Connect with us

Massachusetts

‘With this passing, I plan to run.’ Mass. lawmakers to allow parents to spend campaign funds on child care. – The Boston Globe

Published

on

‘With this passing, I plan to run.’ Mass. lawmakers to allow parents to spend campaign funds on child care. – The Boston Globe


“With this passing, I plan to run in this upcoming election,” said Nicole Coakley, a 43-year-old mother of five and a full-time therapist. Coakley has run twice for Springfield City Council but said she was unsure if she’d try again for a seat on the panel, until now.

During her earlier campaigns, Coakley often took her youngest daughter, now 6, with her to campaign events. She’d then rely on her campaign manager to watch her as Coakley spoke with voters. “For somebody like me, a single parent, we can’t afford that additional financial cost to help cover child care,” she said. With this proposal, “Massachusetts is moving to level the political playing field.”

State rules already allow candidates to spend their campaign cash on tuxedos, body armor, or expensive parties, as long as it’s for the “enhancement of [their] political future” and is not “primarily for personal use.”

They have not been allowed, however, to use political donations to pay a baby sitter while they campaign door to door or attend an evening fund-raising event.

Advertisement

Massachusetts already boasts some of the highest child care costs in the country, if not the highest, according to one measure. A child care center in Massachusetts costs an average of $19,961 annually for a toddler, and family- or home-based care costs $13,344, according to a 2023 report from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. Both were the highest of any state in the US.

“Even if you raise the money, you can’t spend it on something you need. And it’s much more valuable to campaign door to door than it is to pay for a mailing,” said state Senator Patricia D. Jehlen, a Somerville Democrat who has pushed the campaign finance proposal in the Massachusetts Senate.

“If you don’t have relatives or friends to take care of your kids while you’re campaigning, it’s almost impossible to do it,” she said. “This is just one more barrier.”

At least 30 states already allow candidates to use campaign funds for child care, as does the federal election system, according to Vote Mama Foundation, which supports mothers running for public office.

Many have used it, too. Since 2018, at least 68 federal candidates have tapped their campaign for child care funds, spending nearly $718,000 collectively, according to data Vote Mama Foundation published earlier this year. A little more than half of those candidates were women, and 46 percent of those who spent campaign money on child care were people of color.

Advertisement

Still, Massachusetts has long lagged in making the change. A legislative effort in 2017 to allow candidates to expense child care to their campaigns failed. In 2020, a legislative commission recommended the change, arguing it should be allowed when it’s the “direct result of the candidate’s campaign activities.” The state Senate then twice approved language last session, but it never reached then-governor Charlie Baker’s desk.

Supporters saw an opening this session at a time when State House leaders were roundly committed to trying to ease the state’s child care woes.

The proposal included in the economic development bill would allow candidates to spend campaign money on “baby-sitting services,” either by an individual baby sitter or a center, that “occur as a result of campaign activities.” It would bar candidates from paying their family members for child care, unless those relatives run or are employed by a professional child care service.

“We know that moms take the brunt of house work, the child care work. Even if they’re working moms, even if they’re career politicians, they still have to be moms,” said Shaitia Spruell, executive director of the Massachusetts Commission on the Status of Women. “This will absolutely increase the number of women running for office — and hopefully the women in office.”

By some measures, Massachusetts has made notable gains on that front. Five of the state’s six statewide constitutional officers are women, including Governor Maura Healey, the first woman to be elected to that office in state history. She and Kim Driscoll are also one of the country’s first female governor-lieutenant governor duos.

Advertisement

Elsewhere in the State House, however, representation is lacking. Women currently make up 30 percent of the Legislature, but 51 percent of the state’s population. The House and Senate are slated to begin their next two-year session in January with fewer women (61) than it started this session with, according to the Massachusetts Caucus of Women Legislators.

“If you want a diverse legislative body, then you have to be intentional about creating opportunities and removing barriers. And that’s what we did here,” said state Representative Joan Meschino, a Hull Democrat who has cosponsored bills with Representative Mike Connolly of Cambridge to allow candidates to expense child care to their campaigns.

“The bill helps break down those economic barriers,” she said. “That’s going to help open the door.”


Matt Stout can be reached at matt.stout@globe.com. Follow him @mattpstout.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Parents struggle to find child care amid teachers strike in 3 Massachusetts communities; “We’re all overwhelmed”

Published

on

Parents struggle to find child care amid teachers strike in 3 Massachusetts communities; “We’re all overwhelmed”


BEVERLY – As schools remain closed in three Massachusetts communities due to a teachers strike, some parents are struggling to find child care for their children.

“We’re all overwhelmed”

“We’re all overwhelmed,” said Sarah Roy, a mother of two at Ayers Ryal Side Elementary School in Beverly. 

Since last Friday, she’s been juggling her full-time job while also caring for her 6-year-old son Owen and her 11-year-old daughter Annabelle. 

“It’s hard to focus on one or the other when you’re trying to do both at once,” she said. 

Advertisement

Last Thursday, educators in Beverly announced their decision to go on strike, cancelling school Friday and now Wednesday as well. Teachers in Gloucester and Marblehead are also on strike in hopes of getting a new contract with better pay and other benefits. 

“This is a good example to my kids that you should always stand up for what you believe in,” said Roy. She told WBZ-TV she fully supports Beverly educators going on strike, despite the fact that it is illegal in Massachusetts. “The fact that they are getting paid so low is so upsetting. It feels like a reflection of our values and that’s not what I signed up for. Those aren’t my values,” she said. 

Hundreds on child care

In the past week Roy said she has spent $600 for child care. “That was an unexpected expense, that a lot of people don’t have because they’re living paycheck to paycheck,” she said.  The mother of two has hired a babysitter, including local middle schoolers, to watch her children while she works. She says she’s also benefitted from free childcare at the Ryal Side Civic Association Center. 

“We have 25 kids coming in the morning, 25 kids coming in the afternoon,” said Meredith Quinn, Ayers PTO President. She organized the volunteer run child care sessions at the community center so that working parents like herself and Roy can drop their kids off for games and movies. 

“We’re definitely not teaching or learning, but we’re trying to keep the skills sharp while they’re out of school.”

Advertisement

It is still unclear when school will resume for Beverly students. The Beverly Teacher Association and the School Committee are still negotiating a contract. Until they reach a fair agreement, Roy says this is, “just another reminder that we can do hard things, and we make it work.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

High winds making house fires difficult to extinguish in Massachusetts

Published

on

High winds making house fires difficult to extinguish in Massachusetts


MARSHFIELD – Fire crews in Massachusetts are not just dealing with brush fires in these dry and windy conditions, but two house fires had them scrambling to prevent the flames from spreading to neighboring homes. 

Marshfield fire

“The whole sky was covered with black smoke, didn’t know what was happening,” said George Haldoupis, a neighbor who saw the flames quickly spread at a home on Sheridan Drive in Marshfield. “I came out and we saw that house was totally engulfed in flames, it didn’t take long.”

Firefighters from several communities continually poured water on the home and surrounding houses in a neighborhood filled with trees and dried leaves.

“[The wind] was just like a blow torch, it just took off in one direction to the other,” said Marshfield Acting Fire Chief Mike Laselva. “As soon as it caught whatever fire was going, it quickly accelerated it.”

Advertisement

Mara Cronin’s home next door had enough damage to the roof to displace her for now. Fire crews were also able to rescue her three cats hiding under a bed. “Thank god nobody’s hurt, everyone’s OK. We just rescued our three cats so everyone’s fine and we’ll rebuild and we’ll be back,” said Cronin.

Dorchester fire

With only charred remains of the Marshfield home, it was a similar scene on Weyanoke Street in Dorchester as flames quickly engulfed an old Victorian.

“It was quite a bit of smoke in the area. But we couldn’t really figure out where it was. And then we saw the roof literally catch on fire and it looked like a giant candlestick,” said neighbor Dan DeChristoforo.

Six residents were displaced in two units, along with pets. The issue here not just wind but also access. Boston Deputy Fire Chief Scott Malone said rear exits were not only blocked but nailed shut. Dominic Lopez was left screaming from a second floor window to be rescued.

“Within a minute or something like that and then I opened up the window and they were pretty much there,” said Lopez.

Advertisement

“You push security versus safety sometimes,” said Malone. “In this particular case it almost cost someone a life. But thank god we got here in time and that person is saved.”

There were no serious injuries in both fires, but one Boston firefighter had to be treated for neck burns.  

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Shellfish dying, lobster leaving: Mass. marine ecosystem faces hotter, harsher future as climate warms – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Shellfish dying, lobster leaving: Mass. marine ecosystem faces hotter, harsher future as climate warms – The Boston Globe


The Boston Research Advisory Group report found that deadly hot marine heat waves — once extremely rare — could become commonplace. Scientists warn that those and other impacts are only going to get worse if the climate continues to warm with dire and possibly irreversible impacts on the ocean.

If the planet does not stop emitting planet-warming greenhouse gasses, marine heat waves could occur off the coast of Massachusetts once every decade if the planet reaches 2 degrees Celsius of warming and perhaps every other year with 3 degrees of warming. The vast majority of excess heat generated by anthropogenic warming is absorbed by the planet’s oceans.

“The possible impacts described in this report are not pleasant,” said Paul Kirshen, a professor of climate adaptation at the University of Massachusetts Boston and an author of the report. “We need to get to net zero emissions and below as soon as possible.”

Unlike on land, where humans can build a seawall to protect from coastal flooding, for example, there is very little that can be done to help ecosystems adapt to warmer water and higher acidity, experts said. The trends noted in the report will be “very difficult” to respond to, Kirshen said.

Advertisement

The report was created to answer questions posed by leaders of coastal Massachusetts towns and cities about what communities could expect over the next few decades as the climate continues to warm. Many of those towns have local economies that are at least in part dependent on commercial fishing, an industry that is likely to be dramatically changed by a warmer and more acidic Massachusetts Bay.

Native fish populations will likely continue their decline off of Massachusetts’ coast, while species from further south will move in, scientists found. The bay will continue to get acidic and inhospitable for the many fish, plants, and shellfish that live there now.

Oceans absorb about 30 percent of the carbon dioxide that’s released into the atmosphere. When absorbed, carbon dioxide makes sea water more acidic through chemical reactions, putting the entire food web in the marine ecosystem at risk, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

One example: Higher acidity causes shells to deteriorate, which kills shellfish. That will be an early marker of a shift in fishing ecology in Massachusetts Bay, the Boston-area researchers warned.

“Shell fisheries should be monitored … for warning signs,” the report said. As acidity increases, there are fewer carbonate ions in the water, an essential ingredient to build shells.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the Atlantic Cod’s numbers have already declined and the American lobster population is moving north. Scientists further expect populations of winter flounder, silver hake, and Atlantic herring to decline as well.

As others move out, species more suited to warmer temperatures are expected to move in, such as summer flounder, black sea bass, blue crab, and butterfish among them.

Jason Krumholz, an oceanographer and associate professor at the University of Connecticut, said that when he started graduate school in 2005, only very rarely did he catch blue crabs in nets. Now, more than half the crabs he catches are blue crabs, he said.

“I’m not that old yet, and this is a change that I’ve seen just in my career,” said Krumholz, one of the authors of the report. “It’s pretty fast.”

The fishing industry could likely adapt to this change by convincing buyers to push different offerings on the menu, Krumholz said. “We may have a lot more flags outside of restaurants with blue crabs on them instead of lobsters in 20 years.”

Advertisement

Scientists have also observed that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation is slowing down. It’s one of the planet’s most prominent and powerful ocean currents and helps to moderate the climate at sea and on land near the shore.

That’s a wild card for ocean temperatures, said Bruce Anderson, an oceanographer and professor at Boston University and one of the lead authors of the report. The phenomenon could weaken and broaden the Gulf Stream, which brings warm tropical waters to the region.

“It’s really unclear what the Gulf Stream is going to do and how that change is going to affect things like the fisheries or even our climate here in Massachusetts,” Anderson said.

If the Gulf Stream slowdown continues, the water offshore of Massachusetts could see “substantial” warming as subtropical waters diffuse northward into the region, scientists found, further compounding the problems.

Another area of uncertainty: How President-elect Donald Trump’s administration could impact the trajectory of offshore ecosystems.

Advertisement

Environmental advocates are worried that the incoming Trump administration will try to slash budgets for federal environmental agencies, which could both slow the energy transition from fossil fuels to clean energy and affect efforts to clean up marine pollution.

Many federal grants finance beach cleanups, water quality testing, and other programs to manage the marine environment, said Jeff Watters, vice president of external affairs of the Ocean Conservancy, a nonprofit organization.

“I think they’re more at risk now than they were under the first [Trump] administration,” Watters said, because Congress was able to block some of those defunding efforts last time. “Pollution could absolutely go up; that’s a real possibility.”

Those fears come as marshes and coastal ecosystems are already threatened by plastic and pharmaceutical pollution, and runoff pollution is expected to increase due to stronger storms and an increase in coastal populations, according to the new report.

The pollution in Massachusetts Bay is affected by the behavior of people: What they buy, where they fish, how they recreate, and where they live, said Anderson of Boston University.

Advertisement

Yet, perhaps in that relationship lies a glimmer of hope: Towns, cities, and individuals can prevent further pollutants from entering the ecosystem. “This is a very sensitive environment to everyday decisions,” Anderson said.


Erin Douglas can be reached at erin.douglas@globe.com. Follow her @erinmdouglas23.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending