Connect with us

Vermont

Candidate Profiles: Candidiates for Benn-5 State House Representatives

Published

on

Candidate Profiles: Candidiates for Benn-5 State House Representatives


In preparation for the Nov. 5 elections, Vermont News & Media – which includes the Brattleboro Reformer, Bennington Banner and Manchester Journal – will be publishing a series of profiles on candidates throughout Vermont.

Each candidate was asked to respond to the same three questions in no more than 500 words:

1. What skills and experience do you bring to the office you are seeking?

Advertisement

2. There are 3 key issues often cited as Vermont’s biggest challenges: Crime, housing and affordability. What solutions would you propose to address these issues?

3. What other challenges do you see for Vermont and how would you address them?

The following are from candidates for the Benn-5 State House Rep seats of which there are two.

Mary Morrissey [R]

I have been a member of the Vermont House of Representatives for twenty eight years, serving on various committees, including appropriations. I am a member of many local civic and social organizations, serve on several boards and have been an active volunteer in our community. I listen to people’s ideas and concerns, analyze issues and work hard to make a difference.

Advertisement

There are 3 key issues often cited as Vermont’s biggest challenges – Crime, Housing & Affordability 

CRIME

We need a legislature who will put public safety and law abiding citizens first. Our laws need to be strong enough and enforceable to ensure the safety of our citizens. The drastic increase in crime, in part, relates to laws that now mitigate wrongdoing and hamper law enforcement efforts. Rehabilitation and compassion are an important part of our judicial system, but refusal to prosecute crimes and take criminals off the street is not working. It is only creating and allowing more criminal activity in our Vermont communities. The legislature needs to seriously review and change some of our laws that have been watered down and provide the resources needed to keep our communities safe.

HOUSING

Vermont needs a multifaceted solution to address the need for more housing. We need additional revisions to Act 250, which has been a barrier to building new housing. We should undertake efforts to realistically measure and define the different kinds of housing needed in our communities, whether it be workforce, affordable, first time home or general apartments and housing of all income levels. Government should incentivize care of property and encourage private sector builders and developers to help address our housing crisis. We should also expand, if possible, upon efforts like Habitat For Humanity that combines professionals, volunteers and the family receiving the home to create more housing opportunities.

Advertisement

AFFORDABILITY

Vermonters pay the third highest taxes in the nation. The latest increases and the creation of new future taxes to fund legislation that has passed in language only, are making it harder to afford living here. The legislature needs to take a deep dive to reevaluate our existing laws, projects, programs and costs before adding to the tax burden for our citizens. We need to eliminate waste and take a serious cost/ benefits approach in deciding revisions or eliminations. Fiscal responsibility and sustainability need to guide legislative decisions.

The legislature passed Act 18, the Clean Heat Standard Bill that would put a carbon tax on home heating fuels. It was irresponsible for the legislature to pass a piece of legislation of this magnitude, without having the true fiscal impact and the resource needs incorporated into the law before it passed. As the fiscal piece of Act 18 is just being developed, Vermonters could see a $0.70 to $4.00 or more increase per gallon on what they are already paying for heating oil, kerosene, propane and natural gas. Most Vermonters will not be able to afford these cost increases to heat their homes. Efforts to repeal this legislation failed, so it is imperative for citizens to continue to voice their valid concerns to their legislators. I have heard from a large number of my constituents who have said clearly that they do not have another pocket to pick to pay the taxes and do the requirements that will be attached to this law in the next legislative. session.

The next legislature needs to also seriously focus on the following issues that have seen large cost and tax increases: Education/Property Tax, Health Care/Premium Costs and delivery of service issues.

If re-elected, I will continue to listen and to work hard for my constituents and the citizens of Vermont.

Advertisement

Michael Nigro [D]

After obtaining an MBA, I spent a decade as a manager and then director of a residential facility for at-risk youth. Following that I was the director of a home health care agency for eight years. In that work, I experienced firsthand many challenges we face today: workforce shortages, the struggle faced by many lower income Vermonters, and the regulatory complexity and rising costs of health care. For the past six years, my wife and I have made our living as small business owners. I understand the difficulty of starting and growing a business, but also the joy of entrepreneurship.

From 2021 to 2022 I served as a Vermont State Representative, sitting on the Commerce Committee. There I had the opportunity to work on a number of bills that became law, to co-present several bills on the floor of the House, and act as lead-presenter of one bill.

Perhaps the most important skill I have developed throughout my career is the ability to work with people who have diverse viewpoints, something that I see our democracy in need of today. I learned to listen, and to value people with different ideas and experiences than myself.

CRIME

Advertisement

Relating to crime, we need to continue to work on common root causes by improving our mental health and substance abuse resources. But it is also important that lawmakers work with law enforcement and state’s attorneys to learn what support they need to be effective.

HOUSING

There will be no fast answer to increasing and improving housing stock, but I think the legislature has moved in the right direction by trying to make it easier to develop in town centers. I also support programs that help private businesses and property owners develop new housing; the Vermont Housing Improvement Program (VHIP) gives grants to property owners to build or rehabilitate rental units. My wife and I received one of these grants in 2020 and were able to quickly convert a derelict space into a quality apartment. This program alone has made many new apartments available in our community.

AFFORDABILITY

In the conversations I have had with voters, affordability has repeatedly been cited as a top concern. The governor has made this one of his priorities and the legislature also needs to hear voters’ concerns about rising costs. I believe for any bill or budget that is proposed, we must be able to make a clear case for how it will improve (or not negatively impact) affordability.

Advertisement

The challenge that I think about is not one for Vermont, but specifically one for Southern Vermont. There has been economic growth and development, but the majority of that has been in the northern part of the state. We need an economic vision for growth in Southern Vermont. The good news is that I frequently meet smart people invested in our community who are building that vision. It is time for Southern Vermont to reap some of the success seen in other parts of the state.

Jim Carroll [D]

Having an unwavering love for my hometown and wanting to always make it a better place to live and lessening the stress and burdens of others is a fundamental requirement for anyone in this role. Helping others in this role is the essential trait that’s necessary for being a public servant and never being willing to give up is absolutely necessary. Hearing the relief in the voices of people who have felt they had nowhere to turn is the reward of this role.

As a small business owner for the majority of my working years, you have to have a can-do attitude every day because problems present themselves every day, and addressing those problems has only one option: do all you can to find a solution.

Similarly, being a legislator requires the same skills: listening to problems, talking with constituents about issues and doing your best to solve the problems that might seem insurmountable is your number one job.

Advertisement

Crime, housing, and affordability are all closely tied together.

A lack of housing is the greatest impediment to economic growth. We can’t build housing fast enough. It’s taken a long time to get here but the legislature has and must continue to address it by making it easier to build responsibly by reducing regulations without sacrificing safety or the benefits or beauty of our towns.

Crime and housing too often walk hand in hand. However, there are ways to cut crime and drugs out of Bennington and it’s already happening and has been working for many years. I think we can adopt a way of making neighborhoods safer, cutting drugs and criminal activity by passing an ordinance that requires landlords to have their prospective tenants submit to a criminal and credit background check. It has worked for Shires Housing and other responsible landlords and the proof that it works is in the lower cases of police calls at the properties where landlords employ the same kind of requirements for prospective tenants.

Passing this sort of ordinance would not require landlords to exclude any prospective tenant; that would be up to the landlord. At the very minimum, landlords would be on notice about who their tenants are and the risks involved in renting to them. Adopting this way of renting protects tenants, neighborhoods, and the landlord’s property.

If this ordinance were to be adopted, I believe we’d see a dramatic drop in drug activity in Bennington and our neighborhoods would be safer with the kind of neighbors we all would like to have. Furthermore, the landlords who have this as a standard have far fewer problems with their properties. It can be done.

Advertisement

Adopting this sort of ordinance would kill three birds with one stone: reduce drug activity, make neighborhoods safer and reduce the number of calls to the police.

The continuing challenges for Vermont are the perennial problems: taxes, attracting business and people and building more affordable housing.

As a community, we’re all pulling in the same direction and it would be nice to have easy solutions to these issues. There are no easy solutions or answers; otherwise we would have done them. We have to keep searching for new solutions and tweak what’s working. These are problems that will always be knocking on our doors. We have to keep working on them and never be afraid to try to make things better with new ideas and approaches. We just have to keep pushing forward and never give in or give up.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

US Chamber, oil industry sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage

Published

on

US Chamber, oil industry sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay for climate change damage


The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several decades by climate change.

The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1, 1995.

The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”

The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they argue it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over decades.

Advertisement

“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”

A spokesman for the state’s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not been formally served with this lawsuit.

Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry’s way of “trying to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in Vermont and beyond.”

“More states are following Vermont’s lead holding Big Oil accountable for the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to foot the entire bill time and time again,” Iarrapino added.

Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.

Advertisement

It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.

The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states, including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill in December.

The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

With major changes to Act 250 underway, a new board takes the reins

Published

on

With major changes to Act 250 underway, a new board takes the reins


This story, by Report for America corps member Carly Berlin, was produced through a partnership between VTDigger and Vermont Public.

Gov. Phil Scott has appointed the members of a new board that will administer Act 250, Vermont’s statewide development review law.

The new Land Use Review Board replaces the old Natural Resources Board, a shift mandated under Act 181, a major land-use reform law passed last year. That law takes steps to relax Act 250’s reach in existing downtowns and village centers across the state, and also lays the groundwork for extending Act 250’s protections in areas deemed ecologically sensitive.

But the new law also changes how Act 250 is administered. The Land Use Review Board is made up of five full-time members with relevant professional experience — a significant change from the former citizen-board structure. The new members have backgrounds in municipal and regional planning, environmental law, and civil engineering. The review board will also play a key role in overseeing a years-long mapping process that will cement Act 250’s jurisdiction in the future. (Regional district offices still make permitting decisions on individual projects, however).

Advertisement

“Vermont faces a significant housing crisis and the work of this board will play a very important role in helping us address it, while protecting our beautiful landscape and environment,” Scott said in a statement announcing the appointments earlier this week. “I’m confident this board has the diverse expertise, work ethic, and passion to tackle the work that’s required in Act 181 while also forwarding common sense improvements to the law to further our shared goals.”

The new board chair, Janet Hurley, currently serves as the assistant director and planning program manager for the Bennington County Regional Commission. Before that, she worked as a local planner throughout the state, in Manchester, South Burlington, Milton, and Westford, according to a press release from Scott’s office.

Since Act 250 was enacted in 1970, “it can certainly be credited with saving Vermont from rampant development,” Hurley said in an interview. “But it can also certainly be responsible for the depth of our housing crisis, because the burden of Act 250 permitting — often duplicative, especially in our town and village centers — just made housing development that’s affordable much more difficult to achieve for so many years.”

In the past, new housing projects would trigger Act 250 review based on how large they were, and how many homes a developer had already built in a given area during a given timeframe. That system could in fact lead to the sprawl it was trying to prevent, prompting developers to avoid bumping up against Act 250 permitting by building “smaller scale, single family home development dispersed around our towns and villages,” Hurley said.

Act 181 shifts the permitting program toward “location-based jurisdiction,” meaning some areas of the state that already have robust local zoning review and water and wastewater infrastructure could be exempt from Act 250 altogether. That new system will take years to implement, though, and the transition will be one of the board’s primary tasks.

Advertisement

As that longer process plays out, lawmakers made temporary exemptions to Act 250 last year. They were designed to encourage dense housing in already-developed areas, and so far, the carve-outs appear to be working as intended. Hurley thinks loosening Act 250’s rules around housing will make a big difference.

“The market just can’t bear the cost of construction at this point, and so any relief to the financing of new housing development is going to be meaningful,” Hurley said.

More from Vermont Public: Vermont loosened Act 250 rules for housing. Here’s where developers are responding

Still, members of the board think Act 250 will continue to play an important role in years to come.

“The housing crisis requires us to act swiftly, and that means a lot more housing, period,” said Alex Weinhagen, current director of planning and zoning in Hinesburg and another new board member. “But larger projects have impacts, and the whole point of having a development review process is to make sure that we acknowledge those and that the projects, you know, do what they can to minimize them.”

Advertisement

To Weinhagen, Act 181’s goals were to reform statewide development review so that “it’s smarter, it works better, it’s applied consistently across the state, and it’s only used when it’s needed — and not used in places where there’s adequate local level development review happening,” he said.

The board will study whether appeals of Act 250 permits should be heard by the board itself — or continue to be heard in state environmental court. Legislators and administration officials hotly debated the issue last session, arguing over which option would in fact speed up lengthy appeal timelines, and ultimately directed the new board to assess it further.

The other members of the new board include L. Brooke Dingledine, an environmental attorney in Randolph; Kirsten Sultan, an Act 250 district coordinator in the Northeast Kingdom with a background in engineering; and Sarah Hadd, a former local planner and current town manager for Fairfax, according to the press release.

The new board appointments took effect on Jan. 1, and the board will begin its work on Jan. 27.

Have questions, comments or tips? Send us a message.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont has 4th highest rate of homelessness in nation, data shows

Published

on

Vermont has 4th highest rate of homelessness in nation, data shows


MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) – New data shows Vermont now has the fourth highest rate of homelessness per capita in the country. But that’s down from the second highest in the nation last year.

Federal data shows disasters elsewhere are pushing other states higher.

Since winding down government-funded hotel rooms for the homeless, Vermont has struggled to find enough shelter space.

Providers say despite dropping in the national ranking, Vermont is still in a homelessness crisis.

Advertisement

“Through the last several months we have been straight out. We are utterly exhausted from the level of provision of services keeping to keep people alive and out of the elements,” said Julie Bond, the executive director of the Good Samaritan Haven.

Later this month, Vermont will participate in the national Point in Time Count to assess the needs of the homeless. But even then, experts say that data has limitations.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending