Health
Experts Doubt Kennedy’s Timetable for Finding the Cause of Autism
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nation’s health secretary, pledged on Thursday to seek out experts globally to discover the reasons for the increasing rates of autism in the United States.
“We’ve launched a massive testing and research effort that’s going to involve hundreds of scientists from around the world,” Mr. Kennedy announced at a cabinet meeting held by President Trump. “By September, we will know what has caused the autism epidemic and we’ll be able to eliminate those exposures.”
“There will be no bigger news conference than that,” Mr. Trump replied.
But scientists who have worked for decades to find a cause greeted Mr. Kennedy’s predicted timeline with skepticism.
They said that a single answer would be hard to identify in a field of possible contributors including pesticides, air pollution and maternal diabetes.
Dr. Philip Landrigan, a pediatrician and expert on environmental toxins, pointed to the current mass layoffs and cutbacks for research at Mr. Kennedy’s Department of Health and Human Services as one reason for doubting such quick progress.
“Given that a great deal of research on autism and other pediatric diseases in hospitals and medical schools is currently coming to a halt because of federal funding cuts from H.H.S.,” he said, “it is very difficult for me to imagine what profound scientific breakthrough could be achieved between now and September.”
Mr. Kennedy’s office did not offer many details on the plan. Later on Thursday, Mr. Kennedy revealed a few more clues, saying that the National Institutes of Health would lead the effort.
He said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would soon release data showing that the autism diagnoses had now increased to one of every 31 children. Many scientists and doctors attributed the rise in autism rates over the last several decades in part to growing awareness of the disorder and to expanded diagnoses along a spectrum.
“We are launching requests to scientists from all over the country and all over the world,” Mr. Kennedy said in an interview on Fox News. “Everything is on the table: our food system, our water, our air, different ways of parenting, all the kind of changes that may have triggered this epidemic.”
In the interview, Mr. Kennedy also said an important part of the effort would be to compare autism rates in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. It’s an angle that many scientists dismiss, saying that parents who vaccinate their children are also more likely to get a diagnosis, given higher rates of interaction with health providers.
Many scientists who have observed Mr. Kennedy’s dogged opposition to many vaccines over two decades — and his frequent attempts to tie autism to vaccines — have dismissed his claims, citing the scientific consensus that debunked any such link. Scrutiny of his pledges to begin “gold standard” research only heightened in recent weeks when David Geier, a largely discredited researcher, was hired at H.H.S. to study any potential link between vaccines and autism.
Irva Hertz-Picciotto, director of environmental epidemiology of neurodevelopment at the University of California at Davis MIND Institute, said she had been seeking a cause for autism for 20 years.
It’s an exciting time for the field, she said, with multiple studies beginning to point to factors that could play a role. Among the possible links are pesticide exposure through food or nearby agricultural fields; workplace exposures to solvents; fevers or infections during pregnancy; maternal diabetes; and exposure to chemicals in plastics called phthalates or to PFAS, known as “forever chemicals” for their tendency to persist in the environment.
Some studies have found that the effect of environmental exposures can vary based on a person’s genes, “emphasizing the complexity of this syndrome.” Dr. Hertz-Picciotto said it was challenging to get funding for clinical studies that could shed light on a cause of autism, but new research could help advance the field. Those studies, though, could take years.
That all of the research could be sorted out by September, she said, was “ludicrous.”
Dr. Alice Kuo, the chief of pediatric medicine who cares for children and adults with autism at the University of California, Los Angeles, said she was involved in a yearslong project by the National Institutes of Health called the National Children’s Study. It followed thousands of children and parents and elicited information, including the possible causes of autism. The study was costly and ended far earlier than planned, Dr. Kuo said.
She said an effort to do something as rigorous would take months to plan and design — and years to arrive at an answer.
In a social media post on Thursday, Mr. Kennedy recognized the assistance of the president and the Make America Healthy Again Commission — a subgroup of the cabinet that includes Linda McMahon, the education secretary, and Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget. Like Mr. Kennedy, they are not doctors or scientists.
“Thanks to your MAHA Commission, we’ll soon identify the root causes of the autism epidemic,” Mr. Kennedy wrote in a social media post.
Created by an executive order in February, the commission is charged with assessing in 100 days the threat to children of food ingredients, chemicals, medications and other exposures. Within 180 days, the commission is expected to submit a strategy to the president to address its findings.
Health
Thought Yo-Yo Dieting Ruined Your Metabolism? New Research Says Otherwise
Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.
Use escape to exit the menu.
Sign Up
Create a free account to access exclusive content, play games, solve puzzles, test your pop-culture knowledge and receive special offers.
Already have an account? Login
Health
Woman’s unexpected turnaround in Alzheimer’s symptoms follows psychedelic use
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Top stories
→ Woman with advanced Alzheimer’s regained speech and memories after taking magic mushrooms
→ Exercise habit may slash dementia risk and help you live longer
→ Americans born after 1970 face higher death rates from several causes in middle age
A woman with advanced Alzheimer’s reportedly showed significant brain function improvements after taking psilocybin mushrooms, per a case report. (iStock)
Drink discourse
→ Nightly glass of wine may not be as harmless as many people think, study suggests
→ Dirty soda drinks are everywhere, but doctors warn they are ‘metabolic disaster’
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
Dirty sodas combine soft drinks with syrups, creamers and fruit juices, delivering up to 400 calories and 70 grams of sugar per drink, doctors warn. (iStock)
Conversation starters
→ Americans to get new sunscreen option already used abroad for decades
→ Drinking alcohol may influence cravings for certain foods in surprising way
→ Bride in full wedding gown makes two-hour hospital trip to see mother before ceremony
Health
Nightly glass of wine may not be as harmless as many people think, study suggests
US issues new guidance on alcohol consumption
Fox News medical contributor Dr. Nicole Saphier joins ‘Fox & Friends Weekend’ to weigh in on new dietary guidance surrounding alcohol consumption as the overall drinking rate hits a new low.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A new study is challenging the conventional wisdom that a small, daily dose of alcohol might be good for your health.
The research, published in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, suggests that the safest amount of alcohol to consume is actually none at all. If adults do choose to drink, the team of scientists recommends setting a limit of one per day.
This challenges older guidelines, which often suggested that up to two daily drinks for men was a safe limit.
ALCOHOL DEATHS HAVE MORE THAN DOUBLED IN RECENT YEARS, ESPECIALLY AMONG WOMEN
“While the new U.S. Dietary Guidelines contain a useful ‘less-is-best’ message, they provide no quantitative framework,” study co-author Timothy Naimi, director of the University of Victoria’s Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, said in a press release.
“Our study was designed to do just that across the drinking spectrum.”
Researchers analyzed data on alcohol-related injuries and illnesses and compared it with large national health and demographic databases. (iStock)
Researchers reached their conclusions by analyzing data on alcohol-related injuries and illnesses and comparing it with large national health and demographic databases, according to a press release.
Using statistical models, they examined how regular alcohol consumption is linked to life expectancy.
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
“Even low levels of alcohol use come with health risks,” lead study author Kevin Shield, an associate professor at the University of Toronto, said in the same press release. “And that risk continues to increase the more someone drinks.”
After evaluating the cumulative risks for conditions like liver disease, stroke and certain cancers, the study suggests that the assumed benefits of drinking are heavily outweighed by the potential dangers.
Even low levels of alcohol use come with health risks, according to the researchers.
For those looking to protect their long-term health, researchers emphasized that cutting back to one drink or giving up alcohol entirely appears to be the best strategy.
Dr. Marc Siegel, Fox News senior medical analyst, noted that this was an observational Canadian study looking at U.S. census data.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“It is massive, but still not proof,” cautioned Siegel, who was not involved in the study. “I am impressed with the endpoint, which is to assess alcohol-specific mortality,” he added.
The doctor called the research “convincing” in terms of showing that even lower levels of drinking carry a mortality risk.
For those looking to protect their long-term health, researchers recommend cutting back to one drink or giving up alcohol altogether. (iStock)
“We are in the process of debunking previous research and public health statements that a small amount of alcohol is actually good for you, and replacing it with the more realistic and accurate notion that no amount of alcohol is good,” he told Fox News Digital.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
Alcohol affects multiple systems throughout the body, acting as a toxin that can compromise vital organs over time, according to the doctor.
Siegel warned that “alcohol is bad for the heart, the liver and the brain, and it increases inflammation and certain cancers, all of which lead to increased mortality risks.”
Alcohol affects multiple systems throughout the body, acting as a toxin that can compromise vital organs over time, according to a doctor. (iStock)
While the research offers an overview of public health trends, it is an observational study based on U.S. census data, meaning it can only show strong correlations and cannot prove direct cause and effect, the researchers acknowledged.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
Additionally, because the study relies on self-reported drinking habits, it is subject to the common limitation of individuals underestimating or misreporting their actual alcohol consumption.
-
Oklahoma52 seconds agoSix horses caught in $4.8 Mil Oklahoma cocaine seizure, now working towards rehabilitation
-
Oregon6 minutes ago1 dead after small plane crashes into field near Twin Oaks Airpark in Hillsboro
-
Pennsylvania13 minutes agoPennsylvania State Police issue over 6,000 citations during ‘Operation Hands Off’
-
South-Carolina16 minutes ago
Clemson receiver Tristan Smith granted temporary injunction for 5th season by South Carolina judge
-
Rhode Island16 minutes ago
Hailey Bieber’s beauty brand Rhode launches summer tour in Newport
-
South Dakota28 minutes agoSouth Dakota leaders approve funding for projects in Rapid City, Lake County and Sioux Falls
-
Tennessee31 minutes agoTennessee SNAP enrollment drops by more than 100,000 following federal rule changes
-
Texas36 minutes agoDeadly mass shooting in Texas