Connect with us

Maine

Auditor blasts leaders of tiny Maine plantation for mishandling public money

Published

on

Auditor blasts leaders of tiny Maine plantation for mishandling public money


An unbiased auditor referred to as out elected officers of a tiny Maine municipality for violating the general public belief by not following correct procedures for dealing with taxpayer cash.

An accountant who carried out The Forks Plantation’s annual audit for 2021 stopped wanting saying its management was committing fraud, however described a number of uncommon practices in a letter filed with a report back to the state.

Essentially the most questionable motion was the second assessor, who can also be the tax collector, issuing a test to herself with out board approval, after which shortly thereafter paying her again taxes that have been an analogous quantity, in accordance with Keel J. Hood, a licensed public accountant based mostly in Fairfield. City officers made deposits with out documenting them and recorded funds that by no means occurred, Hood stated in his report.

The July 14 doc — referred to as a disclaimer of opinion — represents a uncommon rebuke of elected officers on this distant plantation of 48 individuals in central Somerset County, and caught the eye of the state auditor’s workplace. 

Advertisement

“Disclaimers of opinion are vanishingly uncommon,” Maine State Auditor Matthew Dunlap stated. “We’re not alleging any criminality. Neither is the auditor, however he means that there may very well be potentialities of it based mostly on the dearth of controls.”

The plantation differs from cities and cities in that it’s ruled by a Board of Assessors, which has three elected members. Municipalities in Maine have been required since 1937 to carry out annual audits, that are snapshots of public funds to make sure officers are responsibly managing cash and to safeguard in opposition to fraud. 

Hood declined to remark and directed inquiries to assessors, who didn’t reply to messages. However in an Aug. 11 letter responding to the audit, they argued with a number of of Hood’s key factors, in some circumstances denying any wrongdoing.

Advertisement

Through the fiscal yr ending June 30, 2021, the plantation’s second assessor and treasurer processed and cashed funds to themselves with out approval from assessors, a apply that continued even after he knowledgeable the board of the right process, he stated within the letter.

The second assessor and tax collector — who’s listed as Judith Hutchinson on The Forks web site, although not named in Hood’s report besides by title — cashed a $2,254.92 test, written in September 2020, that was not accepted by assessors earlier than or after it was issued, he stated. She had unpaid 2019 and 2020 property taxes totaling $2,237.91, which have been paid in October 2020, in accordance with the letter.

“Fraud is troublesome to detect, practically impossibly so within the case Administration colludes to hide it,” he stated. “The Board of Assessors’ failure to appropriately scrutinize these transactions is a sign that fraud might go undetected.”

Hutchinson failed to position a lien on her personal property for the 2019 tax yr, Hood stated, which is the accountability of a tax collector. Then assortment of the delinquent property taxes, curiosity and charges are alleged to be turned over to the treasurer.

Assembly minutes didn’t present that the assessors had given their approval to not place liens on Hutchinson’s property, he stated. Assessors, in a response to Hood on Aug. 11, argued they have been conscious of and accepted to not file the tax lien, however in a later change admitted they by no means formally voted.

Advertisement

Hutchinson paid again $15,742 to the plantation for prior years’ overpayments to her, plus the $2,254.92, circumventing the penalty charges and prices related to liens, Hood stated.

“The one financial institution assertion web page lacking from the [The Forks’] 12 months’ financial institution statements was the web page containing the photocopy of this test,” he stated, noting the plantation, by cellphone, needed to request a duplicate from the financial institution to point out to whom it was made out, and there was no file indicating the cost’s objective.

Hood advisable that the treasurer not signal checks with out board approval, in accordance with state regulation. He prompt that the plantation require its tax collector to file liens for all unpaid taxes, and there must be no exception for officers.

Assessors agreed with the 2 suggestions of their Aug. 11 letter.

It has been the board’s apply to position checks on a warrant and approve them, assessors stated, however they acknowledged the wrong sequence and stated they’ve ended that apply. When the plantation’s newly elected treasurer began in October 2021, assessors applied new management insurance policies that they imagine deal with the deficiencies famous in Hood’s letter, they stated.

Advertisement

Hood’s letter additionally detailed how administration tried to manage his entry to individuals he wanted to do his audit. Administration insisted that Hood solely work with the prior treasurer and that an assessor be current always, he stated. Hutchinson wrote that communications ought to undergo her and the primary assessor, he stated.

The assessors, of their Aug. 11 letter, denied that they restricted Hood’s inquiry to assembly solely with the previous treasurer and inspired him to interview the previous treasurer as a result of that’s who served in the course of the fiscal yr. Hood refused, they stated, which they seen as inconsistent together with his obligation to the plantation.

“At two factors, [Hood’s] letter refers to ‘fraud’ with respect to the issuance of checks earlier than putting them on a warrant,” assessors stated. “The board rejects any implication of wrongdoing.”

What unfolds subsequent in The Forks shall be between the city’s elected officers and residents, Dunlap stated, and his workplace doesn’t have the authority to do something greater than request info.

“For me, it will definitely elevate pressing questions if I used to be a citizen of that city,” he stated.

Advertisement

In a letter dated Oct. 13, Melissa Perkins, performing state auditor on the time, wrote to the plantation’s lawyer looking for a evaluate of The Forks’ accounting procedures, description of monetary controls and any plans for corrective motion adopted in the course of the fiscal yr.

Timothy Woodcock of Eaton Peabody in Bangor, who represents The Forks Plantation, responded on Oct. 17 that assessors would rent one other accountant — RHR Smith & Firm — for an expert analysis. Assessors made the choice after Hood failed to offer the plantation the clarification they sought, he stated Thursday.

The accounting agency will evaluate the June 30, 2021, audit and supply suggestions to assessors, which must be accomplished by Jan. 31, 2023. Assessors must settle for the findings and set up controls if RHR finds that there are points. RHR additionally will do the 2022 audit.

Dunlap, who was reappointed as state auditor in November, wrote again to Woodcock on Nov. 22, highlighting that Hood’s inconclusive audit is extremely uncommon.

Dunlap stated his workplace was not requesting one other audit or skilled exterior evaluate, nor was it involved with a disagreement between the plantation and auditor. He has not heard again from the plantation or its lawyer since that final change, he stated this week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Right whales remain near Jeffreys Ledge, DMR advises continued entanglement potential

Published

on




Last week, the Maine Dept. of Marine Resources advised lobstermen that 90 or more North Atlantic right whales were feeding within Jeffreys Basin, in the Gulf of Maine, in an area overlapped with lobster gear. They remain there this weekend, and DMR Commissioner Patrick Keliher  issued another advisory Jan. 24. It follows:

“A large number of endangered North Atlantic right whales remain off the western edge of Jeffreys Ledge.  As many as 90 individual right whales have been identified in this area over the past couple of weeks.    

“The most recent information suggests the whales may be feeding within Jeffreys Basin and the largest overlap of gear and whales appears to be in depths greater than 300 feet. I am strongly urging any lobster fisherman with trap gear set in greater than 300 feet of water inside the following area of Zone G to remove gear completely or drop one endline in order to reduce the number of vertical lines being fished. The identified area, as shown in the attached graphic, includes bottom in 300+ feet of water east of Boon Island Light and west of Jeffreys Ledge. 

Advertisement

“As I stated last week, there is potential for any entanglement that might occur to be linked not just to the Maine fishery, but potentially to an individual fisherman. One entanglement will eventually lead to additional federal restrictions, including closed areas and limiting the use of traditional gear (i.e. rope).  

“Let me be clear, this is not mandatory, this would be a voluntary action on your part – however failure of the industry to self-regulate your activity could be costly in the long run. I urge fishermen to work together to reduce the amount of gear and endlines in the area in order to protect both the right whales as well as the future of the Maine lobster fishery.  

“The Maine Marine Patrol, NOAA Law Enforcement and the US Coast Guard will not be enforcing state or federal regulations requiring two endlines for trap gear being fished in the Jefferys Ledge area described above.  Again, please drop one endline to reduce the risk to right whales.  To minimize potential for lost gear, NOAA will notify the mobile gear fleet through VMS that fixed gear fishermen may be using only one endline in this area. 

“Boats of any size can injure or kill a whale if a collision occurs. A voluntary slow zone of 10 knots remains in effect for this area.  Right whales can be difficult to see on the surface so do not assume that if you do not see a right whale, it is not there; there are large surface active groups in the area. Vessels transiting the area at night should be extremely careful as a collision with a right whale will not only injure the whale but also puts your safety at risk. Do not assume a right whale will avoid your vessel.  

“I will continue to monitor this situation and will reach out to you as we have additional information.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

A new threat emerges at Superfund sites in Maine

Published

on

A new threat emerges at Superfund sites in Maine


SACO, Maine — Duane Choquette hesitated when he discovered the property he wanted to buy to create a small homestead is a quarter mile from a Superfund site containing capped-over pits holding arsenic, chromium and other heavy metal waste dumped by a former tannery.

He researched how the site was cleaned up and found no contaminants when he tested the Saco property’s well water, which he would need for irrigation. Choquette bought the home on Hearn Road in 2014.

“Luckily, I happen to work as an ecologist for an environmental consulting company where a lot of other people do remediation work, so they deployed me to the right documents,” he said. “That helped, and the fact that we are uphill from the site.”

Now, 10 years later, a new potential threat is emerging at the location, known as the Saco Waste Pits Superfund Site. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency notified Choquette and other neighbors by letter recently that it had discovered high levels of forever chemicals in some locations both on the site and in a few residential wells nearby. It will conduct additional testing over the next couple years to find the source of the PFAS and whether it might threaten nearby residences. That has renewed concern over the safety of that Superfund site and others across Maine and the country.

Advertisement

The federal agency has found forever chemicals at several Superfund sites in Maine and elsewhere in New England that could require new scrutiny, said spokesperson Vikram Lakshmanan. The EPA had not tested for the man-made forever chemicals, known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, until the past five years, and regulations at the time did not mandate that the toxic chemicals be cleaned up.

That changed last July when a new federal regulation designated two of the most studied and commonly used PFAS as hazardous substances, requiring them to be remediated if they exceed federal standards They are PFOA, or perfluorooctanoic acid, and PFOS, or perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, both used in tanneries to hydrate and degrease hides and for leather finishing. Exposure to the chemicals may increase the risk of some cancers.

“They’re going to have to start this testing at current Superfund sites across the board,” said Jared Hayes, senior policy analyst at the nonprofit Environmental Working Group in Washington D.C. “This is kind of a new undertaking by the EPA, to have regular testing for PFOA and PFOS. Previously they were only doing it in select locations where there were already chances for concern.”

The EPA has tested Choquette’s well, which did not have PFAS. He expects it to conduct more testing.

Monitoring an emerging chemical

The EPA first tested for and discovered PFAS at the Saco pits Superfund site in June 2019. The nine groundwater monitoring wells at the dump site all showed PFAS levels higher than what was then the drinking water standard, according to the agency’s most recent safety review of the site released in January.

Advertisement

After those results, the Maine Department of Environmental Protection tested 38 residential wells near the Saco pits for several PFAS from 2019 to 2023. Four residential wells topped the drinking water standard at the time.

Last April, the EPA cut by fivefold the allowable limits for PFOA, PFOS and other PFAS in drinking water to 4 parts per trillion. That means more wells both on the Saco pits site and at neighboring residences could now top the new limit, meaning the water is not safe for consumption.

The recent report said the EPA has two years to investigate the PFAS source and whether it may be migrating to private, offsite wells. This year it will conduct soil borings, and test ground and surface water, soil and some residential wells, Lakshmanan said. Depending on results, PFAS might be added to its current list of contaminants that the EPA regularly monitors at the site, which includes arsenic, chromium and lead.

The Corinna Odd Fellows Hall sits on large dollies ready to be moved in this 2000 file photo. The hall was the only building to be salvaged in the Superfund cleanup of the former Eastland Woolen Mill.

“There could be potential that groundwater conditions have changed,” the report said. “The capped tannery waste may contain elevated concentrations of PFAS.”

Meantime, Choquette said he is watching for the results and will read them carefully. He said he will be satisfied “as long as the caps hold on the site.”

Advertisement

The EPA is requiring additional tests at several other Superfund sites where PFAS has been found, including Loring Air Force Base in Limestone and at Naval Air Station Brunswick. Some 1,400 gallons of toxic firefighting foam containing PFAS spilled at and around Brunswick Executive Airport last summer, worrying residents that their well water might be contaminated. PFAS also was found at the former Eastland Woolen Mill in Corinna, which is a Superfund site, during the last EPA review in 2020, but the levels were below the maximums allowed at the time. The EPA plans to review all three locations by the end of September.

Living near a Superfund site

The boundaries of the Superfund site where waste was dumped by the former Saco Tannery are highlighted in this February 2023 photo by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Credit: United States Environmental Protection Agency

The Saco Tannery, which operated from 1959 until 1981, dumped 23 million gallons of its process waste at the site in two large lagoons, about two acres in size each, and 57 smaller waste pits, according to federal estimates. Located on 212 acres, the pits site is surrounded by the Maine Turnpike, Flag Pond Road and Hearn Road.

After the Saco Tannery shuttered, the EPA found three acidic pits posed immediate and significant human health risks. The pits became a Superfund site in 1983. The EPA extracted the liquids, neutralized the sludge and capped the pits with clean soil and a nonpermeable membrane.

The site is now a wildlife refuge owned by the quasi-state Finance Authority of Maine and is not open to the public. FAME has been working cooperatively with the EPA and Maine DEP on testing and remediation at the site, said Bill Norbert, a FAME spokesperson. He said it is unclear and premature to say which entity might need to pay for any possible additional cleanup.

The area looks the same now as it did when the trucks were dumping tannery waste there, said Anatole Brown, education manager at the Saco Museum. It is heavily wooded and not possible to see the covered pits and lagoons from the road. Still, the area developed a reputation from the dumping operation.

“Flag Pond Road was always considered a toxic zone, and not until recently did you see houses starting to get built along that road,” Brown said.

Advertisement
Tim Leary, owner of Leary Farm in Saco, transplants green cabbage with help from his cattle dog, Raymond. The farm sits near a Superfund site that has tested positive for certain forever chemicals. Credit: Courtesy of Tim Leary

In the past decade or so, homes and housing developments have sprung up around the Superfund site, with some neighbors barely aware it is there. So far, the city has not received any complaints about the discovery of the high levels of PFAS nor the two-year timetable for more tests, said Saco City Administrator John Bohenko. He said environmental regulators have been communicating about their review of the site and any necessary actions, and he will wait for their results.

But the PFAS news has some residents paying more attention. Kathleen Pierce, who lives on Hearn Road, said her family bought a house 11 years ago about a mile from the pits and didn’t hear too much about the Superfund site at the time.

“Now, hearing about the PFAS, it is an impetus for me, as a homeowner in the area, to take it seriously and get my water tested,” she said.

On the other road bordering the site, Tim Leary, the seventh-generation owner of Leary Farm, remembers when waste was still being dumped. He said many people at the time didn’t realize that the tannery, located about four miles away in Saco, was dumping acids and heavy metals into the pits.

“The primary concern at the time was the organic waste, because the smell was horrendous,” said Leary, 65, who has lived at the farm his entire life. “Before it was fenced off, we used to go skating on the ponds, on the lagoons. In retrospect, that probably was not a great idea.”

Leary tests the milk from his dairy cows and water to process his vegetables every year. So far, there have been no PFAS readings, and he would like it to stay that way.

Advertisement

“If I hear that the plume is moving, I might be concerned,” Leary said.

Lori Valigra is an investigative environment reporter for the BDN’s Maine Focus team. She may be reached at lvaligra@bangordailynews.com. Support for this reporting is provided by the Unity Foundation, a fund at the Maine Community Foundation, and donations by BDN readers.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

More nominations sought for Piscataquis County Teacher of the Year

Published

on

More nominations sought for Piscataquis County Teacher of the Year


The Maine Department of Education and Educate Maine are excited to announce that nominations are officially open for the 2025 County Teachers of the Year and the 2026 State Teacher of the Year. Maine’s State and County Teachers of the Year serve as advocates for teachers, students, and public education in Maine.

The Maine Department of Education and Educate Maine are excited to announce that nominations are officially open for the 2025 County Teachers of the Year and the 2026 State Teacher of the Year. Maine’s State and County Teachers of the Year serve as advocates for teachers, students, and public education in Maine. More nominations are being sought for the 2025 Piscataquis County Teacher of the Year honor.

“The Maine Teacher of the Year program is an excellent opportunity to recognize the extraordinary educators across our state who are dedicated to their schools and communities – and who are engaging, inspiring, and motivating their students every day,” Maine DOE Commissioner Pender Makin said. “These nominations will give 16 Maine teachers a prominent platform to share the wonderful, innovative happenings in Maine’s classrooms and advocate for public education.”

Nominations can be made through 5 p.m. on Friday, Jan. 31 on a form on the Maine Teacher of the Year website (https://www.mainetoy.org/nominate).  Nominations will be accepted from students, parents, caregivers, community members, school administrators, colleagues, college faculty members, and associations/organizations. Self-nominations and nominations from family members are not accepted.

Advertisement

Teachers who are nominated must:

Hold the appropriate professional certification for their teaching position;

Be a certified, in-good-standing, pre-K-12 teacher in a state-accredited public school – including career and technical education and adult education centers, public charter schools, or publicly-supported secondary schools (i.e. private schools that enroll 60 percent or more publicly-funded students, sometimes referred to as “town academies”);

Be actively teaching students at least 50 percent of the workday at the time of nomination and during their year of recognition;

Maintain their teaching position and remain in the county for which they are selected throughout the year of recognition;

Advertisement

Have a minimum of five years of teaching, three of which are in Maine.

Beyond serving as advocates for education, Maine’s State and County Teachers of the Year serve as advisors to the Maine DOE and state-level education stakeholders across Maine. State and County Teachers of the Year also join a cohort of teacher leaders who actively work together for the betterment of education in Maine. They receive ongoing professional learning and participate in many county and state leadership opportunities.

The 2025 County Teachers of the Year will be announced in May, and the 2026 Maine Teacher of the Year will be selected from the 16 county honorees. Through a selection process designed by educators, the field will be narrowed to semi-finalists and then state finalists before the Maine Teacher of the Year is announced by the Commissioner of the Maine DOE at a school assembly in the fall. Each year, State and County Teachers of the Year are honored at the annual Teacher of the Year Gala.

On behalf of, and in partnership with, the Maine DOE, the Maine Teacher of the Year program is administered by Educate Maine, a business-led organization with a mission of championing college, career readiness, and increased educational attainment. Funding is provided by Bangor Savings Bank, Dead River Company, Geiger, Hannaford, the Maine State Lottery, the Silvernail family, and Unum, with support from the State Board of Education, and the Maine County and State Teachers of the Year Association.

“Educate Maine is honored to continue our partnership with the Maine Department of Education to administer the Maine Teacher of the Year program,” Educate Maine Executive Director Dr. Jason Judd said. “Our State and County Teachers of the Year exemplify the incredible dedication, innovation, and impact of educators across Maine. This program celebrates the vital role teachers play in shaping our future, elevates their voices, and strengthens the profession through leadership and advocacy.”

Advertisement

The Maine Teacher of the Year program is committed to a nomination and selection process that ensures people of all backgrounds are represented. Educate Maine and the Maine DOE champion that commitment by encouraging the nomination of educators from all culturally-diverse experiences and backgrounds. Our goal is to expand and diversify our nomination pool.

Through the generous support of Maine businesses, there is no cost to the local district when the Maine Teacher of the Year is out of the classroom on their official duties, which include representing educators statewide and nationally and highlighting the important work of Maine schools, communities, and educators.

For more information about the Maine Teacher of the Year program, please visit the Maine Teacher of the Year website.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending