Connect with us

Politics

Ketanji Brown Jackson Survives a Final Bruising Day of Questions

Published

on

Ketanji Brown Jackson Survives a Final Bruising Day of Questions

WASHINGTON — Decide Ketanji Brown Jackson emerged on Wednesday from two grueling days of testimony earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee having weathered escalating Republican assaults on her file however leaving Democrats assured that she would change into the primary Black lady on the Supreme Court docket.

Questioning of President Biden’s nominee by Republicans grew more and more hostile as they stepped up their criticism of what they portrayed as a sample of leniency in her sentencing of kid intercourse abusers and tried to color her as a liberal on problems with race, gender, weapons and abortion rights.

Regardless of early pledges from Republican leaders that the method could be marked by decorum and respect, the hearings have been a bruising affair for the Senate, no much less bitter or partisan than their quick predecessors.

Even Senator Ben Sasse, Republican of Nebraska, vented his exasperation at “the jackassery we see round right here” of “individuals mugging” for the cameras.

However however the grilling Decide Jackson endured, there was no indication that Republicans had succeeded in derailing a affirmation that could possibly be accredited alongside celebration traces as quickly as early subsequent month.

Advertisement

Reflecting on the historic nature of that second as her testimony drew to a detailed, Senator Cory Booker, Democrat of New Jersey and the one Black member of the committee, reminded Judge Jackson — and the nation — of the importance of her quest, eliciting tears from the nominee when he invoked Harriet Tubman’s struggles from slavery to freedom.

“You might be my star. You might be my harbinger of hope,” he informed her. “This nation is getting higher and higher.”

On the entire, nonetheless, Wednesday’s listening to was a contentious affair. It steadily deteriorated as Republican senators repeatedly assailed Decide Jackson about her sentencing choices on particular youngster intercourse abuse circumstances after spending a lot of the day on Tuesday peppering her with related questions.

Demanding solutions from Decide Jackson in heated tones and interrupting her repeatedly when she tried to reply, they infuriated Democrats on the panel, at one level prompting a shouting match between Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, and Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois and the chairman of the committee.

In a single significantly heated alternate, Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, pressed Decide Jackson about why she had not been harder on shoppers of kid intercourse abuse imagery, saying that his view was “put their ass in jail.”

Advertisement

Decide Jackson outlined how such circumstances had modified since Congress handed a regulation that enhanced sentences based mostly on the variety of pictures present in a defendant’s possession. On the time of the regulation, such pictures primarily got here via the mail, and the variety of pictures indicated the lengths to which an individual had gone to acquire them.

However, she tried to elucidate over Mr. Graham’s repeated interruptions, within the web age, enormous shops of pictures will be acquired with just a few clicks of a mouse.

“You will be doing this for quarter-hour, and unexpectedly you’re looking at 30, 40, 50 years in jail,” she stated. Mr. Graham interjected, saying, “Good — completely good.”

The flashes of mood from Mr. Graham have been significantly putting coming from a senator who voted lower than a 12 months in the past to substantiate Decide Jackson to the U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. His aggressive questioning of Decide Jackson this week steered that he was unlikely to again her for the nation’s highest court docket.

It additionally drew an offended response from Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, a former Democratic chairman of the Judiciary Committee and the senior member of the Senate, who stated he had not seen the extent of disrespect proven to Decide Jackson in his 48 years within the chamber.

Advertisement

“You had a Republican member who went means over the time allotted to him, ignored the principles of the committee, badgered the nominee, wouldn’t even let her reply the questions,” Mr. Leahy stated. “I’ve by no means seen something like that.”

Republican questioning skittered over a wide range of social points which might be animating conservative voters forward of the midterm election season, together with antiracism and important race concept. Mr. Cruz picked up a line of questioning from Tuesday night time on transgender athletes, demanding that Decide Jackson outline what a lady is. The Republican Nationwide Committee caught with its allegations that Decide Jackson was racially divisive.

“The conservative motion must be alarmed not solely by her file as an activist choose, however by her willingness to advocate for the divisive anti-American ideas like crucial race concept,” stated Matt Schlapp, a detailed ally of former President Donald J. Trump’s and the chairman of the Conservative Political Motion Convention.

In a notable growth, Decide Jackson, a Harvard graduate who’s finishing a six-year time period on the college’s Board of Overseers, stated that if she have been confirmed, she would recuse herself from a marquee case: a problem to Harvard’s race-conscious admissions insurance policies that the court docket will contemplate in its subsequent time period, which begins in October.

Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas, pressed her broadly on felony sentencing and all however accused her of mendacity when she stated she didn’t recall one explicit case.

Advertisement

“Your nomination,” Mr. Durbin informed Decide Jackson, “turned out to be a testing floor for conspiracy theories and tradition warfare theories.”

However the coronary heart of the Republicans’ assault was youngster intercourse crimes, a fraught, deeply uncomfortable topic that speaks to all Individuals however carries particular weight with the conservative fringe, ate up a eating regimen of false QAnon conspiracy theories that maintain {that a} cabal of pedophiles rule Washington.

Republicans far past the Judiciary Committee have been clearly aiming not simply at animating their very own voters however at probably peeling away one or two Senate Democrats — most definitely Senators Joe Manchin III of West Virginia or Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona — and imperiling Decide Jackson’s elevation to the Supreme Court docket.

“Can Joe Manchin clarify to West Virginians why he’s supporting this pedophile apologist?” Donald Trump Jr., the previous president’s son, demanded on Twitter.

To maintain the warmth on, Mr. Cruz pressed Decide Jackson for case-specific particulars on her sentencing of these charged with sexual abuse, pointing to 1 occasion during which she gave a defendant two years in jail when the sentencing guideline was about seven years.

Advertisement

“I’m asking you to take the chance to elucidate to this committee and the American individuals why in 100% of the circumstances you’ve gotten individuals with vile crimes, and you’ve got language saying they’re vile crimes, however you then sentence them to very, very low sentences,” Mr. Cruz stated.

He was adopted by Senator Josh Hawley, the Missouri Republican who initially raised the sentencing concern earlier than the hearings. Mr. Hawley repeatedly demanded that Decide Jackson say whether or not she regretted giving a “slap on the wrist” to a different offender, Wesley Hawkins, who Mr. Hawley stated was arrested once more after his launch.

“What I remorse,” she replied, “is that in a listening to about my {qualifications} to be a justice on the Supreme Court docket, we have now spent numerous time specializing in this small subset of my sentences.”

Decide Jackson stated that she had handed down sentences, some longer than 25 and 30 years, in additional than 100 circumstances. “I’ve stated what I’m going to say about these circumstances,” she stated at one level. “Nobody case can stand in for a choose’s complete file.”

Democrats additionally sought to rebut the claims that Decide Jackson’s sentencing historical past was excessive, noting that it fell within the mainstream of federal judges. Senator Chris Coons, Democrat of Delaware, known as the Republican assault “an try to distract out of your broad help, your deep file, your excellent mental and authorized credentials.”

Advertisement

Whether or not the road of assault may have any influence is unclear. Mr. Manchin was in Paris for a world power convention and had no touch upon the hearings. Ms. Sinema didn’t reply to a request for remark.

Three Republicans voted lower than a 12 months in the past to raise Decide Jackson to the appellate court docket, however Mr. Graham appeared disinclined to repeat his vote. Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, stated she was nonetheless learning the matter, and Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, couldn’t be reached for remark.

One other undecided Republican, Senator Mitt Romney of Utah, stated he could be assembly with Decide Jackson after the hearings and would make his resolution afterward.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Tim Walz slammed as 'political chameleon' after ditching former pro-Second Amendment stand

Published

on

Tim Walz slammed as 'political chameleon' after ditching former pro-Second Amendment stand

Vice President Kamala Harris announced Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz will join her on the 2024 Democratic ticket for the White House, despite the pair previously having wildly differing views on the Second Amendment and gun control. 

“I am proud to announce that I’ve asked @Tim_Walz to be my running mate. As a governor, a coach, a teacher, and a veteran, he’s delivered for working families like his. It’s great to have him on the team. Now let’s get to work,” Harris posted to X on Tuesday morning. 

Walz is in the midst of his second term as Minnesota governor, and previously served as a U.S. congressman in the state from 2007-2019, where he represented a largely rural population. Back when he served as a congressman in a district that typically voted red, Walz was seen as a champion of gun rights and hunting.  

The National Rifle Association awarded Walz an A rating for his commitment to protecting gun ownership and rejecting gun control laws pushed by left-wing members of the Democratic Party. 

TRUMP CAMP SAYS HARRIS-WALZ ‘DANGEROUSLY LIBERAL’ TICKET IS ‘EVERY AMERICAN’S NIGHTMARE’

Advertisement

Gov. Tim Walz speaks at an event in Northfield, Minnesota, on Nov. 1, 2023. (Christopher Mark Juhn/Anadolu via Getty Images)

“Tim Walz is a gun owner. He grew up hunting and spent 24 years in the Army National Guard. Now in Congress, Tim stood up time and time again for the constitutional rights of law-abiding gun owners and sportsmen. It’s why the NRA gave Tim an ‘A’ rating,” a 2010 political ad declared. 

Walz’s celebration of the Second Amendment included earning him a spot on Guns & Ammo magazine’s 2016 list of 20 top politicians for gun owners. 

VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS NAMES MINNESOTA GOV. TIM WALZ AS HER RUNNING MATE: AP

“A Democrat, Rep. Walz proves that gun rights are not always partisan issues. Walz Co-sponsored ATF reform legislation back in 2008 and was a lead sponsor in the SHARE Act,” Walz’s feature on the list reads. “While most congressional Democrats have jumped on the gun control train with both feet, Tim Walz and a few others have stuck to their guns.”

Advertisement
Kamala Harris closeup shot

Vice President Kamala Harris speaks to the media after touring a Planned Parenthood facility in St. Paul, Minnesota, with Gov. Tim Walz and Planned Parenthood North Central States chief medical officer Sarah Traxler, March 14, 2024. (Glen Stubbe/Star Tribune via Getty Images)

Walz has since changed his tune to champion gun control measures, and lost his high marks among the Second Amendment community. The NRA slammed Walz as a “political chameleon” in a statement provided to Fox News Digital on Tuesday after Harris officially announced him as her running mate. 

“Tim Walz is a political chameleon – changing his positions to further his own personal agenda. In Congress, Walz purported to be a friend of gun owners to receive their support in his rural Minnesota district. Once he had his eyes set on other offices, he sold out law-abiding Minnesotans and promoted a radical gun control agenda that emboldened criminals and left everyday citizens defenseless. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz cannot be trusted to defend freedom and our Constitutional rights,” Randy Kozuch, chairman of the NRA Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF), said in a statement.

NRA DIGS UP HISTORY TO PUSH BACK ON KAMALA HARRIS’ CLAIM ON ‘ASSAULT’ BAN

Walz’s previous gun stances stand in stark contrast to Harris’ celebration in recent years that the Biden administration would take on the NRA and win, citing Biden’s work as a senator when he voted to ban semi-automatic firearms in 1994 as part of a major crime bill. 

“@JoeBiden has taken on the @NRA and won. He can do it again,” Harris tweeted last year, accompanied by a campaign ad celebrating Biden’s determination to “ban assault weapons.” 

Advertisement

Biden, while serving as a Delaware senator, voted to ban semi-automatic firearms in 1994 as part of a major crime bill, while the Democrat-majority House at the time passed the ban as a standalone bill. The bill ultimately was incorporated into the sweeping anti-crime package and required exceptions in order to pass, including a sunset provision. 

WHO IS TIM WALZ? MEET THE HARRIS RUNNING MATE WHO CALLED REPUBLICANS ‘WEIRD PEOPLE’

Kamala Harris holding microphone with US flag behind her

Sen. Kamala Harris speaks at an event in Las Vegas on April 27, 2019. (Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

The bill was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton in September of that year. It enacted a 10-year ban on the manufacture, transfer or possession of “semiautomatic assault weapons” and “large capacity ammunition feeding devices.”

The law expired in 2004, when George W. Bush was president and Republicans controlled both chambers of Congress. 

‘THANK YOU, KAMALA!’: GLEEFUL REPUBLICANS RIP TIM WALZ AS GOP READIES TO BATTLE PROGRESSIVE DEM TICKET

Advertisement

Fast-forward to 2009, when Barack Obama was president, Walz was one of 65 Democrats in the House who signed a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder opposing any bans similar to the one from 1994, the Star Tribune previously reported. Holder notably was chosen by Harris this year to head up the vetting process of the pool of potential veeps before Walz was ultimately chosen. 

Tim Walz holding press conference

Gov. Tim Walz speaks during a press conference regarding gun legislation at City Hall on Aug. 1, 2024 in Bloomington, Minnesota. (Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

In 2017 and 2018, the then-congressman wildly changed his tune on gun control, joining fellow Democrats in their calls to tighten laws on gun ownership. Walz announced in 2017, following the tragic Las Vegas shooting, that he was donating the roughly $18,000 he received from the NRA to charity. 

Days after the tragic school shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in 2018, Walz joined fellow Democrats in calling for gun control measures. Last year, the governor also signed into law universal background checks and a red flag order, which was slammed by Second Amendment groups. 

Walz wrote in an op-ed in 2018 that his views on guns are “evolving in some ways,” but that he’s “always been a reformer.”

“To finally come together to end gun violence, we’ll need a new approach. We’ll need to build a coalition we haven’t seen before: rural, urban, suburban and exurban folks; gun owners and gun-violence survivors; hunters and advocates and police officers and the young people who are stepping up right now. We’ll need a coalition of folks of good faith who haven’t seen eye to eye but respect the different ways of life in every corner of our state,” he wrote in an op-ed published by the Star Tribune in 2018. 

Advertisement

“That’s how we get things done in Minnesota: We come together. As a hunter, sportsman and veteran with a lifelong respect for guns, as a resident of greater Minnesota, a teacher, and a dad who just wants his kids to come home safe, I can and will bring together that coalition to end gun violence, preserve our ways of life and ensure that everyone gets home to their families safe.”

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub. 

Continue Reading

Politics

Column: 'Weird' and kinda wonderful: Why Walz is exactly what Harris needs

Published

on

Column: 'Weird' and kinda wonderful: Why Walz is exactly what Harris needs

Kamala Harris has choosen the most down-home dude in the Midwest as her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz — the guy who ingeniously dubbed MAGA Republicans “weird.”

This development is likely giving a fierce case of heartburn to two other political rivals.

First, Gavin Newsom. No matter what our wavy-haired leader says, he’s had his eye on the Resolute Desk. Now, even if the Harris-Walz ticket doesn’t win, he’s got Walz ahead of him in line. Ouch.

And second, of course, is JD Vance, who must be downing Pepto-Bismol with glasses of buttermilk after hearing this news. About a week ago (which is approximately two millennia by the current political calendar) Walz dubbed Vance “weird.”

By today’s standards of labeling immigrants as “animals” and “rapists,” as former President Trump has done, weird sounds like it would be the least of insults.

Advertisement

But it has stuck like gum on the sole of MAGA shoes. Or maybe stuck to their souls. For some reason, it hit home, especially with Vance.

Since then, Trump has had to defend his pick, who can’t shake the image of being strange. Of course, his “childless cat ladies” remark didn’t help.

But the weird label has even Trump on the defensive.

“They’re the weird ones,” he claimed in a recent interview. “Nobody’s ever called me weird. I’m a lot of things, but weird I’m not and I’m up front, and he’s not either, I will tell you, JD is not at all, they are.”

That’s the “I’m rubber, you’re glue,” defense, popular in first-grade classrooms across America.

Advertisement

But if there’s anyone who’s not weird in this election, it’s Walz, which is what makes him such a terrific pick.

This guy. He’s pure Minnesota, in the best way. He was in the Army National Guard for 24 years. He coached football. He was a social studies teacher, on a Native American reservation, in China for a year, then at a public high school where he served as advisor to the first gay-straight alliance club.

Since then, he’s been a champion for LGBTQ+ rights, in a part of the country where there’s often little political capital for doing so.

He has signed laws protecting gender-affirming healthcare. He’s stopped book banning for containing gender issues.

He’s protected abortion rights. He’s banned so-called conversion therapy, the controversial practice of attempting to un-gay people through religion or other methods.

Advertisement

He is hands-down a progressive, even though he looks like central casting sent him to play “conservative grandpa,” though he’s only 60 — clearly a Minnesota 60 is an L.A. 80. No offense, but he doesn’t look young.

But he acts young — and is definitely young at heart.

Perhaps most endearing, he posts videos with his college-aged daughter, Hope, that are pure fun-dad and delightful to watch. They’ve got some real Fargo humor going. (Yes, I know that’s North Dakota. Close enough.) I just watched one of them at the Minnesota State Fair (Walz in a Springsteen T-shirt) that made me laugh out loud:

Walz: We’re going to get some food. Corn dog?

Hope: I’m vegetarian.

Advertisement

Walz: Turkey then.

Hope: Turkey’s meat.

Walz: Not in Minnesota. Turkey’s special.

Yes, it’s silly-dumb. But man is this guy wholesome. You want to argue about family values? Good luck bringing that to Walz.

Which is why this choice by Harris is so strong. Walz is just a good guy. Whether you ask in political circles or dig back into his life, he’s made a habit of standing for the values MAGA Republicans claim to love, but also love to squash.

Advertisement

Put him in a debate with Vance, and my prediction is that Vance will come across as shrill and small. Walz has proven with his leadership in Minnesota that you can have government that is kind and inclusive without the world falling apart.

Last year, Walz created a plan to “make Minnesota the best state in the nation for kids to grow up in.”

That is exactly what Vance claims to be doing — albeit by shoving kids and families into a tiny white Christian nationalist box.

Walz, by contrast, has given free school lunches to children; made college free for more people; and provided substantial state tax credits for families.

How ’bout them policies, Vance?

Advertisement

And when MAGA put IVF in their crosshairs? Well, Hope is an IVF baby. So Walz had this to say about it:

“Even if you’ve never gone through the hell of infertility, someone you know has. When Gwen and I were having trouble getting pregnant, the anxiety and frustration blotted out the sun. JD Vance opposing the miracle of IVF is a direct attack on my family and so many others.”

You may recall that we have yet to hear many specific policies from Trump or Vance, other than the promise to break apart immigrant families and deport millions of people.

By contrast, “We’re leading the nation on climate, gun safety, and protecting reproductive rights. We’re investing in education and ensuring no child has to learn on an empty stomach. We’re expanding voting rights, expanding workers’ rights, and reducing child poverty,” Walz said on Twitter (now X) last year.

Walz has what even Harris lacks — a real track record of doing the right thing successfully.

Advertisement

And, as a bonus, if a Harris-Walz ticket won, Walz’s lieutenant governor, Peggy Flanagan, would become the first Native American governor in American history.

So yeah, I’m a Walz-a-maniac, and there’s nothing weird about that.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Kari Lake to hold 'Democrats for Lake' event after Democrats tout Republican support for Harris, Gallego

Published

on

Kari Lake to hold 'Democrats for Lake' event after Democrats tout Republican support for Harris, Gallego

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

GOP Arizona Senate candidate Kari Lake announced Tuesday an event that will feature current and former Democrats supporting her campaign.

The coalition, called “Democrats/former Democrats for Kari Lake & America First,” was revealed after Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign announced its “Republicans for Harris” initiative, which held a press conference in Mesa, Arizona, and after Lake’s opponent for Senate, Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., announced his “Republicans and Independents for Ruben” coalition.

Advertisement

Lake called on members of the press to give her event, which will be held Thursday, as much coverage as the events for Harris and Gallego.

‘NEVER TRUMPERS’ COALESCE BEHIND DEM TICKET IN REPUBLICANS FOR HARRIS CAMPAIGN

GOP Arizona Senate candidate Kari Lake announced Tuesday an event that will feature current and former Democrats supporting her campaign. (Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)

“Hello Media— We see how you have given Kamala and her favorite liberal congressman Ruben Gallego so much news coverage of their ‘Republicans’ for Kamala/Ruben/America Last press conferences,” Lake wrote on the social media platform X.

“We ask that you give us equal coverage of our event coming Thursday. It’s called Democrats/former Democrats for Kari Lake & America First,” she continued. “Clear your schedule and we’ll let you know the time/place to meet us. I promise this will be eye-opening.”

Advertisement

Gallego announced on Sunday endorsements from 40 Republicans and independents, including officials and operatives who have shown support for other Democrats, in an effort to prove he has appeal across the aisle as he seeks to defeat Lake in November, according to The Arizona Republic.

KARI LAKE WINS GOP NOD, SETTING UP GENERAL ELECTION BATTLE WITH GALLEGO FOR SINEMA’S SEAT

Kari Lake

Lake called on members of the press to give her event, which will be held Thursday, as much coverage as the events for Harris and Gallego. (Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)

At least 10 of these supporters for Gallego have also endorsed Harris for president, the outlet noted.

Republicans for Harris, consisting of “Never Trumpers,” also officially launched on Sunday, in an initiative that features several former officials, including former Trump White House officials Stephanie Grisham and Olivia Troye, as Harris’ campaign looks to rebrand her more moderately ahead of November’s presidential election against former President Trump.

Advertisement

Lake and Gallego will also face off in the general election in November. Arizona’s open Senate seat, currently held by outgoing Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, is rated as “Lean Democratic” by non-partisan political handicapper the Cook Political Report.

Continue Reading

Trending