Connect with us

Vermont

Volunteers in the Northeast Kingdom begin checking in on stranded neighbors

Published

on

Volunteers in the Northeast Kingdom begin checking in on stranded neighbors


Eighteen volunteers gathered in a 150-year-old blue schoolhouse in East Burke Thursday morning to begin the long trek to check in on stranded neighbors.

“Thank you all so much for coming out on such short notice today,” said Megan Durling, East Burke School co-director.

Durling split the group into teams. Some of them would be making first physical contact with residents who hadn’t been able to leave their property since floods tore away roads Tuesday morning.

More than 100 residences in the Northeast Kingdom have been damaged or destroyed, and extensive damage to local roads has stranded scores of people in their homes.

Advertisement

More from Vermont Public: Flash flooding tears through rural communities in Vermont’s Northeast Kingdom

Municipal officials say it could take many weeks in some instances to restore local infrastructure, and concerns here are mounting for vulnerable residents who have no electricity, no running water and no way leave their property by car.

Durling told the assembled volunteers what should classify as a “high-priority case.”

“Life threatening. Building is not habitable. Do not have their insulin,” she said.

Advertisement

Peter Hirschfeld

/

Vermont Public

Flood recovery volunteers Megan Durling, left, and Matt Lipschitz head into the woods of North Kirby to access homes that were isolated by road washouts on Thursday, Aug. 1.

Durling and two volunteers took on territory in North Kirby, where they hiked through fields and a forest to access homes belonging to residents such as Dwight Davis.

“So my name is Megan. I’m with a volunteer group that’s just checking on folks that are isolated in this area,” she said.

Advertisement

“Sorry you had to walk all the way up here,” Davis responded.

Davis’ son had already brought some food and other essentials. Power had been restored, and a local contractor told Davis that the washed-out road heading into town should be drivable again by the end of the day.

Taking stock of needs in a community like North Kirby is arduous work. These Northeast Kingdom roads are the last miles in Vermont. Some towns didn’t get electricity until the 1960s, and infrastructure is still exceedingly vulnerable to severe weather.

The half-dozen or so homes the volunteers canvassed in this neighborhood were all doing fine. But Durling got some alarming news from another crew while they were out.

“I got a message about folks in the part of Kirby I was concerned about,” she said. “There is an elderly woman in need.”

Advertisement

Because development patterns in Caledonia, Orleans and Essex counties are diffuse, so was the damage from Tuesday’s floods. Kirby, Morgan, Island Pond and St. Johnsbury were all hit hard. Red Village Road in Lyndonville saw some of the most severe devastation to land in the region.

Massive road washouts have isolated a 3-mile stretch where multiple homes were swept away and strewn on the banks of the Hawkins Brook.

A photo of a road way with double yellow lines, black asphalt and a giant hole in an area that was washed out by a river next to the road. Trees and green grass line either side of the road.

Peter Hirschfeld

/

Advertisement

Vermont Public

Red Village Road in Lyndonville has numerous washouts following flooding on Tuesday, July 30.

“It took my neighbor’s house away. That was pretty interesting to see,” said Jake Carter. “We watched it happen.”

Carter has a homestead in between bridges that, according to town officials, won’t get even a temporary fix for weeks. The basement and first floor of his old farmhouse flooded, and the river tore more than half his pasture away.

Carter said he’s just grateful that his cows and pigs and beloved old goat survived.

“They made it. They’re smart,” he said. “They all gathered in the barn, at the highest part of the barn.”

Advertisement

Carter’s been living in a camper he parked in the middle of the now-untraveled road, and grilling up burgers for neighbors.

“My little strip here is all really good characters that help each other out real well,” he said. “But I know there’s a lot of problems out there right now, so I’d be nervous for a lot of people out there.”

More from Vermont Public: Lyndon neighborhood reckons with heavy damage as more rain moves through Vermont

Adam Sangiolo, who just moved into this neighborhood in May, is especially worried about some of the older residents who are now in their fourth day of being stranded without power or running water.

“It’s amazing to live in a community that everyone wants to help each other. It really is,” Sangiolo said. “But it’s like … it’s just too much at this point. I don’t see people being able to keep this [up] and sustain what’s happening here.”

Advertisement

A woman and a man in T-shirts sit on the front porch of an old house.

Peter Hirschfeld

/

Vermont Public

Caitlyn Severy and Adam Sangiolo, who live on Red Village Road, pictured on Wednesday, July 31.

On Thursday morning, Justin Smith, Lyndonville’s municipal administrator, surveyed a quarter-mile washout on Red Village Road as contractors hauled in culverts for the repairs ahead. He said he knows residents here want out, but he doesn’t have a timeline for them yet.

Advertisement

“I don’t,” Smith said. “I was told just this first leg alone is a week, so we’re not going to be to the Sheldon Brook bridge for a week.”

Members of the local fire department have been accessing stranded residents to deliver water, offer directions on how to get out by foot or four-wheeler, and see if residents want to be evacuated, according to Smith, who said he’s worried the town won’t be able to find enough material to make all the needed repairs.

He also has no idea how they’re going to pay for it.

Lyndonville is still waiting on a public assistance check from the Federal Emergency Management Agency for the floods that hit here in July of 2023. This is the fifth major flood to hit the town in 13 months.

“We’re at that point where the purse is pretty much dry and we don’t have any liquidity anymore where we can pay,” he said.

Advertisement

More from Vermont Public: For some Vermont flood survivors, FEMA was the second major disaster last year

People who live in the Kingdom are accustomed to making do under harsh conditions. But even lifelong residents of this place are taken aback by the scale of what happened Tuesday.

An older man in a T-shirt, jeans and baseball hat leans against a guardrail near a dirt road.

Peter Hirschfeld

/

Advertisement

Vermont Public

Rick Gorham, pictured on Wednesday, July 31, has lived on Brook Road in Lyndon for more than 60 years.

Rick Gorham has lived on Brook Road in Lyndon for more than 60 years. The Mountain Brook it’s named for decimated about a mile of road, swallowed two houses and damaged two others.

Gorham’s house is high and dry, but his driveway is between two stretches of Brook Road that no longer exist. He said he doesn’t mind the inconvenience. He is worried, however, about what’ll happen to the couple that lived in the old schoolhouse down the road from him.

Half of their home fell into the river after the brook carved a 15-foot ravine under the ground where their living room used to be.

Pat Webster, who lived in the home with her husband, Dave, told Vermont Public Friday about their escape from the structure.

Advertisement

“I woke up at 12:30 [in the morning] because I couldn’t stand hearing the sound of [the brook]. And Dave got up right after I did, and he said at one point, ‘It’s getting bad out back.’ So we were just sort of making coffee and we were in the kitchen and suddenly we hear the foundation begin cracking,” she said. “And so we just said, ‘OK, time go.’ And ran out through the muck, the deep muck, to the garage.”

Webster’s friend on the hospice choir she sings with has a second home that doesn’t get used very often, and so the couple has a safe and comfortable place to stay indefinitely. Webster said she feels enormously lucky right now. But she’s grieving the loss of community she shared with neighbors she’s lived amongst for nearly 50 years.

“We can never go back to our little neighborhood, unless something miraculous happens. Our elderly neighbor up the hill, I’m not sure I’ll ever see him again. He’s on his last days,” she said.

A photo from above shows downed tree debris, mud, houses and trees and mountains, along with construction vehicles.

Kyle Ambusk

Advertisement

/

Vermont Public

Red Village Road in Lyndonville around 5:15 p.m. on Tuesday, July 30.

Webster just lost her home and most of her belongings. But she said the thing that tears deepest right now is her worry for the displaced residents in Lyndonville and other nearby towns who don’t have a place to live.

“That is a huge consideration, far more a consideration than we are, because we have the great luck of our friends and family,” she said. “I don’t know what the answer is there.”

More from Vermont Public: ‘We can’t give up,’ Gov. Scott tells flood-weary Vermont

Advertisement

Megan Durling said local volunteers are well-suited to perform the task of checking in on neighbors and assessing needs in the immediate aftermath of a disaster like the one that hit the Kingdom on Tuesday.

“This is the work of a functioning society — you take care of your neighbors, period,” she said. “And if you are expecting that government officials are going to be able to step in and take care of everything? Well, we can’t have a democracy anymore. That’s not going to function.”

What is required of government, Durling said, is addressing the big-picture problems that contribute to, and are a result of, catastrophic weather events. Climate change, poverty, displacement and the lack of affordable housing are well beyond the purview of local volunteers, she said.

As more frequent severe weather events dislocate more and more Vermonters, long-term recovery groups, such as the Kingdom United Resilience and Recovery Effort, say state and federal governments need to reform disaster-response apparatuses that have proven wholly inadequate at meeting the needs of residents.

Have questions, comments or tips? Send us a message.

Advertisement





Source link

Vermont

Vermont postal worker allegedly threw away mail she was supposed to deliver for months

Published

on

Vermont postal worker allegedly threw away mail she was supposed to deliver for months


Crime

During a search of a dumpster where the worker allegedly discarded the mail, police found several packages and holiday cards.

A Vermont postal worker was cited and suspended for allegedly throwing away mail that was supposed to be delivered to other people, according to police.

Natasha Morisseau, 34, of North Troy, was cited on nine counts of petty larceny and five counts of unlawful mischief, Vermont State Police said in a statement. She works as a mail carrier for the town’s United States Postal Service (USPS) office.

Advertisement

Officers were first alerted to the discarded mail on the afternoon of Jan. 23, according to police. Upon finding the mail in a dumpster on Elm Street in North Troy, they determined that none of it was for that address.

Police identified Morisseau as a person of interest and learned that she was a postal employee. They confirmed that she had regularly been throwing away a small amount of mail under her care since at least October 2025, according to the statement.

After searching the dumpster and Morisseau’s mail vehicle, officers found opened and unopened packages, along with several holiday cards, one of which contained money. Morisseau was later cited Feb. 14 and is due to appear March 17 in Vermont Superior Court, police said.

Since Jan. 23, Morisseau has been suspended by USPS, and all recovered mail has been given back to them for delivery, according to the statement. The case has been forwarded to the USPS’ Inspector General for further review.

Sign up for the Today newsletter

Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Air National Guard joins Iran campaign – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Vermont Air National Guard joins Iran campaign – The Boston Globe


On a typical day, some of the 20 stealth fighter jets based in South Burlington, Vt., take off from tiny Burlington International Airport for training runs near the northern border. In recent months, they’ve flown much farther afield.

The Vermont Air National Guard’s 158th Fighter Wing was deployed in December to the Caribbean, where it took part in the US campaign to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Shortly thereafter, the squadron joined a military buildup in and around the Middle East to prepare for US and Israeli airstrikes against Iran.

Though both deployments had been widely reported, the military remained mum about the whereabouts of Vermont’s F-35A Lightning II jets. Even Governor Phil Scott, technically the commander of the Vermont Guard, said he only knew what he’d read in the news, given that US military leaders were directing the missions.

On Monday, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed the deployments at a Pentagon press conference about the war on Iran. Caine praised National Guard members from Vermont, Wisconsin, and elsewhere.

Advertisement

“In the case of the Vermont Air National Guard and the 158th Fighter Wing, they were mobilized for Operation Absolute Resolve,” Caine said, referring to the Venezuela campaign. “And then were tasked to take their F-35As across the Atlantic instead of going home, to be prepared to support this operation” in the Middle East.

Much remains unknown about the Vermont Guard’s recent missions, including the precise role they played in Venezuela and Iran, where the jets are currently based, and how long they’ll remain.

The Guard did not immediately respond to requests for comment., Its recently elected leader, General Henry “Hank” Harder, said in a statement that the force was “proud of the dedicated and professional service of our Airmen” and pledged to support their families in the meantime.

“We will continue to carry out our commitment to these Vermont Service Members until, and long after, they return from this mission,” Harder said.

Vermont’s three-member congressional delegation, meanwhile, has praised Vermont Guard members for their service in Venezuela but has criticized President Trump’s campaigns there and in Iran, particularly absent congressional authorization.

Advertisement

“The people of our country, no matter what their political persuasion, do not want endless war,” said Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent, echoing similar remarks from Senator Peter Welch and Representative Becca Balint, both Democrats. “We must not allow Trump to force us into another senseless war. No war with Iran.”


Paul Heintz can be reached at paul.heintz@globe.com. Follow him on X @paulheintz.





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

In Vermont, small town meetings grapple with debate on big issues

Published

on

In Vermont, small town meetings grapple with debate on big issues


Tuesday is town meeting day in Vermont. Municipalities in New England and elsewhere are increasingly grappling with major national and international issues at the local level.

JOSEPH PREZIOSO/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

JOSEPH PREZIOSO/Getty Images

If you haven’t lived in certain New England towns, it can be hard to fathom their centuries-old direct democracy-style Town Meetings, where everyday residents vote on mundane town business such as funding for schools, snow plows and road repairs.

These days, voters are also being asked to weigh in on national and international issues, for example, demanding the de-funding of ICE, and condemning “the unprovoked attack and start of an illegal and immoral war against Iran.” It’s all fueling a separate – and fierce– debate on what towns ought to be debating.

Advertisement

“When you have people sleepwalking into an authoritarian regime, it’s up to us to sound the alarm,” insists Dan Dewalt, an activist in Newfane, Vermont, one of several communities where residents scrambled to draft a resolution against the Iran war in time for their annual Town Meeting on Tuesday.

Local resolutions are a uniquely effective tactic, activists and experts say, and they’re being used increasingly around New England and beyond, especially as national politics have become so polarized.

“People feel isolated, helpless and hopeless. And when you hear about other people who are just like you taking a stand and representing something that you believe, that gives you not only hope, but it gives you power,” said Dewalt.

Several other Vermont towns will be considering resolutions Tuesday calling for the removal of the president and vice president “for crimes against the U.S. Constitution,” while many others will vote on a pledge to ” to end all support of Israel’s apartheid policies, settler colonialism, and military occupation and aggression.”

A similar divestment resolution passed 46 -15 in Newfane last year, following hours of heated argument over the plight of Palestinians, the security of Israelis, the “inflammatory” language of the resolution – and whether such problems half-a-world away even belong on the agenda of the tiny town of just about 1,650.

Advertisement

“It’s a Town Meeting for town issues,” Newfane resident Walter Hagadorn declared at a recent Select Board meeting, where residents pressed board members to block any future resolutions not directly related to town business.

“You shouldn’t be subject to hours and hours of people virtue signaling” and trying to “hijack Town Meeting,” Hagadorn said.

Others agreed, suggesting activists host a debate on their issues at another time and place, or stage a rally or protest instead.

But Select Board member Katy Johnson-Aplin pushed back, saying that would not have the same impact.

“It doesn’t work the same way,” Johnson-Aplin said. It’s only when the issue is formally taken up at a Town Meeting that “it goes in the newspaper and it’s recorded that the town of Newfane has agreed to have this conversation.”

Advertisement

University of Pennsylvania political science professor Daniel Hopkins has been watching the growing movement of local communities taking a stand on issues far beyond town lines.

“This is a trend we’re seeing increasingly across the 50 states and in a variety of ways but I think it has taken on a new and potentially more concerning edge,” Hopkins said. “I worry that we are in an attention-grabbing, sensation-rewarding media environment in which the kinds of issues that engage us at a national level may further polarize states and localities and make it harder for them to build meaningful coalitions on other issues.”

Indeed, in Newfane, the resolution regarding Israel became so divisive that some residents decided not to even come to last year’s Town Meeting, according to Select Board vice-chair Marion Dowling.

In Burlington, where a similar resolution was proposed, City Council President Ben Traverse says things got so heated, he and his family were getting harassing phone calls and even death threats. Burlington city councilors voted in January to block the question from going to a popular vote.Vermont has a history of “big issue” resolutions, from the push for a Nuclear Arms Freeze in the 1980’s, to calls to ban genetically modified foods in 2003. Dewalt, the Newfane activist, was behind several of them, including calls to impeach then-president George W. Bush in 2006, which got him invited to talk about it on network TV shows, and quoted in The New York Times.

“I can guarantee you if I stood up on my soap box and made a declaration of the exact same wording, I wouldn’t have had anybody asking me questions about it, he said. “We’re not pie-in-the-sky here about the power of our Newfane Town Meetings, but our actions have consistently had an impact.”

Advertisement

But opponents say activists overstate the impact of their resolutions, and their victory. They say it’s disingenuous, for example, to claim the town of Newfane supported the resolution against Israel, when the winning majority of 46 people was less than 3% of town residents.

“I feel like they’re using the town as a vehicle for their personal messages and that bothers me,” says Newfane resident Cris White. “It’s so junior high.”

Traverse, the Burlington City Council president, also takes issue with what he calls the “inflammatory” language of that resolution.

“The question, as presented, approaches this issue in a one-sided and leading way,” Traverse says.

In Vermont, any registered voter can get a resolution on the Town Meeting agenda by collecting signatures from 5% of their town’s voters. While elected city or town officials have the authority to allow or block the resolution, there is no process in place to vet or edit language.

Advertisement

Traverse says it would behoove city leaders and voters to require an official review to ensure that language is fair and neutral, just as many states do with ballot questions. Traverse says he’s not opposed to contentious, big issue resolutions being put to local voters, but the language must be clear and even-handed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending