Connect with us

Rhode Island

Why RI must keep Victory Day a state holiday | Opinion

Published

on

Why RI must keep Victory Day a state holiday | Opinion


Rep. Patricia A. Morgan, R-West Warwick, was elected to the House of Representatives in November 2020 after previously serving in the House from 2011 through 2018.

On Feb. 27, the House held a hearing on bill H7326, introduced by Democrat Rep. Jennifer Stewart (D-Pawtucket). She and other “progressive” representatives think that celebrating Victory Day in Rhode Island is an affront to an “inclusive” culture.  They want to cancel Victory Day and replace it with a so-called Peace and Remembrance Day, because, among other off-base criticisms and invidious slanders, we should not be celebrating the death of civilians during World War II (which we already aren’t doing). 

Her prepared statement provides an insight into the twisted worldview of the Left.  In their minds, the patriotic folks who established Victory Day ignored reality. They believe the people in charge during World War II made decisions that were morally problematic and troubling, and that Victory Day celebrates a mythologized history that revisionist scholars have exposed as a fairy tale and supplanted with the ugly truth of American conduct during the war. They call into question anything that might be construed as good, or as having a positive impact.

Advertisement

The list of indictments of World War II continued to grow — Representative Stewart was on a roll.

More: War stories: Patricia Morgan’s family legacy drives her resolute support of veterans

It seems that “modern historians” have cast doubt on the necessity of using the atomic bomb to end the war.  She also enlightened us with the absurd assertion by revisionist left-wing scholars that American soldiers were responsible for 50 million civilian casualties. 

Her reasoning was filled with spurious and hackneyed charges that focused on American soldiers and failed to mention our enemy’s culpability.

This is a glimpse into the mind of the radical left.

Advertisement

The problem for me is that it ignores history in favor of revisionist Marxist pseudo-scholarship that seeks to undermine our country. These radicals are systematically picking through our nation’s history and methodically destroying every piece that serves as a bond that holds us together as a nation.

Not long ago, Americans could unite around the war effort in World War II as a shining example of collective sacrifice in service of noble ends, and a time when there was a clear delineation of good and evil and no doubt which side America was on.

By denigrating our history, they dissolve our ties in the present. By attacking our ancestors, they attack us.

Today, Victory Day commemorates a community of shared burden, striving for the common good, and the celebration of total victory against a brutal, implacable, expansionist empire. Tomorrow, if the activists get their way, it will be replaced with a day when we are supposed to feel bad about all the things America did in World War II that offend the delicate sensibilities of the emotional children on the Left.

Advertisement

Medal mystery: Cranston soldier’s WWII heroism earned military’s highest honor – twice

The truth is military victories are built on defeating the enemy. Rhode Islanders who celebrate Victory Day want to show their gratitude to those who fought for our country and for our values. Some 92,000 Rhode Islanders fought in that war, one out of every 10 citizens; 2,200 were killed.  They sacrificed to stop fascist regimes from taking over the world.

It should concern every American that the plain old facts are seemingly not taught in our schools anymore. Grievance and advocacy have taken their place using pseudo history built on ideologically driven rubbish.

I made my thoughts clear during the hearing: Historical facts are not up for debate. Nor are they open to scholarship that evolves and modernizes them.

War is hell and civilians get caught in the middle. But casting aspersions on American soldiers who sacrificed for our country is not open to debate. All of us should thank them for supplying that Great Victory.

Advertisement



Source link

Rhode Island

‘Real Housewives of RI’ affair allegations fuel courtroom drama

Published

on

‘Real Housewives of RI’ affair allegations fuel courtroom drama


play

Advertisement
  • A Cranston woman is suing the husband of a “Real Housewives of Rhode Island” cast member for slander.
  • The lawsuit is a countersuit to one filed by Brian Pontarelli, who accused Beth Walker of violating a confidentiality agreement.
  • Walker claims Pontarelli made defamatory comments about her on the show and related broadcasts.
  • The dispute centers around an affair Pontarelli had, which is a storyline on the reality show.

It was in a Rhode Island court that “The Real Housewives of Rhode Island” heated up as a Cranston woman sued the husband of one of the cast members for slander.

The legal fireworks started April 13, when Brian Pontarelli, husband of “Real Housewife” star Rulla Nehme Pontarelli, sued Beth Walker of Cranston in Superior Court, alleging that she violated a confidentiality agreement in another lawsuit by “making public statements and social media posts” about facts related to the earlier lawsuit.

On Tuesday, May 5, Walker fired back, calling the confidentiality agreement illegal and unenforceable, saying that Pontarelli broke it first by talking on “Real Housewives,” and filing a countersuit saying that he made false, “defamatory and disparaging” comments on the “Real Housewives” main show, as well as during a podcast and an after-show live broadcast. She is seeking unspecified damages.

A past affair, current speculation and a national audience feed lawsuit

Walker particularly identifies the April 26 episode of “Watch What Happens Live,” when host Andy Cohen brings back stars from the show, which was taped last year, for further discussion. In this episode, Brian and Rulla talk about how their marriage has survived his cheating with another woman.

One of the subplots of “The Real Housewives of Rhode Island,” which is midway through its first season, is whether or not the affair Brian had is still ongoing. Texts and social media posts by an unnamed woman, whom the cast refers to as “the mistress,” feature in several episodes.

What Beth Walker has to say

Reached by The Providence Journal on Wednesday afternoon, May 6, Walker’s lawyer, Frank L. Orabona Jr., said that she can’t tell her side of the story right now.

Advertisement

“A public narrative has been created around my client, but narrative and facts are not always the same thing,” Orabona said. “As this unfolds, the evidence will tell a very different story.”

Post-show discussion and podcast fuel drama in court

In the April 26 “Watch What Happens Live” episode, in which Walker’s suit says Pontarelli “discussed a romantic relationship … in a defamatory and disparaging manner,” Rulla and Brian talk about his affair with “the mistress,” also referring to her as “the cockroach.”

Walker’s Tuesday filing also served as her answer to Pontarelli’s suit, and she asked the court to toss his claim based on 16 separate grounds.

Advertisement

Among other things, Walker’s filing says:

  • “Walker’s speech relates to topics of public concern being discussed weekly to a nationwide audience of millions of viewers.”
  • “Any comments made by Walker were truthful, not disparaging, related to matters in the public domain and/or were made in good faith.”
  • “As a result of the national publicity of the show, information related to [Pontarelli’s] personal, romantic relationships is public knowledge nationally across the United States and locally in communities throughout Rhode Island; and is otherwise in the public domain.”
  • “It is inequitable and unfair to allow [Pontarelli] a national platform to discuss topics to a coast-to-coast audience and prohibit Walker from speaking on the same topics and/or from correcting false information being spread by [Pontarelli] or others.”
  • Prohibiting her from commenting would violate the state and federal constitutions’ guarantee of free speech.

No hearings have been scheduled in the case.

Pontarelli’s lawyer, Jessica L. Basso, declined to comment on the case.

This story has been updated with new information.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Several Rhode Islanders win lottery prizes, $2 million Powerball prize still unclaimed

Published

on

Several Rhode Islanders win lottery prizes,  million Powerball prize still unclaimed


(WPRI) — The last few weeks have been lucky for Rhode Island lottery players, including a Cranston man who won a $50,000 Powerball prize.

The Rhode Island Lottery said the lucky winner bought his ticket at the Shaw’s Supermarket on Chapel View Boulevard in Cranston for the drawing on April 25.

In that same drawing, someone won a $2 million Powerball prize, but no one has come forward to claim the money yet. That winning ticket was purchased at the Seasons Corner Market on Old Louisquisset Pike in Lincoln.

In Providence, a man won $30,000 through the Mega Multiplier Instant Game after he had a dream about playing the lottery and decided to buy a ticket. He bought that winning ticket at Three Ring Liquors on Plainfield Street. The man said he is planning to share his winnings with his family.

Advertisement

Another lucky lottery player won $25,000 playing The Numbers on April 27. The Lincoln man bought his ticket at the Twin River Mini Mart on Douglas Pike in Smithfield.

A North Providence woman also won big, claiming a $17,760 prize after playing the RI 250 Instant Game. She told lottery officials that she plans to use her winnings to take a trip. She bought her ticket at the Shaw’s Supermarket on Smithfield Road in North Providence.

Whoever won the $2 million Powerball Prize will have until April 29, 2027, to claim their winnings. You can check the winning Powerball numbers here.

Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.

Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.

Advertisement

Follow us on social media:

 

 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Rhode Island resists Trump DOJ demand for trans youth records ordered by Texas judge

Published

on

Rhode Island resists Trump DOJ demand for trans youth records ordered by Texas judge


Rhode Island officials are refusing to turn over private medical records for trans youth to the Trump administration.

The Ocean State’s Office of Child Advocate has filed an emergency motion in federal court to quash a demand from the Justice Department seeking medical information for minors treated for gender dysphoria.


“The medical records of these children contain private information that is protected under the law, which exists to safeguard confidentiality, privacy, and the dignity of every patient,” said Child Advocate Katelyn Medeiros in a statement reported by the Rhode Island Current.

“When those protections are disregarded — especially for children — it is not merely a violation of the law but a breach of trust that could have profound lifelong consequences.”

Advertisement

Related: Rhode Island hockey mass shooting leaves family shattered and shooter’s identity in the spotlight

In this case, the Justice Department is seeking to enforce a court order from a federal judge in Texas that requests records from Rhode Island Hospital. That order is part of an investigation into possible violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act involving puberty blockers and hormone therapy.

The federal agency said Rhode Island must release “the identities and complete medical histories of every minor patient who received medical care for gender dysphoria at RI Hospital over more than five years.”

Rhode Island officials said the release of information on patients there would not only violate medical privacy but could expose a marginalized population to humiliation at the hands of the government.

Related: Texas AG Ken Paxton won’t leave trans people alone, again requests data from out of state

Advertisement

Related: ‘Retaliation’: Texas AG Paxton demands PFLAG provide names, addresses of trans members

“In other words, for a population of children that already lacks trust in the legal and medical systems, DOJ now seeks unfettered access to everything from their Social Security numbers and addresses to the intimate details about their state of mind, their sexual orientation and gender identity, and the course of treatment they chose with their physician and custodians,” attorneys wrote in a court filing.

The demand is part of a broader effort by the Justice Department under President Donald Trump to obtain private medical information on patients receiving gender-affirming care nationwide.

Under since-fired Attorney General Pam Bondi, the Justice Department had demanded private medical information on patients under the age of 19 through a series of broad subpoenas issued last year.

Courts in some states have blocked that pursuit. A federal judge in Maryland denied access in January to records from Children’s National Hospital. Similarly, a federal court in Pennsylvania stopped the administration from obtaining patient records from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia in November.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending