Connect with us

Vermont

Medical Monitoring In Vermont Now a Legislated Right

Published

on

Medical Monitoring In Vermont Now a Legislated Right


On April 21, 2022, Vermont’s Governor signed into regulation a invoice giving residents the suitable to file lawsuits in opposition to chemical corporations for medical monitoring prices if the plaintiffs allege that they’ve been uncovered to chemical substances of concern, together with PFAS. The legislative replace can have important impacts on corporations in Vermont and follows intently on the heels of a court-approved medical monitoring settlement in a PFAS case earlier this month. Firms with legacy or present PFAS use points should pay shut consideration to those developments and perceive how they are going to impression enterprise pursuits.

Vermont PFAS Laws

On April 22, 2022, the Vermont governor signed a invoice into regulation, which supplies residents the suitable to file lawsuits in opposition to chemical corporations for medical monitoring prices if the plaintiffs allege that they’ve been uncovered to chemical substances of concern, together with PFAS. The invoice, S. 113 (An Act Relating To Establishing a Explanation for Motion For Medical Monitoring Bills), was beforehand handed in related kind by the Vermont legislature, solely to see the invoice rejected by the governor. This time, due largely to the Saint-Gobain litigation described beneath, the governor  signed the invoice into regulation.

Within the absence of the the brand new regulation, Vermonters who believed that they had been uncovered to chemical substances of concern had been left to file a lawsuit in court docket searching for medical monitoring damages. These lawsuits can take a number of years to resolve and may be pricey to litigate. The Vermont invoice, the primary of its variety within the nation, permits residents to keep away from the pitfalls of litigation and have an computerized potential to acquire medical monitoring aid.

Vermont PFAS Litigation Settlement

On April 18, 2022, a federal decide authorised a proposed $34 million settlement in a category motion lawsuit involving producer Saint-Gobain. A lawsuit was filed in 2016 in opposition to Saint-Gobain, during which it was alleged that the corporate produced materials coated with PFAS (particularly, PFOA) from 1969 – 2002. The discharge and effluent from the manufacturing course of allegedly contaminated native ingesting water sources, together with ingesting wells within the Bennington, Vermont area. $26.2 million of the settlement quantity can be positioned right into a fund supposed to compensate plaintiffs for property harm and devaluation. $6 million can be positioned right into a fund for a 15 12 months PFOA medical monitoring program for the plaintiffs. A number of years in the past, Saint-Gobain paid $40 million to adjust to state consent orders to increase municipal water traces and supply clear ingesting water to houses with contaminated wells.

Advertisement

Whereas the Vermont PFAS settlement is however one in every of an rising variety of settlements associated to PFAS contamination of ingesting water or soil, the notable portion of the settlement is the $6 million for medical monitoring. Whereas nationwide, courts stay divided as as to whether medical monitoring prices are recoverable in a lawsuit (and if that’s the case, whether or not an precise harm should first be alleged, or if the damages may be awarded to attempt to stop harm from occurring), there are an rising variety of lawsuits nationwide which are pushing the envelope to attempt to get in any other case reluctant courts to award medical monitoring damages for PFAS instances. As state statutes and court docket selections naturally do not stay stagnant, each the legislative and judicial branches of state governments could possibly be automobiles for plaintiffs’ counsel trying to effectuate change with respect to medical monitoring legal guidelines.

Conclusion

Of concern to many corporations is the truth that some proponents of medical monitoring damages argue that comparatively little should be alleged or confirmed with a view to acquire monitoring price damages. With respect to PFAS, that are seen as ubiquitous and troublesome to take away from the surroundings, the restricted proof which will have to supplied could also be so simple as proving that PFAS are current within the ingesting water or soil of the category of residents that introduced the lawsuit. Many corporations shall be able whereby they should decide the monetary feasibility of having the ability to fund a medical monitoring settlement versus defend the allegations introduced within the lawsuit.


©2022 CMBG3 Legislation, LLC. All rights reserved.
Nationwide Legislation Assessment, Quantity XII, Quantity 116



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

US Chamber, oil industry sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage

Published

on

US Chamber, oil industry sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage


The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several decades by climate change.

The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1, 1995.

The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”

The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they argue it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over decades.

Advertisement

“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”

A spokesman for the state’s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not been formally served with this lawsuit.

Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry’s way of “trying to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in Vermont and beyond.”

“More states are following Vermont’s lead holding Big Oil accountable for the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to foot the entire bill time and time again,” Iarrapino added.

Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.

Advertisement

It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.

The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states, including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill in December.

The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

With major changes to Act 250 underway, a new board takes the reins

Published

on

With major changes to Act 250 underway, a new board takes the reins


This story, by Report for America corps member Carly Berlin, was produced through a partnership between VTDigger and Vermont Public.

Gov. Phil Scott has appointed the members of a new board that will administer Act 250, Vermont’s statewide development review law.

The new Land Use Review Board replaces the old Natural Resources Board, a shift mandated under Act 181, a major land-use reform law passed last year. That law takes steps to relax Act 250’s reach in existing downtowns and village centers across the state, and also lays the groundwork for extending Act 250’s protections in areas deemed ecologically sensitive.

But the new law also changes how Act 250 is administered. The Land Use Review Board is made up of five full-time members with relevant professional experience — a significant change from the former citizen-board structure. The new members have backgrounds in municipal and regional planning, environmental law, and civil engineering. The review board will also play a key role in overseeing a years-long mapping process that will cement Act 250’s jurisdiction in the future. (Regional district offices still make permitting decisions on individual projects, however).

Advertisement

“Vermont faces a significant housing crisis and the work of this board will play a very important role in helping us address it, while protecting our beautiful landscape and environment,” Scott said in a statement announcing the appointments earlier this week. “I’m confident this board has the diverse expertise, work ethic, and passion to tackle the work that’s required in Act 181 while also forwarding common sense improvements to the law to further our shared goals.”

The new board chair, Janet Hurley, currently serves as the assistant director and planning program manager for the Bennington County Regional Commission. Before that, she worked as a local planner throughout the state, in Manchester, South Burlington, Milton, and Westford, according to a press release from Scott’s office.

Since Act 250 was enacted in 1970, “it can certainly be credited with saving Vermont from rampant development,” Hurley said in an interview. “But it can also certainly be responsible for the depth of our housing crisis, because the burden of Act 250 permitting — often duplicative, especially in our town and village centers — just made housing development that’s affordable much more difficult to achieve for so many years.”

In the past, new housing projects would trigger Act 250 review based on how large they were, and how many homes a developer had already built in a given area during a given timeframe. That system could in fact lead to the sprawl it was trying to prevent, prompting developers to avoid bumping up against Act 250 permitting by building “smaller scale, single family home development dispersed around our towns and villages,” Hurley said.

Act 181 shifts the permitting program toward “location-based jurisdiction,” meaning some areas of the state that already have robust local zoning review and water and wastewater infrastructure could be exempt from Act 250 altogether. That new system will take years to implement, though, and the transition will be one of the board’s primary tasks.

Advertisement

As that longer process plays out, lawmakers made temporary exemptions to Act 250 last year. They were designed to encourage dense housing in already-developed areas, and so far, the carve-outs appear to be working as intended. Hurley thinks loosening Act 250’s rules around housing will make a big difference.

“The market just can’t bear the cost of construction at this point, and so any relief to the financing of new housing development is going to be meaningful,” Hurley said.

More from Vermont Public: Vermont loosened Act 250 rules for housing. Here’s where developers are responding

Still, members of the board think Act 250 will continue to play an important role in years to come.

“The housing crisis requires us to act swiftly, and that means a lot more housing, period,” said Alex Weinhagen, current director of planning and zoning in Hinesburg and another new board member. “But larger projects have impacts, and the whole point of having a development review process is to make sure that we acknowledge those and that the projects, you know, do what they can to minimize them.”

Advertisement

To Weinhagen, Act 181’s goals were to reform statewide development review so that “it’s smarter, it works better, it’s applied consistently across the state, and it’s only used when it’s needed — and not used in places where there’s adequate local level development review happening,” he said.

The board will study whether appeals of Act 250 permits should be heard by the board itself — or continue to be heard in state environmental court. Legislators and administration officials hotly debated the issue last session, arguing over which option would in fact speed up lengthy appeal timelines, and ultimately directed the new board to assess it further.

The other members of the new board include L. Brooke Dingledine, an environmental attorney in Randolph; Kirsten Sultan, an Act 250 district coordinator in the Northeast Kingdom with a background in engineering; and Sarah Hadd, a former local planner and current town manager for Fairfax, according to the press release.

The new board appointments took effect on Jan. 1, and the board will begin its work on Jan. 27.

Have questions, comments or tips? Send us a message.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont has 4th highest rate of homelessness in nation, data shows

Published

on

Vermont has 4th highest rate of homelessness in nation, data shows


MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) – New data shows Vermont now has the fourth highest rate of homelessness per capita in the country. But that’s down from the second highest in the nation last year.

Federal data shows disasters elsewhere are pushing other states higher.

Since winding down government-funded hotel rooms for the homeless, Vermont has struggled to find enough shelter space.

Providers say despite dropping in the national ranking, Vermont is still in a homelessness crisis.

Advertisement

“Through the last several months we have been straight out. We are utterly exhausted from the level of provision of services keeping to keep people alive and out of the elements,” said Julie Bond, the executive director of the Good Samaritan Haven.

Later this month, Vermont will participate in the national Point in Time Count to assess the needs of the homeless. But even then, experts say that data has limitations.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending