Connect with us

Vermont

Jay Craven: My new movie digs into Vermont’s origin story

Published

on

Jay Craven: My new movie digs into Vermont’s origin story


I’ll play my new film, “Lost Nation,” at 7 p.m. Friday at the Bellows Falls Opera House as a part of the film’s Vermont 50 Town Tour. The picture is a Revolutionary War-era action drama set in the early upstart Republic of Vermont. It features Vermont founding father and rebel schemer, Ethan Allen, who leads resistance to New Yorker land claims, launches an ill-fated attack on British forces in Montreal, and leads invasions by his Green Mountain Boys into Yorker strongholds of Guilford and Brattleboro.

“Lost Nation’s” parallel and intersecting story features pioneering poet, Lucy Terry Prince, who was enslaved at the age of 3 in Western Massachusetts — and settled a Guilford, Vt., homestead with her family during this same time. Like Ethan Allen, the Princes found themselves caught up in turbulent times that threatened their prospects for the land and freedom they sought. In those days, land was everything — a measure of status, standing and a chance for prosperity and community engagement.

Like Ethan Allen, Lucy Prince upset the status quo in her assertive use of early Vermont’s legal and political systems. Ethan did it to push back New York land claims to property in the Green Mountains. Lucy did it to defend her family and secure their homestead.

Advertisement

Our tour is still new — we’ll play 50 Vermont towns. We’ve been attracting solid crowds. And I had an encouraging sign while driving last summer to southern New England to see Neil Young in concert. Near Amherst, I got a random call on my cellphone. I expected it to be a junk call but a gravelly voice on the other end of the call seemed real.

“Is this Jay?”

“It is,” I said, still expecting to be offered a new option for Medicare.

“My name’s Bob …” the man said, barely pausing for breath, “… in St. Louis. And I never call people about this but I’m one of the pre-screeners for the St. Louis Film Festival and I watched your film, “Lost Nation,” last night and it’s the best film I’ve ever seen in my life.”

“Wow,” I said. “Thanks a lot. And thanks for taking the time to call.”

Advertisement

“No problem,” he said. “I just love your film. But that doesn’t mean it will actually be programmed. I have no control over that.”

“I get it. But can I use your quote on our poster?” I said, half-joking. “The Best Film I’ve Ever Seen.” – Bob from St. Louis.

We both laughed.

We drew our film research from 162 books — I know because we recently donated them to the St. Johnsbury Academy library. But historical films are always fictional because, no matter how much research you do, you can never know the individual moments of an historical character’s life. Every historical character did and said things we’ll never know about — even the modern ones. When you go back 250 years, anything could have happened. That said, every dramatic beat in the film was measured against the research.

I was first drawn to the Ethan Allen story in 1974, after I broke my right arm bailing out of a runaway farm truck and spent winter afternoons at the Vermont Historical Society research room, scrawling handwritten notes on yellow legal pads. Now, 50 years later, I’m taking this long imagined but newly produced film on the road.

Advertisement

With “Lost Nation,” I took what I learned from historical research to build a sometimes-surprising story. One revelation: just the amount of turbulence, strife and dramatic action during the late 18th century here, from whippings and land confiscations to fires set to settle political scores and Ethan Allen’s two invasions of southeastern Vermont towns. The wild west had nothing on what happened in Vermont during this time.

I hoped to capture an indelible moment that shows the complexity and power of an early version of the “American dream” — and the promise of the American Revolution.

This film was quite challenging to produce, because it was filmed on more than three dozen Vermont and Massachusetts locations, needed to include battle scenes and includes 43 speaking parts for characters ranging from Seth Warner, Ira Allen, Thomas Chittenden and Ethan’s wives, Mary and Frances — to George Washington, Alexander Hamilton and more. One fun fact: Boston patriot Samuel Adams is played in the film by his direct descendent, Samuel Adams.

Funding the project was also difficult, with extensive grassroots fundraising, including a $100,000 Kickstarter campaign and a very generous benefit concert performed for us in Burlington by Grammy-winning singer-songwriter Jackson Browne.

So, this was a very difficult project. The British playwright and film director, David Hare, stopped making films because he said his best experiences on a film set always meant the film would fail — and the most difficult times indicated surefire success.

Advertisement

I’ve got my fingers crossed.

Jay Craven is a director, writer and producer, and co-founder of Kingdom County Productions. He lives in Peacham.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Vermont postal worker allegedly threw away mail she was supposed to deliver for months

Published

on

Vermont postal worker allegedly threw away mail she was supposed to deliver for months


Crime

During a search of a dumpster where the worker allegedly discarded the mail, police found several packages and holiday cards.

A Vermont postal worker was cited and suspended for allegedly throwing away mail that was supposed to be delivered to other people, according to police.

Natasha Morisseau, 34, of North Troy, was cited on nine counts of petty larceny and five counts of unlawful mischief, Vermont State Police said in a statement. She works as a mail carrier for the town’s United States Postal Service (USPS) office.

Advertisement

Officers were first alerted to the discarded mail on the afternoon of Jan. 23, according to police. Upon finding the mail in a dumpster on Elm Street in North Troy, they determined that none of it was for that address.

Police identified Morisseau as a person of interest and learned that she was a postal employee. They confirmed that she had regularly been throwing away a small amount of mail under her care since at least October 2025, according to the statement.

After searching the dumpster and Morisseau’s mail vehicle, officers found opened and unopened packages, along with several holiday cards, one of which contained money. Morisseau was later cited Feb. 14 and is due to appear March 17 in Vermont Superior Court, police said.

Since Jan. 23, Morisseau has been suspended by USPS, and all recovered mail has been given back to them for delivery, according to the statement. The case has been forwarded to the USPS’ Inspector General for further review.

Sign up for the Today newsletter

Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Air National Guard joins Iran campaign – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Vermont Air National Guard joins Iran campaign – The Boston Globe


On a typical day, some of the 20 stealth fighter jets based in South Burlington, Vt., take off from tiny Burlington International Airport for training runs near the northern border. In recent months, they’ve flown much farther afield.

The Vermont Air National Guard’s 158th Fighter Wing was deployed in December to the Caribbean, where it took part in the US campaign to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Shortly thereafter, the squadron joined a military buildup in and around the Middle East to prepare for US and Israeli airstrikes against Iran.

Though both deployments had been widely reported, the military remained mum about the whereabouts of Vermont’s F-35A Lightning II jets. Even Governor Phil Scott, technically the commander of the Vermont Guard, said he only knew what he’d read in the news, given that US military leaders were directing the missions.

On Monday, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed the deployments at a Pentagon press conference about the war on Iran. Caine praised National Guard members from Vermont, Wisconsin, and elsewhere.

Advertisement

“In the case of the Vermont Air National Guard and the 158th Fighter Wing, they were mobilized for Operation Absolute Resolve,” Caine said, referring to the Venezuela campaign. “And then were tasked to take their F-35As across the Atlantic instead of going home, to be prepared to support this operation” in the Middle East.

Much remains unknown about the Vermont Guard’s recent missions, including the precise role they played in Venezuela and Iran, where the jets are currently based, and how long they’ll remain.

The Guard did not immediately respond to requests for comment., Its recently elected leader, General Henry “Hank” Harder, said in a statement that the force was “proud of the dedicated and professional service of our Airmen” and pledged to support their families in the meantime.

“We will continue to carry out our commitment to these Vermont Service Members until, and long after, they return from this mission,” Harder said.

Vermont’s three-member congressional delegation, meanwhile, has praised Vermont Guard members for their service in Venezuela but has criticized President Trump’s campaigns there and in Iran, particularly absent congressional authorization.

Advertisement

“The people of our country, no matter what their political persuasion, do not want endless war,” said Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent, echoing similar remarks from Senator Peter Welch and Representative Becca Balint, both Democrats. “We must not allow Trump to force us into another senseless war. No war with Iran.”


Paul Heintz can be reached at paul.heintz@globe.com. Follow him on X @paulheintz.





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

In Vermont, small town meetings grapple with debate on big issues

Published

on

In Vermont, small town meetings grapple with debate on big issues


Tuesday is town meeting day in Vermont. Municipalities in New England and elsewhere are increasingly grappling with major national and international issues at the local level.

JOSEPH PREZIOSO/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

JOSEPH PREZIOSO/Getty Images

If you haven’t lived in certain New England towns, it can be hard to fathom their centuries-old direct democracy-style Town Meetings, where everyday residents vote on mundane town business such as funding for schools, snow plows and road repairs.

These days, voters are also being asked to weigh in on national and international issues, for example, demanding the de-funding of ICE, and condemning “the unprovoked attack and start of an illegal and immoral war against Iran.” It’s all fueling a separate – and fierce– debate on what towns ought to be debating.

Advertisement

“When you have people sleepwalking into an authoritarian regime, it’s up to us to sound the alarm,” insists Dan Dewalt, an activist in Newfane, Vermont, one of several communities where residents scrambled to draft a resolution against the Iran war in time for their annual Town Meeting on Tuesday.

Local resolutions are a uniquely effective tactic, activists and experts say, and they’re being used increasingly around New England and beyond, especially as national politics have become so polarized.

“People feel isolated, helpless and hopeless. And when you hear about other people who are just like you taking a stand and representing something that you believe, that gives you not only hope, but it gives you power,” said Dewalt.

Several other Vermont towns will be considering resolutions Tuesday calling for the removal of the president and vice president “for crimes against the U.S. Constitution,” while many others will vote on a pledge to ” to end all support of Israel’s apartheid policies, settler colonialism, and military occupation and aggression.”

A similar divestment resolution passed 46 -15 in Newfane last year, following hours of heated argument over the plight of Palestinians, the security of Israelis, the “inflammatory” language of the resolution – and whether such problems half-a-world away even belong on the agenda of the tiny town of just about 1,650.

Advertisement

“It’s a Town Meeting for town issues,” Newfane resident Walter Hagadorn declared at a recent Select Board meeting, where residents pressed board members to block any future resolutions not directly related to town business.

“You shouldn’t be subject to hours and hours of people virtue signaling” and trying to “hijack Town Meeting,” Hagadorn said.

Others agreed, suggesting activists host a debate on their issues at another time and place, or stage a rally or protest instead.

But Select Board member Katy Johnson-Aplin pushed back, saying that would not have the same impact.

“It doesn’t work the same way,” Johnson-Aplin said. It’s only when the issue is formally taken up at a Town Meeting that “it goes in the newspaper and it’s recorded that the town of Newfane has agreed to have this conversation.”

Advertisement

University of Pennsylvania political science professor Daniel Hopkins has been watching the growing movement of local communities taking a stand on issues far beyond town lines.

“This is a trend we’re seeing increasingly across the 50 states and in a variety of ways but I think it has taken on a new and potentially more concerning edge,” Hopkins said. “I worry that we are in an attention-grabbing, sensation-rewarding media environment in which the kinds of issues that engage us at a national level may further polarize states and localities and make it harder for them to build meaningful coalitions on other issues.”

Indeed, in Newfane, the resolution regarding Israel became so divisive that some residents decided not to even come to last year’s Town Meeting, according to Select Board vice-chair Marion Dowling.

In Burlington, where a similar resolution was proposed, City Council President Ben Traverse says things got so heated, he and his family were getting harassing phone calls and even death threats. Burlington city councilors voted in January to block the question from going to a popular vote.Vermont has a history of “big issue” resolutions, from the push for a Nuclear Arms Freeze in the 1980’s, to calls to ban genetically modified foods in 2003. Dewalt, the Newfane activist, was behind several of them, including calls to impeach then-president George W. Bush in 2006, which got him invited to talk about it on network TV shows, and quoted in The New York Times.

“I can guarantee you if I stood up on my soap box and made a declaration of the exact same wording, I wouldn’t have had anybody asking me questions about it, he said. “We’re not pie-in-the-sky here about the power of our Newfane Town Meetings, but our actions have consistently had an impact.”

Advertisement

But opponents say activists overstate the impact of their resolutions, and their victory. They say it’s disingenuous, for example, to claim the town of Newfane supported the resolution against Israel, when the winning majority of 46 people was less than 3% of town residents.

“I feel like they’re using the town as a vehicle for their personal messages and that bothers me,” says Newfane resident Cris White. “It’s so junior high.”

Traverse, the Burlington City Council president, also takes issue with what he calls the “inflammatory” language of that resolution.

“The question, as presented, approaches this issue in a one-sided and leading way,” Traverse says.

In Vermont, any registered voter can get a resolution on the Town Meeting agenda by collecting signatures from 5% of their town’s voters. While elected city or town officials have the authority to allow or block the resolution, there is no process in place to vet or edit language.

Advertisement

Traverse says it would behoove city leaders and voters to require an official review to ensure that language is fair and neutral, just as many states do with ballot questions. Traverse says he’s not opposed to contentious, big issue resolutions being put to local voters, but the language must be clear and even-handed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending