Connect with us

South

Bill Maher sounds alarm on immigration chaos: It'll get Dems 'f—ed on Election Day'

Published

on

Bill Maher sounds alarm on immigration chaos: It'll get Dems 'f—ed on Election Day'


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

“Real Time” host Bill Maher continued offering his dire warning to Democrats on the issue of immigration, insisting they’ll be “f—ed” in November following this week’s European election results.

Advertisement

Voters in Europe, particularly in Germany and France roundly rejected far-left policies in the European Union Parliament elections, where immigration was top of mind as the crisis has unfolded in recent years.

“Voters again for the European Parliament said we do not like this much immigration,” Maher said.

BILL MAHER PANS BIDEN’S BORDER PIVOT AS A PRE-ELECTION ‘HAIL MARY’ THAT WON’T WORK

French opposition leader Marine Le Pen delivers her speech at the party election night headquarters after French President Emanuel Macron announced he dissolved the National Assembly and has called a new legislative election following the defeat in EU vote, Sunday, June 9, 2024 in Paris.  (AP Photo/Lewis Joly)

The HBO star then quoted The Atlantic’s David Frum, who warned “If liberals insist that enforcing borders is a job only fascists will do, then voters will hire fascists to do what liberals won’t.” 

Advertisement

“Voters keep saying over and over again we are not comfortable with this level of immigration. I understand why. It doesn’t make you a racist to say that,” Maher said. 

BILL MAHER CALLS OUT CAITLIN CLARK’S TEAMMATES NOT RUSHING TO DEFEND HER: ‘WOMEN ARE CATTY’

He then took a dig at Democratic California Senator Alex Padilla, who said in response to President Biden’s border executive order “By reviving Trump’s asylum ban, Biden has undermined American values.” 

“And then they all stand back and go, ‘We don’t want to be called a racist. So we will not make a move on to immigration.’ It’s going to get them f—ed on Election Day. It’s happening. It’s happening in Europe right now. That proves it in Europe, and it’s going to happen here in America. It happened with Brexit. It’s going to happen again,” Maher insisted. 

Bill Maher insisted Democrats will be “f—ed on Election Day” over their mishandling of immigration. (Screenshot/HBO)

Advertisement

One of his guests, writer Joel Stein, pushed back, saying there’s a “real moral reason” to allow migrants into the U.S. 

“At any number?” Maher asked. 

“No, no,” Stein responded.

“But that’s their point,” Maher exclaimed.

BILL MAHER STRUGGLES WHETHER TRUMP SHOULD GO TO JAIL FOLLOWING GUILTY VERDICT: ‘MAGA NATION WILL GO NUTS’

Advertisement

Maher went on to cite a poll that showed “64% of Latinos” support giving the president authority to shut down the border and that “62% of registered voters” would deport all illegal immigrants in the U.S.

“Yeah, people hate immigrants,” Stein reacted.

“They don’t hate immigrants!” Maher fired back. 

Maher has repeatedly sounded the alarm that the issue of immigration will be a liability for President Biden and Democrats in the upcoming election. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta and Fox News)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Advertisement

Last week, Maher panned President Biden’s border executive order, chalking it up as a pre-election “Hail Mary” that won’t work.

“If Biden loses this election, it’s going to be because of two things: He’s old… and immigration,” Maher said. “I mean, just on a political level, I don’t think they could have handled it worse.

Maher later said, “The question that Democrats don’t seem to be able to have the balls to answer is just how many is too many? And like, infinity is the answer- if you don’t give that answer, you’re a racist. That’s their essential problem with this issue.”



Source link

Advertisement

Texas

NASCAR Texas qualifying live results, Cup Series sets starting lineup

Published

on

NASCAR Texas qualifying live results, Cup Series sets starting lineup


The NASCAR Cup Series Texas race weekend begins with Wurth 400 practice and qualifying on May 2 at Texas Motor Speedway.

Last week, Carson Hocevar earned his first career win last weekend at Talladega before celebrating by driving his car while hanging out of the driver’s side window.

Texas is the third traditional 1.5-mile track on the schedule this year.

Advertisement

Follow along with Texas qualifying updates here:

Refresh this page at 1:40 p.m. Eastern/12:40 p.m. Central as qualifying begins.

Denny Hamlin, likely the favorite for Sunday’s NASCAR Texas race, is currently qualified second with a time of 28.304 seconds. Daniel Suarez is currently on the pole.

Daniel Suarez ran a lap time of 28.225 and is currently on the pole at Texas. Big run for Spire Motorsports, a week after Connor Hocevar gave the race team a win at Talladega.

Advertisement

Kyle Busch turned a lap of 28.304 seconds and is currently qualified second, behind Chase Briscoe at Texas. Briscoe got a new crew chief this past week. Did that play a part?

He is currently the fastest Chevy, ahead of Kyle Larson, Connor Zilisch and William Byron.

Chase Briscoe, driver of the No. 19 Joe Gibbs Toyota, took the pole from Kyle Larson with a time of 28.304 seconds. Briscoe’s teammate, Ty Gibbs, followed up by joining Briscoe on the front row, at least for the moment, with a lap time of 28.394 seconds.

Yes, Toyota appears to still have more speed than the Chevrolets.

Advertisement

Kyle Larson is on the pole early in qualifying after a lap time of 28.411 seconds. Connor Zilisch is second at 28.430.

Ross Chastain, No. 1 Trackhouse Racing Chevrolet

Austin Cindric, No. 2 Team Penske Ford

Austin Dillon, No. 3 Richard Childress Racing Chevrolet

Noah Gragson, No. 4 Front Row Motorsports Ford

Advertisement

Kyle Larson, No. 5 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet

Brad Keselowski, No. 6 Roush Fenway Keselowski Racing Ford

Daniel Suarez, No. 7 Spire Motorsports Chevrolet

Kyle Busch, No. 8 Richard Childress Racing Chevrolet

Chase Elliott, No. 9 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet

Advertisement

Ty Dillon, No. 10 Kaulig Racing Chevrolet

Denny Hamlin, No. 11 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota

Ryan Blaney, No. 12 Team Penske Ford

AJ Allmendinger, No. 16 Kaulig Racing Chevrolet

Chris Buescher, No. 17 Roush Fenway Keselowski Racing Ford

Advertisement

Chase Briscoe, No. 19 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota

Christopher Bell, No. 20 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota

Josh Berry, No. 21 Wood Brothers Racing Ford

Joey Logano, No. 22 Team Penske Ford

Bubba Wallace, No. 23 23XI Racing Toyota

Advertisement

William Byron, No. 24 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet

Todd Gilliland, No. 34 Front Row Motorsports Ford 

Riley Herbst, No. 35 23XI Racing Toyota

Zane Smith, No. 38 Front Row Motorsports Ford

Cole Custer, No. 41 Haas Factory Team Chevrolet

Advertisement

John Hunter Nemechek, No. 42 Legacy Motor Club Toyota

Erik Jones, No. 43 Legacy Motor Club Toyota

Tyler Reddick, No. 45 23XI Racing Toyota

Ricky Stenhouse Jr., No. 47 HYAK Motorsports Chevrolet

Alex Bowman, No. 48 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet

Advertisement

Cody Ware, No. 51 Rick Ware Racing Chevrolet

Ty Gibbs, No. 54 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota

Ryan Preece, No. 60 RFK Racing Ford

Chad Finchum, No. 66 Garage 66 Ford

Corey Heim, No. 67 23XI Racing Toyota

Advertisement

Michael McDowell, No. 71 Spire Motorsports Chevrolet

Carson Hocevar, No. 77 Spire Motorsports Chevrolet

Connor Zilisch, No. 88 Trackhouse Racing Chevrolet

Shane van Gisbergen, No. 97 Trackhouse Racing Chevrolet

  • Qualifying time: 1:40 p.m. Eastern/12:40 p.m. Central on May 2
  • TV: Amazon Prime Video | Radio: SiriusXM and PRN
  • Streaming: Amazon Prime Video; NASCAR.com and SiriusXM for audio (subscription required)
  • Track: Texas Motor Speedway (1.5-mile oval) in Fort Worth, Texas



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia comedian Winston Hodges is a finalist on Kevin Hart’s Netflix series ‘Funny AF’

Published

on

Virginia comedian Winston Hodges is a finalist on Kevin Hart’s Netflix series ‘Funny AF’


RICHMOND, Va. — Winston Hodges, a Cartersville, Virginia native who launched his comedy career at the Richmond Funny Bone in Short Pump, is now one of six remaining comedians on the Netflix series “Funny AF with Kevin Hart,” competing for a Netflix comedy special and a cash prize.

The Virginia Tech graduate and 35-year-old comedian has opened for several major acts and become a regular at New York’s Comedy Cellar.

Hodges said his Richmond roots are where it all began.

“I saw that the Richmond Funny Bone had a competition, and I entered into the competition 11 years ago called Clash of the Comics, and I ended up winning the competition,” Hodges said. “After that point, it was just like, I guess I just do stand up. So I was doing stand up around Richmond the first five years of my career before I moved to Washington DC.”

Advertisement

He said winning the show could be a turning point.

“To win the show would absolutely change the trajectory of my career,” Hodges said. “The winner gets a Netflix special. I’d be able just to kind of jump the line and get an opportunity… it could catapult my career to heights that I never, ever even thought possible.”

The competition culminates with live finale episodes on May 4 and 5 at 9 p.m. Eastern time. Netflix subscribers can vote in real time using their TV remote or the Netflix mobile app, but only while watching live.

Do you know about a good news story in your community? Email the CBS 6 Newsroom.

📲: CONNECT WITH US

Advertisement

Blue Sky | Facebook | Instagram | X | Threads | TikTok | YouTube

This story was initially reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy. To learn more about how we use AI in our newsroom, click here.





Source link

Continue Reading

West Virginia

West Virginia Supreme Court Considers Whether Smell Of Marijuana Can Be Basis For Police To Search Homes – Marijuana Moment

Published

on

West Virginia Supreme Court Considers Whether Smell Of Marijuana Can Be Basis For Police To Search Homes – Marijuana Moment


“There’s no inherent logical connection or nexus between the smell of marijuana and unlawful activity anymore, and there’s a good reason for that.”

By Lori Kersey, West Virginia Watch

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia is considering a case that questions whether the odor of marijuana alone is enough for law enforcement to obtain a warrant to search a person’s home.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on an appeal of Berkeley County Circuit Court’s decision to throw out evidence Martinsburg police officers found in a home after detecting the “strong odor” of the drug. Excluding the evidence effectively stopped the state from prosecuting a man on drug charges, an attorney told justices last week.

Advertisement

Aaron Lewis was arrested in 2020 on three counts of drug possession with intent to deliver and being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, according to reporting by the Herald-Mail.

Court documents say Martinsburg police were answering another man’s call about a suicidal woman who had reportedly stabbed herself when they came across Lewis while searching the caller’s backyard. Officers were unable to locate the woman so they started going door-to-door looking for her.

The officers went to Lewis’s home where his son, Aaron Lewis Jr. answered the door. The officers detected the “strong odor of marijuana,” according to court documents. The younger Lewis refused to give officers permission to search the home.

Before they obtained a search warrant, they entered the home to conduct a “protective sweep,” during which they found a bundle of money and two clear bowls with a leafy substance on the kitchen stove, court documents say. Two officers then left to obtain the search warrant while other officers stayed on scene to secure the apartment.

An officer cited the strong odor of marijuana and the observations during the sweep as the basis to believe a dangerous controlled substance was in the house.

Advertisement

A magistrate OK’d the search warrant for Lewis’ home, including the seizure of “(a)ny and all controlled substances…including but not limited to heroin and methamphetamine,” as well as currency, firearms, ledgers, digital devices and drug paraphernalia, court documents say.

During the search, officers seized bags and tubs of suspected marijuana, a bag of suspected heroin, a bag of crack cocaine, one gun and 11 rounds of ammunition and cash, according to court documents.

An attorney for Lewis asked the judge in 2023 to suppress all evidence seized pursuant to the warrant, arguing that the initial warrantless sweep—the security sweep before the search—violated the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizures. Without the observations made during the sweep, only the smell of marijuana was left and that alone is insufficient for probable cause, the attorney argued.

Berkeley Circuit Judge Debra McLaughlin granted Lewis’s motion to suppress the evidence, saying that more protection should be given to homes subject to searches than to cars. The judge ruled the odor of marijuana alone did not establish probable cause to believe the home contained  “evidence of illegal drug trafficking and/or possession of heroin, methamphetamines, and/or other illegal drugs,” court documents say.

The state of West Virginia is seeking a writ of prohibition in the case, a legal order that the circuit court stop proceedings beyond its jurisdiction.

Advertisement

“This court’s precedent is clear,” Holly Mestemacher, an assistant attorney general for West Virginia, told justices. “The odor of marijuana provides probable cause for a search. The circuit court disregarded the law and rewrote it and suppressed the evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant.” She called the court’s decision to suppress the evidence a  “clear and substantial legal error” that exceeds its authority.

The court required “certainty, and a near impossible list of proof required before probable cause exists,” she argued.

The ruling suppressed the evidence the state needed to proceed in the case, she said.

“It’s effectively a death knell to our ability to prosecute, because the court elevated that standard required far more than has ever been required by law,” she said.

Cameron LeFevre, an attorney representing Lewis, asked the Supreme Court to uphold the Circuit Court ruling by denying the state’s request for a writ of prohibition. He said the court doesn’t need to answer whether the smell of marijuana justified the search. There were “errors throughout” the case, he said, including an improper security sweep, unlawful home search and an affidavit that lacked important details.

Advertisement

Federal courts have upheld that the odor of marijuana is evidence of criminal activity and justifies a search by law enforcement, but many state courts are reconsidering that based on changing legal status of the drug, according to the State Court Report, a project of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. The West Virginia Legislature legalized medical marijuana in 2017. All states surrounding West Virginia have either legalized medical or recreational marijuana.

LeFevre argued that Lewis’ case is not the appropriate one for the Supreme Court to make case law about whether the smell of marijuana alone is enough for a legal search.

“There’s an incomplete record. It’s a unique procedural posture. It’s on a writ of prohibition,” he said. “It would be much better for the court to fairly decide this…case on its final merits, after a trial, after an entire record has been made, and then there’s not a variety of other procedural and legal issues contained within the warrant application process and the search itself.”

However, if the court should decide to take on the issue of the odor of marijuana, it should rule that the mere smell of marijuana is no longer sufficient for probable cause, he said.

“There’s been a significant development in the law of the land regarding marijuana,” he said. “[Medical marijuana has] become legalized in West Virginia. It’s become partially legalized in other states surrounding West Virginia. There’s no inherent logical connection or nexus between the smell of marijuana and unlawful activity anymore, and there’s a good reason for that.”

Advertisement

The court is expected to issue a ruling in the case before the current term of court ends on June 11.

This story was first published by West Virginia Watch.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending