Connect with us

Vermont

Then Again: How Vermont politics’ Mountain Rule crumbled

Published

on

Then Again: How Vermont politics’ Mountain Rule crumbled


Mortimer Proctor addresses a radio viewers in Schenectady, New York, in 1945 as Vermont’s newly elected governor. Proctor had beforehand served as speaker of the Vermont Home, president professional tempore of the Vermont Senate, and lieutenant governor. Photograph courtesy of the Vermont Historic Society

Mortimer Proctor took an audacious step in 1940: he introduced he would run for lieutenant governor. It wasn’t a lot his resolution to run that shocked political insiders. It was his timing.

Proctor got here from what was then arguably Vermont’s main political household — his father, grandfather and uncle every served as Vermont governor, Republicans all. He himself had served as speaker of the Vermont Home, and simply the yr earlier than had turn out to be president professional tempore of the Vermont Senate.

Proctor was clearly a professional candidate. However the factor was, it wasn’t his flip to run. In truth, it wasn’t the flip for anybody from the West facet of Vermont to hunt the workplace, which included Proctor who was from the city of Proctor in Rutland County. By operating, Proctor was breaking the age-old, although unwritten, “Mountain Rule,” a power-sharing settlement designed to foster occasion cohesion.

Though Republicans had thrived by using the Mountain Rule starting within the mid-1850s, the apply may be traced again to Vermont’s founding, lengthy earlier than there was a Republican Celebration. The rule known as for the East and West sides of the state to alternate who would maintain statewide places of work.

In 1778, Vermont’s first elections yielded a governor from the West facet and a lieutenant governor from the East. Elections would respect that precedent, with Western Vermont claiming the highest job and the East contenting itself with electing the understudy, till 1826. Starting that yr, nonetheless, the 2 sides would take turns holding the places of work. It was all very gentlemanly, or as we speak some would say “outdated boys’ membership”-y.

Advertisement

The Mountain Rule prolonged to different places of work as effectively. It determined all the pieces from who might be Speaker of the Home to who might be a U.S. senator. Between 1791 and the mid-1900s, Vermont gave certainly one of its U.S. Senate seats to an East-sider and the opposite to a West-sider. The one exception was throughout the early 1850s, when the fractious sectional politics of the years main as much as the Civil Conflict briefly broke the sample.

Initially, the state Legislature even alternated on which facet of the Inexperienced Mountains it held its classes. Then in 1805, it ended its nomadic methods by inserting the capitol in Montpelier, a location that was equally inconvenient to each side.

This East-West division was the fault of mountains, waterways, and politics.

By a quirk of historical past, the early settlers on the East facet of the state owed the titles to their land, and due to this fact their loyalty, to the colony of New York, whereas these on the West facet of the state have been equally tied to New Hampshire. The explanation for this unusual scenario is that the 2 colonies have been vying for the correct to regulate the territory between them, which is as we speak’s Vermont. Every colony sought to maximise its measurement by claiming land farthest from its personal established border.

The Inexperienced Mountains, which divide Vermont vertically, solely bolstered these political divisions. So did varied waterways. The Connecticut River and its tributaries made East-siders really feel extra linked with New Hampshire, Massachusetts and the remainder of Southern New England. Lake Champlain, which flows north, made West-siders look to Canada for commerce. And starting in 1823, when the Champlain Canal opened to attach the lake with the Hudson River, Western Vermonters might additionally look to New York.

Advertisement

The Mountain Rule solely actually labored when one occasion dominated Vermont politics, however that has been true for a lot of the state’s historical past. Starting within the 1840s, the Whigs rotated their gubernatorial nominees to stop anyone individual from dominating the occasion. Governors would serve two one-year phrases earlier than stepping apart for somebody from the opposite facet of the Inexperienced Mountains.

When the Republican Celebration shaped in 1854, with the assistance of many Whigs, it operated below the identical Mountain Rule. The apply helped the occasion keep away from nasty inner fights over who would acquire the nomination. It additionally bolstered the energy of occasion insiders by squelching the efforts of mavericks, in line with Sam Hand, the late professor of historical past from the College of Vermont who wrote extensively on the subject. 

For greater than a century, the Mountain Rule basically dictated who would maintain statewide workplace. For many of that interval, the Republicans have been so dominant in Vermont that to be nominated by the occasion was nearly as good as getting elected.

Not often did a politician dare to violate the unwritten rule. In these few instances, politicians discovered an excuse for doing so. The primary incident occurred within the run-up to the election of 1872. The state structure had lately been amended to vary the size of the governor’s time period from one yr to 2. The modification raised the query of whether or not the Mountain Rule known as for a rotation of energy after two phrases or two years. 

Like all unwritten guidelines, this one was open to interpretation. The sitting governor, John Stewart of Middlebury, who was ending the primary two-year time period ever served by a Vermont governor, apparently appreciated his job. He interpreted the Mountain Rule to permit a governor to serve two phrases, not years.

Advertisement

The Republican institution felt in another way. Celebration leaders wished an East-sider. After a lot debate, Julius Converse of Woodstock prevailed on the occasion conference over fellow Woodstock resident Frederick Billings, who must wait 4 years, till 1876, for it to be an East-sider’s flip once more.

Within the late Twenties, a Republican managed to interrupt the Mountain Rule. John Weeks was

serving his first two-year time period as governor when a flood devastated Vermont in 1927. Newspapers editorialized that it could be time to bend the principles and provides a governor a second time period.  

Weeks seized the chance and introduced that he was “able to assume the duties and stick with it the work.” His assertion got here the day after Vermonters discovered that the state had obtained federal flood aid. The timing of Weeks’ announcement was hardly coincidental. Republicans agreed to re-nominate Weeks and he gained the overall election with 74 % of the vote. 

Weeks’ transfer settled the query that Stewart had raised. Republican governors, in the event that they wished, might now serve for 4 years in a row. By rewriting one a part of the Mountain Rule, Weeks had made the entire concept appear antiquated. In an editorial supporting Weeks’ second time period, the Burlington Free Press known as the rule among the many worst of “effete political traditions.”

Advertisement

For many years, the Mountain Rule had served Republicans effectively, lessening intra-party

tensions and calming sectional rivalries. However by 1940, the rule appeared so outdated that Mortimer Proctor felt free to disregard it by operating for lieutenant governor when it was an East-sider’s flip. 

Proctor gained the election, and two years later was re-elected. Then he jumped the road once more in 1944 when he ran for governor. By profitable that election too and profitable it simply, he proved as soon as and for all that the Mountain Rule was certainly a factor of the previous.

-->

Do you know VTDigger is a nonprofit?

Our journalism is made potential by member donations. In the event you worth what we do, please contribute and assist hold this important useful resource accessible to all.

Advertisement

Filed below:

Folks & Locations

Tags: Frederick Billings, John Weeks, Julius Converse, Mortimer Proctor, Then Once more

Mark Bushnell

About Mark

Mark Bushnell is a Vermont journalist and historian. He’s the creator of Hidden Historical past of Vermont and It Occurred in Vermont.

E mail: thenagainvt@gmail.com

Advertisement

Ship us your ideas

VTDigger is now accepting letters to the editor. For details about our tips, and entry to the letter type, please
click on right here.

 

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated information relating to the dimensions and geographic distribution of our readership. This data helps us gauge what number of readers come to the web site and what cities they stay in. It doesn't embrace addresses or different figuring out traits about our readers.

-->

Latest Tales

-->






Source link

Vermont

Vermont H.S. sports scores for Friday, April 11: See how your favorite team fared

Published

on

Vermont H.S. sports scores for Friday, April 11: See how your favorite team fared


The 2025 Vermont high school spring season has begun. See below for scores, schedules and game details (statistical leaders, game notes) from baseball, softball, lacrosse, tennis, track and field and Ultimate.

TO REPORT SCORES

Coaches or team representatives are asked to report results ASAP after games by emailing sports@burlingtonfreepress.com. Please submit with a name/contact number.

►Contact Alex Abrami at aabrami@freepressmedia.com. Follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter:@aabrami5.

Advertisement

►Contact Judith Altneu at jaltneu@gannett.com. Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter: @Judith_Altneu.

FRIDAY’S H.S. GAMES

Girls lacrosse

Games at 4:30 p.m. unless noted

Harwood at Lamoille

Colchester at Mount Mansfield

Milton at St. Johnsbury

Advertisement

Spaulding at U-32

Boys lacrosse

Games at 4:30 p.m. unless noted

Otter Valley at BFA-Fairfax

Montpelier at Spaulding

Hartford at Colchester

Advertisement

St. Johnsbury at Milton

Stowe at Mount Abraham

South Burlington at Champlain Valley

Lyndon at Burlington, 5:30 p.m.

Softball

Paine Mountain at U-32, 4:30 p.m.

Advertisement

Baseball

Games at 4:30 p.m. unless noted

Champlain Valley at Hanover (N.H.)

BFA-Fairfax at Hazen

Girls tennis

Matches at 3:30 p.m. unless noted

Stowe at Burlington

Advertisement

Montpelier at Rice

South Burlington at Champlain Valley

Boys tennis

Matches at 3:30 p.m. unless noted

South Burlington at Essex

Colchester at Mount Mansfield

Advertisement

Girls Ultimate

Burr and Burton at Burlington

SATURDAY’S H.S. GAMES

Girls lacrosse

Games at 11 a.m. unless noted

Mount Abraham/Vergennes at Essex

Champlain Valley at South Burlington, 7 p.m.

Middlebury at BFA-St. Albans

Advertisement

Boys lacrosse

Games at 11 a.m. unless noted

Mount Mansfield at Rice

BFA-St. Albans at Middlebury

Burr and Burton at Essex, noon

Softball

Games at 11 a.m. unless noted

Advertisement

St. Johnsbury at South Burlington

Randolph at Spaulding

BFA-St. Albans at Burr and Burton

Baseball

Games at 11 a.m. unless noted

Randolph at Spaulding

Advertisement

Northeastern Clinton (N.Y.) at Richford

Springfield at Blue Mountain

Girls tennis

Harwood at Middlebury, 11 a.m.

Track and field

Meet at St. Johnsbury

Wolves/Bobwhite Relays at South Burlington

Advertisement

(Subject to change)





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Final Reading: Lawmakers consider whether to keep some intoxicated Vermonters out of prisons – VTDigger

Published

on

Final Reading: Lawmakers consider whether to keep some intoxicated Vermonters out of prisons – VTDigger


Rep. Theresa Wood, D-Waterbury, chair of the House Human Services Committee, right, listens to testimony on the implementation of the child care expansions put in place by 2023’s Act 76, at the Statehouse in Montpelier on Tuesday, Feb. 25. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

House lawmakers spent much of this week mulling how the state should treat residents who are, as a matter of law, incapacitated.

Vermont statute describes incapacitated people as intoxicated or in withdrawal, and in need of medical care or posing a threat to themselves or others.

Under current statute, those individuals can be held up to 24 hours with the Department of Corrections, at a “lockup or community correctional facility,” even if they have been charged with no crime. 

Six years ago, however, Vermont tucked language into the annual midyear budget update intended to keep those people out of prisons. That language, which would prohibit incapacitated Vermonters not charged with crimes from being housed in correctional facilities, is set to go into effect in July. 

Advertisement

But now, Gov. Phil Scott’s administration is seeking to repeal that provision — a move that would allow correctional facilities to continue to temporarily hold incapacitated Vermonters indefinitely. 

“The problem is that there are no secure facilities outside of the Department of Corrections,” Vermont Department of Health Deputy Commissioner Kelly Dougherty told the House Human Services Committee earlier this month.

Some local mental health agencies, such as Washington County Mental Health and Northeast Kingdom Human Services, offer beds through the so-called public inebriation program, also known as PIP beds.Those beds are intended as temporary places where intoxicated people can stay and avoid correctional facilities. 

But many of those PIP beds across the state have shut down in recent years, leaving only eight still in operation. 

State health officials are planning to merge PIP beds and mental health crisis beds under one umbrella program to allow for more flexibility. Still, the shortage has left the state reliant on the Corrections Department to hold incapacitated Vermonters. Without the ability to bring them to prisons, Dougherty told lawmakers this month, the state could be forced to send people to hospitals.   

Advertisement

This week, health care workers and law enforcement officials came to the House Human Services Committee to ask its members to go ahead with repealing the provision.

“If the only option that you give police is to bring these individuals to the ED, you will be endangering our staff and other patients,” Alison Davis, the medical director of the emergency department at Rutland Regional Medical Center, told lawmakers Wednesday.

But lawmakers in the committee seemed undecided on whether to move ahead with the repeal. On Thursday, Rep. Theresa Wood, D-Waterbury, expressed uncertainty about the landscape of state services, given, on one hand, new state initiatives like the merger of PIP and mental health beds — and, on the other, potential federal funding cuts. 

“I’m just wondering if it’s a tad early to be thinking about repealing the statute,” she said.

— Peter D’Auria

Advertisement

In the know

Advocates for migrant workers in the state continue to push for H.169, a bill that seeks to expand access to housing for immigrants without legal status living in Vermont. But the debate is shadowed by the specter of federal immigration policy.

As the administration of President Donald Trump ramps up deportation and detention of immigrants, proponents of the bill argue the state should do more to protect immigrants living in Vermont and increase their housing options. But the legislation faces headwinds from landlords and lenders. 

The Vermont Landlord Association has objected to the addition of immigration status to the statute.  “To make a landlord have to take somebody – even if they’re not here legally – I think is a challenge and a big ask,” Angela Zaikowski, the association’s director, told legislators in late March. 

The association echoed these concerns in a “call to action” email last week, imploring its members to reach out to legislators and adding that the proposed change “has the potential to create federal issues for housing providers.” 

Asked by lawmakers whether there were past examples of landlords getting into legal trouble after renting to people without legal status, Zaikowski said no.

Advertisement

“I think anything is possible at this point,” she added.

Will Lambek, from the group Migrant Justice, maintained that these fears of federal repercussions lacked legal basis. “Any fear of civil or criminal liability against landlords for renting to immigrant families is simply unfounded,” he said.

Read more about how federal immigration policy is looming over this debate here. 

— Carly Berlin

A sudden reversal in federal funding for school districts has affected about 32 school districts and one mental health agency in Vermont, Jill Briggs Campbell, deputy secretary of the Vermont Agency of Education, told the Senate Education Committee on Wednesday.

Advertisement

The decision came in a March 28 letter from U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon. It notified state education leaders that the federal department had reversed course on extending the deadline on a Covid-19 pandemic-era grant – the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds, or ESSER – that has paid for learning support and summer programming.

While the money from ESSER originally had to be spent by Sept. 30, 2024, President Biden’s administration had approved an extension to allow schools to use the money through the 2025-26 school year. (Public schools in Vermont operate on a July 1 through June 30 fiscal calendar; the federal government’s fiscal year ends on September 30.)

McMahon’s letter noted that the federal department had “reconsidered” requests from state leaders to continue the extension after finding it “was not justified” and terminated the program at 5 p.m. on March 28 — three minutes before the statement was sent.

Vermont school districts have at least $10 million pending in that grant funding, Briggs Campbell estimated. The department has received about $800,000 worth of invoices but cannot request funds until it goes through the new process outlined in McMahon’s letter, which states the federal department will consider extensions “on an individual project-specific basis.”

“All of these were approved for extension by the previous administration,” she said in the hearing.

Advertisement

Read more about how the funding loss is affecting school districts here.

— Auditi Guha


On the move

After an extensive — and mysterious — delay, the Vermont House’s massive education bill, H.454, survived a voice vote on second reading Thursday. The bill is expected to face a vigorous challenge on the floor tomorrow. 

—Ethan Weinstein 

Visit our 2025 bill tracker for the latest updates on major legislation we are following. 

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vt. school protests state response to federal DEI policy

Published

on

Vt. school protests state response to federal DEI policy


PLAINFIELD, Vt. (WCAX) – A Vermont school is protesting the state’s request to comply with federal rules on civil rights.

Twinfield School will stage a walk Thursday morning in an effort to defend DEI in Vermont.

Earlier this week, Education Secretary Zoie Saunders asked superintendents to sign on to an agreement reaffirming that schools follow existing laws that prohibit race-based discrimination.

Under the Trump administration, the definition of prohibiting race-based discrimination includes DEI policies.

Advertisement

That struck a chord with some school communities, like Twinfield, who want Vermont not to comply with the feds.

However, we now know that the education agency consulted with Vermont’s attorney general and says it will send a letter certifying the state is in compliance.

That’s in an effort to protect federal funding which officials say is a top priority.

The federal DEI policy is currently on hold for two weeks after facing a lawsuit from a New Hampshire organization, meaning no investigations or actions will be taken during that time.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending