Connect with us

Lifestyle

Climate activist who defaced Edgar Degas sculpture exhibit sentenced

Published

on

Climate activist who defaced Edgar Degas sculpture exhibit sentenced

Joanna Smith was sentenced today for defacing the case of Edgar Degas’ Little Dancer sculpture in 2023.

National Gallery of Art


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

National Gallery of Art


Joanna Smith was sentenced today for defacing the case of Edgar Degas’ Little Dancer sculpture in 2023.

National Gallery of Art

A climate activist found guilty of one count of causing injury to a National Gallery of Art exhibit last year for defacing the case around a sculpture by Edgar Degas at the Washington, D.C., museum was sentenced in federal court on Friday.

Joanna Smith, 54, of Brooklyn, N.Y., got 60 days of prison time out of a possible maximum sentence of five years for smearing red and black paint on the case surrounding Degas’ Little Dancer, Aged Fourteen on Apr. 27, 2023. The 1881 artwork is on permanent display at the museum.

Advertisement

In addition to the prison term, Judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered Smith to serve 24 months of supervised release and 150 hours of community service, of which 10 hours must involve cleaning graffiti. Smith must pay restitution for the damage to the Degas exhibit and is also barred from entering the District of Columbia and all museums and monuments for two years. (The plaintiff did not incur a monetary fine otherwise, though the maximum sentence could have included anything up to a $250,000 penalty.)

Smith undertook the action with North Carolina-based climate activist Tim Martin. They are members of the climate activism group Declare Emergency.

According to a statement from the D.C. United States Attorney’s Office, Smith and Martin specifically targeted the artwork.

“Smith and the co-conspirator passed through security undetected with paint secreted inside water bottles,” the statement said. “The duo approached the exhibit, removed the bottles from their bags, and began smearing paint on the case and base.”

Advertisement

YouTube

The statement said the National Gallery had to remove the sculpture from public display for 10 days, and that gallery officials said it cost over $4,000 to repair the damage.

“On April 27, 2023, the protective sanctuary for this beloved girl [Degas’ “Little Dancer”] was battered. She is one of the most vulnerable and fragile works in our entire collection. I cannot overemphasize how the violent treatment of her protection barrier, repeated slamming, and vibrations, have forever jeopardized her stability,” said Kaywin Feldman, director of the National Gallery of Art, in a statement to NPR. “With increased frequency, institutions – overwhelmingly non-profit museums for the public benefit – have suffered collateral damage at the hands of agendas that have nothing to do with museums or the art attacked. The real damage that these acts of vandalism pose must be taken seriously to deter future incidents that continue to threaten our cultural heritage and historic memory.”

“The ‘Little Dancer’ is a depiction of a vulnerable, 14-year-old girl who worked at the Paris Opera. Degas’ depiction of her is beautiful and has been viewed by millions, but the ‘Little Dancer’ seemingly disappeared after she posed for Degas,” said a statement on Declare Emergency’s Instagram page explaining the action at the museum last year. “Like the ‘Little Dancer,’ millions of little girls and boys won’t have a future because our leaders didn’t act decades ago when they should have and continue to drag their feet to stop the fossil fueled climate catastrophe that is engulfing us all.”

Advertisement

Smith and Martin were taken into custody following an indictment. They were charged with conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States and injury to a National Gallery of Art exhibit.

Smith pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington D.C., last December.

Martin’s jury trial case is scheduled for Aug. 26.

A cause célèbre

Popularly known as “The Degas Two,” Smith and Martin have become a cause célèbre in climate activism circles.

Colleagues from other climate groups have spoken out publicly about the case.

Advertisement

Last June, around 20 members of Extinction Rebellion NYC and Rise and Resist protested the charges against Martin and Smith at the Metropolitan Museum in New York.

Extinction Rebellion climate activist Lydia Woolley interrupted a Broadway performance last month, yelling, “Don’t forget about Joanna Smith. Don’t forget about Tim Martin. Don’t forget about the truth tellers. This play doesn’t end when you leave the theater.”

And more than 1,000 people signed a petition ahead of the sentence hearing urging judge Amy Berman Jackson to show leniency on Smith.

“Smith and Martin placed their hands in water-soluble paint and left their handprints on equipment supporting the Degas sculpture ‘Little Dancer,’ which portrays a child. They willingly allowed themselves to be arrested for this symbolic act of civil disobedience, which caused no harm to any person and did not result in the destruction or damage of any property,” the letter to Jackson accompanying the petition states. “The right to protest in the U.S. and the history of symbolic, nonviolent civil disobedience actions are well-documented. However, these charges and this case appear to disregard past precedents and respond to these recent acts in an excessively severe manner.”

Advertisement

Increasing penalties

Penalties against climate protest have been increasing over the past couple of years — and not just in the U.S.

Last year, for instance, two protesters from the climate activism group Just Stop Oil each received sentences of more than two-and-a-half years for scaling a bridge over the River Thames in southeast England, causing a public nuisance. (Both men ended up serving partial sentences — Morgan was released last December and Decker, this past February.)

And just this week, British physician Sarah Benn, who spent more than a month in jail after a series of climate protests, was suspended by a medical tribunal for misconduct.

In Germany, police launched raids against climate activists with the Letzte Generation (Last Generation) group last year. According to an article in The Washington Post from May 2023, seven suspects “were accused of organizing a fundraising campaign to finance criminal activities, advertising them on their website and collecting at least $1.5 million in donations so far.”

Broader implications

Some climate change activism experts are considering how the ratcheting up of penalties against protesters will impact the movement more broadly.

Advertisement

“It is putting people off for sure,” said James Özden, the founder of Social Change Lab, a nonprofit that researches climate activism and other social movements. “I think it’s meaningful that only a small number of people who are willing and able to take these kinds of risks are taking these kinds of actions.”

But Özden also said the severity of governmental pushback could potentially galvanize activists towards taking even more risks.

“Even though the sentences increase, so does people’s desire to actually do something about climate change and make a change and try help wherever they can. So I expect people will keep taking these actions because they don’t see a viable alternative,” he said.

Martin of “The Degas Two” said the inability of many people to grasp the severity of the climate change crisis is the biggest hurdle obstructing the momentum of the climate movement.

“Until the climate and social justice emergencies become more of a clear and present danger to Americans, we won’t have nearly the number of supporters we ought to have who are willing to risk arrest,” Martin said.

Advertisement

Jennifer Vanasco edited this story.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Lifestyle

Beautifully acted 'Shardlake' brings 500-year-old Tudor intrigue into the present day

Published

on

Beautifully acted 'Shardlake' brings 500-year-old Tudor intrigue into the present day

Arthur Hughes plays the title character in Hulu’s four-part series, Shardlake.

Martin Mlaka/Hulu


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Martin Mlaka/Hulu


Arthur Hughes plays the title character in Hulu’s four-part series, Shardlake.

Martin Mlaka/Hulu

We live in discordant times, which may be why the turbulent reign of King Henry VIII has enjoyed a revival over the last few years. We’ve had the gleefully trashy TV series The Tudors, the Tony-winning Broadway musical Six and – at the high end of achievement – Hilary Mantel’s trilogy about Henry’s right-hand-man Thomas Cromwell.

Now comes the new Hulu mystery series Shardlake, based on C.J. Sansom’s first novel in a series about a crime-solving lawyer in 16th-century England. As a rule, I hate historical mysteries and I feared that Shardlake would serve up the Tudor era’s usual cavalcade of castles, codpieces, clopping horses and quasi-Shakespearean lingo – “Prithee, stop, sirrah!” But to my surprise this odd, beautifully acted show pulled me in.

Advertisement

Arthur Hughes stars as Matthew Shardlake, a bitingly intense London barrister known for his brains and for the curved spine that leads the world to undervalue him. One who sees his value is the king’s minister Thomas Cromwell – played by a domineering Sean Bean – a dangerous man who’s busy stripping the assets of the Catholic church and claiming them for the Crown.

As the action begins, Cromwell has just had his envoy murdered in a coastal monastery. He sends Shardlake to find the killer and, in the process, to find evidence of monkish malfeasance that will justify seizing the monastery’s holdings. To keep Shardlake on his toes, he sends along one of his henchmen, brash, impulsive Jack Barak. That’s Anthony Boyle, who plays John Wilkes Booth in the current series Manhunt.

Because the monastery is filled with Catholic monks who hate the Protestant king, things are tricky there from the get-go. Not only do Shardlake and Jack keep being lied to, but the murders are just beginning. As they investigate, they both grow smitten with a servant – played by Ruby Ashbourne Serkis – and they start to develop one of those classic detective story partnerships between a brilliant misfit and an earthier, ordinary guy.

Now, I don’t want to oversell Shardlake. As a historical show, it lacks the sweeping grandeur of Shogun, another period drama that reminds us that Protestants and Catholics were once at each other’s throats. Nor does it approach Mantel’s richly vibrant vision of Henry VIII’s England, with its divisions and hatreds and social climbing.

Yet it has a strong historical atmosphere, especially in showing how Shardlake and Jack find themselves squeezed by powerful forces around them. Both believe they’re doing the right thing in helping Cromwell seize Catholic wealth, thinking it should go to England’s countless poor people. At the same time, they come to realize that, in Cromwell, they’re working for an utterly ruthless politician, one who may have played a key role in setting up Anne Boleyn, whose beheading figures into the plot here.

Advertisement

The show’s finest moments lie in the byplay between its lead actors, played by two of Britain’s rising stars. As the cocky Jack – a lad risen from the streets and terrified of sinking back – Boyle deftly straddles the line between likable and not. You see why he’s been cast to star as a charismatic IRA leader in the upcoming TV adaptation of Patrick Radden Keefe’s book Say Nothing.

Jack’s extroversion pairs nicely with the tightly wound Shardlake, whose smile is almost a wince. Hughes was the first actor with a disability to ever play Richard III for the Royal Shakespeare Company – he was born radial dysplasia affecting his right arm – and he doubtless understands Shardlake’s pride in the face of what some consider his physical imperfection. “I’m known for my gait,” Shardlake says. “It is I, and I embrace it.”

Such self-assertion is profoundly modern, and for all its Tudor trappings, Shardlake is filled with present day resonances – not least in its portrait of Cromwell who claims to speak for the people but actually works on behalf of the elite. “The truth must be what we want it to be,” Cromwell declares, and though Shardlake knows this is un-true, he also knows that saying so can get a man killed.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Nikki Glaser Stands By Tom Brady Divorce Jokes, Apologizes to Gisele

Published

on

Nikki Glaser Stands By Tom Brady Divorce Jokes, Apologizes to Gisele

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

The Eurovision Song Contest kicked off with pop and protests

Published

on

The Eurovision Song Contest kicked off with pop and protests

Baby Lasagna of Croatia performs the song Rim Tim Tagi Dim during the first semi-final at the Eurovision Song Contest in Malmo, Sweden, on Tuesday.

Martin Meissner/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Martin Meissner/AP


Baby Lasagna of Croatia performs the song Rim Tim Tagi Dim during the first semi-final at the Eurovision Song Contest in Malmo, Sweden, on Tuesday.

Martin Meissner/AP

MALMO, Sweden — Competition in the 68th Eurovision Song Contest kicked off Tuesday in Sweden, with the war in Gaza casting a shadow over the sequin-spangled pop extravaganza.

Performers representing countries across Europe and beyond took the stage in the first of two semifinals in the Swedish city of Malmo. It and a second semifinal on Thursday will winnow a field of 37 nations to 26 who will compete in Saturday’s final against a backdrop of both parties and protests.

Advertisement

Baby Lasagna of Croatia performs the song Rim Tim Tagi Dim during the first semi-final at the Eurovision Song Contest in Malmo, Sweden, on Tuesday.

Martin Meissner/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Martin Meissner/AP

Advertisement


Baby Lasagna of Croatia performs the song Rim Tim Tagi Dim during the first semi-final at the Eurovision Song Contest in Malmo, Sweden, on Tuesday.

Martin Meissner/AP

Ten of the 15 acts performing Tuesday were voted through to the final by viewers. They include Croatian singer-songwriter Baby Lasagna, whose infectious electro number “Rim Tim Tagi Dim” is the current favorite to win, and Ukrainian duo alyona alyona and Jerry Heil, flying the flag for their war-battered nation with the anthemic “Teresa & Maria.”

Also making the cut were goth-style Irish singer Bambie Thug, 1990s-loving Finnish prankster Windows95man and Portuguese crooner Iolanda. Iceland, Azerbaijan, Poland, Moldova and Australia were eliminated.

Other bookmakers’ favorites who will perform Thursday include nonbinary Swiss singer Nemo, Italian TikTok star Angelina Mango and the Netherlands’ Joost Klein with his playful pop-rap song “Europapa.”

Advertisement

Bambie Thug of Ireland performs the song Doomsday Blue during the first semi-final at the Eurovision Song Contest in Malmo, Sweden, on Tuesday.

Martin Meissner/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Martin Meissner/AP

Advertisement


Bambie Thug of Ireland performs the song Doomsday Blue during the first semi-final at the Eurovision Song Contest in Malmo, Sweden, on Tuesday.

Martin Meissner/AP

Anti-war demonstrations become the backdrop

Security is tight in the Swedish city, which expects an influx of some 100,000 Eurovision fans, along with tens of thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters. Israel is a Eurovision participant, and demonstrations are planned on Thursday and Saturday against the Israel-Hamas war, which has left almost 35,000 Palestinians dead.

Israel’s government warned its citizens of a “tangible concern” Israelis could be targeted for attack in Malmo during the contest.

Organizers told Israel to change the lyrics of its entry, originally titled “October Rain” in apparent reference to Hamas’ cross-border Oct. 7 attack that killed some 1,200 Israelis and triggered the war. The song was renamed “Hurricane” and Israeli singer Eden Golan was allowed to remain in the contest.

Advertisement

Jean Philip De Tender, deputy director-general of Eurovision organizer the European Broadcasting Union, told Sky News that banning Israel “would have been a political decision, and as such (one) which we cannot take.”

Police from across Sweden have been drafted in for Eurovision week, along with reinforcements from neighboring Denmark and Norway.

Sweden’s official terrorism threat level remains “high,” the second-highest rung on a five-point scale, after a string of public desecrations of the Quran last year sparked angry demonstrations across Muslim countries and threats from militant groups. The desecrations were not related to the music event.

Eurovision’s motto is “United by Music,” but national rifts and political divisions often cloud the contest despite organizers’ efforts to keep politics out.

Flags and signs are banned, apart from participants’ national flags and the rainbow pride flag. That means Palestinian flags will be barred inside the Malmo Arena contest venue.

Advertisement

Some musicians seem determined to make a point. Eric Saade, a former Swedish Eurovision contestant who performed as part of Tuesday’s show, had a keffiyeh, a headscarf associated with the Palestinian cause, tied around his wrist as he sang.

Afterwards, organizers said in a statement that “we regret that Eric Saade chose to compromise the non-political nature of the event.”

Performers are feeling political pressure, with some saying they have been inundated with messages on social media urging them to boycott the event.

“I am being accused, if I don’t boycott Eurovision, of being an accomplice to genocide in Gaza,” Germany’s contestant, Isaak, said in an interview published by broadcaster ZDF. He said he did not agree.

“We are meeting up to make music, and when we start shutting people out categorically, there will be fewer and fewer of us,” he said. “At some point there won’t be an event anymore.”

Advertisement

ISAAK of Germany performs the song Always on the Run during the first semi-final at the Eurovision Song Contest in Malmo, Sweden, on Tuesday.

Martin Meissner/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Martin Meissner/AP

Advertisement


ISAAK of Germany performs the song Always on the Run during the first semi-final at the Eurovision Song Contest in Malmo, Sweden, on Tuesday.

Martin Meissner/AP

One person who knows how Eurovision unity can collide with bitter reality is singer Manizha Sangin, who represented Russia at the contest in 2021. The country was expelled the following year over its invasion of Ukraine.

Manizha, who performs under her first name, spoke out against the war. As a result, her performances were canceled in Russia and her music banned from public spaces. The singer remains in Russia but has found it all but impossible to work.

“People are afraid to work with me here because they’re afraid to have consequences after, problems after that,” she said.

Advertisement

Despite the difficulties, Manizha has recorded a single, “Candlelight,” which she is releasing on Wednesday as “a message of hope.”

“Music cannot stop war,” she said. But “what music can do is inspire people.”

Manizha thinks Russia will one day return to the Eurovision fold – but not soon.

“Maybe next generation,” she said. “But for now, relationships are too complicated. And then that makes me sad, you know, because that’s why people are not hearing each other. Because we are separated from each other. And the thing, is music should unite.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending