Connect with us

New Jersey

NEW JERSEY:  MAJORITY SUPPORTS PLASTIC BAG BAN; BUT FEW AWARE OF BAN ON PAPER – Insider NJ

Published

on


NEW JERSEY:  MAJORITY SUPPORTS PLASTIC BAG BAN; BUT FEW AWARE OF BAN ON PAPER

 

Decrease revenue residents anticipate more durable time to adapt

 

Advertisement

West Lengthy Department, NJ – Most New Jerseyans are conscious {that a} ban on single-use plastic baggage will go into impact subsequent month, however the phrase “ban” might imply various things to completely different folks. There may be majority assist for a “plastic bag ban,” however many backers would nonetheless desire to have entry to plastic baggage for a small charge. On the identical time, the Monmouth (“Mon-muth”) College Ballot finds that many New Jerseyans are more likely to be caught off guard in the event that they anticipate to have the ability to get a paper bag. Few are conscious {that a} ban on paper at giant supermarkets is included within the new guidelines. Total, most state residents say will probably be straightforward for them to regulate to bringing their very own baggage after they store, however these on the decrease finish of the revenue scale are extra possible than others to say they’ll have a really exhausting time adjusting.

NEW JERSEY: SINGLE-USE BANS
 Help ban on…   BY PARTY
TOTAL DEM IND REP
         
Foam meals containers 64% 73% 66% 49%
         
Plastic baggage 61% 72% 62% 44%
         
Plastic straws 52% 67% 54% 26%
         
Grocery store paper baggage 47% 52% 40% 49%
Source: Monmouth College Ballot

New Jersey, March 31-April 4, 2022

Seven in ten New Jerseyans are conscious that shops will probably be prohibited from offering single-use plastic carryout baggage beginning in Could – 33% have heard lots and 37% have heard somewhat about this.  Total, 61% of state residents assist a plastic bag ban, which has similarities to public assist in 2019 (65%).

The ballot finds the definition of a “ban” will not be constant amongst each Backyard State resident, nonetheless. When introduced with a lot of completely different choices, 30% assist an outright ban on all single-use plastic baggage, however 28% desire to permit clients to pay a small charge if they need a plastic bag. One other 41% say shops ought to proceed to be allowed to present away single-use plastic baggage at no cost. These outcomes are just about unchanged from a Monmouth ballot taken three years in the past.

Advertisement

“Most New Jerseyans assist efforts to cut back plastic use, the query is how pleased they are going to be with the change as soon as it goes into impact,” mentioned Patrick Murray, director of the impartial Monmouth College Polling Institute.

About 2 in 3 residents total say will probably be both very straightforward (38%) or considerably straightforward (28%) for them to adapt to bringing their very own baggage after they store. A big phase of the general public (38%) say they already convey their very own baggage when searching for groceries. However half (50%) usually use the shop’s plastic baggage and 10% use paper baggage supplied by the shop. Amongst present plastic and paper bag customers, simply over half say adapting to bringing their very own baggage will probably be both very (22%) or considerably (32%) straightforward.

Generally, New Jerseyans on the decrease finish of the revenue scale might have the toughest time adjusting to the ban on single-use baggage. One-fourth (24%) of those that make lower than $50,000 a yr say this alteration will probably be very troublesome for them, in contrast with 15% of these incomes $50,000 to $100,000 and 10% of these making over $100,000. Whereas 57% of these incomes lower than $50,000 say they assist a ban on single-use plastic baggage, absolutely 51% of this group would favor that shops nonetheless have the ability to give them out at no cost and one other 26% say they need to have the ability to cost clients a small charge for them.

“The upcoming ban is more likely to produce probably the most confusion and issues for these on very tight incomes, particularly for these with restricted transportation choices,” mentioned Murray.

The brand new legislation additionally features a ban on giving out paper baggage in giant supermarkets. Solely 28% of the general public is conscious of this provision and fewer than half (47%) helps it. Curiously, there’s little or no distinction between Democratic (52%) and Republican (49%) backing of this measure. This stands in distinction to statewide opinion on banning numerous single-use plastics which have large partisan gaps.

Advertisement

“Lots of people who assume that they’ll merely bag their groceries in paper as a substitute of plastic on the checkout subsequent month are in for a shock,” mentioned Murray.

In different ballot findings, practically two-thirds of the general public helps a ban on takeout containers and cups fabricated from polystyrene foam (64%), which is a part of the legislation going into impact subsequent month. Simply over half (52%) again a ban on plastic straws, which is similar to public assist in 2019.  The ballot additionally finds that solely somewhat over half the general public (51%) is conscious that the legislation on plastic straws modified final fall, requiring clients to request a straw fairly than be given one mechanically. When requested how New Jersey meals institutions are dealing with this, 47% of state residents report that almost all are complying with the brand new rule whereas 32% say most are nonetheless giving out plastic straws with out being requested by the shopper.

“The brand new plastic straw rule wants a bit extra direct commentary to evaluate compliance. Half the general public hasn’t even heard of it and there could also be selective reminiscence amongst those that have about companies complying with the brand new rule,” mentioned Murray.

At the least two-thirds of Democrats assist the bans on single-use plastic baggage (72%), foam containers (73%), and plastic straws (67%). Just below half of Republicans again the ban on plastic baggage (44%) and foam containers (49%), and simply 1 in 4 assist a ban on plastic straws (26%).

The Monmouth College Ballot was performed by phone from March 31 to April 4, 2022 with 802 New Jersey adults.  The query outcomes on this launch have a margin of error of +/- 3.5 share factors. The ballot was performed by the Monmouth College Polling Institute in West Lengthy Department, NJ.

Advertisement

 

QUESTIONS AND RESULTS     

(* Some columns might not add to 100% attributable to rounding.)

 

[Q1 held for future release.]

Advertisement

[Q2-20 previously released.]

 

  1. If you go grocery buying, do you usually convey your personal baggage, do you utilize single-use plastic baggage supplied by the shop, or do you utilize paper baggage supplied by the shop at checkout?  [If MIXED or DEPENDS: What do you use most of the time?]
April
2022
Carry personal baggage 38%
Retailer’s plastic baggage 50%
Retailer’s paper baggage 10%
(VOL) Don’t store for groceries 1%
(VOL) Don’t know 1%
   (n) (802)

 

  1. Do you assist or oppose a ban on single-use plastic baggage in New Jersey, resembling these given out at supermarkets or different shops?
TREND: April
2022
Sept.
2019*
Help 61% 65%
Oppose 37% 29%
(VOL) Don’t know 2% 7%
   (n) (802) (713)

* Query wording in 2019 was “Would you assist or oppose a ban…”

 

[QUESTIONS 23-25 WERE ROTATED]

 

Advertisement
  1. Do you assist or oppose a ban on giving out paper buying baggage in giant supermarkets?
  April
2022
Help 47%
Oppose 51%
(VOL) Don’t know 2%
   (n) (802)

 

  1. Do you assist or oppose a ban on takeout meals containers and cups which are made out of polystyrene, generally referred to as Styrofoam?
  April
2022
Help 64%
Oppose 33%
(VOL) Don’t know 3%
   (n) (802)

 

  1. Do you assist or oppose a ban on plastic straws in New Jersey?
TREND: April
2022
Sept.
2019*
Help 52% 52%
Oppose 45% 44%
(VOL) Don’t know 3% 4%
   (n) (802) (713)

        * Query wording in 2019 was “Would you assist or oppose a ban…”

 

  1. In terms of single-use plastic baggage given out at shops, which of the next would you favor: a whole ban on single-use plastic baggage, making clients pay a small charge if they need a plastic bag, or permitting shops to proceed to present away plastic baggage at no cost?
TREND: April
2022
Sept.
2019
An entire ban on single use plastic baggage 30% 31%
Making clients pay a small charge if they need a plastic bag 28% 27%
Permitting shops to proceed to present away plastic baggage at no cost 41% 39%
(VOL) Don’t know 1% 3%
   (n) (802) (713)

 

  1. Starting in Could, shops in New Jersey will probably be prohibited from offering clients with single-use plastic carryout baggage, even for a charge. This is applicable to all shops, together with supermarkets, clothes and residential items shops, pharmacies and meals institutions. Have you ever heard about this upcoming ban on plastic baggage, or not?  [If YES: Have you heard a lot or a little?]
  April
2022
Sure, lots 33%
Sure, somewhat 37%
Not heard 30%
   (n) (802)

 

  1. The brand new rules additionally embody a ban on giant supermarkets giving out paper baggage, even for a charge. Have you ever heard about this a part of the upcoming ban, or not?
  April
2022
Sure, heard 28%
No, not heard 72%
   (n) (802)

 

  1. How straightforward will or not it’s so that you can adapt to having to convey your personal baggage everytime you buy groceries – very straightforward, considerably straightforward, considerably troublesome, or very troublesome?
  April
2022
Very straightforward 38%
Considerably straightforward 28%
Considerably troublesome 18%
Very troublesome 15%
(VOL) Don’t know 0%
   (n) (802)

 

  1. Since November, New Jersey meals institutions usually are not supposed to present out plastic straws for drink orders except a buyer requests one. Had been you conscious of this new rule, or have been you not conscious of this prior to now?
  April
2022
Conscious 51%
Not conscious 49%
   (n) (802)

 

  1. Based mostly in your expertise, are most New Jersey meals institutions following this new rule or are most nonetheless giving out plastic straws with out the shopper having to ask for one?
  April
2022
Most are following new rule 47%
Most are nonetheless giving out plastic straws 32%
(VOL) Not been to a meals institution 11%
(VOL) Don’t know 11%
   (n) (802)

 

[Q32-37 held for future release.]

[Q38-45 previously released.]

 

METHODOLOGY

Advertisement

The Monmouth College Ballot was sponsored and performed by the Monmouth College Polling Institute from March 31 to April 4, 2022 with a probability-based random pattern of 802 New Jersey adults age 18 and older, in English. This consists of 280 contacted by a reside interviewer on a landline phone and 522 contacted by a reside interviewer on a cellular phone. Phone numbers have been chosen by random digit dialing and landline respondents have been chosen with a modified Troldahl-Carter youngest grownup family display. Monmouth is accountable for all facets of the survey design, information weighting and evaluation. The complete pattern is weighted for area, age, schooling, gender and race primarily based on US Census data (ACS 2018 one-year survey). Knowledge assortment assist supplied by Braun Analysis (area) and Dynata (RDD pattern).  For outcomes primarily based on this pattern, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a most margin of plus or minus 3.5 share factors (unadjusted for pattern design). Sampling error will be bigger for sub-groups (see desk under). Along with sampling error, one ought to keep in mind that query wording and sensible difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.

 

NJ Areas (by county)

North – Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Morris, Passaic, Sussex, Union, Warren

Central – Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Somerset

Advertisement

South – Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape Could, Cumberland, Gloucester, Ocean, Salem

 

DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)
Self-Reported
24% Republican
40% Impartial
36% Democrat
 
49% Male
51% Feminine
 
28% 18-34
34% 35-54
38% 55+
 
58% White
12% Black
19% Hispanic
11% Asian/Different
 
61% No diploma
39% 4 yr diploma

 

MARGIN OF ERROR
unweighted  pattern moe
(+/-)
TOTAL   802 3.5%
REGISTERED VOTER Sure 738 3.6%
No 64 12.3%
SELF-REPORTED PARTY ID Republican 171 7.5%
Impartial 325 5.4%
Democrat 298 5.7%
REGION North 359 5.2%
Central 203 6.9%
South 234 6.4%
GENDER Male 392 5.0%
Feminine 410 4.8%
AGE 18-34 191 7.1%
35-54 306 5.6%
55+ 301 5.7%
RACE White, non-Hispanic 510 4.3%
Different 270 6.0%
COLLEGE GRADUATE No diploma 316 5.5%
4 yr diploma 486 4.5%
INCOME <$50K 128 8.7%
$50 to <$100K 227 6.5%
$100K+ 405 4.9%
CHILDREN IN HOME Sure 286 5.8%
No 516 4.3%

 

 

Advertisement

Crosstabs could also be discovered within the PDF file on the report webpage:  https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/stories/monmouthpoll_NJ_041922/

 

 

(Visited 4 instances, 4 visits at the moment)

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Jersey

Northern Lights in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut Visible Now—Here's When and How

Published

on

Northern Lights in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut Visible Now—Here's When and How


The tri-state area is getting its chance to see the beauty of the Northern Lights right at home, with New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut seeing a cosmic phenomenon brewing now.

It would first appear later in the night this Friday and reports claim that it is possible to see this cosmic display of lights this weekend, which typically takes place in far northern areas. 

Aurora Borealis is a rare light show in North America, offering a glistening, iridescent, and majestic display. 

Northern Lights in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut

(Photo: Pixabay)

NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center reported in its Planetary K-Index that the magnitude of geomagnetic storms coming this Friday, May 10, will reach 7.5 to 9kp. 

Advertisement

This means that Aurora Borealis would appear in the skies of the tri-state area of New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut, starting from around 3:00 PM and peaking at around 9 PM until the wee hours of the night. 

Typically, the northern lights only need a magnitude of 7kp to appear over a certain location in the world. 

According to CBS News, New York will experience an 8kp geomagnetic storm magnitude, a new record high since 2005. 

Read Also: Northern Lights-Like ‘Airglow’ Can Now be Artificially Recreated with Science

How and When to Watch Tristate’s Northern Lights

The Northern Lights in the US’ tristate area would peak at 2:00 AM on Saturday, May 11, and this is when the 9kp geomagnetic storm would occur.

Advertisement

 It was also reported that it is possible to appear through the weekend to view it, but it remains unknown when to expect it. 

CBS reported that users need not be directly under the Aurora Borealis to see it, as it is visible up to 600 miles away. However, it is recommended that they travel out of the city to avoid light pollution that could hinder its visibility. 

Aurora Borealis: The Glamorous Sky Show

One of the most coveted and frequently occurring lights show from space is the Aurora Borealis, and its breathtaking display and otherworldy colors are some of its most coveted experiences for many.

There are many places to see the Aurora, whether in the European region, with Iceland being one of the most famous, or in North America, in various US states and Canada. 

The Northern Lights are known as a natural occurrence from space. The phenomenon has been the subject of many studies, including why it brings out its unique colors and glows above the Earth. 

Advertisement

When the magnetosphere, a three-dimensional space, receives solar winds from the Sun traveling at 250 to 500 miles per second, charged particles from the planet’s magnetic field interact with it, raising electrons to higher states. The excess energy portrays radiant light. 

Many bucket lists include seeing the Aurora Borealis and planning trips to certain cities or regions where it is widely visible and can be enjoyed.

However, this recent cosmic event is coming to the US, particularly in the tri-state area, and can be easily spotted without equipment. 

Related Article: Beautiful Northern Lights Could Happen Around the Globe, Scientists Warns What Comes After

ⓒ 2024 TECHTIMES.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

Bill that will decimate public access to NJ government records moves forward for approval

Published

on

Bill that will decimate public access to NJ government records moves forward for approval



3-minute read

A bill that would gut access to public records is set be voted on by both chambers of the New Jersey Legislature on Monday after it cleared the Assembly Appropriations Committee on Friday afternoon.

The state Senate Budget Committee advanced the bill on Thursday after a sequel of sorts to the bill’s first hearing at a March meeting played out in a Trenton committee room: Advocates delivered hours of testimony against the bill, multiple lawmakers expressed opposition to it and ultimately the same outcome — the bill advanced.

Advertisement

When draft amendments were posted by the Legislature late Friday afternoon, they differed from the version made available to the press before the state Senate committee hearing on Thursday.

The most recent version available on the Legislature’s website removes the presumption of access clause at the beginning of the New Jersey Open Public Records Act, which notes that “government records shall be readily accessible.”

“It’s crazy to me that they pulled this bill in March to claim they would fix it, only to end up with a process and a bill that’s much worse,” CJ Griffin, an attorney and prominent OPRA advocate, said. “The reprint today contains new amendments which were not even before the committee, including gutting Section 1 of OPRA, which required agencies and courts to construe OPRA in favor of access. There’s no explanation for deleting that other than an extreme hostility toward transparency.”

In addition to that change, the implementation of the bill will now cost $10 million instead of $8 million.

Advertisement

What happened at the Assembly hearing?

Friday’s hearing before the Assembly Appropriations Committee was no different from Thursday’s in the state Senate. Dozens of advocates pointed to flaws with the bill. They questioned lawmakers’ motives and called for a more collaborative discussion to further amend the bill.

“Even with limited time to review the amendments, however, we can see that many problematic provisions remain — sort of wolves in sheep’s clothing,” said Evelyn Murphy, president of the League of Women Voters for Monmouth County. “You changed the language, but you did not address the core issues.”

Marleina Ubel, an analyst at the New Jersey Policy Perspective, said that the amendments do “little to address failings of the bill” and “place the onus of the burden on the public rather than on the agency.”

“New Jersey is already a disgraceful 48th in the nation for public access laws and will no doubt slip even further,” she said. “Fewer than 37% know their congressional representative. How many people know the names and the titles and all of the things we are going to be asking them to do to get access to these records?”

Advertisement

Representatives from agency organizations such as the League of Municipalities, New Jersey Conference of Mayors and New Jersey Association of Counties were in support of the bill, though they said that if it were up to them, they would have implemented even more restrictions on access to public records.

“We don’t think this bill goes far enough but this is a legislative process. You don’t get everything you wanted all the time,” said William Caruso, legislative counsel for the New Jersey Conference of Mayors.

Many had hoped for lightning to strike twice — and wanted the bill to again be pulled from consideration at the last moment, as had happened in March.

Instead, the meeting — which featured just the OPRA bill — went on as planned and ultimately the bill advanced with a final tally of 8-1 with Assemblyman Jay Webber abstaining.

Our view: Amended OPRA bill an absolute sham. Gov. Murphy, veto this affront to democracy

Advertisement

What would the ‘reform’ do to roll back OPRA?

Since the bill was first heard in committee in March, Republicans in both chambers have joined as sponsors — state Sen. Anthony Bucco in the upper chamber and Assemblywoman Victoria Flynn in the lower chamber.

The updated bill includes the renewed ability to make anonymous requests and the removal of exemptions for call and email logs and digital calendars.

It also implements stricter requirements on how to request things like texts and emails including specific accounts, times, topics and titles.

There are modifications to the provision limiting access to metadata to allow for access only to the “portion that identifies authorship, identity of editor, and time of change.”

Language restricting data brokers and commercial entities that resell information obtained through OPRA was removed.

Advertisement

Among the parts that remain mostly intact include one of the most controversial, known as the fee-shifting provision. This provision previously required public record custodians that had not, according to a judge, properly provided records to pay the requesters’ attorney fees.

The bill initially changed that to say winners of OPRA lawsuits “may” be entitled to legal fees if the public agency is found to have knowingly violated the law or unreasonably denied access. In its amended form, the bill still eliminates the attorney fee requirement but does allow for judges to decide that fees are warranted if the denial was unreasonable, if the agency “acted in bad faith, or knowingly and willfully violated” the law.

The amendments also include language that would allow for a court to “issue a protective order limiting the number and scope of requests the requester may make” if they “sought records with the intent to substantially interrupt the performance of government function.”

The legislation was first enacted in 2002 and requires local, county and state government entities to provide the public with access to government records in New Jersey.

This bill is slated for a full state Senate vote on Monday and is expected to appear before the full Assembly on Monday as well.

Advertisement

Katie Sobko covers the New Jersey Statehouse. Email: sobko@northjersey.com



Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

Two of the largest homes in America are in New Jersey

Published

on

Two of the largest homes in America are in New Jersey


It’s a reminder of the “Gilded Age”, a time of opulence in America; two stately homes fit for the wealthiest citizens of the US.

The first is Shadow Lawn mansion, a 90,000 square foot estate in West Long Branch.

The estate’s history dates back to the early 20th century when it was first developed by John A. McCall, president of the New York Life Insurance Company. The original mansion served as the summer White House for President Woodrow Wilson in 1916, where he planned his reelection campaign.

After a devastating fire in 1927, Hubert T. Parson, president of the F.W. Woolworth Company, commissioned the construction of the current Shadow Lawn Mansion as a replacement.

Advertisement

It is the eighth largest home in the US.

It’s now part of Monmouth University and was used in the movie, “Annie.”

The other massive New Jersey home is a mansion called “Florham” and it was built by a Vanderbilt,

It was constructed during the 1890s for Hamilton McKown Twombly and his wife, Florence Adele Vanderbilt, a member of the illustrious Vanderbilt family.

Here are some of the pertinent facts about the mansion:

Advertisement

🏡 Architectural Style: The mansion is designed in the English Baroque Revival style.

🏡 Architects: The renowned firm McKim, Mead & White, known for designing notable buildings such as the original Penn Station and the Rhode Island State House.

🏡 Landscaping: The grounds were designed by Frederick Law Olmsted, the co-designer of New York City’s Central Park.

🏡 Construction: The mansion was built between 1893 and 1899.

According to 24/7 Wall Street, it cost $5 million to build, which translates into $146 million in today’s dollars.

Advertisement

Don’t worry if you think you can’t afford it; it’s not for sale. In the 1950s, the estate was broken up and Fairleigh Dickinson University acquired the house and 138 acres of the grounds.

The mansion is now the centerpiece of the campus.

The estate originally spanned over 1,200 acres, meticulously assembled through 37 separate purchases to create a contiguous property on Madison’s “millionaire’s row.” This area was also home to other Gilded Age luminaries such as the Rockefellers, Dodges, and Mellons.

When used as a residence, it had 110 rooms. Thomas Edison, a close associate of the family, personally designed the mansion’s heating system and boiler.

LOOK: Cities with the most expensive homes in New Jersey

Stacker compiled a list of cities with the most expensive homes in New Jersey using data from Zillow.

Gallery Credit: Stacker

Advertisement

LOOK: Which movies were filmed in New Jersey?

Stacker compiled a list of movies filmed in New Jersey using data from Movie Locations, with additional information about each film collected from IMDb.

Gallery Credit: Stacker

Opinions expressed in the post above are those of New Jersey 101.5 talk show host Bill Doyle only.

You can now listen to Deminski & Doyle — On Demand! Hear New Jersey’s favorite afternoon radio show any day of the week. Download the Deminski & Doyle show wherever you get podcasts, on our free app, or listen right now.

Click here to contact an editor about feedback or a correction for this story.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending