Connect with us

Health

Amid bird flu spread, experts reveal if it's safe to drink milk: 'Indirect concern'

Published

on

Amid bird flu spread, experts reveal if it's safe to drink milk: 'Indirect concern'

Traces of bird flu have been detected in pasteurized milk — leaving many people wondering if it’s safe to drink.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a notice on Thursday stating that one in five retail samples of commercial milk tested positive for fragments of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), more commonly known as bird flu or avian flu.

The share of milk with viral remnants was higher in areas where herds of cattle had been infected.

BIRD FLU PANDEMIC IN FUTURE? EU WARNS OF POTENTIAL SPREAD TO HUMANS DUE TO ‘LACK OF IMMUNE DEFENSE’

Advertisement

The presence of the virus in the milk doesn’t necessarily mean there is a risk to consumers, however, the FDA noted.

“Additional testing is required to determine whether an intact pathogen is still present and if it remains infectious, which would help inform a determination of whether there is any risk of illness associated with consuming the product,” the agency stated.

Traces of bird flu have been detected in pasteurized milk, leaving many people wondering if it’s safe to drink. (iStock)

“Although bird flu viruses do not normally infect humans, sporadic human infections have occurred,” the FDA stated in the alert.

Pasteurization eliminates risk, experts say

Before milk can be sold commercially, government regulations require that it is pasteurized.

Advertisement

During the pasteurization process, raw milk is heated to a certain temperature for a brief period of time and is then chilled again, according to the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) website.

This process kills any pathogens and ensures that milk is safe to drink.

BIRD FLU VIRUS FOUND IN GROCERY STORE MILK, BUT NO RISK TO CUSTOMERS, FDA SAYS

Dr. Scott Pegan, professor of biomedical sciences at the University of California, Riverside and a biochemist for the United States Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense, said the FDA’s finding does not mean there is any direct risks to consumers.

“In the U.S., commercial intrastate sold milk is required to be pasteurized,” he told Fox News Digital. “This process is geared to kill viruses like H5N1 and other bacteria that can pose a threat to human health.”

Advertisement

A milk pasteurization system is shown at a food and drink exhibition. Pasteurization is a process that kills microbes in food and drink, such as milk, juice, canned food and others. (iStock)

“Milk that has been pasteurized is safe and there is no current reason to avoid it or other pasteurized milk products based on the FDA’s findings,” Pegan went on. 

“However, there is a substantial risk of consuming unpasteurized milk and products of that milk.”

Even after viruses and bacteria have been killed in pasteurized milk, remnants can remain in the milk, he said — but they are not dangerous.

RARE HUMAN CASE OF HIGHLY CONTAGIOUS BIRD FLU CONFIRMED IN TEXAS

Advertisement

Edward Liu, M.D., chief of infectious diseases at Hackensack Meridian Jersey Shore University Medical Center in New Jersey, agreed that there is not a risk associated with drinking pasteurized milk.

“The pasteurization is the key — the heat treatment kills off the viruses,” he told Fox News Digital. “Although the FDA’s testing picked up fragments [of the virus], the heating process destroyed it, so it’s not able to infect people.”

The share of milk with viral remnants was higher in areas where herds of cattle had been infected. (iStock)

The fragments alone are not enough to cause any kind of infection, he confirmed.

“I think the key word is ‘fragments.’ Just like with COVID, if you do a PCR test a month later, we’ll detect little fragments of the virus, but it’s not active anymore,” Liu said. 

Advertisement

“So if the virus isn’t entirely intact, it shouldn’t be able to infect you.”

Any sporadic cases of human infection would likely occur when a farmer is handling birds directly, Liu said.

Consumers should avoid drinking raw milk that has not been pasteurized, the FDA said.

“There are some people who like to go all natural, but pasteurization has been used for decades for safety,” he said. “Some degree of processing is actually better and safer for us.”

Animals pose greater concern, experts say

The “indirect concern” within the scientific and medical community involves the increased risk of “spillover” to humans from animals with the H5N1 virus, said Pegan. 

Advertisement

“Prior to the outbreak in dairy cattle, this concern principally revolved around the risk of transmission to humans from wild birds or poultry,” he told Fox News Digital.

The “indirect concern” within the scientific and medical community involves the increased risk of “spillover” to humans from animals with the H5N1 virus, one expert said. (REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo)

“The presence of H5N1 avian flu in the milk of these cattle shows that cattle may be able to provide a new reservoir for this virus, increasing the odds of exposure to those in direct contact with the infected cattle.”

The more animals that are infected, the higher chance that humans may come in direct contact with the virus — which likely would lead to a greater number of human cases, said Pegan. 

SOCIAL MEDIA USERS UPSET AS SHETLAND PONY IS STUCK IN CATTLE GRID FOR 4 HOURS WITH CREWS TOILING TO FREE HIM

Advertisement

“The case of cattle-to-human transmission seen in Texas is in line with this concern,” he noted. 

“Also, the more mammals infected increases the chances that the virus will adapt to other mammals, such as humans.”

FDA’s recommendations

The FDA restated its “long-standing recommendation” that consumers avoid drinking raw milk that has not been pasteurized. 

The agency also recommends that companies refrain from manufacturing or selling raw milk or raw milk products made with milk from cows that tested positive for bird flu, were exposed to the virus or showed symptoms of illness.

“Over the past few years, there has been an increased consumer demand for these unpasteurized products,” Pegan said. 

Advertisement

The FDA restated its “long-standing recommendation” that consumers avoid drinking raw milk that has not been pasteurized.  (iStock)

“While not allowed to be sold via interstate brands, some states have relaxed local sales of these products at farmer’s markets and similar outlets,” he said. 

“Individuals may want to avoid those unpasteurized products until more information is obtained about this H5N1 avian flu outbreak in dairy cattle.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

The FDA also urged producers to “take precautions” when discarding milk from affected cows, “so that the discarded milk does not become a source of further spread.”

Advertisement

So far, only one person has been confirmed to have contracted the virus after exposure to infected cows, the FDA stated.

“The CDC says the risk to the general public remains low,” the agency said.

“The FDA and USDA continue to indicate that, based on the information we currently have, our commercial milk supply is safe.”

Fox News Digital reached out to the National Milk Producers Federation, the American Dairy Association and the International Dairy Foods Association for comment.

Advertisement

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health.

Health

A Single Infusion Could Suppress H.I.V. for Years, Study Suggests

Published

on

A Single Infusion Could Suppress H.I.V. for Years, Study Suggests

For about a decade, scientists have had remarkable success curing some blood cancers by modifying a patient’s own immune cells to recognize and kill the malignant cells.

That same approach may help control H.I.V., among the wiliest of viruses, scientists will report on Tuesday. After a single infusion of immune cells engineered to recognize the virus, two people in a new study have suppressed their H.I.V. to undetectable levels, one of them for nearly two years.

The data is scheduled to be presented at a gene therapy conference in Boston, but the researchers shared an early copy with The New York Times.

The treatment is years, if not decades, from being widely available, but the study offers what scientists call “proof of concept,” and the tantalizing hope that a single shot could one day offer lifelong relief from H.I.V.

“It is inspiration and a potential road map to get to where we need to go,” said Dr. Steve Deeks, an H.I.V. expert at the University of California, San Francisco, who led the trial.

Advertisement

Other scientists were enthusiastic about the milestone.

“It’s truly amazing that they were able to accomplish this,” said Dr. Hans-Peter Kiem, an oncologist and gene therapy expert at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in Seattle, who was not involved in the study.

H.I.V. requires lifelong control because the virus hides out in deep recesses of the body, and comes roaring back when it sees an opportunity. It also mutates easily to evade its attackers.

More than 40 million people are living with H.I.V. worldwide. About three-fourths of them take daily oral pills to keep the virus in check, and a much smaller proportion now receive injections every month or two. Several companies are developing longer-acting options, including weekly and monthly pills, and shots that could be given just once a year.

But scientists still aspire to develop “functional cures” that would effectively control H.I.V. over a lifetime, even if they do not eliminate it.

Advertisement

“People are really working hard on trying to cure it, and we’re making progress,” said James Riley, an immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania who is also modifying immune cells to control H.I.V.

Since the 1990s, many scientists have tried to modify immune cells called T cells to attack H.I.V., but those efforts were mostly unsuccessful. Some research teams lost interest after the arrival of powerful antiretroviral drugs soon after.

Cancer researchers soldiered on and succeeded in using the approach against blood cancers like leukemia.

“Cancer will always probably be the pioneer in this stuff, because of the incredible unmet medical need,” Dr. Riley said.

In the new study, scientists at Caring Cross, a nonprofit focused on developing affordable immunotherapies, engineered immune cells from each study participant to carry two molecules on the cell surface. Both molecules bind to H.I.V. and kill infected cells, but one also prevents the immune cells from becoming infected.

Advertisement

“It’s this dual nature of targeting — killing and protecting — that we think is the missing piece in terms of how this therapy works,” said Boro Dropulić, the executive director of Caring Cross, who developed the method.

The researchers extracted immune cells from each participant, modified the cells, then injected them back in. The participants stopped taking antiretroviral drugs the day of the infusion.

If a person does not take antiretroviral drugs, their H.I.V. levels typically soar within two weeks. But one person in the trial partially suppressed the virus for 12 weeks before rebounding. Two others were still in remission, 92 and 48 weeks after their infusion.

All three had begun receiving antiretroviral therapy within months of being infected. Three others who had lived with H.I.V. for longer before they were treated did not respond and needed to resume antiretroviral therapy. (A seventh participant showed signs of control seven weeks after infusion.)

Those details may be important. Those who were treated early in infection may have less H.I.V. sequestered in their body. Their immune system may also be less ravaged by the virus, and therefore more likely to rally when infused with the modified cells.

Advertisement

“Three out of three people with early disease doing some degree of control, to me, is the most provocative finding here,” Dr. Deeks said.

The two people with long-term response did show some blips of viral replication that quickly died down. That is to be expected as H.I.V. emerges from its reservoirs and is quashed by the immune cells.

Still, the results were exciting, several experts said.

The numbers in the study are very small but “these n-of-ones are so powerful because they encourage further research,” said Dr. Mike McCune, the head of a division at the Gates Foundation that supports innovation in H.I.V.

“For us, what’s important is to make sure that we can go from an n-of-one to an n-of-a-million or more,” he said. “And the only way to do that is to engage companies that know how to make products.”

Advertisement

The foundation has not invested in work that involves removing immune cells and reinfusing them back into the individual. That approach is too invasive and expensive to reach the millions who will need it, Dr. McCune said. But it is actively pursuing scalable options.

Cancer researchers are already showing success altering the immune cells while they are still in the body, which should eventually be cheaper by orders of magnitude.

The direct injections could be produced “for less than $10,000 and then be off-the-shelf, meaning you can have them ready when a patient or person living with H.I.V. comes in,” Dr. Kiem said.

Other groups are working on broadly neutralizing antibodies, rare molecules that can disable a wide range of H.I.V. versions by targeting parts of the virus that do not mutate.

“If we can combine these two approaches, that really may be synergistic and provide a pathway to deliver something close to a functional cure long term,” Dr. Riley said.

Advertisement

Anticipating long-term needs, Caring Cross is working with organizations in Brazil, India and elsewhere to manufacture the products for cancer at much lower costs. The team is also refining the tools and approach for H.I.V. and plans to begin a bigger study later this year.

“This is a first-in-human approach,” Dr. Deeks said. “We often come up with new theories as we do this, and that’s what’s happening as we speak.”

Continue Reading

Health

Two Maryland residents monitored for hantavirus after sharing flight with infected cruise ship passenger

Published

on

Two Maryland residents monitored for hantavirus after sharing flight with infected cruise ship passenger

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Two Maryland residents are being monitored for potential hantavirus exposure, according to the Maryland Department of Health.

Health officials said the Maryland residents were on a flight that included a passenger from the MV Hondius cruise ship who was infected with hantavirus.

Health authorities said they are taking these steps out of an abundance of caution. At this time, the risk to the public in Maryland remains “very low,” state health officials said.

DR MARC SIEGEL: HANTAVIRUS CRUISE OUTBREAK IS ALARMING BUT FEAR IS SPREADING FASTER THAN FACTS

Advertisement

View of the cruise ship MV Hondius docked in the port of Granadilla before setting course for the Netherlands, on 11 May, 2026 in Granadilla de Abona, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.  (Europa Press Canarias via Getty Images)

Maryland health officials said the two residents with potential hantavirus exposure were not on the MV Hondius cruise ship, but they were on a flight abroad with a passenger who has the virus.

The department declined to provide additional details about the residents, citing a need to protect their privacy.

Medical staff direct some of the last passengers to be evacuated from the MV Hondius on May 11, 2026 in Tenerife, part of the Canary Islands, Spain.  (Chris McGrath/Getty Images)

The two Maryland residents are being monitored during the virus’s incubation period, which can range from four to 42 days. Officials said asymptomatic individuals are not considered infectious.

Advertisement

No hantavirus cases have been reported in Maryland since 2019, and Andes virus infections have never been identified in the state, officials said. Health authorities said they are coordinating with federal and international partners as the situation continues to evolve.

WHAT IS HANTAVIRUS, THE CAUSE OF GENE HACKMAN’S WIFE’S DEATH?

American passengers from the cruise ship MV Hondius arrived in Omaha, Neb., on Monday, May 11, 2026, after flying from Tenerife, Spain. The ship was stricken with hantavirus. (Nick Ingram/AP)

According to the Maryland Department of Health, hantavirus is typically spread through contact with infected rodents, but the strain tied to the cruise ship – the Andes virus – is the only known type capable of person-to-person transmission.

“The hantaviruses that are found throughout the United States are not known to spread between people,” the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a rare infectious disease that starts with flu-like symptoms and can quickly progress to life-threatening lung and heart problems. Several hantavirus strains can cause the illness, also known as hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome, according to Mayo Clinic. 

Early symptoms of HPS can include fatigue, fever and muscle aches, with about half of all patients also experiencing headaches, dizziness, chills and abdominal problems, like nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, according to the CDC. 

HPS has a nearly 40% fatality rate in those who are infected, according to the CDC. Similar hantavirus cases have been reported in Arizona, California and Georgia.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

Doctors Reveal the 3 Surprising Weight-Loss Hacks Nobody Talks About

Published

on

Doctors Reveal the 3 Surprising Weight-Loss Hacks Nobody Talks About


Advertisement





Surprising Weight-Loss Hacks Doctors Swear by To Melt Pounds




















Advertisement





Advertisement


Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.


Use escape to exit the menu.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending