.7 percent from three on a relatively modest 4.1 attempts per game.

Despite the solid adjusted efficiency on defense, Colorado State trends offensively in the raw percentages, ranking second in assist rate led by the playmaking ability of Stevens and shooting well from two-point range and at the free-throw line while relying on the fifth-year senior’s decision making to avoid turnovers.

Advertisement

So the matchup between the Rams and Cavaliers rates as an intriguing strength-on-strength contest even if the Texas team doesn’t plan on congregating together to view the outcome on Tuesday.



Source link

Texas

How to Watch No. 1 Texas Longhorns Hosting No. 15 Texas A&M in Lone Star Showdown

Published

on

How to Watch No. 1 Texas Longhorns Hosting No. 15 Texas A&M in Lone Star Showdown


The Texas Longhorns haven’t slowed down throughout the 2026 season as they now hold a 29-1 record and continue to push the longest winning streak in program history farther along, as the Longhorns’ winning streak now stands at 27 games.

The Longhorns have strung together consistency and dominance over the last weeks of the season, as recently the Longhorns have become the unanimous top team in the country, earning the top spot, ranking as the No. 1 team in the nation.

And now No. 1 Texas will get back to the gauntlet that is SEC play with a conference series against one of its bitter rivals in the dirt edition of the Lone Star Showdown against the No. 15 Texas A&M Aggies. The Longhorns get ready to host, welcoming in the Aggies to Red and Charline McCombs Field with the first game of the series set for Friday, March 27, at 6 p.m. CT.

Advertisement

How to Watch Texas vs. Texas A&M

Texas Longhorns utility Katie Stewart celebrates after hitting a home run in the fourth inning of a Women’s College World Series. | BRYAN TERRY/THE OKLAHOMAN / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Advertisement

Who: No. 1 Texas Longhorns and No. 15 Texas A&M Aggies

Advertisement

What: Lone Star Showdown

When: March 27-29

Where: Red and Charline McCombs Field in Austin, TX

TV/Streaming: Friday on SEC Network+, Saturday on ESPN2 and Sunday on ESPN

Advertisement

Radio: Longhorn Radio Network 

Meet the Opponent

Advertisement

Texas A&M Aggies head coach Trisha Ford and Florida Gators head coach Tim Walton shake hands before game. | Matt Pendleton/Gainesville Sun / USA TODAY NETWORK

Advertisement

The Aggies head into the Lone Star Showdown series with a 23-9 overall record and have found success through their two conference series of the season, with a 5-1 record in the SEC. Away from home, the Aggies have split four of their away games with a 2-2 record on the road.

With the flip of the calendar from non-conference to conference play, the Aggies find a rhythm on the field, taking their conference opener against the then No. 17-ranked LSU Tigers on the road 2-1 and followed that up with a sweep at home against the Kentucky Wildcats, outscoring the Wildcats 26-9 over the three-game series.

The Longhorns batting order will battle against an Aggies pitching staff that heads into the weekend series with a 3.10 ERA and 1.09 WHIP. As a whole, the Aggies pitching staff has recorded 193 strikeouts while holding their opponents to a .225 batting average.

The leader of the Aggies pitching staff is sophomore Sydney Lessentine, as her 72 innings pitched is the most by any other Aggies pitcher. In her 19 appearances this season, Lessentine tallies a 2.43 ERA and .82 WHIP along with 60 strikeouts and holds opponents to a .196 batting average.

Advertisement

Sign up to our free newsletter and follow us on FacebookX and Instagram for the latest news.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Prescribed burns play regenerative role in Texas ecosystems. Here’s why

Published

on

Prescribed burns play regenerative role in Texas ecosystems. Here’s why


COVINGTON, TX – Clouds of grey and brown smoke rolled through the field as yards of fire roared across dead grass. About 30 acres of Austin and Kelli Rollins’ property burned on the March morning, leaving blackened remnants just a couple dozen yards from the house.

But what looked like a natural disaster was the result of careful planning.

Prescribed burns, like the one onthe Rollinses property, can benefit wildlife populations, encourage the growth of native prairie grasses and limit damage from wildfires. Throughout Texas’ history, fires occurred naturally every three to seven years. Most native species are fire-adapted, Texas A&M’s Prescribed Burn Coordinator David Brooke said, but human fire suppression tactics have substantially decreased fire frequency and changed the landscape.

“From the Edwards Plateau, Hill Country up towards Dallas [and the] Panhandle, our habitat was a lot more open. It’s supposed to be rolling plains, prairies … with intermittent tree cover. What we’re seeing now is woody encroachment,” Brooke said.

Advertisement

D-FW Weather Wise

From snow to 100-degree heat, we’ve got you covered.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

At the Rollinses, the prescribed burn began with an introductory meeting to discuss strategy and a test fire on a corner of the lot. The team, largely consisting of members of the North Texas Prescribed Burn Association, edged the field with a water line, creating a moisture barrier to prevent flames from spreading in the wrong direction. Just a few yards behind the lengthening water line, volunteers used drip torches to create a “black line,” a thin burned strip meant to contain the larger plumes of fire that would come later.

The tip of a drip torch is used to set fire to Austin and Kelli Rollins property outside of Covington, Texas, March 18, 2026. They used a controlled burn to regenerate the pasture surrounding their home.

Advertisement

Tom Fox / Staff Photographer

The crew collaborated with the wind, starting the test fire at the most downwind corner and expanding the black lines perpendicularly. Winds whipped, around 20 miles per hour, approaching the regulatory safety limit. By working backwards from the fire’s natural destination, the team limited the chance of flames escaping their control.

“Essentially what we’re doing is building a catcher’s mitt so when we light everything up, [the black line] will be there to stop it,” Brandon Martin said, who serves on the board of the prescribed burn association.

Martin, dressed in a hard hat and flame retardant clothing, assisted with this prescribed burn as a volunteer, but he also knows fire professionally through his role in emergency management at the Tarrant Regional Water District. As well as providing advice, he actively spread flames with a drip torch. Torch canisters are filled with fuel that, when turned down, trickles past a burning wick and ignites as it falls to the ground.

This fire is part of an effort to return the field to native prairie, a landscape Martin said depends on fire to thrive. Regular burning limits the growth of saplings and bushes, keeping the environment clear of exotic species that can outcompete native grasses.

Advertisement
North Texas Prescribed Burn Association member Don Nelson radios wind speed and direction to...

North Texas Prescribed Burn Association member Don Nelson radios wind speed and direction to the rest of the crew during a controlled burn on the property of Austin and Kelli Rollins outside of Covington, Texas, March 18, 2026.

Tom Fox / Staff Photographer

Brooke said fire isn’t only a natural land management process, it’s also cost-effective. Invasive species can be removed mechanically with chainsaws and digging, or with chemical application. But in either instance, the labor and equipment costs are usually significantly higher than burning, especially with bigger plots.

“From an economics standpoint, it’s a heck of a lot cheaper to use fire,” Brooke said.

The resulting ash is high in nitrogen and phosphorus, which fertilizes the soil. With a little rain, Brooke said fields are often covered in green shoots within a matter of weeks, with a reinvigorated landscape emerging in the following months.

However, Brooke noted “one burn isn’t a silver bullet,” since invasive species could also be fed by these fresh nutrients. But if landowners can commit to following the three- to seven-year historic fire frequency, “it gives your native species the edge.”

Advertisement
Austin Rollins grabs a pressure sprayer to extinguish a spot fire during a controlled burn...

Austin Rollins grabs a pressure sprayer to extinguish a spot fire during a controlled burn on his property near Covington, Texas, March 18, 2026.

Tom Fox / Staff Photographer

New growth also attracts a variety of wildlife, as it is highly palatable and an ideal habitat to spot predators. Brooke said he’s seen a number of landowners undertake prescribed burns to improve the hunting prospects.

Prescribed burns are best known for their power to stopthe spread of wildfire. The lack of fuel for a wildfire after an intentional burn can lower the fire’s intensity and help save structures. Brooke pointed to the town of Borger, which has a history of proactive wildfire management.

In the fall of 2023, they burned a 7-mile-long, 250-foot wide strip along the edge of town, creating a “black line” that proved crucial months later. When one of the 2024 Panhandle wildfires approached the town, it stopped just outside of several neighborhoods at the fire break. Firefighters credited the work with saving homes and possibly lives.

For landowners considering undertaking controlled burns themselves, Brooke said Texas is a “right-to-burn” state – guaranteeing landowners the right to burn on their own property – but there are still regulations to follow. County burn bans must be observed, local authorities notified and some state agencies regulate weather conditions to manage the smoke.

Advertisement
The North Texas Prescribed Burn Association used a backing fire to control a burn on the...

The North Texas Prescribed Burn Association used a backing fire to control a burn on the property of Austin and Kelli Rollins outside of Covington, Texas, March 18, 2026. They burned approximately 30 acres.

Tom Fox / Staff Photographer

Wind speeds are required to be between six and 23 miles per hour during a burn. If the breeze is too low, smoke won’t clear properly and it could settle on nearby roads, potentially causing an accident. If gusts are too high, fire behavior becomes more unpredictable.

Some counties also require a copy of the burn plan to be submitted in advance, which accounts for things like weather, the crew, suppression tactics (such as water, specialized rakes and leaf blowers) and smoke modeling.

Ultimately, given the high winds, the team on the Rollinses land decided to burn back to the black line in smaller strips instead of one roaring blaze. But even those sections could generate significant heat as the orange glow jumped from stem to stem. The gusts cleared most smoke quickly, but each time a new strip ignited, the plumes towered into the distance.

When just a few smoldering spots remained, the group gathered to debrief and share H-E-B sandwich trays. Pairs inquired about other teams’ strategies, but mostly, the crew was pleased with the safety and their progress – finishing the project in about three hours.

Advertisement

“Man, it’s beautiful,” Kelli Rollins said as she took a picture of the charred field against the blue sky. “I know that’s a weird thing to say, but it is.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

Texas city named as 1 of 3 finalists for Elon Musk’s ‘Boring Company’ projects

Published

on

Texas city named as 1 of 3 finalists for Elon Musk’s ‘Boring Company’ projects


A modified Tesla Model X drives into the tunnel entrance before an unveiling event for the Boring Company Hawthorne test tunnel in Hawthorne, south of Los Angeles, California on December 18, 2018. – On Tuesday night December 18, 2018, Boring Co. will

After a months-long competition to convince tech mogul Elon Musk’s Boring Company to choose a U.S. city for a transit tunnel project, one Texas city has made the cut for the final three in consideration. 

Advertisement

‘Tunnel Vision Challenge’ finalists

What we know:

The “Thrilling Three” in the running for the Tunnel Vision Challenge, announced in January, are Dallas, New Orleans, LA, and Baltimore, MD.

Advertisement

Dallas is in consideration for a “University Hills Loop.” When the challenge first launched on Jan. 18, the options of “a Loop tunnel, a freight tunnel, a pedestrian tunnel, a utility tunnel, a water tunnel, or any other use case where a tunnel would be useful” were pitched. All three finalists are Loop tunnels, which the company tags as “Teslas in Tunnels!”

Wednesday’s announcement says the projects will be up to one mile long and 12 feet in diameter. 

What’s next:

Advertisement

The Boring Company said in their Wednesday announcement that, if possible, it “would be awesome” to build all three Loops. 

The company plans to, along with the project stakeholders, enter into a rigorous diligence process which includes “meetings with elected officials, regulators, community leaders, and business leaders; geotechnical borings; and utility and subsurface infra investigation.”

Advertisement

They say they plan to build any and all final projects that are found to be feasible. 

Possible second Texas project

The company said there were other projects that caught their attention as interesting projects, which they plan to attempt in the near future. 

Advertisement

These include the “Morgan’s Wonderland Tunnel” in San Antonio, as well as the “Hendersonville Utility Tunnel” in Tennessee. 

The Source: Information in this article comes from The Boring Company. 

TexasDallasTechnologyElon Musk
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending