Politics
Steve Sisolak, Former Governor of Nevada, Weighs Running Again
Many Democrats performed better than expected in the 2022 midterm elections, bucking historical trends to hold on to key governor’s offices and House seats and to expand their majority in the Senate.
One notable exception was Gov. Steve Sisolak of Nevada, who was weighed down by a backlash to the lockdowns he had ordered during the coronavirus pandemic and by the economic downturn that followed. Even as Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, a Democrat, squeaked out a re-election victory in Nevada, Mr. Sisolak became the only Democratic governor to lose that year, giving way to Joe Lombardo, a Republican.
Now, as Democrats search for a direction after their November defeat and contemplate the best ways to oppose President Trump and his allies, Mr. Sisolak is considering a rematch against Mr. Lombardo. A former Clark County sheriff, Mr. Lombardo has stood as a Republican bulwark against the Democratic-controlled Nevada Legislature. He is up for re-election next year.
Mr. Lombardo occupies a somewhat rare position in today’s Republican Party. Though he speaks favorably of the president, he distanced himself last year from the state party and its focus on debunked election conspiracy theories, and he was not an especially vocal presence on the campaign trail for Mr. Trump.
In two phone calls this week, Mr. Sisolak, 71, spoke about a possible comeback attempt, the state of the Democratic Party and how the economic turmoil caused by Mr. Trump’s tariffs could affect Nevadans.
Here is the conversation, condensed and edited.
What have you been seeing in Nevada since you’ve been out of office, and how do you think Governor Lombardo has been doing?
I’ve seen a lot of changes. He vetoed 50-odd bills in the first session, and we’ll see what he does this session.
Visitation, with the economy the way it is right now, and our foreign partners — flights from Canada are down 15 percent. Same is true for Mexico. As the economy gets tougher and tougher, people aren’t going to have the disposable income to be able to come to Las Vegas for a nice vacation, and that’s going to cause a problem. That’s going to cost jobs.
Trump pulled visas from some students at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, which is disappointing. He’s laid off some federal workers, which is disappointing.
What people need to understand is, these aren’t just numbers. These are jobs. These are families.
I think we need Joe to stand up and start speaking up about some of these Nevada situations. I know he’s walking a tightrope with President Trump right now.
Are you considering challenging Lombardo in 2026?
We’re going to wait and see what happens as we go through the next few months of the Legislature. I’m not ruling it out — I’m looking into it. I’ve been encouraged by a lot of people to run again, and I’m considering it.
Today, I picked up some dry cleaning and ran into somebody who recognized me and said: ‘Jeez, I miss you. I wish you would run again.’ It’s a daily occurrence. It’s very heartwarming to see that people feel that way.
It’s a big undertaking. It’s a big decision. I’ll get with my family and look at everything.
We’re doing some polling [with John Anzalone, a veteran Democratic pollster]. We’re going over the questions now. Both a primary and general-election challenge — how people feel about the job that I did and the future going forward.
What do you think about Aaron Ford, the Democratic attorney general of Nevada, who has said he is planning to run for governor?
Yeah, I know Aaron. I’ve known him for a long, long time.
That’s a big decision. It’s something that I hope he thought through and decided with his family and he’ll make the decision that he feels is best for him.
You were the only incumbent Democratic governor to lose in 2022, and a big part of that was attributed to a backlash over Covid lockdowns. There’s a sense that this feeling also helped Trump last year. Could you overcome that?
Our priorities were saving people’s lives, and that’s what we did. I wouldn’t go back on that. We lost over 10,000 Nevadans to Covid. I didn’t consider re-election when I made those decisions.
Nevada, with its tourist-heavy economy, was slower than other states to recover from the pandemic. Last year, voters in the state were still unhappy with the cost of living and backed a Republican for president for the first time since 2004. What would you say to those people?
All the promises that came from Lombardo or Trump to bring down the cost of housing and groceries and gasoline haven’t come to fruition. People are feeling the pain and the suffering more than ever.
There’s a lot of soul-searching going on with Democrats right now. Working-class voters last election felt Democrats were no longer speaking to them. Is that something you’ve wrestled with?
It was a difficult situation with Joe Biden staying in for so long, and then getting out. People felt like they weren’t hearing the truth.
We talked more about transgender athletes than we did about the cost of groceries. And I don’t think people are as concerned with transgender athletes playing in sports as opposed to what their grocery bill’s going to be.
Voters felt we were talking at them, rather than with them. They wanted a change, because they were dissatisfied with what had happened. The change that came about, I think they’re seeing now, is not exactly what they signed up for.
Do you think Biden should not have run for re-election?
Well, I don’t know. That’s not a decision that I made. I’m going based on the fact that my interactions with the president were pretty good. I didn’t see the frailty, or whatever you want to call it, that existed. The meetings that I had with him, and they were numerous, and the events that I did for him — he was pretty good right down to the very end.
And as far as voters not getting what they bargained for, do you think they’ll naturally swing back toward Democrats if Trump’s tariffs hurt them financially?
I’m not an economist, but I understand the volatility of the stock market. I’m concerned that that is wreaking havoc on people’s savings, their 401(k)s. It’s going to affect a state like Nevada, where our public employees fund is invested in securities and whatnot.
I think people want some clarity and some certainty, and right now, I don’t think they’re seeing that.
I think some of them are going to come back naturally. A lot of times in politics, when people are unhappy, they just want change. When an election comes a year from now or 18 months from now, are people happy with the situation they’re in economically? Or were things better prior?
Politics
Video: Trump’s Counterterror Strategy Focuses on the Left
By Zolan Kanno-Youngs, Gilad Thaler, Jon Miller, Stephanie Swart, Rafaela Balster, Whitney Shefte and Nikolay Nikolov
May 29, 2026
Politics
Federal judge orders Trump’s name removed from Kennedy Center, says only Congress can rename it
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A federal judge on Friday ordered that President Donald Trump’s name be removed from the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.
U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, an Obama appointee, said the iconic venue cannot be renamed without an act of Congress, ruling that the Kennedy Center Board of Trustees overstepped its “statutory bounds by unilaterally renaming” the building.
As part of his ruling, the Trump administration will be required to take down all physical signage bearing Trump’s name and eliminate any references to a “Trump-Kennedy Center” from official materials.
TRUMP KENNEDY CENTER’S BOARD VOTES UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE $257M RENOVATIONS AND TWO-YEAR CLOSURE
A sign is displayed on the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts building. (Getty Images)
“The Kennedy Center’s organic statute makes crystal clear that the Center is to be named for President Kennedy, and it cannot bear any other formal name or public memorial based on the Board’s unilateral say-so,” Cooper wrote. “Congress gave the Kennedy Center its name, and only Congress can change it.”
Roma Daravi, the Trump Kennedy Center vice president of public relations, said the board plans to appeal the decision.
“We will review the decision carefully though the reality remains — the Center requires an urgent and significant restoration – a truth that even the plaintiff acknowledges,” Daravi said. “With $257 million secured by President Trump and approved by Congress, the resources are in place and we remain committed to pursuing every lawful avenue to ensure the Trump Kennedy Center is restored as a national cultural landmark for all Americans to enjoy.”
The ruling was part of a lawsuit filed by U.S. Rep. Joyce Beatty, D-Ohio. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
BOARD VOTES KENNEDY CENTER TO BE RENAMED ‘TRUMP-KENNEDY CENTER,’ LEAVITT SAYS
President Donald Trump stands in the presidential box during a tour of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C., on March 17, 2025. On Friday, a federal judge ruled that Trump’s name must be removed from he iconic venue. (Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images)
Cooper previously denied a request for a preliminary injunction filed by a preservation group to block the planned two-year closure of the Kennedy Center for a rehabilitation project.
Trump secured $257 million from Congress as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to address disrepair and deferred maintenance of the Kennedy Center, which critics say has been neglected and mismanaged before Trump intervened.
The funds appropriated by Congress are spent on maintenance, repairs, security, and capital projects related to the building and site.
Beatty, who serves as an ex officio member of the board, praised Friday’s ruling.
“Today’s ruling rightly affirms that this administration’s efforts to rename and close the Center have no basis in law,” Beatty said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital. “The Kennedy Center is an institution that belongs to the American people, not to Donald Trump. He has desecrated this sacred memorial for his own vanity. I am proud to have fought for the rule of law and to protect this sacred institution.”
Workers install Donald J. Trump signage above the existing Kennedy Center sign in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 19, 2025. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Trump’s name was added to the venue last December following a unanimous decision by the board. In February 2025, Trump was elected chairman of the Kennedy Center board after removing 18 trustees appointed by former President Joe Biden.
Politics
Trump holds Situation Room meeting to decide on Iran deal
WASHINGTON — A framework agreement to end the U.S. war with Iran is all but settled, pending sign-off from the presidents of the two warring sides, President Trump said Friday, projecting optimism that a deal could finally be at hand.
Yet doubt cast a shadow over the diplomatic process entering the weekend as Trump faced a politically fraught decision to enter an agreement that would invariably require significant concessions to Tehran.
The negotiations have faced severe headwinds in recent days, with both sides accusing the other of violating a fragile ceasefire that has largely stopped the fighting since April.
On his Truth Social site, Trump said he had summoned his top aides to the White House Situation Room to decide on the deal.
The agreement would see an end to the U.S. naval blockade on Iranian ports and the removal of Iranian mines from the Strait of Hormuz, an international waterway through which 20% of the world’s energy supply passes each day. The strait, Trump wrote, will reopen with “no tolls” for “unrestricted shipping traffic, in both directions.”
And “Iran must agree that they will never have a Nuclear Weapon or Bomb,” Trump wrote, noting that Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, the key ingredient for nuclear weapons, “will be unearthed by the United States (which, it is agreed, is the only Country, along with China, with the mechanical capability of doing so!), in close coordination and conjunction with the Islamic Republic of Iran, plus the International Atomic Energy Agency, and DESTROYED.”
“No money will be exchanged, until further notice,” he added.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also said the deal would require Iran to disavow the continuation of its domestic nuclear program — a diplomatic feat never before achieved throughout a quarter-century of international negotiations over Iran’s nuclear work.
It is unclear whether Tehran would go that far. And Iran’s negotiators expressed defiance on Friday, stating that there was “no trust in guarantees or words” from the American side.
“No step will be taken before the other side acts first,” said Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the speaker of Iran’s Parliament. “We do not gain concessions through dialogue, but through missiles.”
It remains unclear when the Trump administration would ease sanctions on Iran, how extensive that relief would be, or what form it would take — questions that fueled Republican criticism of the Obama-era nuclear deal more than a decade ago.
The working diplomatic document would formally extend the existing ceasefire for 60 days, allowing for a more detailed negotiation to take place over Iran’s nuclear program. But the truce as it currently stands is on perilous ground. Iran launched a ballistic missile on Thursday at Kuwait, a close U.S. ally, after American forces took “defensive” actions against Iranian missile launchers and mine-laying boats it had launched in the strait.
The war has proved historically unpopular with the American public, and has seen oil prices soar since the U.S. military, in partnership with Israel, launched its first strikes against Iran in February.
Bessent said he is hopeful that oil prices would drop quickly once an agreement is signed. But industry analysts say the effects of the war on the oil market could last for months, if not years, with the stability of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz now in question for commercial shippers.
While oil has dropped to under $100 a barrel, markets appeared skittish on Friday over the prospects for a deal, with mixed messages appearing to emerge out of the region.
It is also unclear whether a U.S. agreement with Iran would in any way bind Israel’s hands in its military operations, either in Iran or in Lebanon, where an Iranian proxy militia, Hezbollah, has vowed to keep up the fight.
Israel has ramped up strikes against Hezbollah targets in recent days, jeopardizing a delicate ceasefire negotiated with the Lebanese government, a deal encouraged by the Trump administration in order to grease the wheels for its talks with Tehran.
Trump has been uncharacteristically silent on the prospects of an agreement in recent days, expressing cautious optimism in limited exchanges with reporters.
“It’s hard to say exactly when or if the president’s going to sign,” Vice President JD Vance, who has led the U.S. diplomatic team, told reporters, noting that “the nuclear stuff” is still subject to negotiation. “We’re going back and forth on a couple of language points.”
“I do think that we’ve made a lot of progress here,” Vance added. “Hopefully we’ll continue to make progress, and the president will be in a position where he can endorse the agreement. But obviously, that’s still TBD.”
-
Minneapolis, MN2 minutes agoUnited flight from Chicago to Minneapolis diverted to Wisconsin due to unruly passenger: officials
-
Indianapolis, IN7 minutes agoTop seeded West Chester cruises to 12-3 win over University of Indianapolis in the Division II championship
-
Pittsburg, PA14 minutes agoPittsburg man accused of hotel kidnapping, assault enters plea deal
-
Augusta, GA17 minutes agoSenate candidate Derek Dooley visits Lincolnton, Augusta
-
Washington, D.C22 minutes agoMan in critical condition after water rescue in Southwest DC
-
Cleveland, OH29 minutes agoKoby Altman Sounds Like Evan Mobley’s Future With Cavaliers Could Be in Question
-
Austin, TX32 minutes agoBarton Springs Bridge named one of Preservation Texas’ most endangered places for 2026
-
Alabama37 minutes agoA path to employment for Alabama individuals with a criminal background