Col. Daniel Finnegan of the Vermont Air National Guard speaks during a roundtable event at the Patrick Leahy International Airport on Wednesday, Oct. 23. Photo by Corey McDonald/VTDigger
SOUTH BURLINGTON — The Vermont Air National Guard on Wednesday detailed a new initiative to use afterburners on the F-35s based at the Patrick Leahy International Airport to mitigate the impact of noise from the fighter planes on local communities.
The initiative is likely months away from approval or implementation. But if approved, use of afterburners — which act as auxiliary jets that add power to the aircraft’s engine, increasing thrust on takeoff — could allow the F-35s to take off from a shorter distance and achieve a higher altitude upon take off, according to Col. Daniel Finnegan, the 158th Fighter Wing Commander.
By then reducing the power at the higher altitude, sound pollution from the aircraft could be significantly reduced, he said.
Early conversations with sound engineers suggest this initiative could remove “thousands of people” from a local noise contour line, “including, potentially, the entire city of Winooski,” Finnegan said at an evening roundtable event Wednesday night at the airport.
Advertisement
The press event was scheduled as patience with the mission has worn thin. In recent months, four Chittenden County municipalities have introduced resolutions calling for the reconsideration of the airport as the base for the Vermont Air National Guard’s F-35 mission.
Finnegan on Wednesday said this new takeoff method could make a difference for communities that are affected by the noise. The guard would “start flying this new takeoff profile right away, if we could,” but said the initiative must go through a new federal environmental impact study, expected to begin in January and end in March.
Afterburners are not allowed at the airport, Finnegan said, based on restrictions set from a similar 2013 study. “This restriction was set based on what I believe is a fundamental misunderstanding of afterburners used by folks who were opposed to the basing of the F-35s during its initial conversations,” he said.
“As both members of this community and those who serve it, we remain fully committed to minimizing our noise impact,” Finnegan said. “The supplemental (study) is another step in fulfilling our long standing commitment to be responsible stewards of the community and to do everything we can to improve with that.”
But for many residents who have been vocally opposed to the F-35s since they arrived — like former South Burlington City Councilor, Meghan Emery — the plan to use afterburners to reduce noise represents “a nightmare scenario,” she said.
Advertisement
“It shows how desperate and impossible the task is to reduce noise with the F-35s here,” Emery said. “It underscores… that this is an incompatible mission. There’s no other word, it’s incompatible, and it is time for our senior leaders to stand up for the residents in this area of Vermont who are suffering.”
The F-35s have been based at the airport since 2019. There are currently 20 planes at the base that are used for training purposes, according to Col. Michael Blair. The mission employs hundreds of people, and brings $63 million a year into the local economy through pay and benefits alone, he said.
“We are here. Our people are called on whenever the state is in an emergency,” Finnegan said. “All of those things are a byproduct of having 1,000 people here to support the F-35s.”
The guard also works collaboratively with the airport. Nic Longo, the airport’s director of aviation, said the guard provides sole firefighting services at this airport, and provides mutual aid to all surrounding communities at no cost.
The Vermont Air National Guard leases more than 281 acres at the Burlington airport, and was recently approved for a 25-year lease extension by the Burlington City Council.
Advertisement
“That’s extremely important because not a single commercial flight operation could occur at this airport without the support of the fire department that is there,” Longo said.
READ MORE
Advertisement
But the mission has been vehemently opposed by some members of the community since the aircraft arrived. Their flight causes thundering sound effects throughout Chittenden County that some argue is detrimental to residents’ quality of life.
In August, Burlington passed a resolution directing the city to discuss the F-35s basing with Vermont’s congressional delegation. That was followed by similar resolutions in Winooski and South Burlington, where the airport is located. Williston this month introduced a resolution as well but tabled it.
“I respect the work and the commitment of the Air National Guard. I know they serve an important purpose for the country in terms of national defense. I don’t want to diminish anything about their mission here at all,” Tim Barritt, the chair of the South Burlington City Council said during the meeting. “But, again, this is an opportunity for the communities to state that the noise is an incompatible use, period. It’s just an incompatible use.”
Finnegan, in response to questions about the resolutions at the roundtable event, said “there is no discussion and there is no plan for mission change.”
Advertisement
“We’ve been working hard to reduce the noise through various mitigation efforts, and our goal has always been to balance our mission with the responsibility to the community,” Finnegan said.
Both the airport and the guard have taken steps to try and mitigate the noise effects from the military aircraft.
A residential sound insulation program, which the airport launched in 2022, remains ongoing, and will soon enter its fourth phase. Roughly 25 homeowners have participated in the program since its launch.
The guard’s proposal on Wednesday came in tandem with the release of a new sound map. Rereleased every five years, the map uses data accumulated from “every single flight operation at his airport,” Longo said, and is a key component guiding the airport’s ongoing sound insulation program.
The airport’s previous map, released in 2019, was produced prior to the F-35s basing at the airport, and used data associated with the environmental impact statement, as well as projected flight operational data from F-35s at other airports, Longo said.
Advertisement
The map released Wednesday, however, reduces the noise contour line and, in effect, reduces the number of housing units that were previously eligible for the noise insulation program, Longo said, from roughly 2,600 homes down to approximately 2,400.
“That also means that the noise is less than what the projected forecast was back in 2019, so there’s a reduction in the forecasted noise, a real reduction in what we actually have collected with radar information as well as noise information,” he said.
The Federal Aviation Administration has committed roughly $5 million annually to the insulation program, enough to fund the work in up to 50 homes a year, Longo said. (The program is voluntary).
The airport itself has applied for a nearly $18 million grant opportunity from the U.S. Department of Defense that would provide more funding for homeowners seeking to modify their homes to protect from aircraft noise, Longo said during the roundtable meeting.
“If we can get $18 million, we can vastly advance this program,” Longo said in an interview.
Advertisement
These initiatives, however, are months or possibly years away from approval or implementation.
Barritt said that while the sound insulation program in South Burlington has been “a very slow progression,” it has been a benefit nonetheless to those most affected by the F-35s takeoff.
“But I don’t see a way for the guard to be able to attenuate their noise,” he said. “I don’t think it will make a real difference to the people in Winooski if they change their takeoff power and adjust it when they achieve elevation.”
Emery, in an interview, said the only achievable balance she sees is to decrease the number of flights.
“I would think that the military would have a minimum threshold where it’s no longer tenable to have the F-35 here — that they would find a more appropriate site for it. So, we might not be able to find that sweet spot because of the Air Force’s thresholds and all of the different criteria and factors that go into their decision making,” she said.
Advertisement
She added, “I think it’s feasible that there could not be a compromise that would meet their needs and meet the needs of the people here.”
A portion of a Vermont highway has been shut down following a rock slide on Tuesday.
Vermont State Police said in an email around 1:22 p.m. that they had received a report of a rock slide on Route 5 in Fairlee, just south of the Bradford town line.
“Initial reports are of a substantial amount of rock & trees in the roadway, making travel through the area difficult or impassable,” they said. “Motorists should seek alternate routes or expect delays in the area.”
Route 5 is a nearly 200-mile, mostly two-lane highway running from the Massachusetts border to Canada.
Advertisement
In an update shortly after 2 p.m., state police said Route 5 in Fairlee between Mountain Road and Sawyer Mountain Drive will remain closed while the Vermont Agency of Transportation assesses the stability of the roadway.
Vermont has some big problems that desperately need fixing! Many of them are connected, in a variety of ways to a symptom rarely discussed. The population of Vermont is falling while the population of the United States is growing. Vermont has been losing people for the last few years. The reasons include deaths in Vermont outpace births; between 2023 and 2024 there were 1,700 more deaths than births. More people left the state than moved into Vermont. In another worrying sign the birthrate in the United States is down 25 percent since 2007 when the decline began. Another symptom may be that weekly take home pay in Vermont is about $400.00 less than the national average. Taken together these problems should set off alarms about our future.
S, it should not be a surprise that our schools throughout the state have a diminishing number of students while simultaneously school budgets are skyrocketing upward. Yes, it is costing us more to educate fewer students, and Vermonters are rarely wealthy. Maintaining quality schools is expensive. The average pay for public school teachers in the United States is $72,030. The average pay for a public-school teacher in Vermont is only $52,559. A nearly $20,000 gap is hardly an incentive to attract the best of the best. Good teachers are a precious commodity.
Gov. Phil Scott has demanded the Legislature do something about education costs in the Green Mountain State. Legislators have been spending much more time on this problem than any other facing the state. There have been various proposals, one of the latest is from Sen. Seth Bongartz of Manchester that would create a two year “ramp period” for school districts to merge voluntarily. Two years is a long time to wait when the problem is financially urgent. School mergers are inevitable in many areas which will mean the eventual closing of several small elementary schools. The closing in many cases means long bus rides for little kids.
Advertisement
One idea that has not been discussed is increasing, substantially, Vermont’s population over the next decade or so. We don’t have enough students to make financial sense for our small rural schools. We need more property-owning people whose taxes will help balance our cash-strapped education budgets. Why doesn’t the Legislature think about a campaign to entice people to move to the Green Mountain state?
In the 1960s Vermont’s economic development officials, under new Gov. Phil Hoff, launched a marketing campaign that was known as “Vermont the Beckoning Country.” The campaign was remarkably successful, bringing thousands of people to a place that at that time had largely skipped the Industrial Revolution. Vermont’s ski industry began growing by leaps and bounds then, bringing in large numbers of people new to the state. Entrepreneurs, many of them World War II veterans, began developing ski resorts in the Green Mountains. They attracted thousands of visitors and some of those visitors fell in love with Vermont. They stayed. These Flatlanders changed the state, making it more liberal, and more environmentally conscious. Gov. Hoff, the first Democrat elected governor since 1853, was followed by a wave of successful liberal politicians who turned Vermont from red to blue. People can differ about the whether the political transformation improved the state or destroyed it, but the state undoubtedly grew more prosperous.
Vermont has plenty of land that can be used to build new housing. New people can bring fresh ideas and the capital needed to create new businesses with good jobs. More families living in more houses means more property taxes going to schools. It should also lighten the load for the current financially stressed Vermonters.
A well-financed advertising campaign to entice new people to make Vermont their home will make us more prosperous. More taxpayers can be one of the many solutions needed to save our struggling education system.
Clear the cobwebs off the old slogan and invite a whole new crop of young, energetic families to Vermont the Beckoning Country!
Advertisement
Eric Peterson lives in Bennington. Opinions expressed by columnists do not necessarily reflect the views of Vermont News & Media.
