Is this the world’s most famous lobster shack? Maine eatery popular with Tom Cruise and Lionel Richie has lines stretching down highway for their $36 rolls
Red’s Eats has been dubbed ‘the most famous lobster shack in the world’
Its lobster rolls are filled with the meat of two claws and a whole split tail
By Rachel Bowman For Dailymail.Com
Published: | Updated:
Advertisement
A Maine eatery dubbed ‘the most famous lobster shack in the world’ where customers line up for hours to buy one of their $36 rolls has officially opened for the season.
Red’s Eats, located on the corner of Water and Main Street in Wiscasset, has served fresh New England seafood for over 80 years.
The shack has been ranked Maine’s best lobster roll in countless lists and has attracted the likes of Tom Cruise, Lionel Richie and Susan Sarandon for its famous bites.
Red’s Eats opened for the summer on May 1 and for $36 customers can get a roll filled with the meat of two claws and a whole split tail with a side of butter or mayo.
‘They don’t make them like most other places, they don’t chop up the meat, they don’t put in any mayonnaise or anything else on it. It’s just the lobster, the roll,’ a customer named Diane told WGME.
Advertisement
Red’s Eats, located on the corner of Water and Main Street in Wiscasset, has been dubbed ‘the most famous lobster shack in the world’
For $36 customers can get a roll filled with the meat of two claws and a whole split tail with a side of butter or mayo
‘It came out of the ocean yesterday, I mean it’s so fresh. You’ll never get one fresher than what you get here,’ a customer named Jonathan said.
The shack ranked number one on Boston.com’s best place to get a lobster roll in New England in 2023 list.
Not only do they serve one of the highest rated lobster rolls, Red’s Eats boasts an extensive menu of fresh seafood, grilled good and desserts.
‘I’ve been waiting for clams all winter because there’s no other place in Maine that has them that taste like this,’ said a customer named Jerry.
The family-owned business is currently run by Debbie Gagnon, daughter of the previous owner and man who brought the iconic lobster rolls to the menu Al Gagnon.
Advertisement
The shack has been ranked Maine’s best lobster roll in countless lists and has attracted the likes of Tom Cruise and Lionel Richie (center) for its famous bites
Locals have taken out their frustration at traffic around the shack with Facebook group of nearly 10,000 members dedicated to posting photos of their middle fingers at the building
‘She [Debbie] makes you feel like you’re family when you step up to the window and order,’ Cumberland resident Lorraine Rardin told Bangor News Daily.
Debbie said she gets the most joy out of serving repeat customers and said her motto is a quote from her father, ‘You can feed anyone once, but feed them twice and you’re doing something right.’
Red’s Eats has been featured on several shows including Phil Rosenthal’s Netflix program ‘Somebody Feed Phil and Andrew Zimmern’s Travel Channel show ‘The Zimmern List.’
It’s fame has made the shack a bucket list item for visitors across the country.
‘I read that you should get a lobster roll at Red’s,’ said Allie Ackles from Rochester, New York.
Advertisement
Red’s Eats has been featured on several shows including Phil Rosenthal’s Netflix program ‘Somebody Feed Phil and Andrew Zimmern’s Travel Channel show ‘The Zimmern List’
‘I’ve also seen it on Facebook because I get a bunch of information for Maine since my daughter goes to school there,’ said Donise Gehrisch from Chicago.
While its popularity is good for business, locals have taken out their frustration at traffic around the shack with Facebook group of nearly 10,000 members dedicated to posting photos of their middle fingers at the building.
However, Paul Merrill, a spokesperson for the Maine Department of Transportation, insists the shack is not the cause of traffic.
‘Red’s is a popular restaurant that draws a lot of customers — but not the reason for traffic back-ups on Route 1,’ Merrill said.
Advertisement
Share or comment on this article:
Is this the world’s most famous lobster shack? Maine eatery popular with Tom Cruise and Lionel Richie has lines stretching down highway for their $36 rolls
SOUTH PORTLAND—It’s one of Maine’s most desirable locations—home to a vibrant and diverse community, nearby beaches, and close proximity to Portland’s downtown. But for years, residents in South Portland have wondered: With 120 massive petroleum storage tanks dotting the shore and knitted into some neighborhoods here, is the air safe to breathe?
Now the first answers are in, thanks to a year of emissions monitoring along the fencelines of the city’s tank farms. At two of those locations, in particular, the results showed levels of benzene—a known carcinogen—well above the state’s limit.
“We’re about 300 feet from those tanks,” said Ted Reiner, whose home is surrounded by three of the city’s tank farms. It’s where he and his wife raised their two daughters, now 38 and 28. Around Christmas, Reiner had surgery for bladder cancer. Now he’s undergoing immunotherapy, and he can’t help but wonder whether his environment is contributing to his health woes.
“You just don’t know what the cumulative effect is,” he said. “I think about it a lot.”
Advertisement
Reiner lives closest to the Citgo South Portland Terminal, in a part of South Portland known as Turner Island. The tanks there primarily hold gasoline, while others in the city contain an array of petroleum products, including heating oil and asphalt.He and his family are among the more than 12,600 people who live within a mile of the tank farm, according to EPA data.
According to data collected by Maine’s Department of Environmental Protection, the CITGO terminal is one of two tank farms in the city where emissions exceed the state limit. Average benzene levels were measured at 2.18 micrograms per cubic meter, well above Maine’s allowed limit of 1.28 micrograms.
The highest levels in the city—3.05 micrograms—were measured at South Portland Terminal LLC owned by Buckeye Partners,which, unlike Citgo’s tanks, does not have people living nearby. A tank farm owned by Sunoco, meanwhile, had measurements just below the state guideline.
Long-term inhalation of benzene can damage bone marrow and blood-forming cells, suppress the immune system, and increase the risk of leukemia. According to the World Health Organization, there is “no safe level of exposure.”
Each reported number from the state is the average of a two-week continuous sample. Citgo’s final number for the year is the average of all those two-week samples. When examining a year’s worth of data, higher emissions levels get masked. But levels spike: For one two-week period in particular, the average benzene level recorded near the Citgo facility was 11.8 micrograms per cubic meter, nearly 10 times the state limit.
Advertisement
Those shorter-lived “burst emissions” can be dangerous in their own right.
One to 14 days of exposure to higher levels of benzene can cause headaches and breathing issues for sensitive individuals, such as children, older adults, or people with preexisting health conditions. The risk level for short-term exposure for benzene is 30 micrograms per cubic meter. What’s not clear in the state’s data is whether benzene levels get high enough to trigger those responses.
Rich Johnson, a spokesman for Citgo, said the company takes the concerns of South Portland residents seriously and is continuing to work with state regulators. “We believe it is important that any study of air monitoring results support accurate, representative conclusions about community-level air quality,” Johnson said.
Buckeye Partners did not respond to multiple emails requesting comment.
Petroleum companies and oil terminal owners use various technologies to eliminate emissions, but they still happen. Most often, chemicals escape from tank vents, equipment leaks and loading rack operations.
Anna O’Sullivan, a 42-year-old artist and therapist, thinks about all of this. She worries when her 7-year-old son, Henry, plays in the yard. “Is he just, like, absorbing what’s in the air?” she wonders.
Advertisement
This story is funded by readers like you.
Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.
Donate Now
She’s hesitant to eat anything grown in the soil there. She’s concerned that staying put means poisoning them both.
But she’s also stuck. O’Sullivan bought her three-bedroom cape, built in 1904, with a big backyard for $190,000 in 2017—a charming and impossible find in the market today.
Advertisement
“I can see the tanks from my house,” she said. The feeling is: “I need to move. I can’t raise my kids in an area where it’s just, like, poisonous air.”
But also: “I like my house. … It’s hard to move, it’s hard to buy a house.”
The science supports these emotions.
The readings are high enough “to merit serious attention,” said Drew Michanowicz, a senior scientist at Physicians, Scientists, and Engineers for Healthy Energy, an independent scientific research institute that brings science to energy policy.
Across South Portland, most people don’t live immediately next to the tanks, which lessens their exposurebecause emissions are quickly dispersed. But especially around the Citgo facility, some live quite close.
Advertisement
Until last fall, when she had to move following a house fire, Jacky Gerry was living near the Citgo tanks. “Did I ever think we were safe? Probably not,” she said. “But did a lot of people have a choice as to where you live? No.”
People in South Portland first became concerned about the tanks in 2019, after the EPA announced consent decrees, a resolution of a dispute without an admission of guilt, with two companies with tanks here—Global Partners LLC and Sprague Energy. In both cases, heated petroleumstorage tanks containing asphalt and a thick fuel oil were emitting what are known as volatile organic compounds—chemicals that include benzene—in violation of their state permits. That issue was specific to tanks containing asphalt and number 6 fuel oil, which were previously thought to have no emissions, and is not the situation with the Citgo tanks.
As a result of the consent decrees, the operators installed systems to capture emissions that appear to have worked. In the most recent testing, emissions levels around both tank farms were below Maine’s threshold.
The consent decrees also helped put the tanks on the radar of lawmakers. In 2021, a newly passed law mandated that all petroleum tank farms in the state begin fenceline monitoring for chemicals including benzene. That monitoring began in August 2024, and the first results were released late last year.
Residents here have long taken the fight against industrial emissions into their own hands, including in a high-profile—and successful—fight to keep oil from Canadian tar sands from being piped into the city in 2018.
It was in that spirit that South Portland resident Tom Mikulka, a retired chemist witha Ph.D. in biochemistry from Cornell, opted to analyze the state results so residents would be able to start understanding the implications.
Advertisement
“I wouldn’t want to go to sleep knowing there’s high benzene levels that close to my home,” said Mikulka,referring to the houses that stand just feet from a fenceline monitor mounted along the Citgo property. “While there is diffusion, I can’t imagine the data is much different just a few feet away.”
The state findings validate the concerns he’s had all along. Mikulka first began testing emissions in the neighborhood back in 2020, when he used COVID relief checks to purchase air monitoring equipment. He hung one of the monitors on Reiner’s property, near the swing his grandkids like to play on.
Now, six years later, with official data in hand, Mikulka hopes the findings will be harder for regulators to dismiss.
That’s Jacky Gerry’s hope, too.
“Now that we have these answers, who’s stepping up to the plate to say, ‘Let’s try to fix that?’” she said. “Is it a city problem? An oil company problem? Where does it fall?”
Advertisement
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Advertisement
Thank you,
Advertisement
Ryan Krugman
Contributor
Ryan Krugman is a recent graduate of Columbia University’s Climate School focusing on climate change reporting and communications. He also holds a Bachelor’s degree from St. Lawrence University where he studied Environmental Science and Sociology. As a former Inside Climate News fellow, he is now reporting on climate and environmental issues in New England and Georgia.
After a fatal car crash in Waterville killed two Maine Department of Transportation employees in January, state lawmakers are backing a bill to expand death benefits to the families of DOT workers killed on the job. The Labor Committee unanimously voted Tuesday to advance LD 669, which will make DOT employees eligible for the same […]
WISCASSET, Maine (WMTW) – A Maine man has been arrested after police say he intentionally set a bed on fire after a dispute with his girlfriend, while they were still in it.
Police responded Monday, March 9, to a report of a fire that had been intentionally set inside a home on Beechnut Hill Road, according to the Wiscasset Police Department.
Investigators say the homeowner, Terry Couture, 41, set the bed on fire following an argument while both he and his girlfriend were in it. Authorities said the fire was extinguished and no serious injuries were reported.
Couture was arrested and charged with attempted murder, arson, aggravated criminal mischief, and domestic violence criminal threatening with a dangerous weapon.