Connect with us

Vermont

How residents in one Vermont county are feeling after Trump's victory

Published

on

How residents in one Vermont county are feeling after Trump's victory


On Wednesday morning, Vermonters learned Donald Trump is their president-elect.

And Wednesday afternoon, Vermont Public reporter Elodie Reed crisscrossed Franklin County to hear how residents were feeling.

This story was produced for the ear. We highly recommend listening to the audio. We’ve also provided a transcript, which has been edited for length and clarity.

Elodie Reed: I visited farms, front yards, flower shops, restaurants, laundromats, a food shelf and a hair salon.

Advertisement

Some people felt happy about Trump winning. Some felt sad about Kamala Harris losing. Some people didn’t have strong opinions either way.

Some did have strong opinions, but didn’t want their neighbors to know about them.

And one person, citing their diversity, equity and inclusion work, as well as their gay son — said they planned to leave the country because of Trump’s victory.

Of the couple dozen people I spoke to, only a few felt comfortable sharing on the record, with their full names attached. No women wanted to be recorded.

Here’s 55-year-old Robert Ovitt, at his family’s farm in Fairfax.

Advertisement

Robert Ovitt: Trump is a good situation. You know, better than Harris, obviously, in my book, so. 

Elodie Reed: What are you hoping his presidency changes in your life? 

Robert Ovitt: Well, hopefully we get some taxes straightened out and the world straightened out a little bit. He isn’t afraid to step up to the plate. We figured that out last term.

Especially Vermont’s getting stupid. You know, the taxes are just phenomenal. Property taxes, too. I mean, it’s crazy. Makes it makes you think that you should, can’t live here no more.

Elodie Reed: When did you find out about Trump winning?

Advertisement

Robert Ovitt: This morning.

Elodie Reed: Do you remember, like, what you felt?

Robert Ovitt: “Ahhhh,” that’s how I felt. 

Elodie Reed: “Ahhhh”?

Robert Ovitt: Yes, delighted.

Advertisement

Elodie Reed

/

Vermont Public

Kyle Ovitt prepares to chop and haul firewood on Wednesday, Nov. 6. Ovitt didn’t vote in the presidential election, and has reservations about Donald Trump — and said regardless of who is president, he’ll continue living his life the same way.

Elodie Reed: I also met Robert Ovitt’s son, Kyle, who was sweeping out a truck bed.

Advertisement

Elodie Reed: What are you up to right now? 

Kyle Ovitt: Oh, getting ready to go cut some firewood. 

Truthfully, I didn’t even vote. I mean, I’m not really — I wasn’t really too keen on either one of them, but I definitely feel that Trump was definitely the better elected president at this point. I’m not quite sure how it’s going to go the next four years with everything that’s happened in the last couple months, as far as the tries — the assassination attempts.

I’m gonna live my life the same way, no matter what, who becomes president, who becomes what. That’s why I don’t really get into politics too much. I kind of just, you know, have a farm family and live the way I live.

Elodie Reed: What do you see as the future of this family farm?

Advertisement

Kyle Ovitt: Hopefully keeping it going? Unfortunately, we had to sell our dairy cows quite a few years ago, in the ’90s, because of that, and we got into excavation and trapping. We keep the sugaring, you know, as a hobby, but also for our agricultural tax rate. But hopefully we can keep it going with the way society is going.

Elodie Reed: Is there anything you wish your president would do that would have an impact on your life?

Kyle Ovitt: Absolutely. Help the, you know, lower-income people, and that’s the biggest thing I disagree with, with Trump is, you know, he wants to raise taxes on the lower class, and, you know, middle class or whatever, and nothing for the higher class.

Well, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, you know. And that’s just the way it’s been for the last 20 years, you know, probably longer than that, but I’m only 35, so.

Advertisement

A photo of a man in a tshirt and jeans standing inside a room with shelves full of food and lined with pumpkins.

Elodie Reed

/

Vermont Public

John Gorton stands for a portrait inside the Sheldon Methodist Church food shelf. Gorton said Franklin County providers are worried about what a Trump presidency could mean for funding for social services — but that they’re committed to continuing their work.

Elodie Reed: After spending time with the Ovitts, I drove through Fairfield and into Sheldon, where John Gorton and several volunteers were working in the local food shelf.

John Gorton: I’m the lay minister who serves the Sheldon Methodist Church. And we operate this rather sizable food shelf operation here.

Advertisement

I’m very disappointed. A lot of people talked about the economy. Apparently that was one of the main drivers, was the economy. And people say, was I better off in 2019 when Trump was president? The trouble is, the conditions that existed in 2019 will never exist again. We live in a totally different world today.

Before the pandemic hit, we were serving about 100 families a month. In February of 2020, just as the pandemic hit, we almost immediately doubled to about 200 families.

And then once the pandemic started wane, we actually dropped down a little bit for a few months. And then the effects, as the effects of inflation came in, it started growing and growing, growing. Today, right now, this month, we serve about 400 families.

I’m not very optimistic. I had a meeting this morning of leaders of social service providers out in St. Albans for Franklin County, and the mood was pretty somber, because we’re concerned that the need for our services is going to skyrocket and the federal resources that might support social services work will essentially be dried up.

You know, as a lay minister and a preacher, I studied the Old Testament. And if you think about the history of the Jewish people, the Israelite nation, as espoused in the Old Testament, through the Old Testament, they go through periods where they’re being very righteous. They’re doing things correctly. They’re being very morally right, and then they fall away, and they kind of forget about God and what they should be doing, to serve God, and fall down, and they’ll come back. And many times when they fall down, there are bad things that happen, like they got into slavery in Egypt.

Advertisement

But if you read through all those stories in the Bible, there’s a group of people who are always referred to as the remnant, and those are the people who remain faithful to their relationship with God and their calling to serve other people. And I feel like that’s what we’re going to see in this country. And the meeting I had this morning with a lot of other service providers, people who provide services to marginalized people, we all had the same feeling. We’re the remnant, and we are the people who, no matter what else happens, no matter how many bad things happen in the country or even around the world, we will be the ones who will remain faithful and will serve other people, no matter what. No matter what happens.

Have questions, comments, or tips? Send us a message.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Where Democrats lost ground in Vermont’s House – VTDigger

Published

on

Where Democrats lost ground in Vermont’s House – VTDigger


In Tuesday’s election, Vermonters voted to change the balance of power in the state’s House of Representatives during the next legislative biennium. Republicans picked up 17 seats, bringing their ranks to 55 in the 150-member chamber. 

Democrats held 105 seats alone by the end of the 2023-2024 session, but now will be left with just 88, meaning they’ve lost their supermajority. Their numbers are bolstered by alliances with Progressives and independents, who will occupy the same number of seats as they do now: 4 and 3, respectively. But even with full cooperation, their numbers would not allow them to pass bills into law over the veto of Republican Governor Phil Scott. That requires a two-thirds vote in the chamber, or at least 100 votes. 

Fourteen incumbent House Democrats lost their seats, though two of them will be replaced by fellow Democrats. Several lawmakers from districts in Bennington, Caledonia and Rutland counties were ousted, as were at least one from Addison, Chittenden, Franklin, Washington and Windsor counties. 

Advertisement

Among them are several veteran lawmakers who hold leadership positions and other legislators who just started in 2023. Voters have left almost no House committee unchanged. 

  • Rep. Diane Lanpher, D-Vergennes, chair of the House Appropriations Committee, first elected in 2008, was bested by Republican Rob North of Ferrisburgh. 
  • Rep. Mike McCarthy, D-St. Albans City, chair of the House Government and Military Affairs Committee, fell to Republican Joe Luneau also from St. Albans City.
  • Rep. Stephanie Zak Jerome of Brandon, a House member since 2019 and vice chair of the House commerce committee, fell to Republican Todd Nielson, also of Brandon.
  • Robin Chesnut-Tangerman of Middletown Springs, vice-chair of the House Committee on General and Housing, was bested by Republican Chris Pritchard of Pawlet.
  • Rep. Carl Demrow, D-Corinth, ranking member on the House Ways and Means Committee, fell to Mike Tagliavia, also of Corinth.
  • Rep. William Notte, D-Rutland City, an assistant majority leader, lost his seat to Republican Chris Keyser, also of Rutland City.
  • Rep. Mike Rice, D-Dorset, elected in 2022, lost to Republican Sandra Pinsonault, also of Dorset.
  • Rep. Bobby Farlice-Rubio, D-Barnet, elected in 2022, fell to Republican Debra Lynn Powers, a Waterford Republican.
  • Rep. Dennis LaBounty, D-Lyndon, also elected in 2022, lost to Republican Martha “Marty” Feltus, a former lawmaker, also of Lyndon.
  • Rep. Julie Andrews, D-Westford also elected in 2022, was bested by Republican Brenda Steady of Milton.
  • Rep. Josie Leavitt of Grand Isle, also elected in 2022, lost a race to Republican Leland Morgan, a former state lawmaker from Milton.
  • Rep. Heather Chase, D-Chester, elected in 2022, fell short in her race against Republican Thomas Charleston, also of Chester.
  • Rep. Jonathon Williams, D-Barre City, elected in 2022, landed third in a four-person race. Republican Mike Boutin of Barre City came out on top, and a different Democrat, Edward “Teddy” Waszazak, was second. 
  • Rep. Jim Carroll of Bennington, came in third to both Rep. Mary Morrissey, R-Bennington, and fellow Democrat Michael Nigro. The two seatmates were both in the spotlight over the past session, Carroll for a drunken driving arrest in Montpelier and Morrissey for her behavior towards Caroll, which included repeatedly soaking his personal belongings. 

Elsewhere, Democrats lost ground when newcomers were unsuccessful in filling a seat vacated by an incumbent. 

  • Republican Mike Southworth of Walden bested Sabrina Morrison of Hardwick.
  • Republican Greg Burtt of Cabot prevailed over Thomas Ziobrowski of Danville.
  • Democrat Jim Ryan of Wolcott was unable to overcome a challenge from Richard Bailey of Hyde Park. 
  • Republican Kevin Winter of Ludlow outlasted Adrienne Raymond of Shrewsbury.
  • Republican VL Coffin of Cavendish bested Mark Yeungling of Weathersfield. 

Republicans Jim Casey of Hubbardton and Ken Wells of Brownington won without a fight when Democrats did not field a candidate for one stepping down.

The highlight for Democrats was in a Chittenden County district, where incumbent Rep. Sarita Austin and newcomer Wendy Critchlow, both of Colchester, were able to overcome Republican challengers to swing one seat the other direction. 

The overall balance of power is complicated by party shifts in two other districts. Northfield’s Anne Donahue, a long-time Republican, won reelection as an independent, while Democrat Chris Morrow of Weston was able to win a seat for his party previously held by independent Kelly Pajala who did not run. 

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

One of the best Christmas getaways on the planet is in Vermont, according to Travel + Leisure

Published

on

One of the best Christmas getaways on the planet is in Vermont, according to Travel + Leisure


Travel

It is “one of the most picture-perfect places to go for Christmas.”

The WhistlePig Pavilion at The Lodge at Spruce Peak in Stowe, Vermont.

Stowe, Vermont is more than a leaf peeping paradise, according to Travel + Leisure — it’s also an ideal Christmas getaway.


  • New England has 3 of the country’s most affordable ski resorts

    Advertisement

Stowe often lands on best-of lists for fall foliage but is also world-renowned for its skiing, and Travel + Leisure just named it one of 20 best places to spend Christmas this year. It was the only New England destination on the worldwide list.

Here’s what the publication wrote about Stowe:

A popular ski destination among East Coasters and one of the most picture-perfect places to go for Christmas, Stowe is within driving distance of several medium and large northeastern cities (Boston, Albany, and Montreal, to name a few). The ski season typically starts in November, so this is an ideal place to hit the slopes if you’re looking for a white, powder-filled Christmas. Stay at The Lodge at Spruce Peak for beautiful mountain views and ski-in, ski-out access.

Other Christmas destinations on the list include Beaver Creek, Colorado; Saint Lucia; and Edinburgh, Scotland.

Earlier this year, Stowe was named among the top 10 skiing locations in the U.S. by The Family Vacation Guide. Last year, the Vermont spot was named among the 20 best ski resorts in the world by Conde Nast Traveler and one of the best ski towns in North America by USA Today.

Profile image for Kristi Palma

Kristi Palma

Culture writer


 

Kristi Palma is a culture writer for Boston.com, focusing on New England travel. She covers airlines, hotels, and things to do across Boston and New England. She is the author of Scenic Six, a weekly travel newsletter.






Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Democrats lose supermajority — and a pair of committee chairs — in the Vermont House – VTDigger

Published

on

Democrats lose supermajority — and a pair of committee chairs — in the Vermont House – VTDigger


Rep. Diane Lanpher, left, and Rep. Mike McCarthy lost their bids for reelection Tuesday. Photos by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Updated Nov. 6 at 2:12 a.m.

The Democratic supermajority in the Vermont House is no more. 

Republicans picked up 18 seats in the 150-member chamber on Tuesday, dramatically reshaping power dynamics in the House. They’re set to hold 55 seats in the next biennium — enough to prevent Democrats and Progressives, who will hold 92 seats together, from overriding Republican Gov. Phil Scott’s vetoes. Three independents won races Tuesday, according to unofficial results from the Vermont Secretary of State’s Office.

Advertisement

The chairs of two House committees were among several Democratic incumbents unseated Tuesday — as was an assistant majority leader of the party — ensuring major changes to the chamber when lawmakers return to Montpelier in January.

The outcome mirrored that of the Vermont Senate, where Republicans toppled four incumbents and picked up two additional seats in the 30-member body. 

Vermont Republican Party Chair Paul Dame said the Republican successes in legislative races will force Democrats to work with Republican Gov. Phil Scott, who cruised to reelection Tuesday.

“I don’t think we’ve had a night this good in 10 years,” Dame said. “Tonight, voters have weighed in on how to solve that stalemate. They said, ‘You should have been listening to the governor in (the) last two years.’”

Speaking at an election party in South Burlington on Tuesday night, House Speaker Jill Krowinski, D-Burlington, bemoaned the outcomes of that day’s elections. 

Advertisement

“Our stomachs are in knots tonight about what’s happening with the national election and elections here at home,” said Krowinski, flanked by about a dozen House colleagues. “We are still waiting to get final results from across the state. We’ve picked up some seats. We’ve lost some seats. It’s difficult, but what I want Vermonters to know is that we still have your back.”

Republicans flip six seats in the Vermont Senate, shattering Democratic supermajority


The loss of two committee chairs was a particularly tough blow for Democrats.

Advertisement

Rep. Diane Lanpher, D-Vergennes, who chairs the House Appropriations Committee, came in third in a four-way race for two seats in the Addison-3 district, according to unofficial results from the Secretary of State’s Office. 

Republican Rob North finished first with 24.67% of the vote. Lanpher’s fellow incumbent, Rep. Matt Birong, D-Vergennes, finished second with 21.86%. Lanpher picked up 21.7%, finishing just 17 votes behind Birong. Republican Joseph Baker took 20.63%.

Lanpher’s leadership position on the powerful money committee is among the most coveted posts in the House and helps guide state spending. She was first elected in 2008, led the House Transportation Committee and took over the appropriations panel in 2023. 

Rep. Mike McCarthy of St. Albans, the chair of the House Government Operations and Military Affairs Committee, lost his reelection bid to Republican Joe Luneau in the single-member Franklin-3 district. Luneau won 52.53% to McCarthy’s 44.43%.

In the Rutland-7 House district, Rep. William Notte, one of the Democrats’ assistant majority leaders, was also defeated. Republican Chris Keyser won 55.9% of the vote to Notte’s 40.43%.

Advertisement

Other House Democratic incumbents ousted Tuesday included:

  • Rep. Josie Leavitt in the Grand Isle-Chittenden district
  • Rep. Dennis Labounty in the Caledonia-3 district
  • Rep. Robin Chestnut-Tangerman in the Bennington-Rutland district
  • Rep. Jim Carroll in the Bennington-5 district

Jim Dandeneau, executive director of the Vermont Democratic Party, said in an interview around 11:15 p.m. at the party’s election night gathering in South Burlington that the state GOP’s — and particularly Scott’s — messaging over property taxes proved to be more effective on the campaign trail than what he called Democrats’ ‘herculean work’ knocking on doors and engaging with voters on the ground.

Scott and the GOP, Dandeneau said, “overwhelmed people’s concerns about the future of our democracy with concerns about the future of their own pocketbooks.”

“We were fighting this fight one person at a time, one household at a time,” he added, holding several boxes of uneaten finger foods from the party’s hors d’oeuvres spread as workers began to break down the event space. “He was blanketing the airwaves with his messaging about cutting taxes. That ended up being not great for us.”

Shaun Robinson and Sarah Mearhoff contributed to this story.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending