Connect with us

Politics

Socialists’ Response to War in Ukraine Has Put Some Democrats on Edge

Published

on

Socialists’ Response to War in Ukraine Has Put Some Democrats on Edge

Not lengthy after Russia invaded Ukraine, the Democratic Socialists of America launched an announcement that drew prompt reproof.

The group condemned the invasion, but additionally urged america “to withdraw from NATO and to finish the imperialist expansionism that set the stage for this battle.”

The place — a watered-down model of a previous, much more pointed assertion from the group’s worldwide committee — drew rebukes from a White Home spokesman and from a number of Democratic candidates and elected officers, from Long Island congressional contenders to officers in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. However within the New York Metropolis space, the place the D.S.A.’s largest chapter wields substantial affect, it has additionally created a difficult dynamic for politicians aligned with the group.

Within the state’s sixteenth Congressional District, a refugee from Kosovo is making overseas coverage central to his main problem of Consultant Jamaal Bowman, a former center faculty principal from Yonkers who rose to energy with support from the Democratic Socialists of America.

In New York Metropolis, Democratic congressional candidates are debating America’s position on the planet. And even earlier than D.S.A.’s most up-to-date assertion, Metropolis Council members had been clashing over the historical past of American and NATO intervention.

Advertisement

With a majority of People backing Ukraine because it struggles to repel a bloody, usually live-streamed Russian invasion, the D.S.A.’s need for a coverage dialogue about NATO seems to have sown unease in marketing campaign circles: Not one of the 9 New York Metropolis candidates the D.S.A. endorsed this 12 months would consent to an interview on the subject, at the same time as extra centrist Democrats at the moment are utilizing the topic as a cudgel.

“We’re refugees from Kosovo, a rustic the place me and my household needed to flee due to ethnic cleaning and had been saved, frankly, by U.S. and NATO intervention there,” Vedat Gashi, a Democrat difficult Mr. Bowman, mentioned final week. “Blaming Ukraine and NATO for the escalation of this Russian invasion of Ukraine is to me, at the easiest case, naïve and definitely unsuitable.”

The D.S.A. argues that NATO promotes a militarized response to battle on the expense of diplomacy, and that financial sanctions too usually victimize working individuals. Within the case of Ukraine, many D.S.A. members say that america, by encouraging the growth of NATO eastward, provoked Russia.

“There’s a longstanding custom with the U.S. left in addition to in Europe that NATO has performed a task, particularly for the reason that collapse of the Soviet Union, in emphasizing militarized options when diplomacy may result in extra long-term stability,” mentioned Ashik Saddique, a member of the D.S.A.’s Nationwide Political Committee. “It feels just a little bit absurd for individuals to be appearing prefer it’s a political crime to criticize NATO.”

Mr. Gashi known as on Mr. Bowman to totally disavow the D.S.A. stance.

Advertisement

Mr. Bowman has chosen a subtler tack, signaling distance from the D.S.A.’s place, with out the form of direct condemnation that may alienate a element of his base and play into his opponent’s fingers. He declined to remark for this text, however in a previous assertion, he mentioned he helps NATO, “and can proceed to take action throughout this disaster.”

Mr. Bowman’s district features a sizable inhabitants of Ukrainian immigrants, and final week, he known as greater than a dozen who’ve written him letters, his workplace mentioned. He has additionally joined the Congressional Ukraine Caucus and has put collectively a bipartisan letter asking President Biden to let at-risk Ukrainians enter the nation with out visas.

However Ukrainians will not be the one constituents D.S.A.-aligned politicians want to think about amid the disaster, mentioned Drisana Hughes, the previous marketing campaign supervisor for India Walton, the D.S.A.-backed candidate for mayor of Buffalo, and a marketing campaign strategist at Stu Loeser and Co.

“I don’t assume it’s simply Ukrainian constituents; I believe it’s Polish constituents, Finnish constituents,” Ms. Hughes mentioned. “It’s a variety of nations which might be delicate to Russian aggression and anybody involved about the way forward for Europe particularly.”

Actually, regardless of the balancing act for some Democrats, tensions are clearly evident for Republicans. Whilst many specific solidarity with Ukraine, former President Donald J. Trump has lavished reward on Russian President Vladimir V. Putin — only a few years after Mr. Trump’s first impeachment centered on points together with pressuring Ukraine for political favors. The one individuals to vote towards a current Home decision in help of Ukraine had been three Republican members of Congress. And a few right-wing media figures, like Fox Information host Tucker Carlson, have till very just lately sounded protecting of Mr. Putin.

Nonetheless, in New York, the rifts across the Russian invasion have taken on extra urgency on the Democratic facet, together with within the battle for New York’s eleventh Congressional District, which was just lately redrawn to absorb each Staten Island to Park Slope, and the place the 2 most outstanding Democratic contenders are navy veterans.

Brittany Ramos DeBarros, a member of D.S.A., has endorsed working “with worldwide companions to produce and help civil-military protection techniques,” and mentioned “no” when requested instantly in an interview if the U.S. ought to withdraw from NATO. However in 2019, she was listed as a speaker at an anti-NATO occasion, and acknowledged that she “attended a gathering about that” in her days as an anti-war activist. Her marketing campaign mentioned that she doesn’t help withdrawing from NATO “right now.”

“‘Not right now’ implies that proper now’s the time to save lots of lives, and to de-escalate the state of affairs,” she mentioned in an interview. “If individuals want to have a broader dialog about understanding how we received right here and diagnosing what we have to do with a view to, you already know, form a special future, then that may come as soon as we have now eliminated ourselves from the brink.”

Advertisement

Her marketing campaign has famous that her primary Democratic main opponent, former Consultant Max Rose, initially voiced skepticism of the primary impeachment proceedings towards Mr. Trump.

Mr. Rose, seen by social gathering strategists because the probably front-runner, did vote to question Mr. Trump and mentioned he took the topic “very severely. However I didn’t blink within the face of holding Donald Trump accountable for his egregious actions.”

He additionally condemned the D.S.A.’s place concerning NATO and known as for constructing “a fair stronger NATO alliance.”

“America’s unilateral withdrawal from NATO is maybe probably the most dangerous, stupidest factor, overseas coverage determination, that we might be contemplating proper now,” he mentioned. “America has to double down on its alliances, significantly its trans-Atlantic ones.”

Some left-wing candidates additionally instantly rejected the D.S.A. assertion.

“I don’t agree with the D.S.A.’s stance on the U.S. exiting NATO,” mentioned Rana Abdelhamid, a member of D.S.A. who’s difficult Consultant Carolyn Maloney in a New York Metropolis district that, underneath redistricting strains, has shed some left-wing neighborhoods. “NATO is without doubt one of the main strains of protection that we have now to handle Russian aggression in the direction of Ukraine.”

However many different New York Metropolis officers aligned with D.S.A. — a few of whom have weighed in usually on different nationwide and worldwide points previously — had been way more circumspect.

“Thanks for reaching out, however our marketing campaign has no touch upon that,” emailed Stephen Wooden, a spokesman for Brooklyn State Senate candidate David Alexis, on Wednesday.

Advertisement

Different elected officers who declined to remark or didn’t return requests for remark included Consultant Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; State senators Julia Salazar and Jabari Brisport; and Meeting members Zohran Kwame Mamdani, Marcela Mitaynes and Phara Souffrant Forrest. Nor did Assemblywoman Emily Gallagher, of Brooklyn, conform to remark.

“In the event you’d like to jot down about all electrical buildings act, LLC disclosure laws, or any of my different work as a legislator I’d be completely satisfied to speak,” Ms. Gallagher mentioned.

Domestically, the D.S.A.’s viewpoint has been most energetically superior by Kristin Richardson Jordan, a councilwoman from Harlem and a democratic socialist, who was not backed by the group in her marketing campaign for workplace.

“In 2014, the U.S. helped overthrow Ukraine’s democratically elected chief in an unlawful coup, helped set up a fascist authorities and empowered a far proper navy all with the purpose of destabilizing Russia,” Ms. Jordan said recently on Twitter, accusing america and European Union of “upsetting Russia with NATO growth” — feedback that some mentioned offered cowl for Mr. Putin.

She didn’t reply to requests for remark. However throughout a current radio look, Ms. Jordan was requested to justify her place. She repeated her prior claims, and drew open pushback from Council colleagues.

Advertisement

“I’m undecided it is sensible to dive into the main points of worldwide politics once I’m in native authorities,” she mentioned on The Brian Lehrer Present.

In Yonkers, the place Mr. Bowman and Mr. Gashi are operating, Kiril Angelov, the pastor at St. Michael the Archangel Ukrainian Catholic Church, mentioned he had seen each males at a current service.

“I hope that each single politician is seeing the state of affairs in Ukraine with open eyes and with open hearts,” he added.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Blackface photo shakes up toss-up House district in NY

Published

on

Blackface photo shakes up toss-up House district in NY

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

A close House race in New York was rocked by an October surprise when photos surfaced of the incumbent Republican congressman in blackface as part of a Halloween costume years ago.

Rep. Michael Lawler, R-N.Y., who is white, is pictured dressed like pop sensation Michael Jackson, complete with bronzer to darken his face in an October 2006 photo reported by the New York Times. Lawler does not dispute the photo’s authenticity and has issued an apology to anyone who has taken offense, though he said it was not his intention to dress in blackface.

Advertisement

“As has been well-documented – most recently by the Daily Beast – I was a so-called ‘Super Fan’ of Michael Jackson, so much so that I was mentioned by name in his biography for my outspoken support of him and the Jackson Family.  I loved Michael’s music, was awed by him as a performer, and by his impact on pop culture,” Lawler said in a statement. “One of my greatest memories is attending his concert at Madison Square Garden before his untimely death.  

“When attempting to imitate Michael’s legendary dance moves at a college Halloween party eighteen years ago, the ugly practice of black face was the furthest thing from my mind. Let me be clear, this is not that. Rather, my costume was intended as the sincerest form of flattery, a genuine homage to one of my childhood idols since I was a little kid trying to moonwalk through my mom’s kitchen.  

FOX NEWS POWER RANKINGS: HARRIS TICKS UP AND SENATE REPUBLICANS TAKE CHARGE

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., talks with reporters after a meeting of the House Republican Conference in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, June 4, 2024.  (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

“I am a student of history and for anyone who takes offense to the photo, I am sorry.  All you can do is live and learn, and I appreciate everyone’s grace along the way,” he said. 

Advertisement

The 38-year-old Lawler, a moderate first-term lawmaker from the Hudson Valley, is seen as a rising star in the GOP conference who is running for re-election in a suburban swing district. His Democratic opponent in New York’s 17th Congressional District is former Rep. Mondaire Jones, a Black man. The Jones campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

Michael Lawler dressed in blackface as Michael Jackson

Photos show Rep. Michael Lawler pictured in October 2005, dressed as pop star Michael Jackson complete with bronzer to darken his face. Lawler did not dispute the authenticity of the photos.  (Published by the New York Times)

The race is one of 22 toss-up contests that may well determine which party controls the House of Representatives next year, according to Fox News’ Power Rankings.  

Lawler is not the first politician to be wrapped up in recent controversy over a costume that resembled blackface. Former Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat, faced calls to resign after a photo from his medical school yearbook surfaced which pictured men in Ku Klux Klan robes and blackface. Northam denied he was in the photo but admitted he once used shoe polish to darken his face for a dance contest in the 1980s in which he too dressed like Jackson.

NEW YORK REPUBLICAN WRANGLES WITH CNN HOST HITTING TRUMP’S ECONOMIC POLICIES

Mondaire Jones

Lawler is up against former Rep. Mondaire Jones. (Getty Images)

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau also faced controversy in 2019 when photos surfaced of him wearing blackface in 2001. The prime minister said in an interview after the fact that he could not give a definitive number on how many times he had worn blackface. 

Advertisement

Lawler was photographed in his Jackson costume in New York City when he was a sophomore at Manhattan College, now Manhattan University, a Catholic school in the Bronx where only three percent of the student population is Black, according to the New York Times. 

Lawler, who was class valedictorian in 2009, was well-known for his love of Michael Jackson, the paper reported.

When Lawler was a high school senior in 2005, he flew from New York to California to attend parts Jackson’s criminal trial. The musician had faced allegations of molesting a 13-year-old boy at his Neverland Ranch, though Jackson was eventually acquitted. 

FORMER DEMOCRATIC REP MONDAIRE JONES LAUNCHES COMEBACK BID FOR CRUCIAL SEAT THAT HELPED GOP TAKE HOUSE

Michael Jackson performance

Michael Jackson performing “Thriller” on stage at Madison Square Garden as part of his Bad Tour in 1988.  (George De Sota (ID 5073478)/Redferns)

Jackson biographer J. Randy Taraborrelli recounted in his book how he helped get Lawler into the courtroom, according to the Daily Beast. Taraborrelli wrote in “Michael Jackson: The Magic, The Madness, The Whole Story” that the teen had been “so disgusted” by testimony against Jackson “that he couldn’t help but mutter something derogatory under his breath.” 

Advertisement

In Taraborrelli’s account, Lawler was overheard by court officials and “tossed right out of the courtroom.” 

The photos in question were posted to Facebook and depict Lawler dressed in a jacket reminiscent of the one Jackson wore in the “Thriller” music video. 

The New York Times cited a person familiar with the costume who said that Lawler had used bronzer borrowed from female classmates to darken his skin. 

Lawler’s 2022 victory was one of several Republican victories in crucial New York districts, despite the state’s status as reliably blue overall. The 17th includes stretches through four suburban counties outside of New York City: Dutchess, Putnam, Rockland and Westchester.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Emma Colton and Emily Robertson contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Politics

Opinion: Why President Biden hasn't been able to end Israel's nearly year-old war in Gaza

Published

on

Opinion: Why President Biden hasn't been able to end Israel's nearly year-old war in Gaza

As the world prepares to mark the first anniversary of Hamas’ Oct. 7 terrorist attack and the ensuing war is set to drag into a second year with intense fighting on another front, many Americans are wondering why President Biden has been unable to end the conflict.

Contrary to plenty of commentary, it certainly has not been for lack of trying.

Since the war broke out, Biden has visited Israel and had a host of conversations with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken has made at least 10 trips to Israel. Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III has also made multiple visits to the country since Oct. 7 and had seemingly countless talks with his counterpart, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. This is all on top of lower-ranking U.S. officials’ continuous efforts to engage with Israel.

And yet for all the time and effort the Biden administration has expended, it has failed to broker a cease-fire between Israel and the militant group Hamas. Meanwhile, the threat of a wider war loomed again this week as Iran launched a missile attack on Israel in retaliation for the escalation of its conflict with the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The Biden administration is hardly alone in its struggle to find diplomatic common ground in the Middle East. Ever since the Oslo accords some three decades ago, a series of American administrations have tried and failed to broker peace between Israelis and Palestinians.

Advertisement

At the same time, although Americans may want wars to be short and relatively restrained, they rarely are. The unfortunate battlefield reality is that any war against a group such as Hamas — with its estimated 30,000 fighters and hundreds of miles of tunnels embedded in one of the most densely populated places on Earth — was going to be a long, bloody slog. There is very little that anyone — even an American president — can do to change that.

Biden’s critics counter that the administration could put more pressure on Netanyahu to force a cease-fire. They note that Israel receives billions of dollars’ worth of American military aid and depends on American diplomatic cover. They say that provides sufficient leverage to force Netanyahu’s hand. But does it?

In practice, the United States often has less influence over its allies than one might think. Historically, economic sanctions have a poor track record of forcing major concessions, particularly when existential security matters are at stake — which, in Israel’s case, they are. Indeed, threats to sanction the hard-right elements of Netanyahu’s coalition have yet to produce any sort of moderation. At the same time, the International Criminal Court’s announcement that it would seek arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant produced what few other policies could: It united Israel’s fractured political spectrum around the current government.

Even if U.S. pressure were effective enough to motivate the Netanyahu government to try to end the war, it still might not succeed. Ending the war, after all, would require the cooperation of both Israel and Hamas — and more specifically Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, who shows no signs of budging.

Sinwar could unilaterally declare a cease-fire, release all the remaining Israeli hostages and deny Israel one of its core justifications for the war. But Hamas seems intent on executing hostages and otherwise doubling down on the hostilities. Presumably, despite all the devastation and suffering in Gaza, Sinwar on some level still believes that he is winning.

Advertisement

Even if America had successfully secured a bilateral cease-fire, it would be unlikely to produce a lasting peace. Indeed, all the structural and political reasons that have prevented peace for decades remain.

Because Israel would have to free hundreds of militants serving life sentences for murder in exchange for the release of remaining hostages, Hamas’ ranks would swell during a cease-fire. Eventually the battered organization would rebuild and strike again. Moreover, regional spoilers — most notably Iran — view a continuing proxy conflict with Israel as being in their strategic interest.

A year in, the Biden administration’s diplomatic offensive has yielded some modest results. The rate of casualties — even as reported by Gaza’s Hamas-controlled Health Ministry — has slowed. Aid to Gaza’s civilians, albeit insufficient, is flowing. More than three-fifths of the hostages taken on Oct. 7 have either been freed or recovered, although 97 have not. And, most important, a full-blown, regional Middle East war — widely feared at several junctures over the last year — has been averted, at least for the moment.

All that is admittedly cold comfort to the Palestinians caught in the crossfire, the Israeli hostages who remain in Gaza and the growing displaced populations of southern Lebanon and northern Israel.

In the wake of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, Americans have become far more aware of the bounds of what military power can achieve. But other tools of national power, including diplomacy, have their limits too. Outside mediators can’t end this war, particularly if the combatants themselves don’t want to stop fighting.

Advertisement

Raphael S. Cohen is the director of the strategy and doctrine program at Rand Project Air Force and of the national security program at the Pardee Rand Graduate School.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump to headline NRA event in pivotal swing state two weeks before Election Day

Published

on

Trump to headline NRA event in pivotal swing state two weeks before Election Day

Former President Trump will headline the National Rifle Association’s (NRA) Defend the 2nd event in Savannah, Georgia, Oct. 22, the organization announced Friday morning.

“This election is a pivotal one for America’s gun owners. Kamala Harris and her far-left allies have big plans to erode Second Amendment protections,” NRA Vice President and CEO Doug Hamlin said in a statement. 

“Donald J. Trump has proven himself a fighter for Americans’ right to keep and bear arms. We are excited to have him speak at our Defend the 2nd event and to support his return to the White House in January.”

NRA TARGETS SEN SHERROD BROWN IN 7-FIGURE AD BUY IN OHIO

Former President Trump speaks during the National Rifle Association Convention May 18, 2024, in Dallas. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

Advertisement

Earlier this year, the NRA endorsed Trump in his presidential campaign. Trump also spoke at the NRA’s convention in May. 

The NRA has been ramping up its attacks on certain Democratic candidates who are softer on gun owners’ rights. Ohio is the second state the NRA Political Victory Fund has targeted this election cycle. Last month, the gun group launched a major radio campaign against vulnerable Democratic Sen. Jon Tester of Montana.

NRA BETS BIG ON MONTANA IN GUN RIGHTS PUSH AS TESTER TEETERS IN SENATE RACE

Donald Trump at NRA event podium, seen in wide profile shot

Former President Trump speaks during the NRA ILA Leadership Forum at the National Rifle Association Annual Meeting in May. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

“When it comes to preserving and strengthening our constitutional rights in America, the stakes could not be higher in this presidential election,” the NRA’s news release said. “No matter your reason for owning a firearm — whether for hunting, self-defense or just as an exercise of your constitutional right — law-abiding gun owners have a clear choice this fall if they hope to preserve their Second Amendment rights.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending