Connect with us

South-Carolina

Oregon pioneered a radical drug policy. Now it's reconsidering.

Published

on

Oregon pioneered a radical drug policy. Now it's reconsidering.


Oregon voters passed the most liberal drug law in the country in November 2020, decriminalizing possession for small amounts of hard drugs.

Under Ballot Measure 110, instead of arresting drug users, police now give them a citation and point them towards treatment. The law passed with 58% of the vote and also funneled hundreds of millions of dollars in cannabis tax revenue to fund new recovery programs.

But more than three years later, the drug crisis in Oregon – like many other places battling the fentanyl crisis – has gotten worse. And that’s prompted a fierce political debate in Oregon about whether Measure 110 has succeeded or failed.

Addressing Measure 110 is one of the priorities for Oregon lawmakers, as they start their new legislative session this week. Democrats, who control the legislature and the governor’s office, have indicated they’re open to recriminalizing drugs, which could effectively end the most controversial piece of this legislative experiment.

Advertisement

A citation system many say isn’t working

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

/

OPB

Advertisement
A sidewalk in downtown Portland, Ore., is dotted with tiny scraps of tinfoil, that police say are used for smoking fentanyl.

On a gray November afternoon in downtown Portland, Officer Joey Yoo stood hunched over a city-issued mountain bike.

The sidewalk was dotted with tiny scraps of tinfoil used for smoking fentanyl. Down the block, a man officers said was high on meth was raging about his stuff being stolen.

“Do you have any questions while I’m talking to you about why I’m giving you this citation?” Yoo asked a young man he stopped for using fentanyl in public. NPR is not using his name because he was in no condition to give us permission to do so.

The man was staring down at the ground, not making eye contact with Yoo. The little he said was hardly audible.

“What brought you out here?” Yoo asked.

Advertisement

“Drugs, I guess,” the man replied.

“Do you have any family here?” Yoo asked.

The man didn’t appear to respond.

Then, Yoo handed the man several slips of paper. One was a $100 citation. Another had the phone number to a state-funded hotline. If the man were to call and get assessed for addiction, the fine and citation would go away.

“You don’t have to go into treatment, but they’ll give you information about how to get the treatment,” Yoo said. “That’s all you have to do.”

Advertisement

Court records show the man never made the call.

And that’s typical.

So far, police have handed out more than 7,000 citations, but as of December, only a few hundred people had called the hotline to get assessed for a substance use disorder. And even fewer accessed treatment through the citation system.

This exchange – a citation for drug use, instead of an arrest – is a direct result of Measure 110.

Advocates for the measure argued the criminal justice system didn’t effectively treat addiction. They also said it disproportionately harmed people of color. Before it passed, the state estimated it would reduce racial disparities in conviction rates.

Advertisement

Back on the street, Officer Yoo said handing out citations doesn’t appear to move people from using drugs on the streets into treatment programs.

“The same people I gave a citation to yesterday, today I see doing the same thing,” Yoo said.

A heated debate in the state capital

Portland Police Sgt. Jerry Cioeta checks for a pulse after giving a third round of opioid reversal medication to a man found unresponsive in downtown Portland, Ore. The man was revived.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

Advertisement

/

OPB

Portland Police Sgt. Jerry Cioeta checks for a pulse after giving a third round of opioid reversal medication to a man found unresponsive in downtown Portland, Ore. The man was revived.

What’s happening here on the streets of Portland has led to a passionate debate about substance use and drug policy in Oregon.

Opioid overdoses have surged across the state since Measure 110 passed. In 2019, 280 people died from unintentional opiate overdoses in Oregon. In 2022, that was up to 956 deaths, according to the state health authority – a 241% increase.

A number of researchers have said there isn’t evidence that Measure 110 is the cause.

Advertisement

One study published in September by the Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry, looked at Oregon and Washington, where drug possession was also decriminalized for several months in 2021. Researchers say they found no evidence between “legal changes that removed or substantially reduced criminal penalties for drug possession in Oregon and Washington and fatal drug overdose rates.”

At least one study, however, did find that Measure 110 caused 182 additional overdose deaths in Oregon in 2021. That study, published in the Journal of Health Economics, said those additional deaths represented, “a 23% increase over the number of unintentional drug overdose deaths predicted if Oregon had not decriminalized drugs.”

Brandon del Pozo, an assistant professor of medicine at Brown University who studies the overdose crisis and substance use, said that study should be taken with a “grain of salt” because it doesn’t control for fentanyl’s entry into Oregon’s drug supply.

A used Narcan bottle lays on the ground in Portland, Ore.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

Advertisement

/

OPB

A used Narcan bottle lays on the ground in Portland, Ore.

“In virtually every state, fentanyl is intimately linked to overdose,” said del Pozo, who also spent 23 years as a police officer, in January during a symposium on Measure 110 in Oregon.

During the past several months in Salem, Oregon’s state capital, health experts, law enforcement, and members of the public have offered deeply divided testimony to Oregon lawmakers about what should happen to Measure 110. Hundreds of people submitted testimony, including some who argued that taking away criminal penalties for drug use hadn’t worked. Others said they’re concerned about safety.

“The police occasionally come in and clean up a specific area with their superficial presence and the drug market moves along to another corner,” Lisa Schroeder, who owns Mother’s Bistro & Bar in downtown Portland, testified. “The quality of life of our citizenry, from the user to the general population, is suffering.”

Advertisement

Cat and Chad Sewell own Sewell Sweets, a bakeshop in Salem. In written testimony, the Sewell’s said they’ve witnessed drug use leading to conflicts outside their business.

“The scenes that we see day in and day out leave us frustrated and questioning just how safe the longevity of our business and livelihood is,” they wrote.

Unidentified people with drug paraphernalia in downtown Portland, Ore.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

/

Advertisement

OPB

Unidentified people with drug paraphernalia in downtown Portland, Ore.

Addiction doctors and criminal justice experts in Oregon said that a lot happened between 2020 and now besides Measure 110: not just the fentanyl crisis, but also the pandemic, which taxed the healthcare system, and a growing crisis of homelessness.

Dr. Andy Mendenhall is an addiction medicine physician and the CEO of Central City Concern, a social service organization in Portland that gets a small amount of money from Measure 110. He testified at one of the hearings in Salem, and in an interview after, said it’s understandable people are frustrated.

“They’re reasonably questioning why this is happening – why it’s all not fixed,” he told OPB. “Folks are experiencing their own despair, seeing the suffering of others… There’s a ton of compassion fatigue.”

Advertisement

During the past several months in Salem, Oregon's state capital, health experts, law enforcement, and members of the public have offered deeply divided testimony to Oregon lawmakers about what should happen to Measure 110.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

/

OPB

During the past several months in Salem, Oregon’s state capital, health experts, law enforcement, and members of the public have offered deeply divided testimony to Oregon lawmakers about what should happen to Measure 110.

Mendenhall said people are pointing at Measure 110 and saying it’s the reason for Oregon’s problems, “when in reality it is our decades-long, underbuilt system of behavioral health, substance use disorders, shelter and affordable housing – that are the primary drivers.”

Some treatment providers have testified that if lawmakers recriminalize drugs it will just take Oregon back to a different system that wasn’t working.

Advertisement

“Arrest records – it impacts people looking for employment, it impacts their housing, it perpetuates a cycle of poverty,” testified Shannon Jones Isadore, CEO of the Oregon Change Clinic, a recovery program that specializes in working with African American and veteran communities in Portland.

“A better solution is to dramatically increase our street services and outreach where there can be adequate care available for everyone,” she said.

Amid the debate about how – or even whether to change the law – there’s general agreement that whatever should happen next to Measure 110, Oregon made a radical change to its drug laws before the infrastructure was in place to really support it.

Still, treatment has expanded

There are parts of the law that aren’t being debated.

Advertisement

The influx of money towards recovery expanded the state’s detox capacity, funded new staff such as drug and alcohol counselors, and increased culturally specific treatment programs. Still, a recent study from state health officials found Oregon was years away from being able to treat everyone who needed it.

Joe Bazeghi helps run Recovery Works Northwest, which opened a new 16-bed detox facility during the fall of 2023.

“It’s Measure 110 funded,” Bazeghi said, during a tour in December. “The purchase, the retrofit, the remodel as well as supplying of this facility was accomplished with support from Measure 110.”

The common area at the detox center at Recovery Works Northwest, in the Portland, Ore. area. Recovery Works is a medication-assisted treatment program, focusing on opioid dependency, that opened a new detox facility last fall, funded by Measure 110.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

Advertisement

/

OPB

The common area at the detox center at Recovery Works Northwest, in the Portland, Ore. area. Recovery Works is a medication-assisted treatment program, focusing on opioid dependency, that opened a new detox facility last fall, funded by Measure 110.

The facility opens to a high ceiling with a staircase that goes to a second floor. There’s a dining room, game area and off to one side, a living room for recovery group meetings.

The detox center is evidence that Measure 110 is working, Bazeghi said.

“Measure 110 is providing treatment resources that otherwise would not exist,” he said. “It’s working as well as could ever possibly be expected of a brand new system that had to be built.”

Advertisement

Most of the people here are really sick, withdrawing from fentanyl.

A woman named Aleah is one of them. NPR is just identifying her by her first name, because she was still a patient in the detox facility when we spoke with her.

Unable to have visitors, Aleah and her boyfriend press their hands together, separated by the screen of an open window, as Aleah stays at Recovery Works Northwest's detox center.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

/

Advertisement

OPB

Unable to have visitors, Aleah and her boyfriend press their hands together, separated by the screen of an open window, as Aleah stays at Recovery Works Northwest’s detox center.

“I feel a lot better than I did yesterday,” Aleah said.

She’d been at the facility for five days. She said she drove 250 miles from Eastern Oregon to Recovery Works because it’s where she was able to get a bed. Her boyfriend also wanted her to come here so they could both get sober, she said. While we were talking, her boyfriend, Trey Rubin, who’d just completed residential treatment, walked up and stood outside one of the windows.

“I wish I could come out,” Aleah said, pressing her hand against the screen of an open window to meet his hand on the other side.

“At least we can talk through a window,” she said. “You look so good.”

Advertisement

Rubin recently moved into a sober house in Portland.

“I want to be successful and do things in my life and that’s definitely the first step,” Rubin said. “You can’t really do anything if you’re not clean, you know.”

He said he’s thinking about what he may do now that he’s not using drugs.

“I love dirt bikes and writing,” he said. “I don’t know exactly what I want to do yet. But maybe want to go to school to be an X-ray technician or something like that.”

Oregon has faced some criticism for how slow the expansion of treatment programs such as the one that helped Aleah and Rubin has been. But if anything, state lawmakers say they want to invest more in recovery programs, even if they’re considering other changes.

Advertisement

Oregon’s 2024 legislative session got underway this week, where lawmakers are expected to debate Measure 110’s future.

By early March, lawmakers could decide exactly what that future will be. Oregon Senate Majority Leader Kate Lieber – who co-chaired the legislature’s addiction committee – told Oregon Public Broadcasting that she’s not advocating for Measure 110 to be repealed. But she and other top lawmakers have said they support recriminalizing drug possession so long as there are ways for the criminal justice system to direct people into the treatment programs Measure 110 has helped to expand.

“We knew that we didn’t want to go backwards on what was happening with regard to the war on drugs, we can’t go back to that – but people are dying of overdoses on the street,” Lieber said.

“The state of the drug crisis in Oregon is unacceptable.”

Copyright 2024 Oregon Public Broadcasting

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South-Carolina

Shane Beamer updates injuries going into Clemson game

Published

on

Shane Beamer updates injuries going into Clemson game


For the first time really all year, South Carolina football is facing some injury questions. Wide reciever Jared Brown, tight ends Joshua Simon and Michael Smith all missed the Wofford game last week, forcing the Gamecocks to change up their approach offensively and play with one or no tight ends all day.

On Tuesday afternoon at his weekly press conference, Shane Beamer updated the injury sitution going into Saturday’s game at Clemson.

Regarding Brown, Beamer said “he’ll be fine” and confirmed the Coastal Carolina transfer will play in his first rivalry game this weekend. Wide reciever Vandrevius Jacobs on the other hand is out this weekend with a hamstring injury he suffered against Wofford.

Beamer did not have a further update on either of the tight ends, simply saying “we’ll see” with regards to Simon and Smith.

Advertisement

************************************************************************

Looking to continue the conversation? Join us on the insider’s forum to talk all things South Carolina football.



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Keys to Success for Clemson Tigers Against South Carolina Gamecocks

Published

on

Keys to Success for Clemson Tigers Against South Carolina Gamecocks


The Clemson Tigers are getting ready for what will be a crucial game in Week 14 against the South Carolina Gamecocks. 

This rivalry matchup is not going to disappoint, as both teams are coming into the game as Top-25 schools. For the Tigers, there is a lot on the line in this matchup. 

Due to Clemson not holding the tie-breaker against the Miami Hurricanes in the ACC and the SMU Mustangs already clinching a spot, the Tigers are going to have to hope for a Hurricanes’ loss to the Syracuse Orange if they are going to make the title game. 

However, due to recent upsets in the SEC, another path might have emerged for Clemson to make the College Football Playoffs. If they can beat a Top-25 team in the Gamecocks on Saturday, it could be the type of statement win that propels them into an at-large bid. 

Advertisement

While making the CFP still might be realistic, they first and foremost have to handle South Carolina, which will be no easy task. 

The Gamecocks have also had a great season, and they could present some matchup problems for Clemson. 

On offense, South Carolina is a run first team. Stopping the run has been an issue at times for the Tigers, as they just recently got torched on the ground against The Citadel Bulldogs. If Clemson is unable to stop or at least slow down the rushing attack for the Gamecocks, it will allow them to control the pace of the game. That obviously wouldn’t be ideal for the Tigers. 

Furthermore, on the defensive side of things, the Tigers’ offense is going to have their work cut out for them against a very strong Gamecocks defense. Clemson quarterback Cade Klubnik has had a very strong season and this could end up being a defining game of his college career. 

Going back to the win against the Pittsburgh Panthers, the Tigers’ offense really struggled on the ground trying to run the football. If that’s the case once again in Week 14, it will fall on the shoulders of Klubnik to get the job done. 

Advertisement

This matchup could very well go down as one of the games of the week and potentially the year, with both teams being fairly even talent-wise on paper. For Clemson, this is a must-win game to keep their playoff hopes alive, as a win this late in the season against a Top-25 team would be a nice last thing to put on their resume. 

Overall, the Tigers are going to need to have a balanced attack and prepare to stop the run if they are going to come away with the win against their rival.



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

South Carolina community left without police after entire P.D. resigns

Published

on

South Carolina community left without police after entire P.D. resigns


The entire police department of a small South Carolina town resigned en masse, leaving the area without its own dedicated police force.

Chief Bob Hale of the McColl Police Department announced his resignation on November 21 in a social media post, citing a “hostile work environment perpetuated by a specific Councilman.”

“For months, I have endured unwarranted and malicious behavior aimed at undermining my integrity and leadership,” Hale wrote. “These actions have not only affected me personally but have also created a toxic atmosphere that has hindered the department’s ability to function effectively.”

The chief also said his department’s resources had been severely cut. The four officers under his command quickly resigned as well.

Advertisement

“At the end of the day, I have a family. And when my job is constantly getting threatened and certain things are getting said I’m not going to stay somewhere and tolerate that,” former McColl investigator Courtney Bulusan told WRAL.

“I’m not going to stay where I’m tolerated,” Bulusan said. “I’m going to go where I’m celebrated.”

As the town seeks new officers, the Marlboro County Sheriff’s Office will fill in for the department police force, according to South Carolina Public Radio.

The town has gone through six chiefs in the past four years. Hale’s tenure in the position lasted little over a year.

“I feel unsafe. Very unsafe,” resident Lisa Bowen told local outlet WPDE. “Because anytime anybody could do anything.”

Advertisement

“They jump ship back and forth all the time,” Mayor George Garner told the Post and Courier newspaper. “This is nothing new.”

The paper reported that the councilman in question denied he had harassed any of the officers and told the paper the allegations were “hearsay.”

Such mass resignations, while uncommon, are not unprecedented.

The entire police force of Geary, Oklahoma, resigned earlier this month, Fox News reports.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending