Connect with us

South-Carolina

Oregon pioneered a radical drug policy. Now it's reconsidering.

Published

on

Oregon pioneered a radical drug policy. Now it's reconsidering.


Oregon voters passed the most liberal drug law in the country in November 2020, decriminalizing possession for small amounts of hard drugs.

Under Ballot Measure 110, instead of arresting drug users, police now give them a citation and point them towards treatment. The law passed with 58% of the vote and also funneled hundreds of millions of dollars in cannabis tax revenue to fund new recovery programs.

But more than three years later, the drug crisis in Oregon – like many other places battling the fentanyl crisis – has gotten worse. And that’s prompted a fierce political debate in Oregon about whether Measure 110 has succeeded or failed.

Addressing Measure 110 is one of the priorities for Oregon lawmakers, as they start their new legislative session this week. Democrats, who control the legislature and the governor’s office, have indicated they’re open to recriminalizing drugs, which could effectively end the most controversial piece of this legislative experiment.

Advertisement

A citation system many say isn’t working

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

/

OPB

Advertisement
A sidewalk in downtown Portland, Ore., is dotted with tiny scraps of tinfoil, that police say are used for smoking fentanyl.

On a gray November afternoon in downtown Portland, Officer Joey Yoo stood hunched over a city-issued mountain bike.

The sidewalk was dotted with tiny scraps of tinfoil used for smoking fentanyl. Down the block, a man officers said was high on meth was raging about his stuff being stolen.

“Do you have any questions while I’m talking to you about why I’m giving you this citation?” Yoo asked a young man he stopped for using fentanyl in public. NPR is not using his name because he was in no condition to give us permission to do so.

The man was staring down at the ground, not making eye contact with Yoo. The little he said was hardly audible.

“What brought you out here?” Yoo asked.

Advertisement

“Drugs, I guess,” the man replied.

“Do you have any family here?” Yoo asked.

The man didn’t appear to respond.

Then, Yoo handed the man several slips of paper. One was a $100 citation. Another had the phone number to a state-funded hotline. If the man were to call and get assessed for addiction, the fine and citation would go away.

“You don’t have to go into treatment, but they’ll give you information about how to get the treatment,” Yoo said. “That’s all you have to do.”

Advertisement

Court records show the man never made the call.

And that’s typical.

So far, police have handed out more than 7,000 citations, but as of December, only a few hundred people had called the hotline to get assessed for a substance use disorder. And even fewer accessed treatment through the citation system.

This exchange – a citation for drug use, instead of an arrest – is a direct result of Measure 110.

Advocates for the measure argued the criminal justice system didn’t effectively treat addiction. They also said it disproportionately harmed people of color. Before it passed, the state estimated it would reduce racial disparities in conviction rates.

Advertisement

Back on the street, Officer Yoo said handing out citations doesn’t appear to move people from using drugs on the streets into treatment programs.

“The same people I gave a citation to yesterday, today I see doing the same thing,” Yoo said.

A heated debate in the state capital

Portland Police Sgt. Jerry Cioeta checks for a pulse after giving a third round of opioid reversal medication to a man found unresponsive in downtown Portland, Ore. The man was revived.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

Advertisement

/

OPB

Portland Police Sgt. Jerry Cioeta checks for a pulse after giving a third round of opioid reversal medication to a man found unresponsive in downtown Portland, Ore. The man was revived.

What’s happening here on the streets of Portland has led to a passionate debate about substance use and drug policy in Oregon.

Opioid overdoses have surged across the state since Measure 110 passed. In 2019, 280 people died from unintentional opiate overdoses in Oregon. In 2022, that was up to 956 deaths, according to the state health authority – a 241% increase.

A number of researchers have said there isn’t evidence that Measure 110 is the cause.

Advertisement

One study published in September by the Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry, looked at Oregon and Washington, where drug possession was also decriminalized for several months in 2021. Researchers say they found no evidence between “legal changes that removed or substantially reduced criminal penalties for drug possession in Oregon and Washington and fatal drug overdose rates.”

At least one study, however, did find that Measure 110 caused 182 additional overdose deaths in Oregon in 2021. That study, published in the Journal of Health Economics, said those additional deaths represented, “a 23% increase over the number of unintentional drug overdose deaths predicted if Oregon had not decriminalized drugs.”

Brandon del Pozo, an assistant professor of medicine at Brown University who studies the overdose crisis and substance use, said that study should be taken with a “grain of salt” because it doesn’t control for fentanyl’s entry into Oregon’s drug supply.

A used Narcan bottle lays on the ground in Portland, Ore.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

Advertisement

/

OPB

A used Narcan bottle lays on the ground in Portland, Ore.

“In virtually every state, fentanyl is intimately linked to overdose,” said del Pozo, who also spent 23 years as a police officer, in January during a symposium on Measure 110 in Oregon.

During the past several months in Salem, Oregon’s state capital, health experts, law enforcement, and members of the public have offered deeply divided testimony to Oregon lawmakers about what should happen to Measure 110. Hundreds of people submitted testimony, including some who argued that taking away criminal penalties for drug use hadn’t worked. Others said they’re concerned about safety.

“The police occasionally come in and clean up a specific area with their superficial presence and the drug market moves along to another corner,” Lisa Schroeder, who owns Mother’s Bistro & Bar in downtown Portland, testified. “The quality of life of our citizenry, from the user to the general population, is suffering.”

Advertisement

Cat and Chad Sewell own Sewell Sweets, a bakeshop in Salem. In written testimony, the Sewell’s said they’ve witnessed drug use leading to conflicts outside their business.

“The scenes that we see day in and day out leave us frustrated and questioning just how safe the longevity of our business and livelihood is,” they wrote.

Unidentified people with drug paraphernalia in downtown Portland, Ore.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

/

Advertisement

OPB

Unidentified people with drug paraphernalia in downtown Portland, Ore.

Addiction doctors and criminal justice experts in Oregon said that a lot happened between 2020 and now besides Measure 110: not just the fentanyl crisis, but also the pandemic, which taxed the healthcare system, and a growing crisis of homelessness.

Dr. Andy Mendenhall is an addiction medicine physician and the CEO of Central City Concern, a social service organization in Portland that gets a small amount of money from Measure 110. He testified at one of the hearings in Salem, and in an interview after, said it’s understandable people are frustrated.

“They’re reasonably questioning why this is happening – why it’s all not fixed,” he told OPB. “Folks are experiencing their own despair, seeing the suffering of others… There’s a ton of compassion fatigue.”

Advertisement

During the past several months in Salem, Oregon's state capital, health experts, law enforcement, and members of the public have offered deeply divided testimony to Oregon lawmakers about what should happen to Measure 110.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

/

OPB

During the past several months in Salem, Oregon’s state capital, health experts, law enforcement, and members of the public have offered deeply divided testimony to Oregon lawmakers about what should happen to Measure 110.

Mendenhall said people are pointing at Measure 110 and saying it’s the reason for Oregon’s problems, “when in reality it is our decades-long, underbuilt system of behavioral health, substance use disorders, shelter and affordable housing – that are the primary drivers.”

Some treatment providers have testified that if lawmakers recriminalize drugs it will just take Oregon back to a different system that wasn’t working.

Advertisement

“Arrest records – it impacts people looking for employment, it impacts their housing, it perpetuates a cycle of poverty,” testified Shannon Jones Isadore, CEO of the Oregon Change Clinic, a recovery program that specializes in working with African American and veteran communities in Portland.

“A better solution is to dramatically increase our street services and outreach where there can be adequate care available for everyone,” she said.

Amid the debate about how – or even whether to change the law – there’s general agreement that whatever should happen next to Measure 110, Oregon made a radical change to its drug laws before the infrastructure was in place to really support it.

Still, treatment has expanded

There are parts of the law that aren’t being debated.

Advertisement

The influx of money towards recovery expanded the state’s detox capacity, funded new staff such as drug and alcohol counselors, and increased culturally specific treatment programs. Still, a recent study from state health officials found Oregon was years away from being able to treat everyone who needed it.

Joe Bazeghi helps run Recovery Works Northwest, which opened a new 16-bed detox facility during the fall of 2023.

“It’s Measure 110 funded,” Bazeghi said, during a tour in December. “The purchase, the retrofit, the remodel as well as supplying of this facility was accomplished with support from Measure 110.”

The common area at the detox center at Recovery Works Northwest, in the Portland, Ore. area. Recovery Works is a medication-assisted treatment program, focusing on opioid dependency, that opened a new detox facility last fall, funded by Measure 110.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

Advertisement

/

OPB

The common area at the detox center at Recovery Works Northwest, in the Portland, Ore. area. Recovery Works is a medication-assisted treatment program, focusing on opioid dependency, that opened a new detox facility last fall, funded by Measure 110.

The facility opens to a high ceiling with a staircase that goes to a second floor. There’s a dining room, game area and off to one side, a living room for recovery group meetings.

The detox center is evidence that Measure 110 is working, Bazeghi said.

“Measure 110 is providing treatment resources that otherwise would not exist,” he said. “It’s working as well as could ever possibly be expected of a brand new system that had to be built.”

Advertisement

Most of the people here are really sick, withdrawing from fentanyl.

A woman named Aleah is one of them. NPR is just identifying her by her first name, because she was still a patient in the detox facility when we spoke with her.

Unable to have visitors, Aleah and her boyfriend press their hands together, separated by the screen of an open window, as Aleah stays at Recovery Works Northwest's detox center.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB

/

Advertisement

OPB

Unable to have visitors, Aleah and her boyfriend press their hands together, separated by the screen of an open window, as Aleah stays at Recovery Works Northwest’s detox center.

“I feel a lot better than I did yesterday,” Aleah said.

She’d been at the facility for five days. She said she drove 250 miles from Eastern Oregon to Recovery Works because it’s where she was able to get a bed. Her boyfriend also wanted her to come here so they could both get sober, she said. While we were talking, her boyfriend, Trey Rubin, who’d just completed residential treatment, walked up and stood outside one of the windows.

“I wish I could come out,” Aleah said, pressing her hand against the screen of an open window to meet his hand on the other side.

“At least we can talk through a window,” she said. “You look so good.”

Advertisement

Rubin recently moved into a sober house in Portland.

“I want to be successful and do things in my life and that’s definitely the first step,” Rubin said. “You can’t really do anything if you’re not clean, you know.”

He said he’s thinking about what he may do now that he’s not using drugs.

“I love dirt bikes and writing,” he said. “I don’t know exactly what I want to do yet. But maybe want to go to school to be an X-ray technician or something like that.”

Oregon has faced some criticism for how slow the expansion of treatment programs such as the one that helped Aleah and Rubin has been. But if anything, state lawmakers say they want to invest more in recovery programs, even if they’re considering other changes.

Advertisement

Oregon’s 2024 legislative session got underway this week, where lawmakers are expected to debate Measure 110’s future.

By early March, lawmakers could decide exactly what that future will be. Oregon Senate Majority Leader Kate Lieber – who co-chaired the legislature’s addiction committee – told Oregon Public Broadcasting that she’s not advocating for Measure 110 to be repealed. But she and other top lawmakers have said they support recriminalizing drug possession so long as there are ways for the criminal justice system to direct people into the treatment programs Measure 110 has helped to expand.

“We knew that we didn’t want to go backwards on what was happening with regard to the war on drugs, we can’t go back to that – but people are dying of overdoses on the street,” Lieber said.

“The state of the drug crisis in Oregon is unacceptable.”

Copyright 2024 Oregon Public Broadcasting

Advertisement





Source link

South-Carolina

Alan Wilson says affordability a top issue for SC voters this year

Published

on

Alan Wilson says affordability a top issue for SC voters this year


play

  • Attorney General Alan Wilson is one of six Republicans campaigning for governor of South Carolina.
  • Wilson’s platform includes improving education, infrastructure, and healthcare access while cutting government spending.
  • Recent polling indicates a close race, with Wilson among the top candidates in the Republican primary.
  • The gubernatorial primary is scheduled for June 9 to decide which candidate will advance to the November general election.

Attorney General Alan Wilson started his campaign visit to the Upstate on Monday, May 11, at the Clock of Greer restaurant, where he worked the drive-through window and spoke with diners inside.

Wilson, who has been in the governor’s race since late June, has spent the past 10 months traveling the state and connecting with voters.

Advertisement

Wilson is one of six Republicans running to be South Carolina’s next governor. His competitors are Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, U.S. Reps. Nancy Mace, District 1, and Ralph Norman, District 5, DOGE SC founder Rom Reddy, and State Sen. Josh Kimbrell, Spartanburg.

Wilson brought his campaign for governor to the Upstate, with less than a month left until the primary.

“You learn so much when you go on a listening tour,” Wilson said. “It’s not just about me telling people what I want to do as their governor. It’s about learning from people what they want their governor to do for them.”

Advertisement

Wilson’s campaign platform includes investing in education, improving infrastructure, cutting wasteful government spending, expanding rural healthcare access, and enforcing federal immigration law. After traveling the state, he believes affordability is a top issue for South Carolinians in this election cycle.

“There’s a lot of things going on around the world that we can’t control the price of,” Wilson said. “But there’s things that we can do as a state to react better to it.”

Wilson often polls as a top candidate that Republican voters would choose to support in the primary. A recent poll conducted by The Trafalgar Group, an Atlanta-based polling firm, reported that 23% of likely Republican voters would vote for him in the primaries.

The same poll found that roughly 25% of voters backed Evette, 20% backed Norman, 15% backed Mace, 10% backed Reddy, and 4% backed Kimbrell. Roughly 3% backed Jacqueline Dubose, a Republican candidate who has been disqualified from the primaries. The poll had a 2.9% margin of error.

Advertisement

Wilson said he is running for office to be accessible to South Carolinians and accountable for his actions. He said his experience as a combat veteran and as the state’s attorney general sets him apart from other candidates.

“I have a proven record of serving this state and a proven record of fighting for what people want,” Wilson said. “I believe I will be a great governor.”

The gubernatorial primary will be held on June 9 and will determine which Republican candidate advances to the general election in November. There are also three Democrats running: State Rep. Jermaine Johnson, Richland, Upstate business owner Billy Webster, and Charleston attorney Mullins McLeod.

Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@gannett.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South-Carolina

South Carolina Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 results for May 10, 2026

Published

on

South Carolina Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 results for May 10, 2026


play

The South Carolina Education Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at May 10, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Pick 3 Plus FIREBALL numbers from May 10 drawing

Evening: 0-4-0, FB: 1

Check Pick 3 Plus FIREBALL payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 Plus FIREBALL numbers from May 10 drawing

Evening: 3-6-6-7, FB: 1

Check Pick 4 Plus FIREBALL payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Cash Pop numbers from May 10 drawing

Evening: 04

Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Palmetto Cash 5 numbers from May 10 drawing

15-17-24-32-42

Check Palmetto Cash 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Advertisement

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

The South Carolina Education Lottery provides multiple ways to claim prizes, depending on the amount won:

For prizes up to $500, you can redeem your winnings directly at any authorized South Carolina Education Lottery retailer. Simply present your signed winning ticket at the retailer for an immediate payout.

Winnings $501 to $100,000, may be redeemed by mailing your signed winning ticket along with a completed claim form and a copy of a government-issued photo ID to the South Carolina Education Lottery Claims Center. For security, keep copies of your documents and use registered mail to ensure the safe arrival of your ticket.

SC Education Lottery

P.O. Box 11039

Advertisement

Columbia, SC 29211-1039

For large winnings above $100,000, claims must be made in person at the South Carolina Education Lottery Headquarters in Columbia. To claim, bring your signed winning ticket, a completed claim form, a government-issued photo ID, and your Social Security card for identity verification. Winners of large prizes may also set up an Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) for convenient direct deposit of winnings.

Columbia Claims Center

1303 Assembly Street

Columbia, SC 29201

Advertisement

Claim Deadline: All prizes must be claimed within 180 days of the draw date for draw games.

For more details and to access the claim form, visit the South Carolina Lottery claim page.

When are the South Carolina Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. ET on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11 p.m. ET on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3: Daily at 12:59 p.m. (Midday) and 6:59 p.m. (Evening).
  • Pick 4: Daily at 12:59 p.m. (Midday) and 6:59 p.m. (Evening).
  • Cash Pop: Daily at 12:59 p.m. (Midday) and 6:59 p.m. (Evening).
  • Palmetto Cash 5: 6:59 p.m. ET daily.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Carolina editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Clyburn says record speaks for itself, warns GOP to ‘be very careful what you pray for’

Published

on

Clyburn says record speaks for itself, warns GOP to ‘be very careful what you pray for’


Rep. Jim Clyburn appeared on CNN’s State of the Union Sunday morning and said he remains confident he could win another term in a redistricted South Carolina.

Host Jake Tapper asked Rep. Clyburn what it would mean for South Carolina voters if his seat, which represents the state’s sixth congressional district, was eliminated. The congressman said voters will have the last word and he will run irrespective of the new makeup of his district.

“I don’t know why people think I could not get re-elected if they redistrict South Carolina,” he said before pointing out his district as currently drawn contains about 45% Black voters. “I have no idea what the demo will be after the legislature finishes [redistricting], but whatever that number is I will be running on a record and a promise – my record, and America’s promise.”

Clyburn, as one of the more prominent Democratic voices in American politics in the South over the past several decades, said his pitch to voters won’t change even if his new district is drawn to house more Republicans.

Advertisement

“I think that it is very clear to most people in America that voters, most voters, believe in fundamental fairness, most voters believe in competence, and most voters can tell the difference between a true public servant and someone who may be in it for the next social hit,” he said.

READ MORE | “Opponents raise racial, representation concerns as redistricting debate continues at State House”

The 17-term representative also said he believes Republicans’ redistricting plan could backfire.

“Be very careful what you pray for, because what I do believe is that when they finish with the redistricting, there will be the possibilities of at least three Democrats getting elected here in South Carolina to the United States Congress,” he said.

If re-elected, Clyburn would begin his 18th term in Congress in 2027. He has served as South Carolina’s representative for its Sixth Congressional District, which through multiple gerrymanders spanning decades has comprised of different parts of the Pee Dee, Midlands, and Lowcountry in some capacity, since 1993.

Advertisement

State lawmakers have pushed the redistricting issue legislatively in the last week in the wake of the US Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais. A special session on redistricting passed on Thursday in the State House, and more House legislation to push back congressional primaries to August advanced to the House Judiciary Committee Friday. The issue is expected to be taken back up in Columbia this week.

READ MORE | “SC House panel approves 2-month delay in congressional primary amid redistricting push”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending