Connect with us

Massachusetts

Harvard gains backing from the state of Massachusetts in Trump administration’s research and funding dispute – The Times of India

Published

on

Harvard gains backing from the state of Massachusetts in Trump administration’s research and funding dispute – The Times of India


Harvard’s ongoing legal disputes with the Trump administration have found a consistent supporter in the state of Massachusetts. According to the Harvard Crimson, since President Donald Trump took office in January, Attorney General Andrea J. Campbell has joined 35 lawsuits and filed several amicus briefs against his administration. Many of these cases involve higher education and research policy, areas central to the state’s economy.Universities and research institutions in Massachusetts support about 320,000 jobs and generate nearly 70 billion dollars in annual economic activity, reports

The Crimson

. The state receives more federal research funding per capita than any other in the country, with universities collectively drawing over 2 billion dollars in federal support each year.Campbell has opposed federal actions that could affect this funding, including restrictions on diversity-related grants and limits on reimbursements for research costs not tied to specific projects. Her office has filed briefs in support of Harvard in both of its lawsuits against the administration’s attempts to apply pressure on the university.

Disputes over federal research funding

Advertisement

The Crimson reports that the legal conflict began soon after the new administration took office. The National Institutes of Health introduced a 15 percent cap on indirect research costs, which cover expenses such as facilities and administrative support. Massachusetts joined 21 other states in suing to block the change. A federal judge later ruled that the cap violated federal law, and it was permanently withdrawn.The National Science Foundation then imposed a similar limit and ended funding for projects aimed at increasing participation of underrepresented groups in science and engineering. Massachusetts again joined other states in challenging the decision. The case is still pending.When the administration cut funding for research involving race, gender, health disparities, and vaccines, Massachusetts participated in another multistate lawsuit. A lower court ordered the restoration of nearly 800 million dollars in grants, but the Supreme Court later allowed the cuts to proceed.

Economic interests and legal alignment

Harvard is one of the largest employers in Massachusetts and a major contributor to the state economy. Its federal research funding supports industries such as biotechnology and healthcare, which depend on university partnerships. State officials view federal funding reductions as a threat to this economic structure.Campbell’s legal stance aligns with these interests. When Harvard sued over the federal government’s decision to freeze more than 2 billion dollars in research funds, Massachusetts led 20 states in supporting the university through an amicus brief, according to the Crimson. A federal judge later ruled that the freeze violated constitutional protections, and most of the blocked payments were released.

Support for international scholars and academic freedom

Massachusetts has also opposed federal actions targeting international students and researchers. The Crimson reports that when the administration moved to revoke Harvard’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, the state filed an amicus brief supporting the university. International students in Massachusetts contribute about 3.9 billion dollars to the state economy each year, including 380 million dollars from Harvard students, supporting nearly 4,000 jobs.Campbell’s office also supported Harvard researcher Kseniia Petrova, who was detained in Louisiana on charges related to undeclared biological materials. She was released from detention in May and is awaiting trial.In another case, Massachusetts joined 19 states in filing a brief in support of university professors, including those from Harvard, who challenged the government’s actions against international academics engaged in political expression. A federal judge ruled this month that the government’s actions violated free speech protections.

Advertisement

Broader implications

The partnership between Massachusetts and Harvard illustrates the state’s effort to protect its higher education and research base from federal intervention. The outcomes of these cases carry financial and policy implications for both the university and the broader economy. Campbell’s actions reflect a coordinated approach to defending research institutions that play a central role in the state’s development.





Source link

Massachusetts

Police to address Princeton death during child sexual abuse material investigation

Published

on

Police to address Princeton death during child sexual abuse material investigation


Authorities will speak Friday after a death occurred while police were serving a search warrant for child sexual abuse material in Princeton, Massachusetts.

The subject of the search warrant “was a person of trust in communities in Worcester and Middlesex Counties,” Massachusetts State Police said.

Authorities said little about the case ahead of the press conference, which will begin at 6 p.m. and be streamed in the player above.

State police will be hosting the conference, which will include Princeton Police Chief Paul Patricia, Worcester County District Attorney Joseph Early Jr. and Middlesex County District Attorney Marian Ryan.

Advertisement

Check back for more as this story develops.



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Mass. unveils $250 million in subsidies to protect residents from premium hikes – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Mass. unveils 0 million in subsidies to protect residents from premium hikes – The Boston Globe


Audrey Morse Gasteier, executive director of the Massachusetts Health Connector, said the financial bulwark that benefited 270,000 residents is “part of the reason that we’re hanging in there in terms of enrollment and keeping people covered.”

But Thursday’s announcement won’t translate into any additional help.

Healey’s news conference coincided with the beginning of an election year in which three Republicans are vying for her job and voters are expected to be particularly focused on the state’s high cost of living. One survey last year found Massachusetts had the second highest cost of living in the country. People who saw their insurance premiums increase this year said it was one pricey bill amid an onslaught of growing expenses.

“I can’t believe how much it is when we go to the grocery store. Our electricity has gone up,“ said Judith O’Gara, whose family was hit with a $400 increase a month in insurance premiums for their ACA plan in January. ”We were just bracing ourselves to try to stretch the paycheck further.”

Advertisement

O’Gara, of Millis, is a part-time editor at community newspapers, and her husband is a self-employed computer animator and mural artist. She has added hours at work, she said, but it still wasn’t enough to qualify for health coverage through her employer, leaving the couple to buy insurance through the connector.

Healey also used the news conference to weigh in on a high-profile effort in Congress to revive the federal subsidies. Also on Thursday, the US House, with help from 17 Republican defectors facing competitive reelection races, passed a bill that would extend the subsidies for another three years. A small group of senators is considering proposing their own extension of the subsidies.

“We need to see people in Congress step up and take action and fight the president on this and get him to focus on the domestic agenda and how to make life more affordable for people,” Healey said.

The governor said she didn’t announce the influx of funds earlier because she had hoped Congress would act before the end of 2025.

“We gave up until the deadline to see if they take action,” she said.

Advertisement

ACA open enrollment extends through Jan. 23.

The infusion of funds from the Commonwealth Care Trust Fund brings the state’s total commitment to the insurance marketplace to $600 million, which Healey said is the largest support from any state in the country.

Federally subsidized insurance policies were first made available to people making less than 400 percent of the federal poverty level, or about $128,600 for a family of four, in 2009 under President Barack Obama’s ACA, also known as Obamacare. In 2021, Congress made those subsidies more generous for many recipients and extended them to people earning up to 500 percent of the federal poverty level. The expanded tax credits doubled participation in the ACA exchanges over the past four years, and by last year 337,000 people in Massachusetts received subsidized insurance through ConnectorCare.

The increases were slated to expire after four years, and without congressional action to preserve them, premiums reverted to pre-2021 levels for this year. People earning more than 400 percent of the poverty level became ineligible to receive subsidized insurance. State officials have estimated roughly 300,000 people could become uninsured statewide over the next decade, in part due to the expiration of the tax credits.

Democrats staged a 43-day shutdown last fall, the longest in US history, in an unsuccessful effort to preserve the expanded subsidies.

Advertisement

The Commonwealth Care Trust Fund predates the 2021 coverage expansion, said Doug Howgate, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, a nonprofit budget watchdog, and was established to support ConnectorCare programs. Massachusetts has long had a robust public insurance program, and the 2021 expansion essentially allowed the state to shift the cost of subsidies it had been paying to the federal government. Tapping the trust fund now essentially returns Massachusetts to the support levels it provided prior to 2021, Howgate said.

Regardless of the timing of Healey’s announcement, it is a reality that Massachusetts has a uniquely robust commitment to health insurance access, Howgate said.

“I do think that the idea that the state is able to offset some of those impacts is an important message to get out there,” he said. “This is real money.”

According to Healey’s office, a 45-year-old couple with two kids making $75,000 in Fall River previously paid $166 per month for the lowest-cost coverage. Without state action, their premium would have more than doubled. But with the infusion from the trust fund, they will pay $206 per month.

There’s only so much the state can do to mitigate the impacts of the expired subsidies, though. Because Congress didn’t extend them, people between 400 and 500 percent of the federal poverty level simply are ineligible to sign up for subsidized policies through the ACA marketplace. There are roughly 27,000 people statewide who cannot benefit from the state’s effort to compensate for the lost federal money, and those people are among those facing the biggest new insurance expenses.

Advertisement

Christa, 56, a hair dresser, and her husband, Gary, 69, a truck driver, earn less than $105,750 annually combined, just shy of 500 percent of the poverty level. The couple, who asked not to be named to protect their privacy, went from paying $282-a-month for Christa’s insurance with no deductible, to a private plan costing $725 a month with a $2000 deductible.

Gary, who is enrolled in Medicare, is still counting on Congress for a reprieve.

“I believe the Senate will be forced to do something, and we’re hoping,” he said.


Jason Laughlin can be reached at jason.laughlin@globe.com. Follow him @jasmlaughlin.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Healey shares plan to limit health insurance cost increases for Massachusetts residents

Published

on

Healey shares plan to limit health insurance cost increases for Massachusetts residents



Gov. Maura Healey said Thursday that the state is spending an additional $250 million to limit premium increases for residents who have insurance through the Massachusetts Health Connector.

After Congress let Affordable Care Act tax credits expire at the end of last year, more than 300,000 people in Massachusetts have been facing a potentially steep increase in their health care bills. 

The governor’s office said those enrolled in ConnectorCare who make below 400% of the of the federal poverty level, which is $62,600 for an individual or $128,600 for a family of four, will see “little to no premium increases.”

Advertisement

Under the plan, Healey’s office said a 45-year-old couple with two kids in Fall River will see their monthly health insurance costs rise from $166 to $206. Without the new funding, the governor says they would be paying $452 a month.

“While President Trump continues to increase health care costs, we are taking the strongest action in the nation to address them and keep costs as low as possible for families,” Healey said in a statement. “Despite this increased state investment, far too many people will still see their premiums increase because of the White House.”  

The U.S. House of Representatives is set to approve a three-year extension of the health care tax credits. While it appears unlikely to pass the Senate, senators have talked about a compromise plan that could include a two-year extension with added reforms. President Trump hasn’t offered a specific health care plan, but said subsidies going to insurance companies should “go to the people” instead. 

The $250 million is coming from the Commonwealth Care Trust Fund, which gets its money from employer medical assistance contributions and financial penalties from residents who violate the state’s health care insurance mandate. 

Massachusetts residents can sign up for health insurance coverage or switch their Health Connector plans until Jan. 23 if they want to be covered by Feb. 1. 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending