Sign up for the Today newsletter
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) finds himself in a familiar position Tuesday — on the Vermont ballot — and vying for another term of elected office as he’s done for more than four decades.
Sanders is running unopposed in the 2024 primary Tuesday with no challengers from the Democratic or independent side, setting himself up for a fourth term in the Senate as he fashions himself as the progressive standard bearer for the country.
With President Joe Biden, 81, bowing out of the presidential race, Sanders, 82, is taking on the role of elder statesman as he nudges the next generation of Democratic Party leaders into a big government agenda.
Democratic strategist Brad Bannon told the Washington Examiner that Sanders’s decision not to seek the presidency again as he did in 2016 and 2020 “basically freed him to be this national spokesman for the progressive wing of the party.”
“The party has moved toward Bernie Sanders,” Bannon said. “So he lost his battles for president, but he won the battle for the heart and soul of the Democratic Party.”
“He has a safe seat in Vermont, so he really doesn’t have to worry about politics, so he’s focused on progressive policy,” Bannon added.
Sanders will face Republican Gerald Malloy in the 2024 general election for Vermont’s Senate race. Malloy lost his campaign for the state’s other Senate seat in 2022.
Both candidates ran unopposed in their respective primaries on Tuesday: Sanders, who has been serving in the Senate since 2007 and Congress long before then; and Malloy, who lost to now-Sen. Peter Welch (D-VT) for the open seat left vacant by former Sen. Patrick Leahy in the midterm elections.
The senator will appear on the Democratic primary ballot as he has for several years despite being an independent since 1978. Vermont has open primaries, allowing unaffiliated or independent votes to vote for either candidate.
Sanders’s popularity in the state of Vermont has allowed him to skate easily to victory over the last few cycles. In 2018, Sanders won the general election with 67% of the vote and with 71% of the vote in 2012. Unlike his congressional colleagues, Sanders does not pursue funding through super PACs or from wealthy donors and instead focuses on small-dollar donations.
DecisionDesk HQ finds Sanders has a greater than 99% chance of winning in November. However, Malloy believes he will be successful this cycle due to high inflation, high taxes, and clean energy policies supported by Sanders and the Biden-Harris administration.
He said in statements to the Washington Examiner that his work in the business industry, as well as federal agencies like the departments of Homeland Security and Health and Human Services, make him a better fit for office.
“My opponent is a socialist, career politician,” Malloy said. “He does not have work, government, business, military, or foreign policy experience. He has had 34 years as a member of Congress. He has delivered very little for Vermont. He speaks of lowering costs or free healthcare, housing, education — false promises as all have gone up, even as he is Senate chair of HELP Committee. He speaks of the working class but has no work experience.”
“His Twitter/X site banner reads ‘The struggle continues.’ It certainly does, by design,” Malloy continued. “His platform: false promises and scare tactics of existential climate crisis. He will be 83 very soon, well into 89 if reelected.”
In 2022 ahead of the midterm elections, Sanders had the highest favorability rating among possible presidential contenders at 46% compared to President Joe Biden’s 43%.
Bannon also noted that if Sanders, at 82, had decided to run for president in 2024, the age concerns that plagued Biden during the second half of his administration would have trailed Sanders as well.
Nathan Gonzales, editor for Inside Elections, echoed Bannon’s comments, telling the Washington Examiner that Sanders hasn’t had a “public elderly episode” that has constituents questioning whether the senator can do his job — unlike Biden, whose gaffes, misnaming of public figures, and lackluster debate performance caused members of his own party to call on him to step aside as the nominee.
“The comparison between Biden and Sanders is a good example that each person ages differently,” Gonzales said.
After Biden stepped aside as the presumptive nominee and endorsed Kamala Harris, Sanders, a staunch Biden supporter, also decided to throw his support behind vice president. Sanders has called Biden the “most progressive president” in history, but eyes will now be on Harris to see whether she will continue to jettison left-wing policies she once embraced, including “Medicare for All.”
“She should be very proud of the record of the Biden-Harris administration in taking on the greed of the pharmaceutical industry, lowering the cost of prescription drugs, creating millions of jobs by rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure — we’ve done more in that area than any administration in history,” Sanders said on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday.
Sanders said Harris is running a “very strong campaign” and thinks she is talking to people from all sides to build an agenda that will win in November.
Host Dana Bash asked Sanders whether he is concerned about Harris reversing her stance on several progressive policies such as Medicare for All, legislation that she co-sponsored with Sanders when she was a senator in 2017 that would eliminate private insurance.
Sanders pointed to a poll from his campaign that found most people are in favor of several progressive policy areas that Harris is diverting from.
“I think the agenda that we have talked about for working people, expanding Medicare, expanding Social Security, raising the minimum wage, demanding that the wealthy start paying their fair share of taxes — this is an agenda that is not only good policy, it’s what we should be doing when so many of our working people are struggling, but it is good politics, as well,” Sanders said.
The Vermont senator added that Harris should be coming out with an economic agenda this week, so “we’ll see what she has to say.”
With Harris as the presumptive Democratic nominee and Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN) as her running mate, the ticket has appeased progressives who had reservations about Harris’s other choices, including Gov. Josh Shapiro (D-PA) for his strong support of Israel.
Sanders announced he would seek reelection in early May, at a critical point for Democrats as the party continued to fracture over the war between Israel and Hamas.
Like most congressional progressives, Sanders has been vocal about the need for immediate humanitarian aid to the Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip, as well as openly critical of Biden’s handling of the United States’s relationship with the Jewish state. Sanders did not attend Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech before a joint session of Congress in July.
The Israel-Hamas war has divided progressives from the rest of the Democratic conference, particularly as pro-Israel groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee have funneled millions into primary races to defeat members of the progressive “Squad.” As a co-founder of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Sanders had rallied behind Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) in the days leading up to the primary the New Yorker ultimately lost.
“What this campaign is about is telling the billionaire class and their greed and their super PACs that they are not going to destroy American democracy,” Sanders told rally attendees on June 22.
While Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA) was able to survive a targeted AIPAC campaign, Bowman and Cori Bush (D-MO) were ousted thanks in part to the millions AIPAC’s PAC, United Democracy Project, threw behind their opponents. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is facing a primary challenge from a Democrat who is favored by AIPAC.
Sanders, who has been in politics for over 40 years, first as a mayor in Vermont, is not a vulnerable target of AIPAC. Gonzales said the pro-Israel group has been strategic in its targets in the 2024 cycle and looking for candidates who are beatable at the ballot box — and Sanders does not fit the bill.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Gonzales added that Bush and Bowman had their “own problems” beyond just their stance on the Israel-Hamas war, “issues that Sanders just doesn’t have.”
“Trying to knock off a one or two-term incumbent is very different than defeating a 30-year legend,” Gonzales said. “Sanders is well-liked in Vermont and candidates aren’t lining up to take him out. You can’t beat somebody with nobody.” The Washington Examiner reached out to Sanders for comment.
The Washington Examiner reached out to Sanders for comment.
Crime
A Vermont postal worker was cited and suspended for allegedly throwing away mail that was supposed to be delivered to other people, according to police.
Natasha Morisseau, 34, of North Troy, was cited on nine counts of petty larceny and five counts of unlawful mischief, Vermont State Police said in a statement. She works as a mail carrier for the town’s United States Postal Service (USPS) office.
Officers were first alerted to the discarded mail on the afternoon of Jan. 23, according to police. Upon finding the mail in a dumpster on Elm Street in North Troy, they determined that none of it was for that address.
Police identified Morisseau as a person of interest and learned that she was a postal employee. They confirmed that she had regularly been throwing away a small amount of mail under her care since at least October 2025, according to the statement.
After searching the dumpster and Morisseau’s mail vehicle, officers found opened and unopened packages, along with several holiday cards, one of which contained money. Morisseau was later cited Feb. 14 and is due to appear March 17 in Vermont Superior Court, police said.
Since Jan. 23, Morisseau has been suspended by USPS, and all recovered mail has been given back to them for delivery, according to the statement. The case has been forwarded to the USPS’ Inspector General for further review.
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
On a typical day, some of the 20 stealth fighter jets based in South Burlington, Vt., take off from tiny Burlington International Airport for training runs near the northern border. In recent months, they’ve flown much farther afield.
The Vermont Air National Guard’s 158th Fighter Wing was deployed in December to the Caribbean, where it took part in the US campaign to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Shortly thereafter, the squadron joined a military buildup in and around the Middle East to prepare for US and Israeli airstrikes against Iran.
Though both deployments had been widely reported, the military remained mum about the whereabouts of Vermont’s F-35A Lightning II jets. Even Governor Phil Scott, technically the commander of the Vermont Guard, said he only knew what he’d read in the news, given that US military leaders were directing the missions.
On Monday, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed the deployments at a Pentagon press conference about the war on Iran. Caine praised National Guard members from Vermont, Wisconsin, and elsewhere.
“In the case of the Vermont Air National Guard and the 158th Fighter Wing, they were mobilized for Operation Absolute Resolve,” Caine said, referring to the Venezuela campaign. “And then were tasked to take their F-35As across the Atlantic instead of going home, to be prepared to support this operation” in the Middle East.
Much remains unknown about the Vermont Guard’s recent missions, including the precise role they played in Venezuela and Iran, where the jets are currently based, and how long they’ll remain.
The Guard did not immediately respond to requests for comment., Its recently elected leader, General Henry “Hank” Harder, said in a statement that the force was “proud of the dedicated and professional service of our Airmen” and pledged to support their families in the meantime.
“We will continue to carry out our commitment to these Vermont Service Members until, and long after, they return from this mission,” Harder said.
Vermont’s three-member congressional delegation, meanwhile, has praised Vermont Guard members for their service in Venezuela but has criticized President Trump’s campaigns there and in Iran, particularly absent congressional authorization.
“The people of our country, no matter what their political persuasion, do not want endless war,” said Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent, echoing similar remarks from Senator Peter Welch and Representative Becca Balint, both Democrats. “We must not allow Trump to force us into another senseless war. No war with Iran.”
Paul Heintz can be reached at paul.heintz@globe.com. Follow him on X @paulheintz.
Tuesday is town meeting day in Vermont. Municipalities in New England and elsewhere are increasingly grappling with major national and international issues at the local level.
JOSEPH PREZIOSO/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
JOSEPH PREZIOSO/Getty Images
If you haven’t lived in certain New England towns, it can be hard to fathom their centuries-old direct democracy-style Town Meetings, where everyday residents vote on mundane town business such as funding for schools, snow plows and road repairs.
These days, voters are also being asked to weigh in on national and international issues, for example, demanding the de-funding of ICE, and condemning “the unprovoked attack and start of an illegal and immoral war against Iran.” It’s all fueling a separate – and fierce– debate on what towns ought to be debating.
“When you have people sleepwalking into an authoritarian regime, it’s up to us to sound the alarm,” insists Dan Dewalt, an activist in Newfane, Vermont, one of several communities where residents scrambled to draft a resolution against the Iran war in time for their annual Town Meeting on Tuesday.
Local resolutions are a uniquely effective tactic, activists and experts say, and they’re being used increasingly around New England and beyond, especially as national politics have become so polarized.
“People feel isolated, helpless and hopeless. And when you hear about other people who are just like you taking a stand and representing something that you believe, that gives you not only hope, but it gives you power,” said Dewalt.
Several other Vermont towns will be considering resolutions Tuesday calling for the removal of the president and vice president “for crimes against the U.S. Constitution,” while many others will vote on a pledge to ” to end all support of Israel’s apartheid policies, settler colonialism, and military occupation and aggression.”
A similar divestment resolution passed 46 -15 in Newfane last year, following hours of heated argument over the plight of Palestinians, the security of Israelis, the “inflammatory” language of the resolution – and whether such problems half-a-world away even belong on the agenda of the tiny town of just about 1,650.
“It’s a Town Meeting for town issues,” Newfane resident Walter Hagadorn declared at a recent Select Board meeting, where residents pressed board members to block any future resolutions not directly related to town business.
“You shouldn’t be subject to hours and hours of people virtue signaling” and trying to “hijack Town Meeting,” Hagadorn said.
Others agreed, suggesting activists host a debate on their issues at another time and place, or stage a rally or protest instead.
But Select Board member Katy Johnson-Aplin pushed back, saying that would not have the same impact.
“It doesn’t work the same way,” Johnson-Aplin said. It’s only when the issue is formally taken up at a Town Meeting that “it goes in the newspaper and it’s recorded that the town of Newfane has agreed to have this conversation.”
University of Pennsylvania political science professor Daniel Hopkins has been watching the growing movement of local communities taking a stand on issues far beyond town lines.
“This is a trend we’re seeing increasingly across the 50 states and in a variety of ways but I think it has taken on a new and potentially more concerning edge,” Hopkins said. “I worry that we are in an attention-grabbing, sensation-rewarding media environment in which the kinds of issues that engage us at a national level may further polarize states and localities and make it harder for them to build meaningful coalitions on other issues.”
Indeed, in Newfane, the resolution regarding Israel became so divisive that some residents decided not to even come to last year’s Town Meeting, according to Select Board vice-chair Marion Dowling.
In Burlington, where a similar resolution was proposed, City Council President Ben Traverse says things got so heated, he and his family were getting harassing phone calls and even death threats. Burlington city councilors voted in January to block the question from going to a popular vote.Vermont has a history of “big issue” resolutions, from the push for a Nuclear Arms Freeze in the 1980’s, to calls to ban genetically modified foods in 2003. Dewalt, the Newfane activist, was behind several of them, including calls to impeach then-president George W. Bush in 2006, which got him invited to talk about it on network TV shows, and quoted in The New York Times.
“I can guarantee you if I stood up on my soap box and made a declaration of the exact same wording, I wouldn’t have had anybody asking me questions about it, he said. “We’re not pie-in-the-sky here about the power of our Newfane Town Meetings, but our actions have consistently had an impact.”
But opponents say activists overstate the impact of their resolutions, and their victory. They say it’s disingenuous, for example, to claim the town of Newfane supported the resolution against Israel, when the winning majority of 46 people was less than 3% of town residents.
“I feel like they’re using the town as a vehicle for their personal messages and that bothers me,” says Newfane resident Cris White. “It’s so junior high.”
Traverse, the Burlington City Council president, also takes issue with what he calls the “inflammatory” language of that resolution.
“The question, as presented, approaches this issue in a one-sided and leading way,” Traverse says.
In Vermont, any registered voter can get a resolution on the Town Meeting agenda by collecting signatures from 5% of their town’s voters. While elected city or town officials have the authority to allow or block the resolution, there is no process in place to vet or edit language.
Traverse says it would behoove city leaders and voters to require an official review to ensure that language is fair and neutral, just as many states do with ballot questions. Traverse says he’s not opposed to contentious, big issue resolutions being put to local voters, but the language must be clear and even-handed.
Exclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
Mother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
Wildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
Florida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
AM showers Sunday in Maryland
Try This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies